Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US drivers in SUV gas-guzzling buying
Reuters Environmental News Service ^ | 12/07/2001

Posted on 12/07/2001 9:42:21 AM PST by cogitator

US drivers in SUV gas-guzzling buying spree

NEW YORK - U.S. drivers are buying gasoline at a feverish clip despite the nation's recession, due largely to low pump prices and an autumn buying rush for gas-guzzling SUVs, analysts said this week.

"Americans are driving more in less-efficient vehicles," automobile expert Mike Lucky of John S. Herold Inc. said. "Sales of SUVs and pickup trucks have been amazingly strong considering the recession, and low pump prices are keeping people on the roads."

Gasoline consumption for November averaged about 8.6 million barrels per day, up nearly 3 percent from last year, according to the American Petroleum Institute (API), despite a recession.

The robust gasoline demand comes amid a steep drop in retail pump prices to two-year lows of $1.12 a gallon and amid a dramatic increase in sales of sport utility vehicles and pickup trucks - some of the least fuel-efficient automobiles on the market.

Bargain financing deals by big automakers have helped push sales of SUVs and light pickup trucks 13.7 percent higher than last year for the month of November, according to the U.S. Commerce Department. Meanwhile, half of the 20 best-selling automobiles so far this year have been trucks or SUVs, including the mammoth GMC Sierra and Dodge Ram pickup, according to data reported by automakers.

"The rate of purchase for new fuel inefficient vehicles is far outpacing the rate of retirement for older automobiles," said Lucky. According to the Federal Highway Administration, the number of vehicles on the road grew by 5.2 million between 1999 and 2000.

In October, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said that Americans' love affair with gas-guzzling SUVs reduced the average fuel mileage of all 2001 model year vehicles to 20.4 miles per gallon, the lowest in two decades.

The trend could become a curse to the the nation's energy infrastructure, which over the past two years struggled desperately to overcome regional fuel shortages due to refinery and pipeline outages.

"The lowest fuel economy since 1980 can be attributed to the increase in light trucks on America's roads," the EPA said in a statement. "Light trucks are less fuel efficient."

The current Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards, first adopted by Congress in 1975 after the Arab oil embargo, require passenger cars to average 27.5 miles per gallon and light trucks to average 20.7 mpg. At the time, light trucks were allowed to get lower mileage because they were used mostly by farmers and small businesses.

If auto manufacturers increased fuel economy by as little as three miles per gallon, consumers would save as much as $25 billion a year in fuel costs, the EPA said.

That modest increase in fuel efficiency, the agency said, would also reduce 140 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions per year and cut the United States' reliance on foreign oil by 1 million barrels of oil each day - a boon as heightened tensions in the Mideast raise fears of a disruption in crude supply.

Senate Democrats introduced a broad energy bill this week that seeks, in part, to boost vehicle fuel efficiency but said that any change could not take effect until the 2004 model year is introduced.

The legislation does not set specific fuel mileage requirements for vehicles. That language will be added to the bill after the Senate Commerce Committee approves a new standard, they said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last
Fight terrorism -- don't buy an SUV.

Is this any different than rubber rationing and victory gardens during WWII?

1 posted on 12/07/2001 9:42:21 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cogitator
How left wing of you.
2 posted on 12/07/2001 9:45:28 AM PST by JohnGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
This thread makes me want to go for a long ride in my Suburban.
3 posted on 12/07/2001 9:46:12 AM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
I think I'll take a nice long Sunday drive.
4 posted on 12/07/2001 9:47:13 AM PST by Hillary 666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
US drivers in SUV gas-guzzling buying

by: Reuters Environmental News Service

Doesn't Reuters have primarily a UK roots?

BTW, the fuel efficiency of these vehicles is the HIGHEST they have ever been owing to a wide range of technological advencements including PORT fuel injection, Electronic fuel and ignition control systems and MORE light-weight composites being used ...

5 posted on 12/07/2001 9:48:35 AM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary 666
I think I will take my '85 gas guzzling Dodge out for a long drive this weekend. Anybody who don't like it can kiss my Rebel flag on the back window. :)
6 posted on 12/07/2001 9:49:24 AM PST by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
I think people value comfort, safety, and power over economy. That's why we buy big trucks and SUV's. Try taking a long trip with the family in a subcompact.
7 posted on 12/07/2001 9:52:57 AM PST by 38special
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
I'm all for V-8s and tailfins for all real Americans!

-Dakota PU V-8!

8 posted on 12/07/2001 9:53:17 AM PST by gunnyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ohioman
When I floor my 4x4 you can see the gas gauge move. Maybe I'll tow the boat and burn some gas in the water this week end. I love cheap gas.
9 posted on 12/07/2001 9:53:37 AM PST by ar10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Fight terrorism -- don't buy an SUV.

How about YOU don't buy an SUV and keep your nose out of my business?

10 posted on 12/07/2001 9:53:51 AM PST by Doodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioman
My dad has an '82 Dodge. Maybe we'll use his vehicle.
11 posted on 12/07/2001 9:54:07 AM PST by Hillary 666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
If auto manufacturers increased fuel economy by as little as three miles per gallon, consumers would save as much as $25 billion a year in fuel costs, the EPA said.

No mention of the cost to those consumers to pay for the technology required to meet these unnecessary and arbitrary standards.

What these zany environmentalists don't seem to count on, is that by driving the cost of new cars through the roof, many of us will keep or buy older, emissions-exempt vehicles. Thus the end result of their policies is more pollution, and greater fuel usage.
12 posted on 12/07/2001 9:55:59 AM PST by babyface00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Gasoline consumption for November averaged about 8.6 million barrels per day, up nearly 3 percent from last year, according to the American Petroleum Institute (API), despite a recession.

Now this IS interesting. Gas prices are down 30 or so percent yet consumption is only up 3 percent! It almost seems like we are not getting sucked into comsuming more.

13 posted on 12/07/2001 9:57:20 AM PST by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
They conviently left out the reduction of jet fuel not being used by these people driving! Duh!
14 posted on 12/07/2001 9:57:22 AM PST by US_MilitaryRules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
If the envirowackos can put a sock in it, these things can be sold with economical diesels as in the rest of the world,thus pumping up fuel mileage. Soon they will be hybrid versions and all this will be moot. another strategy is to use the right tool for the right job. I have an old 3/4 ton for the heavy stuff, a mid 60's mid size wagon for weekends and car shows, and a 30mpg compact for grocery getting and my wife going to her job. This strategy has significantly cut our fuel consumption. Lastly, make sure tire pressure is on the high end of what's normal for a given application. mileage will go up significantly. In the U.S. real Americans drive what they want to1
15 posted on 12/07/2001 9:59:38 AM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules
Plus the faster we use up that arab oil, the faster they go back to humping camels and killing each other.
16 posted on 12/07/2001 9:59:44 AM PST by US_MilitaryRules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: babyface00
The auto safety experts believe that there would be an increase of 1,500 - 3,000 deaths due to the savings in fuel economy of 2-3 mpg. Which do you prefer, death or fuel economy?
17 posted on 12/07/2001 10:00:01 AM PST by ar10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Doodle
Fight terrorism! Run over Osama and his pals!
18 posted on 12/07/2001 10:00:31 AM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ar10
Since the environuts consider humans to be a blight on the surface of the Earth, what do you think their answer to your question would be?
19 posted on 12/07/2001 10:02:05 AM PST by Cyber Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Fight terrorism -- kill terrorists!

That is much more effective.
20 posted on 12/07/2001 10:02:12 AM PST by JacksonCalhoun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson