Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Patrick J. Buchanan: Is a war of civilizations ahead?
Creators Syndicate ^ | Friday, December 07, 2001 | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 12/06/2001 9:06:57 PM PST by ouroboros

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 12/06/2001 9:06:57 PM PST by ouroboros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mercuria; diotima; sheltonmac; Askel5; DoughtyOne; tex-oma; A.J.Armitage; x; Campion Moore Boru...
ping
2 posted on 12/06/2001 9:08:59 PM PST by ouroboros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
He needs to add to his list of faiths one more lie of the Left, egalitarianism.
3 posted on 12/06/2001 9:12:10 PM PST by junta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
More level-headed than usual.
4 posted on 12/06/2001 9:13:01 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
"Don't count Islam out. It is the fastest growing faith in Europe and has surpassed Catholicism worldwide. And as Christianity expires in the West and the churches empty out, the mosques are going up."

You know, the man has a point. What do Americans, British, Australians,
and Europeans in general believe in these days?
Diversity and multi-culturalism?

5 posted on 12/06/2001 9:14:15 PM PST by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
Minor question - how can Islam be 16 centuries old if it started in the 7th century?
6 posted on 12/06/2001 9:17:00 PM PST by Rightwing Canuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
Buchanan has some good points. Too bad his ill-advised run for President last year on the Reform Party ticket has rendered him virtually irrelevant in America's political landscape. I don't think he has much of an audience anymore.
7 posted on 12/06/2001 9:19:00 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
Pat's got his history a wee bit WRONG, again. ISLAM is a religion, and as such the Magyars did NOT convert to Islam, though the MUSLIMS did conquer Hungary, for a time; twice.

Belloc and / or Pat are still claiming athat ALL Protestants are " heritics " I see , and lumpin ISLAM i with the Reformation is particularly offensive and NOT at all accurate.

8 posted on 12/06/2001 9:20:25 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
Pat's got his history a wee bit WRONG, again. ISLAM is a religion, and as such the Magyars did NOT convert to Islam, though the MUSLIMS did conquer Hungary, for a time; twice.

Belloc and / or Pat are still claiming that ALL Protestants are " heritics " I see , and lumping ISLAM in with the Reformation is particularly offensive and NOT at all accurate.

9 posted on 12/06/2001 9:20:53 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
Is a war of civilizations coming?

Pat's question is rhetorical, of course, but I'd make a slightly different point: the war of civilizations is not coming, it has already been in progress throughout human history. That's part of what human beings do--they take care of their own and display group egoism...which entails conflict and competition with alien groups.

Now, about Pat's comparison of the fighting spirit of Islam v. Christianity, he is right on the money. We can see it in George W. Bush's cautious refrains that we can't discriminate against our fellow "American" Muslims at home, Islam is a religion of peace, etc. You see, the funny thing is this: Western man has been the most compassionate in history, and that wonderful trait is exactly what will kill him in this world. The West is just too PC to do what it takes to hold the line, while the Muslims don't just hold the line--they want to expand it. Although if we took the right measures, they would be unlikely to expand their caliphate into America, given their innate limitations regarding the ability to adapt and maintain Western technology.

Of course, there are those out there who will say it's "racist" to do what it really takes to eliminate the Muslim problem, but that accusation should tell us something...those who fail to be adequately illiberal end up being the suckers that get beaten by those who refused to beat their swords into plowshares.

So does this line of argument erase or invalidate Pat's non-interventionist foreign policy stance? Nope. I see it as part of the solution. Americans need to stop pretending to be the British Empire and come home, and think about the issues I raise above. I feel that only such an "ingathering," in which Americans clean up their own country and live in a sense of solidarity exclusively among themselves, will the appreciation of the truths discussed above help--it will create a "critical mass" of the right kind of group egoism needed to counter that of the Muslims. And like I said, once we deport the ones on our soil, seal our borders, and deploy the proper intelligence networkm we won't be seeing Muslims this side of the ocean for a very long time, so we have the time to reconnect with our true identities. America needs to recenter herself, recharge her batteries, and remember just what it means to be an American versus a Muslim.

10 posted on 12/06/2001 9:24:11 PM PST by thuleanfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
BTTT
11 posted on 12/06/2001 9:32:34 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: StormEye
Im an Australian my lunch bar is run by a greek,my barman is czech,my dentist is chinese and my physician is finnish,multiculturalism can work,all of the afforementioned agree the middle east is full of nutters,most of humanity like white caucasians can also identify lunatics and in the last 230 years bar for 350,000 odd here were all immigrants,multiculturalism can work however Im glad we've started to be more discriminating 40 palestinian refugees just got returned to sender.If you can't leave it at home-go back there.
12 posted on 12/06/2001 9:33:18 PM PST by Governor StrangeReno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
The main problem with Islam is it's inability to adapt to the modern world. Christianity and Judaism have.

So the issue is not a simple us vs. them. Islam is up against a lot of perils that have nothing to do with us. Islamic states cannot govern themselves, cannot live amongst their own Islamic neighbors, and cannot in general get their cultural & economic act together. They are dangerous because of their reality negating ways and fanatism, but they are often impotent for similar reasons. I agree with Pat that we have to have the will to act - but once we do the advantage becomes ours overwhelmingly.

When has an Islamic nation had success in any war against a Western foe in the last 50 years or more? Arab countries especially have a humiliating track record in this regard.

As is often the case, Pat has some very interesting insights but I can't agree with his major point.

13 posted on 12/06/2001 9:59:40 PM PST by djr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
The main problem with Islam is it's inability to adapt to the modern world. Christianity and Judaism have.

So the issue is not a simple us vs. them. Islam is up against a lot of perils that have nothing to do with us. Islamic states cannot govern themselves, cannot live amongst their own Islamic neighbors, and cannot in general get their cultural & economic act together. They are dangerous because of their reality negating ways and fanatism, but they are often impotent for similar reasons. I agree with Pat that we have to have the will to act - but once we do the advantage becomes ours overwhelmingly.

When has an Islamic nation had success in any war against a Western foe in the last 50 years or more? Arab countries especially have a humiliating track record in this regard.

As is often the case, Pat has some very interesting insights but I can't agree with his major point about the underlying strength of Islam.

14 posted on 12/06/2001 10:00:22 PM PST by djr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thuleanfire
Although if we took the right measures, they would be unlikely to expand their caliphate into America, given their innate limitations regarding the ability to adapt and maintain Western technology.

Muslims will mainly be fighting among themselves, or surrendering; sadly a few will persist with terrorism. Those are characteristics of this diabolical grouping of human flesh. I therefore reckon civilized nations will battle with them, until the Muslims adopt secular, democratic governance.

They are like angry juvenile delinquents, incapable of grasping a mainly adult world. Even when educated in English language, engineering, they do not become civilized.

15 posted on 12/06/2001 10:03:45 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
Islam terrorists and the countries that harbor terrorists can easily be defeated. The Republican Guard, Taliban and Al-Queda have folded like a house of cards. Jihad Islam is out, more moderate Islam will be in.
16 posted on 12/06/2001 10:04:01 PM PST by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
Since Islam is an essentially militaristic ideology, the only way to counter it is by inflicting repeated, overwhelming military defeats. There will be much more killing before the clash of civilizations is over. Look for the Indian Wars, redux. There is no doubt who the ultimate victor will be.
17 posted on 12/06/2001 10:09:57 PM PST by Clinton's a rapist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
For no matter how many deaths or defeats we inflict, we cannot kill Islam as we did Nazism, fascism, Japanese militarism and Soviet Bolshevism.

Pat forgot to add protectionism to his list.

18 posted on 12/06/2001 10:14:50 PM PST by Holden Magroin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
Bump
19 posted on 12/06/2001 11:08:49 PM PST by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
For no matter how many deaths or defeats we inflict, we cannot kill Islam as we did Nazism, fascism, Japanese militarism and Soviet Bolshevism.

He must be on drugs, all of these ideologies are still festering. defeated but not out. Every now and then a nail sticks out and it is nailed down.

Yes it is a war of civilization and Islam flourishes because of ignorance and illiteracy, plus the fact that they live in controlled societies where the state controls the press and information.

Our mistake has been to back all the petty tyrants in the area to the point there is not one democracy in ANY Islamic country with the possible exception of Turkey (and they are not an exemplary model).

Islam like Communism can be defeated the same way we defeated communism, back the dissidents and let their societies reform from within. Embargoe their economies to force them to straighten out. Back the Islamic reformers. Islam has never had a reformation, it is unchanged since the time of Mohamed, no separation of church and state and no secularist philosophical movements. That needs to change.

As long as our only criteria for dealing with these countries is oil profits or acccess to minerals and we support backward 12th century regimes the problem will continue unabated.

20 posted on 12/06/2001 11:30:59 PM PST by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson