Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study Finds Genetic Link Between Intelligence and Size of Some Regions of the Brain
NY Times ^ | 11-5-01 | Nicholas Wade

Posted on 11/05/2001 4:21:00 AM PST by Pharmboy

November 5, 2001 Study Finds Genetic Link Between Intelligence and Size of Some Regions of the Brain

By NICHOLAS WADE

Plunging into the roiled waters of human intelligence and its heritability, brain scientists say they have found that the size of certain regions of the brain is under tight genetic control and that the larger these regions are the higher is intelligence.

The finding is true only on average and cannot be used to assess an individual's intelligence, said Dr. Paul M. Thompson, the leader of the research team and a pioneer in mapping the structure of the brain.

The measurement of intelligence has long been a controversial issue, and even more so the efforts to tease out the relative contributions of heredity and environment.

Dr. Bruce L. Miller, a neurologist at the University of California at San Francisco and an expert on brain changes in Alzheimer's disease, said Dr. Thompson's work was "an exciting study that starts to show there are some brain areas in which there are very significant genetic influences on structure."

And Dr. Robert Plomin, a psychologist who studies intelligence at the Institute of Psychiatry in London, said the high correlation found between the size of certain areas of the brain and general intelligence "does make it harder to dismiss intelligence as some meaningless construct, as some want to do."

Dr. Thompson, who is at the University of California at Los Angeles, uses a type of brain scanning called magnetic resonance imaging, which can show the difference between gray matter and white matter in the living brain. The gray matter consists of brain cells, while the white matter comprises the bundles of wiring with which the cells communicate with one another. The amount of gray matter is a measure of the number of brain cells.

The human brain seems to be divided into modules that perform separate tasks. The frontal lobes are involved in planning and risk assessment, while regions at the back of the brain handle visual processing. Dr. Thompson has tried to discover if the relative size of the brain's modules is under genetic control by studying how their size varies in twins.

With the help of colleagues in Finland, where a national registry of twins is maintained, he scanned the brains of identical and fraternal pairs of twins and measured the size of the brain modules. Qualities that are under genetic control show a characteristic pattern of varying hardly at all between identical twins, who have the same genes; quite a lot between fraternal twins, who share about half their genes; and a great deal between unrelated individuals.

The researchers had their computer draw three-dimensional maps of each subject's brain, and then color coded the modules' degree of heritability. In an article published in today's issue of Nature Neuroscience, they report that the quantity of gray matter in the frontal lobes was under particularly tight genetic control, as was a region at the side of the left hemisphere known as Wernicke's area, which is central to language.

Dr. Thompson's reason for probing the genetic control of brain structure was to uncover genes that might be involved in mental diseases that can be inherited, like schizophrenia and autism. But he and his colleagues also wished to understand the role of brain modules in healthy individuals, so they gave their subjects intelligence tests and found that intelligence was significantly linked with the amount of gray matter in the subjects' frontal lobes.

Dr. Thompson said the findings were "the first maps of the degree to which the genes control brain structure." There were only 40 subjects in his study — 10 pairs of identical twins and 10 pairs of fraternal twins — but the results gave "enough statistical power to identify the key brain systems," he said.

He expressed surprise that the amount of gray matter in the frontal lobes turned out to be correlated with intelligence in his study "because you wouldn't think something as simple as gray matter would affect something as complicated as intelligence." But the amount of gray matter, which is related to the number of brain cells, perhaps reflects something that bears more directly on intelligence, like the number of cell- to-cell connections, he said.

Dr. Plomin, who wrote a commentary on the study in the journal, said the larger volume of gray matter could be the cause of higher intelligence, or it could be the other way around — people with a stronger motivation, say, might exercise their brains harder and develop a higher density of neurons.

As brain-scanning studies like Dr. Thompson's become more refined, they raise the possibility that a scan could be used to gauge various elements of personality or behavior.

Dr. Thompson said he believed that as brain scans become increasingly informative they will raise issues of personal privacy just as genetic testing has done, and should be protected with similar safeguards.

The size of gray matter in the frontal lobes cannot be used to measure an individual's intelligence, he said. Some potential uses, such as scanning to compare the intelligence of different groups, would be unethical, he added. "It would be remiss to use technology developed for disease for those types of goals," he said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Well, well, well: eventually the truth will out and even the NY Times publishes it when it bites them in the butt. How many years have those whiners and obfuscators on 43rd Street turned themselves inside-out attempting to show that genes had NOTHING to do with intelligence and if we could only just find the right kind of environment we could make everyone into Newtons or Einsteins.

The biggest purveyor of this psuedo-science crapola has always been that lying, hypocritical communist apologist Stephen Jay Gould of Harvard. SJG: call your office.

These findings are impressive in that the statistical significance was seen with only 10 individuals per group which means that the differences must have been very large (the more subjects in groups the less differences you need to show for statistical significance.

1 posted on 11/05/2001 4:21:00 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
I thought I read somewhere in an article about Hillary Clinton that there is a link between a womans intelligence and the size of her thighs...
2 posted on 11/05/2001 4:25:48 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Bigger thighs more intelligence or bigger thighs less intelligence?
3 posted on 11/05/2001 4:29:19 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Sources of human psychological differences: the Minnesota study of twins reared apart.

Conclusion: IQ is 70 percent genetic and 30 percent environmental.

Genetic IQ will always triumph. That's why so many geniuses pop out of seemingly normal families and backgrounds.

4 posted on 11/05/2001 4:29:51 AM PST by SocialMeltdown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SocialMeltdown
``Genetic IQ will always triumph.''

Uh-oh! If my gene pool is anything to go by, I'm in BIG trouble! *ROFL* ~sigh~ Guess I'll just have to rely on me good looks and charm to get on in the world! It's hard being blonde, ye know! *ROFLMAO*

5 posted on 11/05/2001 4:37:15 AM PST by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SocialMeltdown
Thanks for the link on the Minnesota study.
6 posted on 11/05/2001 4:38:20 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
HMMMMM, Probably Bimbo Crusher has an extra pair of testicles where his frontal lobes should be.
7 posted on 11/05/2001 4:38:33 AM PST by Quix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
A quick scan of Hillary's frontal lobes would reveal I.D.M. (it don't matter)packed and racked.
8 posted on 11/05/2001 4:39:56 AM PST by Mobilemitter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
The finding is true only on average and cannot be used to assess an individual's intelligence, said Dr. Paul M. Thompson, the leader of the research team and a pioneer in mapping the structure of the brain.

Anyone with average intelligence can see that bright people have bright children..the genetics of intelligence has always been clear..

We can add or subtract some of it with environmental things,but by and large look at the parents.

I once had a client that was so bright,his thinking process was incredibly complex and thoughtful..but he could not read....He was raised in the south ,picked cotten from age 6..no schooling.He had raw intelligence.

This study will be buried,because it is not PC

9 posted on 11/05/2001 4:40:20 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
If you're a freeper, we know that you're smart.

But seriously folks, really smart people CAN and DO arise from parents who are average (were Newton's and Einstein's and Bohr's folks as smart as them? I think not). What is going on here is that YOU (as is everyone else) is a UNIQUE combination of genes mixed together from each of your parents; so, while you resemble your folks in some ways, in others you are on your own.

10 posted on 11/05/2001 4:42:01 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Well, while Dan Rather will not lead with this story on tonight's CBS Evening News, the Times did publish it. I guess they have been on the wrong side of histroy and truth so many times they are getting tired of it.
11 posted on 11/05/2001 4:44:51 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Pharmboy
Someone once explained to me that intelligence was like a measuring cup--it all depends on how you fill it up, and most people come nowhere close to filling it up. Intelligence/IQs are really overrated.

Most people make good grades and get ahead in work because they study & work hard, not necessarily because they're smart.

I think that "bright families" exist simply because there is a history of strong work ethics and "try your best" attitudes.

13 posted on 11/05/2001 4:48:33 AM PST by Nataku X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abwehr
Of course you are right; I have always thought that the Nazis did incredible damage on any studies linking genes and behavior of any sort.

As far as Plomin is concerned, he really is on the side of truth as he has been publishing original research for years supporting a strong genetic role not only for intelligence but for personality traits as well. I would guess he put the caveat in the editorial just to throw a bone to the environmental whackos and avoid criticism.

14 posted on 11/05/2001 4:49:59 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: SocialMeltdown; dighton
Genetic IQ will always triumph.


16 posted on 11/05/2001 4:51:53 AM PST by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nakatu X
Yes--there is certainly some of that. We've all grown up with kids who were "pluggers" and worked hard and did better than they would have based just on their innate intelligence.

OTOH, intelligence tests given to 3 y/o kids tend to run true over the long run. Don't minimize the effects of genes in this most human of traits.

17 posted on 11/05/2001 4:52:24 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
So, if I want smart grandchildren, I should crack open the skull of every boy who tries to date my daughter so I can make sure he's good breeding stock. (I always wanted an excuse to do that!)
18 posted on 11/05/2001 4:53:46 AM PST by SubSailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal
A bit too much hanky panky in the family gene pool, eh?

LOL!!

19 posted on 11/05/2001 4:53:50 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal
LOL..humor is an intelligence marker..and ya always make me LOL Gal!

The "Royal" family is so inbred that toilet traing must have been a real chore*grin*

20 posted on 11/05/2001 4:54:31 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SubSailor
Well, if he wants to date your daughter, he must be pretty smart (Freeper daughters are the best, right? I've got four). Hey, but character counts too--and there is some evidence that that is partially genetic also.
21 posted on 11/05/2001 4:57:31 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal
LOL! Pooloo See Bahgoomba! He looks like Gilligan!
22 posted on 11/05/2001 4:59:10 AM PST by SubSailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: Pharmboy
I'm Shocked! Size does matter.
24 posted on 11/05/2001 5:04:55 AM PST by PA Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist
another fyi bump
25 posted on 11/05/2001 5:38:49 AM PST by freefly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freefly
An east coast, mid-day bumparooney.
26 posted on 11/05/2001 7:53:25 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
For all you Lefties out there (where better to find Lefties like me than on Free Republic?), here is an interesting little tidbit. Lefties May Possess Superior Memory for Events. It seems our corpus callosums are extra big and tough.

Oh...before everybody goes running for their blood-pressure medication, the article is referring left-handers, not leftwingers.

27 posted on 11/05/2001 8:25:09 AM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beckett
Hoo boy--you had me going until your last sentence. Touche.
28 posted on 11/05/2001 8:56:27 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson