Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientist stirs the cauldron: oil, he says, is renewable
Boston Globe | May 22, 2001 | David L. Chandler

Posted on 11/19/2001 10:07:24 AM PST by Aurelius

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-209 next last
To: EricOKC
Actually Dog Gone is dead on. Many fields that took hundreds of millions of years to form are now depleted, this is fact. Not all of the fields are depleted, as is obvious by the fact that we are still making gasoline, but some have definitely being depleted.

Given another hundred million years, those fields may regenerate, but so what.

41 posted on 11/19/2001 11:08:24 AM PST by Double Tap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
See what?
42 posted on 11/19/2001 11:09:13 AM PST by Double Tap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
Unless oil is being created at the rate of millions of barrels a day (I think the US alone goes through 12 mil a day) then its really a moot point.
43 posted on 11/19/2001 11:09:36 AM PST by 74dodgedart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Thomas Gold developed the Steady State Theory with Hoyle and Bondi
44 posted on 11/19/2001 11:10:09 AM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
I don't know anything about Russian or central Asian geology, but when you hit basement rocks in America they certainly don't produce hydrocarbons.

I've been involved in drilling wells that were nearly 5 miles deep and I can assure you that they don't get better the deeper you go.

45 posted on 11/19/2001 11:15:14 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: The Truth Will Make You Free
Rather than adjusting facts to support the theory, he changes the theory to support the facts.

Well said!
46 posted on 11/19/2001 11:16:45 AM PST by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: HopeSprings
Gold is the P. T. Barnum of the oil industry. Same old stuff that he's being touting for years. Don't believe it.

Proof?

47 posted on 11/19/2001 11:16:51 AM PST by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
According to one source, at its largest, great Salt Lake had an area of 6,200 sq km or 6.2 billion sq m. At a uniform depth of 1/2 ft., if I haven't made a mistake, that would be a volume of 1.88 trillion liters.
48 posted on 11/19/2001 11:22:29 AM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Double Tap
The post above the post that says "see above"

The Russians are milking basement rock like crazy and it's helped to drive oil prices down to their current levels.

49 posted on 11/19/2001 11:23:16 AM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: FairWitness
"It's life Jim, but not as we know it"!

Maybe oil is a byproduct of Hortas.

50 posted on 11/19/2001 11:24:21 AM PST by CubicleGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: The Truth Will Make You Free
Rather than adjusting facts to support the theory, he changes the theory to support the facts.

The search for truth is not achieved by replacing incorrect theories with correct ones; it's done by replacing incorrect theories with new ones that are more subtly wrong.

53 posted on 11/19/2001 11:27:24 AM PST by CubicleGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
All the oil in the world
54 posted on 11/19/2001 11:36:47 AM PST by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CubicleGuy
Theories shouldn't be judged in a two-valued system of "correct" and "incorrect", but on a continuous, opened-ended scale proceeding from worse to better. The "complete, perfect theory" being an unattainable end. And maybe a one-dimensional scale is inadequate.
55 posted on 11/19/2001 11:37:02 AM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

Comment #56 Removed by Moderator

To: Aurelius
Thomas Gold

Is it possible that he and Sagan had the same high-grade source?

57 posted on 11/19/2001 11:45:39 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Source of what? I assume you are referring to Carl Sagan?
58 posted on 11/19/2001 11:49:20 AM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
There's no article link?
59 posted on 11/19/2001 11:51:05 AM PST by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChemistCat
If oil comes from dead and decayed living organisims, where did they get their carbon mass? Isn't a lot of wasted/spilled oil consumed by microorganisms? Why couldn't they make it? Plants make oil, people and animals make oil, why not bacteria?
60 posted on 11/19/2001 11:55:05 AM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson