Posted on 10/26/2001 2:04:20 PM PDT by DoctorMichael
ARGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Senator scumbaggie is on Larry King Live...........THE HORROR, THE HORROR.
|
|||||
Hello, Drunk. Welcome to Free Republic. I thought I'd visit all of the threads you've posted on and let everyone know how long you've been here and why you decided to show up here.
Hahahaha! TV as babysitter! Whatever happened to parents' taking responsibility for the influences on their children? Let's blame Ellen for the fact that we're too lazy to pay attention to information sources which mold our children's minds from early youth! It's all big, bad, lesbian Ellen's fault! -- DrunkenDotter
The preceding was in response to the fact that the Human Rights Campaign, the largest of the organizations shoving the homosexual agenda down our throats, has bought a bunch of advertising time during the Saturday morning cartoons. Apparently brainwashing our kids in the public schools isn't enough for these people.
Now then, regarding your heroine Hillary, the time that she spent participating in the Watergate investigation was enough to provide abundant proof of her partisan hypocrisy. She wrote a report explaining why impeaching a president, purely for his political activities and with no evidence of any endangerment to national security, is perfectly appropriate.
Now, Bryan: have you anything to say that's germane to the discussion?
That is to say: I posted to debunk a myth that's been going around about HRC. In response, you posted something about the "homosexual agenda" and Hillary's partisanship; you called her my "hero."
Sir, you have no clue as to who my "heroes" might be; and I never claimed that Senator Clinton is not partisan. I did respond with a well-referenced website which proves that the criticism of the junior senator from New York and of Mr. Lee is factually incorrect. If you cannot prove me wrong --if you cannot provide references which support the veracity of Post 9 in this thread-- then I submit that you have not contributed.
Thank you for your attention!
Have you anything of substance to add to this discussion, or do you believe that calling someone's contribution "pervert propaganda" is of value in itself?
The racism of white homosexuals is very intense.
It is well-known to the liberal media,
Yet the media would never mention this fact.
It doesn't fit cozily in their "cause"
Of establishing BEHAVIORAL minority status to homosexuals.
If they WERE to report the racism of the homosexuals,
It would make them "journalists,"
Which they like to think they are.
But it would interfere with their "cause."The homosexuals,
Who think they're better than mere "cows" and "breeders,"
They look at the minorities and say:
"Gee.
If these lowly Black people can have civil rights,
Then WE, who are better, anyway,
Who are more valuable than others,
WE should have civil rights, too!"The homosexuals are courting the legitimate minorities,
To go along with them,
To accept their money,
In their civil rights "cause."Thus, the genuine minorities are played for fools.
If minorities don't distance themselves
From the debauched homosexuals,
It will hurt THEMSELVES.
For their own survival,
They need to cut themselves off from the evildoers.The mud just splatters,
And gets over EVERYBODY.
** Bigoted Against Evil Behaviors **
Concerning the question of rights, that homosexuals are a "legitimate minority group": Liberals are talking about a rise in hate crimes, against Arabs during the war, against different minority groups, and they ALWAYS include homosexuals, always slip in under that umbrella.
I don't think anyone should make physical assaults, but now, things such as verbal harassment. So what's next? If I see some guy pick up dog excrement off the street, and eat it, I'm not allowed to say anything? I'm not allowed to be disgusted and say: "Hey, you're sick, man! Cut it out!" If I see a prostitute on the corner, I'm not allowed to say: "Hey, you're doing something really terrible and awful! You're destroying yourself! I don't think you should be here!" That's the logical extension.
Anybody that wants to do any kind of evil, all they have to do is declare themselves a "minority group." Personally, I think that's one reason there's been an increase of intolerance towards LEGITIMATE minority groups. By homosexuals insisting that THEY'RE a minority group, they've diluted the whole concept of what a minority group IS. If being against homosexuality makes me a bigot, okay, I'm a bigot. That's what the liberals are saying: "If you won't tolerate homosexuality, then you're a bigot." They say that all the time. All I can say is: "Fine. So be it. Then I'm a bigot."
I think a lot of other people out there are saying the same thing. They've made it ACCEPTABLE to be a bigot, because people are saying: "If being in favor of civil rights means that I have to tolerate homosexuality, then I'm not in favor of civil rights anymore." Now bigotry is legitimized, because you can't expect people to accept homosexuality. That's just not going to happen. It may happen over the short-term, for a short period of time, if they can propagandize enough people. But then, all these young kids are going to be born in twenty years from now. They're going to all be coming up, and they're going to be as disgusted and repelled by it as most people are today. So these battles are going to have to be fought all over again, and they're not going to win.
Will rapists claim to be the next persecuted minority? Am I a bigot if I'm against rape? Then okay, I'm a bigot. Forget the other minorities. If society says THEY'RE a minority, too, then all the REAL, LEGITIMATE minorities must be something to be intolerant of as well.
It legitimizes real bigotry. I think it's the worst mistake that the civil rights movement has made in the last twenty years, accepting homosexuals as a legitimate minority group. I know they were doing it just to try to increase their numbers and to increase the pressure, so they could get more rights for themselves. But they made a terrible mistake, because for one thing, they've given up their high moral ground. Now, the backlash against homosexuals has now extended to legitimate minorities.
What a terrible blow to the self-esteem of minorities, to say: "I'm a minority; homosexuals are a minority; therefore we're equal." That's what the homosexuals are saying. So a black person is supposed to say: "Oh? I'm equal to a homosexual?" An Asian is supposed to say: "Oh? I'm equal to a sex-pervert?" They're trying to equate this equivalence with legitimate minority groups, to go along with that. What a blow to their self-esteem, to their sense of their own self-worth, to say they're no better than these guys who go out and do these disgusting acts, just because their skin is black, or yellow, or whatever. That's cruel to themselves.
It's cruel to equate legitimate racial, ethnic, and religious minorities, with people who are in the minority because they do evil, and most people don't do evil.
The title of this post is derived from the homosexual "rights" group, ACT-UP. What they mean by their slogan is that since their community is being devastated by the AIDS plague, and although funding for AIDS research is about equal to cancer and heart disease research combined, they are griping because society is not spending ALL the money on research for AIDS.
A better slogan would be: SODOMY = DEATH.
Sodomy results in both spiritual death and physical death. It wasn't silence which brought on their own unneeded suffering. It was their own evil behaviors.
Thank you all for reading the article!!!!!As I said, Senator scumbaggie is exactly THAT. What's most galling NOW to me is he is just sitting on Dubya's nominees. Nothing is moving through the system!........and at a time like this!
A corolary arguement that arises here is that...........one of the reasons we had lower crime rates during the nineties were the judges appointed during the Reagan years. These guys were not afraid to throw the book at a perp. Now, after eight years of Clinton, we need these positions to be filled to take care of the current crisis.........and THIS clown is playing politics with the situation by digging in his heels.
From Operation Obstruct Justice (Noted above):
Very real differences exist between Republicans and Democrats about the kind of judge America needs. Those differences, however, should be thoroughly and openly debated. Democrats once demanded this open process, demanded hearings and votes, arguing that a productive confirmation process was the Senate's constitutional duty.
That was then, this is now — when they have the chance to gore some other ox. Rigging the rules and stalling the process perhaps reveal Democrats' fear that they'll lose that debate.
BTT (UNFORTUNATELY this thread is newly relevant.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.