Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Martin Luther Wrong?
antithesis.com ^ | 10/31/01 | R. C. Sproul

Posted on 10/31/2001 8:11:42 AM PST by AnalogReigns

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-277 next last
To: AnalogReigns
... evangelical Calvinist fellowships ...

Now there's an oxymoron. "Evangelical" means 'carrying the good news to those in need.' as in "evangelism". Where's the "good news" in "so sorry, I'm telling you this story, but you're not included. [It's only us.] Have a happy eternity in Hell."

Of course we think there are no non-Calvinists in heaven.

I think this statement even tops the one (by one of your co-religionists on a FR thread a month or two ago) that "Christ was a Calvinist."

I suppose it would be too much to ask you to find that verse in the Bible. [You know, "Thus saith the Lord, 'There are no non-Calvinists in Heaven.'") Nah, forget it. A closed mind is a terrible thing to waste.

101 posted on 10/31/2001 4:06:03 PM PST by winstonchurchill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson
I agree, according to the Book of Acts, Peter said to repent, be baptized, and recieve the Holy Ghost. John's Baptism is essential to christianity. The Holy Ghost can not reside in a sinful shell.
102 posted on 10/31/2001 4:06:57 PM PST by AMMON-CENTRIST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
Was Martin Luther Wrong?

Yes.

103 posted on 10/31/2001 4:08:49 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns
I don't agree with every single canon in the Council of Orange but I do agree with this in response to Arminian heresy:

Council of Orange Canons (529 A.D.)

CANON 6. If anyone says that God has mercy upon us when, apart from his grace, we believe, will, desire, strive, labor, pray, watch, study, seek, ask, or knock, but does not confess that it is by the infusion and inspiration of the Holy Spirit within us that we have the faith, the will, or the strength to do all these things as we ought; or if anyone makes the assistance of grace depend on the humility or obedience of man and does not agree that it is a gift of grace itself that we are obedient and humble, he contradicts the Apostle who says, "What have you that you did not receive?" (1 Cor. 4:7), and, "But by the grace of God I am what I am" (1 Cor. 15:10).

CANON 7. If anyone affirms that we can form any right opinion or make any right choice which relates to the salvation of eternal life, as is expedient for us, or that we can be saved, that is, assent to the preaching of the gospel through our natural powers without the illumination and inspiration of the Holy Spirit, who makes all men gladly assent to and believe in the truth, he is led astray by a heretical spirit, and does not understand the voice of God who says in the Gospel, "For apart from me you can do nothing" (John 15:5), and the word of the Apostle, "Not that we are competent of ourselves to claim anything as coming from us; our competence is from God" (2 Cor. 3:5).

104 posted on 10/31/2001 4:10:30 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winstonchurchill
I believe there are Free-willers in heaven since most just misunderstand the Bible, but still believe Jesus is the Savior etc. Anyway, in heaven though, I am sure they are corrected.

Calvinists are very evangelical because the way God saves his elect is through the spreading of the Gospel. If you do not spread the truth, nobody can be saved.

105 posted on 10/31/2001 4:13:05 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: RickyJ
Guess what? Even after you die and are accepted in heaven YOU can still LOSE your salvation.

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him sould not perish, but have everlasting life. - John 3:16

If you are right, then John 3:16 is a lie.

106 posted on 10/31/2001 4:13:22 PM PST by Tares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: winstonchurchill
Baptism and faith in Christ saves. The Book of Acts is clear on this. Once you are baptized, you must believe in all your heart in Christ.
107 posted on 10/31/2001 4:15:47 PM PST by AMMON-CENTRIST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: AMMON-CENTRIST
Oh, so the thief on the cross is in hell right now since he was not baptized.....BS!
108 posted on 10/31/2001 4:17:19 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: AMMON-CENTRIST
Baptism of babies is false. Babies have no idea who God is.

I beg to differ. You say that "babies have no idea who God is" because you base it on your concept of knowledge. Do you agree that the only way that you or I "know" God is by His grace and not of our own doing? Assuming that you do agree, can you still argue that a baby is incapable of receiving the same? It is a mistake to determine what can and can't be based on limited human understanding. It is perfectly natural for a believer to realize that baptism of an infant is as valid as any other baptism. It is God's baptism and is not restricted by any rules or arbitrary ages we decide upon.

109 posted on 10/31/2001 4:17:47 PM PST by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Romestamo
flame-retardant jumpsuit I treat the five points of Calvinism as an attempt to outline, as much as is possible, the mechanism behind salvation.

No jumpsuit needed. But neither do I need a trusty "outline" or an understanding of the "mechanism". If it were needful, Christ would have told us.

I don't need Calvin's "mechanism" or his "outline" any more than I need the 'perpetual virginity of Mary' or Mary as a "co-redemptrix" with Christ. I suspect few Calvinists would have any difficulty seeing the danger of that little 'addition' to the Gospel.

Why is it that they cannot see that saying "there are no non-Calvinists in Heaven" displaces the Gospel of Christ with the 'gospel of Calvin'?

I NEED Jesus Christ. That's all.

110 posted on 10/31/2001 4:18:29 PM PST by winstonchurchill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: AMMON-CENTRIST
John's Baptism is essential to christianity

Oops. So much for the penitent thief.

111 posted on 10/31/2001 4:19:54 PM PST by Tares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Keep in mind in several places Scriptural writers record how from the very womb, they were saved. The idea that somehow salvation or baptism has to be associated with our undertsanding of when people can learn things is garbage.
112 posted on 10/31/2001 4:19:59 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: GWfan
Baptism is what God does for us. We, even as adults can't fathom His love for us.

AMEN !!!! (Thanks for the ping).

113 posted on 10/31/2001 4:20:25 PM PST by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: AMMON-CENTRIST
John's Baptism is essential to christianity.

And that's why Christ did it. Oops, no He didn't did He? [John 4:2] So let me get this straight: the Lord Jesus Christ, in the process of conveying the Gospel to us, failed, neglected and refused to do something that was "essential" but you have discovered and intuited it and you will help us out?

You won't be offended will you if I just stick with Jesus?

114 posted on 10/31/2001 4:22:28 PM PST by winstonchurchill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: winstonchurchill
When you exalt yourself in the process of salvation, that is a problem. However, again...I agree with you....and as a Calvinist, that nobody can say only Calvinists are in heaven. The thing is, most Arminians don't intend to exalt themselves or anything. It is just that they do not understand the workings of salvation and assume, based on their experience (which biases their readig of Scripture), that they chose God. This goes agaist the NT where it says "you did not choose me, but I CHOSE YOU." Ignorance does not damn. There are a few ARminians though which flagrantly attack this new knowledge and refuse to accept it. They openly attack the truth of God. That is sin and I can't say for sure if these people are saved.
115 posted on 10/31/2001 4:24:25 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
The idea that somehow salvation or baptism has to be associated with our undertsanding of when people can learn things is garbage.

Absolutely !!!!!

116 posted on 10/31/2001 4:24:58 PM PST by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Paradise and seeing God is two different things. He will be able to see Jesus on earth again, but will not see the most High face to face. To see God, you must be pure...totally pure.
117 posted on 10/31/2001 4:25:25 PM PST by AMMON-CENTRIST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: AMMON-CENTRIST
And you believe that water makes us pure. Sorry to burst your bubble, but it is something called God's grace....and his mercy...which TOTALLY cleans us. Glorification then creates us worthy to enter in to his kingdom.
118 posted on 10/31/2001 4:27:45 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
I beg to differ. You say that "babies have no idea who God is" because you base it on your concept of knowledge. Do you agree that the only way that you or I "know" God is by His grace and not of our own doing? Assuming that you do agree, can you still argue that a baby is incapable of receiving the same? It is a mistake to determine what can and can't be based on limited human understanding. It is perfectly natural for a believer to realize that baptism of an infant is as valid as any other baptism. It is God's baptism and is not restricted by any rules or arbitrary ages we decide upon.

There is no evidence of infant baptism in scripture. Scripture says "REPENT and be baptised" an infant can not repent.

To believe that sprinkling water on an unknowing ,uncooperative infant is of any spiritual effect to that infant is superstition and nothing more.

119 posted on 10/31/2001 4:30:19 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: winstonchurchill
So what you think Jesus did to for??? To look good and be flashy? If that's the case the Book of Acts is a lie.
120 posted on 10/31/2001 4:30:57 PM PST by AMMON-CENTRIST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-277 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson