Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
"That is my point they had him on penicillin, note that they did not state what other antibiotics/treatments were used. Or did they ever? Something smells fishy."

Many of you misunderstood this entirely. The idea of the bug they cultured from this man being sensitive to penicillin is supposed to indicate that it was not genetically manipulated, and therefore less likely to be bioterrorism. One thinks that if you were to release a bioterroristic bug, you would first make it resistant to common antibiotics. Since this bug was not resistant, they are using that to help support the idea that it was not from a terrorist source.

34 posted on 10/06/2001 12:57:18 PM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: MarMema
Thank you for the information in reply #34.
37 posted on 10/06/2001 1:10:31 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: MarMema
And I thought I understood all of the Q & A's on anthrax.

I was under the impression that after exposure it is not too late.

They better get serious about stopping the mad men that wish to do this and quickly.

39 posted on 10/06/2001 1:29:39 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: MarMema
" Since this bug was not resistant, they are using that to help support the idea that it was not from a terrorist source."

Good input, thanks. I hadn't considered that.

96 posted on 10/06/2001 6:21:51 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson