Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Clinton Cover-up Iraqi Involvement in 1993 WTC Bombing and TWA 800 and OKC Bombing
September 16, 2001 | Allan J. Favish

Posted on 09/16/2001 12:42:29 PM PDT by AJFavish

http://www.meib.org/articles/0106_ir1.htm

The link above is to: Iraqi Complicity in the World Trade Center Bombing and Beyond by Laurie Mylroie, which was published in June of this year and discusses the 1993 bombing of the WTC.

She explains how Bill Clinton intentionally failed to confront Iraq over its complicity in the bombing and other attacks. She supported Clinton in 1992 having been an advisor on Iraq policy to the 1992 Clinton presidential campaign, as you can see at http://admissions.geneseo.edu/cgi-bin/nrap?Roemer98.html

Her September 13, 2001 article in the Wall Street Journal on the recent attack is at http://opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=95001120

In a live interview on Los Angeles radio station KPFK, broadcast around noon today, PST, she stated that Clinton lied about more than sex; he lied about national security.

I wish somebody would ask her about whether she thinks the Clinton administration covered up Iraqi involvment in the murder of those aboard TWA 800 and ordered the military not to pursue the attackers. Or whether there was Iraqi involvement in the Oklahoma City bombing that was not pursued.

Regards,

Allan J. Favish
http://members.aol.com/allanf8702/page1.htm



TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clintonscandals; okcbombing; twa800list
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

1 posted on 09/16/2001 12:42:29 PM PDT by AJFavish (ajfavish@att.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
It would appear some believe that our government may lie to "we the people".

Surely, that can't be possible!

2 posted on 09/16/2001 1:03:20 PM PDT by G.Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
X42 would never lie. Never for some self-serving reason. Right?

/sarcasm

3 posted on 09/16/2001 1:17:29 PM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Yeah coverup to protect the Gore voter base--DNZ-FUNDING!
4 posted on 09/16/2001 1:47:51 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
I'm more convinced than ever that the TWA 800 was an Iraqi stinger missile type operation that was covered up. I believe it was covered up so as to not allow the terrorists to use it for propaganda purposes and also to not panic the American people.
5 posted on 09/16/2001 1:47:54 PM PDT by truth_eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Yeah coverup to protect the Gore voter base--DNZ-Hllary-Sharpton-Waters-Reno-Jackson-FUNDING!
6 posted on 09/16/2001 1:49:08 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Yeah coverup to protect the Gore voter base--DNZ-Hillary-Sharpton-Waters-Reno-Jackson-PLO-bin laden--FUNDING!
7 posted on 09/16/2001 1:50:23 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
Maybe TWA 800 was the reason the Air Force One threat was taken seriously. Bush can't just come out and say Clinton is a pig without threatening national security.
8 posted on 09/16/2001 1:50:49 PM PDT by marbren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
I believe it was Wednesday, but when Clinton was allowed back in this country, he went to NYC and ran into a FoxNews reporter. I wish I'd had my VCR taping it, the reporter asked Clinton if he didn't feel somewhat responsible. Of course all he did was dance around the question, but I gotta admire the reporter.(though the question of reponsibility comes 8 years too late)
9 posted on 09/16/2001 1:59:56 PM PDT by orlop9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
I just read an article from a London paper (1999)on another thread, which claims that Bin Laden had a cell in Albania that was playing a part in Kosovo. This would mean that Clinton was fighting on the same side as Bin Laden in Kosovo.
10 posted on 09/16/2001 2:05:23 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael12001
bttt
11 posted on 09/16/2001 2:08:03 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Michael12001
The previous thread I was trying to say---Serbia wars, both sides could be 100% wrong...we could quibble about it--the %'s!
12 posted on 09/16/2001 2:12:41 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: truth_eagle
I tend to agree with you. We have compromised our principles from the day that we let Arafat hijack 3 American airliners and burn them to the ground in the desert. By refusing to meet the challenge head-on, we have allowed the terrorists to continue these acts for 25 years. The Beruit bombing, Khobar Towers bombing, Cole bombing, Pan Am 103 were but a few of the increasingly bolder acts of violence against us. This time it must stop.
13 posted on 09/16/2001 2:37:34 PM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
The Clinton Administration actually bombed Iraq for nothing more than evidence of a plot to assassinate ex-prez Bush, so there is no reason to suppose that Clinton covered up for other Iraqi guilt. The investigation of the 1993 WTC bombing uncovered a primarily Egyptian conspiracy and several of the guilty parties are now rotting in prison. THe suggestion that Iraq had something to do with the Murrah Building bombing is such obvious hokum that it is pretty obvious that the author of this essay has a heavy axe to grind. The Taliban were heavily subsidized by the Reagan and Bush administrations, and if the Clinton Administration failed to take aggressive steps against it, it was not for lack of trying - when Clinton ordered various Bin Laden assets bombed, the Republicans started whining that he had bombed a poor innocent aspirin factory.
14 posted on 09/16/2001 8:13:05 PM PDT by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonQ
BTW, do you think a missile was NOT the cause of the crash of TWA 800?
15 posted on 09/17/2001 7:54:35 AM PDT by 1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 1234
bttt
16 posted on 09/17/2001 7:52:13 PM PDT by AJFavish (ajfavish@att.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
Bttt
17 posted on 09/18/2001 3:39:08 PM PDT by AJFavish (ajfavish@att.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1234
#15: Response?
18 posted on 09/25/2001 1:32:16 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
This certainly makes sense. My God.
19 posted on 09/25/2001 1:35:36 PM PDT by Osinski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonQ
when Clinton ordered various Bin Laden assets bombed, the Republicans started whining that he had bombed a poor innocent aspirin factory.

Like the scum in his sink, so you speak this way.

That, amigo, was murder by CinC.

20 posted on 09/25/2001 1:39:11 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish; *TWA800_list; *clintonscandals
Index-
21 posted on 12/09/2001 6:25:40 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonQ
Yea Right! The poor owner of the innocent asprin factory is presently suing your Ark. buddy. He'll probably win.
22 posted on 12/09/2001 6:41:29 AM PST by sandydipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
TWA flt. 800 WAS shot down. The only real question is by who??
23 posted on 12/09/2001 6:43:04 AM PST by sandydipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandydipper
TWA flt. 800 WAS shot down. The only real question is by who??

Really?

Contrary to documented evidence that indicates the catastrpohic loss of a forward cargo bay door (AS HAS HAPPENED on several OTHER 747s)?

24 posted on 12/09/2001 6:52:39 AM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: truth_eagle
more convinced than ever that the TWA 800 was an Iraqi stinger missile type operation ...

Not long after the event the WSJ published a report of a radar tape showing an unidentified vessel racing away from the crash scene as other vessels went in the other direction to assist in the 'rescue'.

According to the article the FBI was not able to ID that boat.

Although I do not buy the 'coverup' angle -- I'm a fundamental believer in incompetence -- the fact that that boat has never been located and the tape never denied is very worrisome.

25 posted on 12/09/2001 7:00:19 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
and [the] OKC Bombing

Are you saying that the experienced invesigators hired by McVeigh's original lawyer, Oklahoma Jones, were incompetant?

And you THINK a bunch of geeks and social misfits on the internet are going to find the truth?

I don't THINK so ...

What about Tim McVeigh's claim he did it himself-

- and the corroborating testimony of Michael Fortier-

- and the TONS of evidence (including witnesses, phone records and sales reciepts for materials)?

Was McVeigh drugged and hypnotized during those interviews (that were the basis for the book)?

You know, he laughed at you conspiracy types who blow this up as you do into some HUGE gov't cover-up!


26 posted on 12/09/2001 7:01:16 AM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
Something I'd really like to know from the 'conspiracy pinheads' -

- do ANY of these conspiracy-minded books and videos or web sites EVER cover the model series, the history, the age, the accumulated flight hours or the total number of takeoff/landing cycles on that 747 that was TWA800?

I thought not ...


27 posted on 12/09/2001 7:07:16 AM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: _Jim
I thought it was a center fuel tank explosion caused by a spark that ignited fumes that downed TWA-800.
29 posted on 12/09/2001 7:19:42 AM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
You know for a fact that the federal government has lied, obstructed justice and manipulated the press in efforts to cover-up inconvenient truths from the American people. Many of those instances have occured in the past ten years.

For you to ridicule people who question the official version of events as unsatisfactory given that track record is more than insulting. If the federal government were held to the same standards as others in courts of law, the Justice Department would have been disbarred a long time ago and hundreds of government officials would be behind bars.

That's not to say that everyone in government is a crook (they're not) and that every conspiracy theory is factual (they're not).

But to question whether a habitual liar is lying again does not make one a geek or a social misfit. It shows good judgment.

30 posted on 12/09/2001 7:36:35 AM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
I thought it was a center fuel tank explosion caused by a spark that ignited fumes that downed TWA-800.

If you look at the time line of that event - the aircraft exploded *after* the initial event due to damage inflicted on the tanks due to the severe damage when the large, outward-opening cargo door blew out (fodding the right-side engines) followed by the forward fuselage separating (power cables/wires get ripped, as do fuel lines etc.) ...

31 posted on 12/09/2001 7:44:18 AM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
You know for a fact that the federal government has lied, obstructed justice and manipulated the press

People/investigators 'leak' (as Sen. Depends -er- Leahy does), to reporters who want stories - little 'snipets' here and there get mis-interpreted by non-technical reporters ... wind-up in the media ... whole story get 'distorted' ... THEN there's the internet ...

32 posted on 12/09/2001 7:47:22 AM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
But to question whether a habitual liar is lying again

... it is WELL understood here that Xlinoon, X-42, Belzebubba is a habitual LIAR and a con man - but to insist that his influence extends outward and down to the lowest levels of our governmenmt's functioning so as to pervade EVERY agency and investigation, is, well, conspiratorial thinking at best ...

33 posted on 12/09/2001 7:50:35 AM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
All of you should watch a movie called "Arlington Road" with Jeff Bridges. It's out on video tape.
34 posted on 12/09/2001 7:52:57 AM PST by freeper0743
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: freeper0743
Like a 'movie' proves anything? C'mon - it's not *real life*!
35 posted on 12/09/2001 7:55:16 AM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: freeper0743
... not to 'post and run', but, I've got to reboot my machine so I can get some software I loaded to run (the most recent release version of "Echelon Desktop Analyzer: Traffic Statistics, Voice Recognition and Auto-Call Transcriber") ...
36 posted on 12/09/2001 7:58:50 AM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
"Did Clinton Cover-up Iraqi Involvement in 1993 WTC Bombing and TWA 800 and OKC Bombing "...........now, that must be the most rhetorical question ever asked.

Of course, that is exactly what this former researcher for the U.S. State Department documents in her work. But, many others, who remain employed with the federal government, were involved. Mr. Bush, for this government to operate effectively, empty liberal heads need to roll.

37 posted on 12/09/2001 7:59:11 AM PST by God_isa_Jew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
Yes. And then blamed it on innocent patriotic Americans such as "Lee Harvey McVeigh" and his totally innocent army buddy from Kansas.
38 posted on 12/09/2001 8:08:44 AM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
One of our favorite examples is Ruby Ridge, which happened before Clinton. As did the groundwork for the incident at Waco.

Forgive my ignorance, but I don't recall the cargo door being cited as the cause of the center fuel tank explosion.

I remember a great hullabuloo over the center fuel tank, but not a cargo door.

Leahy is a convenient bogeyman for some now, but the issue here is federal government malfeasance and cover-ups--of which there are plenty of examples.

39 posted on 12/09/2001 8:11:47 AM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
McVeigh and his bud were no patriots. They were/are cold blooded mass-murderers. The question is whether they had outside help and if so, did the federal government cover that up ?
40 posted on 12/09/2001 8:15:55 AM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: orlop9
when Clinton was allowed back in this country, he went to NYC and ran into a FoxNews reporter

It might have been Brian Kilmead.

41 posted on 12/09/2001 8:17:56 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
AS HAS HAPPENED on several OTHER 747s

Which ones?

42 posted on 12/09/2001 8:20:29 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: _Jim
model series, the history, the age, the accumulated flight hours or the total number of takeoff/landing cycles on that 747 that was TWA800

What would that have to do with anything? The maintenance requirements performed on aircraft precludes any of the items you mention. That is the point of it.

44 posted on 12/09/2001 8:23:35 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: _Jim; Admin Moderator; John Robinson; Jim Robinson
'conspiracy pinheads'

p.s. DO try to avoid personal attacks; this thread was not started as a personal attack against or about you.

Thank you.

45 posted on 12/09/2001 8:25:07 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: freeper0743
I have not seen the movie, thanks for mentioning it. Many times movies are created by producers being consulted by people who are closer to the facts that are hidden or buried in an effort to get the truth out. Interesting. I think I will rent it. Thanks again.
46 posted on 12/09/2001 8:27:34 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
bump
47 posted on 12/09/2001 8:29:24 AM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
Seems to me that the only things he didn't cover up were his lust and his arrogance....oh yea, and his wife!
48 posted on 12/09/2001 8:32:08 AM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: _Jim; kristinn; OKCSubmariner
If you look at the time line of that event - the aircraft exploded *after* the initial event due to damage inflicted on the tanks due to the severe damage when the large, outward-opening cargo door blew out (fodding the right-side engines) followed by the forward fuselage separating (power cables/wires get ripped, as do fuel lines etc.)

Eh? You are saying the cargo door "ripped off", "fodding" the engine, the forward fuselage separated (as a result of the engine FOD or separating from the fuselage?) and that cause the center tank to explode?

You're not involved in aviation, are you? If you are, what is your past?

I think the comments (including personal attacks and insults) you make at others on FR are an indication of your lack of expertise and knowledge. To spread the misinformation you did that I have quoted here is an indication of the poor information, lies and rumors spread around the internet.

Don't you have a comment that is ON TOPIC?

49 posted on 12/09/2001 8:36:26 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
Hey, black pantsuits don't perform miracles, you know!
50 posted on 12/09/2001 8:37:03 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson