Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The book Bukovsky can't publish [because it reveals Soviet support of Western lefties]
UPI ^ | September 18, 2001 | STEPHEN BATES

Posted on 10/01/2001 6:32:22 AM PDT by aculeus

Vladimir Bukovsky has written a richly detailed, heavily documented account of how the Soviet Union aided Palestinian militants, Latin American revolutionaries, and even America's Black Panther movement.

Based on materials unearthed in Russian archives, "Judgment in Moscow" also discloses Moscow's clandestine efforts to manipulate public opinion throughout the West.

The book has been published in France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Bulgaria. Leading historians of communism call it "fascinating," "stunning," and "a massive and major contribution." But, six years after the first French edition appeared, you still can't buy an English translation. Random House sought the rights in 1995, but dropped the project a few months later. A small British publishing house, John Murray, secured the rights, but never printed the book.

To Bukovsky, it's nothing short of "political censorship." Bukovsky has a good deal of experience with repression. Born in Moscow in 1942, he spent most of his 20s and early 30s in Soviet prisons and mental hospitals, charged with possessing forbidden literature, organizing demonstrations, and other political crimes. In 1976, when he was halfway through a 12-year sentence, the Soviet Union released him in exchange for a communist jailed in Chile. Bukovsky completed his education, earning degrees from Cambridge University in England and Stanford University in California, and wrote "To Build a Castle: My Life as a Dissenter" (1978) and other books. He now lives in Cambridge. After the break-up of the Soviet Union, Bukovsky got invited back to Moscow. Russian communists had sued President Boris Yeltsin for banning their party, and the government wanted Bukovsky to testify about the party's sordid past. The dissident said he would come only if the secret Soviet archives would be unsealed for purposes of the case. The government agreed. So Bukovsky spent some six months of 1992 poring over secret Politburo and Communist Party Central Committee documents. Using a laptop with a handheld scanner, he copied thousands of pages.

Nobody tried to stop him, though many of the papers are festooned with such prohibitions as this: "Photocopying or making notes from minutes ... (or) making any reference to them in oral or written form, in the open press or other publicly accessible documents, is categorically forbidden." These secret papers, dating from the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, form the core of Bukovsky's book. The manuscript (Bukovsky gave UPI the first chapter) demonstrates that communist, socialist and anti-Western movements around the world, some peaceable and some violent, weren't as home-grown as they seemed. If, to borrow the phrase of another communist leader, a thousand flowers bloomed,

Moscow was surreptitiously providing the fertilizer. Documents show, for instance, that the Soviet Union was arming one of the most notorious militant leaders of the time, Wadia Haddad. One of the leaders of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (a radical Palestine Liberation Organization faction), Haddad reportedly originated the idea of hijacking airliners to win attention for the cause. His troops included Carlos the Jackal. In 1974, Haddad told Moscow about his "prospective program of sabotage and terrorism." Besides attacks in Israel, he envisioned "actions against American and Israeli representatives" in Greece, Iran, Ethiopia and Kenya, but he needed KGB help to procure the necessary "special technology." A memo from KGB head Yuri Andropov to President Leonid Brezhnev recommends giving Haddad "a generally favorable response," notwithstanding the Soviet Union's "opposition to terrorism in principle." Brezhnev concurred.

A year later, Andropov reported that the Soviets had shipped 50 submachine guns, 50 handguns (10 with silencers), and 34,000 rounds of ammunition to Haddad. "The covert delivery of arms was carried out in the neutral waters of the Gulf of Aden at night, with no direct contact, and with full observance of secrecy by an intelligence-gathering vessel of the Navy of the USSR," the memo reports. "W. Haddad is the only foreigner who knows that the arms were supplied by us."

Another 1975 arms shipment to the Middle East, this one to Lebanon, included 600 submachine guns, 50 machine guns, 30 anti-tank weapons, 3,000 hand grenades, 2,000 landmines and 2 tons of explosives. "By the mid-1980s," writes Bukovsky, "the Soviet Union was training at least 200 Lebanese thugs per annum." Moscow trained and armed Latin American Marxists even as it denounced the United States for aiding those who opposed them. In 1976, according to Bukovsky's documents, the Soviets agreed to bring 19 "comrades" from Argentina, El Salvador, Paraguay and Panama to Moscow for special training in "party security, intelligence, and counterintelligence." In 1980, El Salvador sought Moscow training for "30 of our young communists," some of them assigned to be "commanders of sabotage units." The same year, the Soviets agreed to deliver "60-80 tons of Western-manufactured firearms and ammunition from Hanoi to Havana, to be passed on to our Salvadoran friends."

According to a 1970 document, the Soviets also took an interest in America's would-be revolutionaries, the Black Panthers. Deeming the Panthers "a dynamic Negro organization which poses a serious threat to America's ruling classes," the document declares that the Communist Party of the USA "is attempting to influence the organization in the necessary direction." If the radical movement thrived, it could help "distract the attention of the Nixon administration from pursuing an active foreign policy."

In addition, according to Bukovsky's manuscript, the Soviets worked to manipulate foreign opinion. They gave thousands of tons of paper to congenial newspaper and book publishers, subsidized foreign publishers by spending millions of dollars on their publications, and covered the operating deficits of communist bookstores in the United States, England, Israel, Belgium and Australia. In 1979, half of Soviet trade with Spain went through a firm whose president was helping arrange publication of a book by Brezhnev. Moscow correspondents of friendly foreign periodicals received free housing, telegraph and telephone service, travel, medical treatment and access to resort facilities. Bukovsky also documents dealings between the Soviets and American media companies. A 1966 memo reports that the ABC network hoped to produce a TV special on the daily life of a Soviet factory worker, with Soviet authorities to exercise prior approval before it could be shown on U.S. television.

A 1967 memo seeks authorization to sell "one of the largest American television corporations," not further identified, the rights to Soviet documentaries on Vietnam, which would be incorporated into an American program and broadcast "on propagandist and economic conditions favorable to us."

According to a 1979 memo, Francis Ford Coppola met with a Soviet representative in Cannes to discuss a joint Soviet-American film on disarmament. Coppola said the project had the endorsement of President Carter. "If agreement is reached," the memo reports, "the Soviet side will reserve the right to exercise control over the ideological and artistic content of the film at all stages of its production." The Soviets also worked in other ways to strengthen the disarmament movement. One target in the early 1980s was the international Palme Commission, whose members included former Secretary of State Cyrus Vance and former British Foreign Secretary David Owen. "Despite agreeing generally with the Soviet point of view on many issues," the committee's Soviet delegate wrote, "such members of the committee as C. Vance, D. Owen, ... and a number of others tried (in the commission's report) to avoid wording which would be an exact repetition of Soviet terminology, and explained in private conversations that they are (wary) of accusations that they are following 'Moscow policies.'" The Palme report strongly urged "multilateral arms reductions."

Fascinating stuff -- so why can't you buy the book? Troubles arose over the commentary and analysis that Bukovsky interspersed with the extracts of documents.

Bukovsky's Random House editor, Jason Epstein, didn't return a call seeking comment. From correspondence that Bukovsky provided, it appears that Epstein believed the manuscript was too quick to accuse particular individuals of doing Moscow's work. "It is possible to have sympathized with the peace movement in good faith, as thousands of people did, without assuming either treachery or cynicism on their part," Epstein wrote. He wondered if the document concerning the Palme Commission might reflect an underling's "boasting to his bureaucratic superiors" rather than subversion. He wanted Bukovsky to follow up on various matters, too. Did Coppola make the film on disarmament? "Mr. Coppola is an important figure in the United States, as you know, and a letter or phone call from you to him would settle the matter. ... Your implication that Coppola agreed to Soviet censorship is, in the absence of further research on your part, potentially libelous under American law," he wrote.

[Snipped. Go to the site for the remainder of this potential bombshell.]

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events

1 posted on 10/01/2001 6:32:22 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Geez - I am so shocked! (note my sarcasm). Anyone who thinks communism is not alive and well and living in America has their head in the sand. Did not Kruschev say they would bury us by taking us over from within?

How soon people forget.

2 posted on 10/01/2001 6:40:31 AM PDT by gramho12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Hollywood has made dozens of movies about blacklisting of Communists in the fifties, and never miss any chance to thrust it into the popular consciousness.

Almost unknown are the many books that were suppressed in the West because of their political views, like Orwell's Homage to Catalonia and Animal Farm, and Trotsky's biography of Stalin.

3 posted on 10/01/2001 6:46:05 AM PDT by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Years ago Jason Epstein was editor of the New York Review of Books. That's all you need to know about him to understand why the book was never published.
4 posted on 10/01/2001 7:06:42 AM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Might be worth if for some Freepers with money to look into getting the rights and publishing it. Self and small-press publishing is getting easier and easier with computer technology.
5 posted on 10/01/2001 7:07:14 AM PDT by Celtjew Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
6 posted on 10/01/2001 7:08:49 AM PDT by T. Buzzard Trueblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
It is interesting to speculate why the very liberal Jason Epstein of Random House won't publish the book. One clue lies in the surfacing of Cyrus Vance's name. Today, Epstein is the editor for Richard Holbrooke, Democrat foreign policy guru and former Ambassador to the UN. Holbrooke was given a leg up by Secretary of State Cyrus "Let a thousand flowers bloom" Vance during the Carter administration. As Depty Asst Secretary of State for east Asia, Holbrooke pushed hard for the recognition of Viet Nam in 1978-9, only to be blindsided when Hanoi demanded two billion dollars in reparations. Holbrooke also sought to recognize the Communist government in Laos, only to find that the generals were drug dealers and it might not look good. Leads one to think...
7 posted on 10/01/2001 7:28:26 AM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gramho12
Kruschev's "we will bury you" comment is often thought of in a military nature. But he was actually refering to burying us with their goods and services. Neither ended up happening.
8 posted on 10/01/2001 7:34:13 AM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
The fact is that these charges are proven in "The Sword and the Shield: The Mitrokhin Archives". In fact, the KGB routinely tried to use the "useful idiots" in this country to stir up racial hatred,

The best story is how the Soviets gave million to the Communist Party USA, but two brothers in the CPUSA leadership were FBI agents nearly the whole of their adult lives. They totally skimmed off the money the the Soviets gave the party and lived quite lavishly in Chicago. It must have been crushing to the commies to see Ronald Reagan eventually give them a special service medal in the 80's when they came out of the cold.

9 posted on 10/01/2001 7:53:01 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny
Is animal Farm banned in the us?I had to read it in high school 30 years ago.
10 posted on 10/01/2001 8:03:02 AM PDT by eastforker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eastforker
I doubt that Animal Farm is banned in the U.S.A. because not too long ago the movie was on T.V. and I think that I saw this book at Barnes & Noble about two months ago.
11 posted on 10/01/2001 8:53:20 AM PDT by peter the great
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny
The interesting thing about the McCarthy era and the Blacklist that was circulated around Hollywood is that the Old Soviet Archives seem to indicate that McCarthy was in the Ballpark but not exactly on the money. In other words alot of what McCarthy was saying was true.
12 posted on 10/01/2001 8:56:43 AM PDT by peter the great
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eastforker, peter the great
Animal Farm could not be published for several years after it was first written. Please read George Orwell's Animal Farm: The Little Book That Could.
13 posted on 10/01/2001 10:25:37 AM PDT by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
"Kruschev's 'we will bury you' comment is often thought of in a military nature. But he was actually refering to burying us with their goods and services. Neither ended up happening."


Ever hear of "China"?

14 posted on 10/01/2001 11:10:40 AM PDT by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
I have heard of China. But your point falls flat since China was not part of the USSR.
15 posted on 10/01/2001 11:50:57 AM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
16 posted on 10/01/2001 11:56:28 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus Eric Breindel VENONA PAPERS, Armand Hammer and Al Gore--Partners in CPUSA
Eric Breindel went to his New York bar for a drink, developed liver complications and died shortly. He'd just outed the KGB hand in CPUSA in The Venona Papers.

Recommend Edward Jay Epstein Dossier: The Secret History of Armand Hammer in which the money-laundering paymaster of Lenin, Stalin et al is recognized for his service to the CPUSSR and its KGB (in all its alphabeic permutations).

The American left is the bookcase that swings open to the communist active measures, be they Russian or Chinese.

Watch carefully as their agent Hillary maneuvers through a shrinking candidate field to the podium before the draped red banner. How did OBL get the Air Force One codes? From the crew that got the FBI files, the Vince Foster files, gave Russia 17,000 CIA files, gave China warheads and guidance and supercomputers oh my.

And now we see a peace movement in the U.S. so like the nuclear freeze movement--both clandestinely aided and abetted by active measures.

It's asymmetrical warfare, unrestricted warfare.

Was the Kursk firing food to Afghanistan? Is the hand of China "saving" Afghanistan as it did Tibet, as it arms Pakistan with conventional and nuclear and missile aid?

The Cold War is over. China is our strategic partner. Santa Claus knows if you're bad or good.--All statements are equally true.

17 posted on 10/01/2001 12:33:21 PM PDT by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson