Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Phyllis Schlafly: Are Mexican Immigrants Assimilating Or Invading?
Too Good Reports ^ | December 2, 2001 | Phyllis Schlafly

Posted on 11/30/2001 7:47:46 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen

Since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, support for the United States has poured in from around the world, but the response from Mexico has been decidedly lukewarm. A Gallup poll reported that 78 percent of Mexicans oppose contributing troops to a multinational coalition, and we have seen no indication that Mexico will modify its oil policy of acting like a member of OPEC.

While there is no evidence that the 9/11 terrorists entered over the Mexican border, the trial in El Paso of an Iraqi smuggler produced evidence that he alone brought more than 1,000 Middle East illegals into the United States via that route, charging his clients $10,000 to $15,000 each. Border Patrol agents have confirmed the increase in illegal aliens coming from the Middle East across our southern border and the fact that Arabs pay up to $50,000 each for a "coyote" to smuggle them into the United States.

The 9/11 events have temporarily shelved the foolish proposals to grant amnesty to three million Mexicans illegally living in our country. Unfortunately, there is no indication that Mexico has retreated from its longtime goal of opening the U.S. border.

In Chicago on July 27, 1997, then Mexican President Ernesto Zedilla told the National Council of LaRaza, "I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders." He announced a Mexican constitutional amendment that purports to allow Mexicans to retain their Mexican nationality even though they become U.S. citizens (which is contrary to the U.S. naturalization oath).

When President Vicente Fox came to the United States this year, he reiterated this line, proclaiming that "the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders" and includes migrants living in the United States. He called for open borders and endorsed Mexico's new dual citizenship law.

Some Mexicans use the term "reconquista," which is Spanish for reconquest, to describe their desire to see California, New Mexico, Arizona and Texas acquired by Mexico and named the new country of Aztlan. They are teaching their youth that the United States "stole" those areas from Mexico and that they should be "returned."

The United States acquired the Southwest a century and a half ago in three ways: part by the 1845 annexation agreement with Texas, which was then an independent republic, part ceded by Mexico in the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo after the Mexican-American War, and part by the 1852 Gadsden Purchase.

Mexico's claim to the Southwest originated with the 1494 Treaty of Tordesillas, which drew an imaginary line on the map to divide the Western Hemisphere between Spain and Portugal. Because geography had so many unknowns at that time, Portugal got only Brazil (which is why Brazilians speak Portuguese).

Other countries never recognized this treaty, and Americans consider it ridiculous even to talk about giving the Southwest to Mexico. Most national borders all over the world have come about as the result of war.

Mexicans obviously have no thought of invading the Southwest with troops, so their hope is reconquista by migration, both legal and illegal. According to Mario Obledo, founder of the Mexican American Legal Defense & Education Fund, "California is going to be a Hispanic state and anyone who doesn't like it should leave."

An amnesty rally in the Los Angeles Sports Arena on June 10, 2000 attracted 25,000 people. In demanding amnesty for illegal Mexican aliens, the speakers proudly announced the names of at least a dozen unions in Los Angeles that are now headed by Mexicans.

Vicente Fox presented Mexico's Congress with a five-year development plan to eliminate the U.S.-Mexican border. He said he plans to serve "the 100 million Mexicans who now live in Mexico and the more than 18 million who live abroad," and to "strengthen our ability to protect and defend the rights of all Mexicans abroad."

Juan Hernandez, appointed by Fox as special liaison to Mexicans abroad, lobbies to get U.S. driver's licenses issued to illegal aliens and defends the Mexican government's issuance of desert survival kits to those sneaking across the border. On ABC's Nightline on June 7, he boasted: "We are betting that the Mexican-American population in the United States ... will think Mexico first."

Fox's five-year plan calls for building a larger consular presence in the United States, and this is already in operation. In U.S. areas with large Hispanic (including illegal) populations, the Mexican consul donates to the local public schools the same textbooks that are used in every elementary school in Mexico, grades 1 through 6.

The books, written in Spanish and including all academic subjects, teach that America "stole" the southwest from Mexico and that Mexico is entitled to take it back. The Mexican government considers these textbooks a symbol of Mexican national pride, guarantees a set to every Mexican child, and makes it a crime for anyone to sell them.

The only reason we learned about this Mexican plan is that one school in Santa Ana, California, decided to sell the books at a book fair and the local Hispanics kicked up a fuss about it. The school apologized to the Hispanics for selling the books, but should have apologized to the students for accepting the books in the first place.

The question we should ask our Mexican immigrant friends is, are you assimilating or invading?

TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: immigrantlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-346 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: mvscal
Hey, thanks for bumping the thread.....folks here really need to read this article and also listen to you spew your venom and wake up to the fact that we need serious border control.

I'll say it again, I am FOR the same LEGAL immigration we have had for hundreds of years. I do not favor the types that sneak in, cover a convenience store parking lot like locusts and give you the finger if you even look in their direction.

BTW, JimRob dislikes profanity being used in his house, so do respect his wishes.

42 posted on 11/30/2001 11:53:05 AM PST by citizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mvscal
Please summarize any "stalking" performed on you.

You seem to be rather paranoid, (besides enjoying the use of the "f-word" and disgusting made up from whole cloth personal attacks in place of arguement.)

43 posted on 11/30/2001 11:54:22 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: citizen
BTW, JimRob dislikes profanity being used in his house, so do respect his wishes.

Allegedly he doesn't like racists either. So, likewise to you.

44 posted on 11/30/2001 11:55:01 AM PST by mvscal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: FreeLibertarian
What part of the moon are you living on? Stick to working on legalizing pot or whatever nonsense Lib's work on but stay out of the immigration debate because you don't have a clue.
46 posted on 11/30/2001 11:57:57 AM PST by american spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
"I'm still waiting for any type of evidence that would suggest that Mexican immigration is any different than any other past wave of immigration."

Well for one how about the fact that the Mexicans can just walk over an undefended boarder any time they feel like it. Where as other imigrants had to sell everything, get on a boat an forget ever seeing thier homeland again. I'd call that a very very big diference.

47 posted on 11/30/2001 11:58:28 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mvscal
Ups, 47 was meant for you!
48 posted on 11/30/2001 11:59:04 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mvscal
Not on Free Republic.

Been great seeing you around, good luck with your vocabulary development, and better luck with your self control next time.

49 posted on 11/30/2001 12:00:43 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mvscal; Travis McGee
We cannot see who is making complaints, but it is pretty clear you two are just hitting abuse on each other as you flame back and forth.

Please stop (both abusing each other and then complaining).

50 posted on 11/30/2001 12:01:17 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
Oh, I get it. If you arrive by boat, you're all right because you because you had to sell everything to get here, but if you walk across the border after selling everything to get to the border it isn't OK. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.
51 posted on 11/30/2001 12:02:33 PM PST by mvscal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

Comment #53 Removed by Moderator

To: HangFire; AnnaZ; abigail2; NewDestiny; rebuildus; Cortez; brat; MissAmericanPie; miss print...
54 posted on 11/30/2001 12:05:04 PM PST by Mercuria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
No problem.
55 posted on 11/30/2001 12:05:07 PM PST by mvscal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Would you like a tissue? I think I have one around here somewhere.
56 posted on 11/30/2001 12:07:15 PM PST by mvscal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: mvscal
I'm happy you see that earlier immagrants had to have a much greater commitment to becomming American by virtue of knowing where was no going back.

I was afraid you might not get it.


57 posted on 11/30/2001 12:08:19 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
And just what precisely does a Mexican dirt farmer have to go back to?
58 posted on 11/30/2001 12:09:16 PM PST by mvscal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

Comment #59 Removed by Moderator

To: Admin Moderator
I have never hit the abuse button. Not once ever. Really.
60 posted on 11/30/2001 12:09:57 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-346 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson