Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Final Word? New documents raise questions about news media’s findings on the 2000 pres. election
Newsweek via MSNBC.com ^ | 11/19/01 | Michael Isikoff

Posted on 11/19/2001 12:32:17 PM PST by Jean S

Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:34 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Nov. 19 — After spending nearly $1 million, a consortium of big news organizations last week rendered what it once thought would be final word on last year’s bitterly contested Florida recount.

THE DECISION: a split verdict.

To the chagrin of Democratic partisans, the consortium proclaimed Bush still would have won the apparently limited statewide recount underway last December 9 even if the U.S. Supreme Court had not swooped in and stopped it. But if all disputed ballots had been manually counted—something, ironically, neither side had even asked for—Al Gore could have eked out a narrow victory.


(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2000algore; floridarecount; soreloserman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 11/19/2001 12:32:18 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Compare:


2 posted on 11/19/2001 12:35:15 PM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
OH MY! ROFLMAO! Under the desk laughing at that one!!!!
3 posted on 11/19/2001 12:36:52 PM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Buried deep in the files of the mammoth Florida litigation, Newsweek has uncovered hastily scribbled faxed notes written by Terry Lewis, the plain-speaking, mystery-novel writing state judge in charge of the Florida recount, that potentially changes the calculations rather substantially

15 yard penalty to Isikoff for abuse of verb tense to try and make an irrelvant point seem relevant.

4 posted on 11/19/2001 12:37:02 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Just how many times have these ballots been handled now? And they're still thought of as to be accurate?

No clowns need reply.

5 posted on 11/19/2001 12:37:40 PM PST by SGCOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Except for pathetic creatures like Isikoff, this story is "deader than a wooly mammoth's nuts".

GORE LOST!
GET A LIFE, LOSERS!

6 posted on 11/19/2001 12:39:51 PM PST by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
BUMP
7 posted on 11/19/2001 12:41:38 PM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Turning my megaphone volume to 11: SHUT UP!!! SHUT! UP! JUST SHUT...UP!!! IT'S OVER YOU FREAKIN' LOSERS!!!!!
8 posted on 11/19/2001 12:47:21 PM PST by Jhensy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SGCOS
I still don't understand why we should feel that an election is only properly counted if we include illegally cast votes? Am I the only one who sees the logic of this?
9 posted on 11/19/2001 12:47:28 PM PST by Keith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
15 yard penalty to Isikoff for abuse of verb tense to try and make an irrelvant point seem relevant.

However, 5 yards given back for a spelling error within a grammar critique ;)

10 posted on 11/19/2001 12:47:29 PM PST by Roger the Shrubber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
The only thing this Florida fiasco proved was that people who are too stupid to vote....voted for ALGORE.
11 posted on 11/19/2001 12:48:27 PM PST by AuntB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Then there is another small matter overlooked by the consortium: the numbers don’t add up. - - - - - In all, the NORC counters were able to inspect 175,010 disputed ballots that the counties identified as having gone uncounted or rejected. But those 175,010 uncounted votes are 1,436 ballots less than the 176,446 ballots that, the news organizations independently determined, had originally been reported by the counties as rejected or uncounted on election night.

So there is a discrepancy of 1436 ballots, a larger number than any of the winning margins dreamed up by the consortium. What a farce.

12 posted on 11/19/2001 12:49:10 PM PST by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith
I still don't understand why we should feel that an election is only properly counted if we include illegally cast votes? Am I the only one who sees the logic of this?

Actually, I think you've hit on the difference between the use of "feelings" and "logic".

13 posted on 11/19/2001 12:49:15 PM PST by Roger the Shrubber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FairWitness
You forget the 1200 military ballots THAT WERE ILLEGALLY REJECTED by direct order by Gore's lawyers, and NEVER COUNTED IN ANY "media" survey.

These ballots ARE NOT included in these "media NORC" counts either as 1000 votes for Bush, and 200 (approximately) for Gore. (Assuming their count is what the military surveys' at that revealed.)

14 posted on 11/19/2001 12:56:17 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Yankee
GORE LOST! GET A LIFE, LOSERS!

Here's the thing ... these folks just keep coming back time and time again to plant a seed of doubt into people's minds. They know that Bush will be a formidable opponent in the 2004 elections and they're willing to do anything to undercut him politically -- even if it's something that is largely a moot issue.
15 posted on 11/19/2001 12:56:34 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
The media would have done a better service to the TRUTH to explain to a generation of clueless Americans WHY Bush won the election. It is the perception of many a person on the street that the election was really won by Gore, because he did win the popular vote, but they simply do not understand the concept of an electoral college and the procedures in place to arbitrate disputes.
16 posted on 11/19/2001 1:04:44 PM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
What are these crying libs going to do after Bush gets 83% of the votes in the next election? The first smart thing Gore has done is getting himself a real job....before the next elections.
17 posted on 11/19/2001 1:22:44 PM PST by Winfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

18 posted on 11/19/2001 1:32:16 PM PST by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
They're keeping this alive for 04, that's all. You know how they are, It will lead the news casts every night for months and they will try to give people a chance to set the record straight, but I think it will have the opposite effect. Kind of like the guy who has lived with a gal without benefit of clergy, discovers he loves her and decides to "make an honest woman of her." The voters will get a chance to make an honest pres out him.(not that he's not) That's how it will be with Bush, all those sorry they voted for Gore will get a do over. HA HA.

regards

19 posted on 11/19/2001 1:32:43 PM PST by okiedust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove
LOL
20 posted on 11/19/2001 1:38:07 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson