Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Kills Al Qaeda Leaders by Remote Control
The Sunday Times/Fox News ^ | 11/18/2001 | Stephen Grey

Posted on 11/19/2001 4:20:08 AM PST by Eyes Now Opened

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:31:39 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

There was no moonlight in Afghanistan on Wednesday night. The new moon, marking the beginning of Ramadan, had yet to appear. Invisible under the stars, an unmanned American spy plane circled inaudibly over a stretch of dark landscape, transmitting grainy images back to the United States. Its night-vision camera was focused on a pinpoint of light in the distance, a three-story hotel building, where it detected a great deal of movement. Turbaned men talked agitatedly outside among parked pick-up trucks and military vehicles. Others moved in and out of the building. The drone's controllers, thousands of miles away in a bunker on the eastern seaboard of America, knew who they were. For two days since being roused from their beds in Kabul, these ragged figures had been fleeing south, trying to stay ahead of enemy forces and anxious to avoid satellites and surveillance planes. Moving furtively in small groups across the parched plains, they had spread out on side tracks and dirt roads, avoiding the main highway. Progress was slow. They were still less than 100 miles from the capital when they reached the end of the second day of flight. Many thousands of men had fled in the Taliban withdrawal from Kabul. But amid all the chaos of the retreat, this small convoy was given special attention. It was believed by American intelligence to consist of fighters from Usama bin Laden's Al Qaeda organization. Predator spy planes, capable of staying aloft for 24 hours on station, and JSTARS surveillance planes, equipped with radar that can monitor ground movements across a vast area, tracked them from the moment they left Kabul despite their elaborate efforts to avoid detection. The Predators known as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) come from the CIA's squadron of remote-control drones. At their cruising speed of 80 knots, they are inaudible from the ground and can identify targets five miles away. Armed with two Hellfire anti-tank missiles, a Predator could have been ordered to strike the convoy at any time. But the controllers chose to go on shadowing it. "This may have been a case of 'follow me to our leader,'" said one American source. If so, the patience paid off with a remarkable prize. It was just before 1 a.m. local time on Thursday when the Americans went in for the kill. The convoy had stopped at a small town. Men in other vehicles were there, too. Some sort of gathering was taking place in the hotel. The single Predator, now overhead, gave a clear picture of the hotel's crowded car park and of the fighters apparently pacing nervously as they waited for their commanders to finish their meeting. Through encrypted satellite communications, the Predator was providing a live battlefield television picture back to control rooms at the U.S. Central Command in Tampa, Fla., from where Gen. Tommy Franks has been running the war in Afghanistan. From Tampa, the Predator picture was relayed through the American secure communications network to the CIA in Langley, Va., and to the battle-scarred Pentagon itself. With the local clock showing 3:30 p.m. Wednesday, the operation was providing post-lunch viewing for senior leaders. "When this kind of excitement is going on, everyone big wants to take a look. This is modern warfare at work," said one U.S. intelligence source. President Bush was absent, however. He was entertaining President Vladimir Putin of Russia on his Texan ranch. As American officials watched with mounting excitement, three U.S. Air Force F-15 Strike Eagle planes, America's premier attack fighters, were moved into position. Deployed from bases in the Gulf, the aircraft had been "loitering" in the Kabul area, kept aloft by in-flight refueling, awaiting the right moment to move in. Nobody knew precisely who they would kill if the order to attack the hotel was given, but intelligence analysts felt certain that senior Al Qaeda officials were meeting in the hotel to consider their next moves as the Taliban regime was collapsing all over the country. Finally, the order was given in Florida for the target to be engaged. Locking the crosshairs of their weapon guidance systems on the hotel below, each of the three F-15s let loose a single GBU-15 "smart bomb." Weighing 2,500 pounds each, these bombs are guided on to their targets by infrared cameras in their noses. As the bombs slammed into the side of the hotel, the Predator completed the mission, launching its two Hellfire missiles at the vehicles in the car park. Almost everyone at the scene was incinerated, with close to 100 people killed. It was many hours before American officials could know just how much they had achieved. Then, in panic and pandemonium, an Al Qaeda operative breached the organization's strict security rules and revealed that a large number of the movement's senior figures had been killed including Mohammed Atef, the 57-year-old deputy to bin Laden and the terrorist group's senior military commander. According to one British official, a satellite phone call from an extremist group in Afghanistan to a foreign country was, like all satellite phone calls from the country, intercepted by British and American listening centers. Translated and transcribed at the National Security Agency in Maryland, the phone call revealed an operative who was heatedly reeling out a list of casualties, and he made a distinct and definite reference to the death of Mohammed Atef. This information was confirmed by a further human intelligence source, said another British official. "They said, 'What a shame he is dead,'" said the senior official, paraphrasing the overheard conversations. By Friday, nobody had identified any bodies at the devastated hotel or could be 100 percent certain who had died. But Pentagon officials began to be increasingly confident that they had killed Atef in the onslaught. Yesterday, the Taliban initially confirmed but then denied he was dead. Other air raids have taken place on Taliban and Al Qaeda positions in the past few days, but the intelligence officials believe Atef died at the hotel. Its exact location has not been confirmed, but one source suggested it was in Gardez, an ethnic Pushtun stronghold on the road up from Kabul into the Taliban mountain province of Paktia. The death of Atef, say security officials, has wiped out one of the western world's most formidable opponents. With a daughter married to one of bin Laden's sons, he was considered by many to be a potential successor to head Al Qaeda if bin Laden was killed. British and American intelligence agencies had identified Atef as an important planner of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center. He was the key link man, they believe, between bin Laden and the hijackers. Telephone calls intercepted by spy agencies are believed to have revealed specific details of how Atef controlled and approved the suicide hijackings. It is believed by security agencies that Mohammed Atta, the German-based ringleader of the hijackers and a fellow Egyptian, had visited Afghanistan to get Atef's specific go-ahead for the Sept. 11 attacks. In May 1998, at a press conference in Afghanistan, bin Laden introduced Atef as his "right-hand man," according to Pakistani newspaper reports. The Al Qaeda leader then repeated his declaration of war on Americans. Atef was already plotting the bombing of two U.S. embassies in Africa, which occurred three months later. Atef not only sat on the shura (consultation council) of Al Qaeda, but also headed the group's military council. He was responsible for the training of Al Qaeda terrorists, including suicide bombers. While Ayman al-Zawahiri, Al Qaeda's other top figure, provided bin Laden with the reasoned religious justification for mass murder, Atef provided him with the means of delivering it. Like al-Zawahiri, he was an Egyptian who was trained as a terrorist by the extremist Islamic Jihad organization. His relationship with bin Laden dates back to the 1980s, when he left Egypt to fight in Afghanistan. When bin Laden left Afghanistan for Sudan in 1991, Atef traveled with him, in charge of his security. About two years later, he was dispatched to Somalia to determine "how best to cause violence to the United States and United Nations military forces stationed there," according to the court indictment over the 1998 bombings of the American embassies in Africa. Atef also provided training to Somali tribes opposed to the U.N. intervention in Somalia. American authorities believe fighters who attacked and killed 18 American soldiers in Somalia were trained by Al Qaeda.


(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: Vigilanteman
Duh, I think we get it by now, learn to put mental paragraphs in your head. And learn to read prior posts, before posting.
41 posted on 11/19/2001 7:42:41 AM PST by skateman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Here's a REALLY scary thought: you can put together a lot of this sort of capability with stuff from Radio Shack and the local model & hobby shop.

You can buy a satellite from Radio Shack?

Do the boosters come with it or are they purchased separately (Rockets-r-us)? ;-)

Actually, what makes Predator and Dark Star so effective are the secure, real-time satellite communications. Something a radio controlled device wouldn't have.

42 posted on 11/19/2001 7:44:48 AM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
This also suggests a new TV game show: Survior Al-Qaeda Edition. Terrorists vie to survive the various challenges, such as "evade the Special Forces sniper team," "conduct a satellite telephone conversation without the NSA listening in," and "dodge the GBU-15 strike," while voting each other out of their caves, and the winner gets $1,000,000...only to find out that the bills have been soaked in PETN (the main ingredient of det cord) and there's a mercury switch fuse :o)
43 posted on 11/19/2001 7:45:53 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TomB
Well, you don't have to buy a whole satellite these days; you just need to lease a few channels on a commercial bird.
44 posted on 11/19/2001 7:47:08 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
That would make it rather easy to trace though. With a limited number of transponders on a limited number of birds, a terrorist organization would find it rather difficult to keep their activities secret.

The reason the military launches their own satellites is that commercial sats aren't very secure.

45 posted on 11/19/2001 7:51:45 AM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
bttt
46 posted on 11/19/2001 7:54:23 AM PST by the bottle let me down
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Time to allow 13 year old boys in the military. They would pay the government to allow them to sit behind a terminal and control a Predator drone.

Lousy idea. Why let those @#$@@!! kids have all the fun? I was blowin' away Tie Fighters before blowin' away Tie Fighters was cool...

47 posted on 11/19/2001 7:54:52 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TomB
No, the reason the military launches its own satellites is that they need guaranteed bandwidth availablity--they don't want their pictures of Atef getting blown to smithereens preempted by some guy broadcasting "Ishtar."

As for making it secure, there are a number of rather good encryption algorithms out there. Ecryption on both ends of the conversation is what makes the content secure--not the bird itself.

48 posted on 11/19/2001 7:56:45 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Deutsch
Besides Rocket Technology via Dr. Von Braun, the Germans also had the first operational jets, though it was too late to help them. It sure as hell helped us.
49 posted on 11/19/2001 8:08:11 AM PST by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
As for making it secure, there are a number of rather good encryption algorithms out there. Ecryption on both ends of the conversation is what makes the content secure--not the bird itself.

That assumes the NSA cannot break those algorithms. However, since one of the main advantages of Predator is that no one knows it is there, bouncing a signal off a commercial bird lets you know it is there in the first place, and makes locating it much easier. We wouldn't be interested in the information in the drone, only that it is operating.

And this, of course, debunks your earlier statement that "you can put together a lot of this sort of capability with stuff from Radio Shack and the local model & hobby shop."

50 posted on 11/19/2001 8:20:08 AM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
You are right. Kids have enough fun as it is. Let's have a national lottery to see who gets to sit behind a desk and blow away terrorists with the Predator's Hell-Fire missiles. We could use the money for the NRA Eddie Eagle program.
51 posted on 11/19/2001 8:26:34 AM PST by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
LOL!!!!!!!!!
52 posted on 11/19/2001 8:29:11 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Also, UAVs don't have mommies or babies, and they don't scream when they are captured and their guts are ripped open.
53 posted on 11/19/2001 8:31:02 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Let's have a national lottery to see who gets to sit behind a desk and blow away terrorists with the Predator's Hell-Fire missiles.

Take my wallet. Please!

54 posted on 11/19/2001 8:34:12 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: TomB
I have news for you--it is actually much easier to DF a Predator using most military satellites than it would be if it were using a commercial bird.

You are presuming that if the NSA can detect a signal, it can instantly determine its context and content in realtime, even from a very dense electronic environment.

The NSA may be good, but they ain't THAT good.

55 posted on 11/19/2001 8:41:44 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
they don't scream when they are captured and their guts are ripped open.

They might let out a single very dramatic scream, one might even say an explosive one :o)

56 posted on 11/19/2001 8:43:09 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
That would be a nice scream.
57 posted on 11/19/2001 8:47:13 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Follow-up info from our surveillance sensors:

"Achmed! The Great Satan's spy plane is ours! Let's open it up and view its secrets!"

(Achmed having a good deal more sense than his compadre) "Selim, Allah loves your devotion to jihad, but shouldn't we wait for Abdul to get here? The Great Satans may have laid traps for us, and Abdul is skilled at disarming such devices."

"Achmed, you are SUCH a wimp! Here..." (sounds of screwdriver and hammer)

"Selim, QUIT MESSING WITH THAT YOU CAMEL-FORNI--"

(Loud explosion, end of tape.)

58 posted on 11/19/2001 8:52:18 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Eyes Now Opened
Thanks for the great article. It is a fascinating read.

If you'd like to learn more about posting with HTML code, just type "HTML" in the search box and you'll get the links to the instructions.

59 posted on 11/19/2001 9:09:49 AM PST by Kryptonite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RushingWater
Video please!

I agree. Something along the lines of ESPN's "Plays Of The Week."

Lol, "Hey Mohammad, don't hate me because I'm a player hater."

60 posted on 11/19/2001 10:20:00 AM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson