Posted on 12/11/2001 9:57:28 AM PST by mancini
Profits of Death (A Special FTW Series)
Part II -- Trading with the Enemy
by
Tom Flocco – Edited by Michael C. Ruppert
[© Copyright 2001. From The Wilderness Publications, www.copvcia.com. All Rights Reserved. May be recopied, distributed or posted on the worldwide web for non-profit purposes only as long as this Copyright statement appears intact.]
[Editor’s Notes – As disclosed in Part I and in previous stories by FTW, an abnormal amount of "put" options – bets that a stock price would suddenly fall – were placed on United Air Lines and American Airlines in the days before the attacks of September 11th. These were only two of the companies affected by the attacks which experienced highly suspicious trading in their shares.
In Part I we described how put options work. They are basically futures contracts that obligate the "put buyer" to purchase the shares at a price that might be well above the market price when the contract matures. Heavy purchases of put options before a dramatic drop in a particular share price are clear-cut indicators of criminal activity based upon insider trading. Last month we identified the purchasin end of the contract incorrectly as a "call." That person, unhappily obligated to pay too high a price for the shares, is better described as the "put buyer."
Investigative journalist Tom Flocco also revealed dramatic new links to the growing mountain of evidence that puts the Central Intelligence Agency at the heart of America’s and the world’s financial markets. In particular he showed that the firm which had handled many of the put option purchases on United Airlines -- Deutschebank-Alex Brown -- was once headed by the man who is now the Executive Director of the CIA, A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard.
I would like to thank and acknowledge British investigative journalist/writer David Guyatt for first bringing to my attention, Krongard’s past relations with Alex Brown.
Part II of this series is easily one of the most damning pieces of investigative journalism that I have ever seen or participated in. In it Tom Flocco will now reveal even darker direct connections between the worlds of high finance, terrorism, and intelligence. And he will reveal some names that will shock you. – Mike Ruppert]
Part II -- Trading with the Enemy
FTW, December 11, 2001 -- No member of Congress is publicly, as yet, questioning the hazy areas of "private client banking" -- repeatedly described by the U.S. Senate and Justice Department as being a vehicle for drug money laundering -- and apparent conflicts of interest linked to documented 9/11-related insider trading in United Air Lines stock. The trades were placed through one of the world’s three largest pools of investment capital, Deutschebank-Alex Brown.
This, in spite of the fact that there is mounting evidence of "real-time" monitoring of stock market trades by intelligence entities (See Part I at www.copvcia.com). The recent indictment of a former Deutschebank executive, Kevin Ingram -- who has since pled guilty to conspiracy to launder drug money and arrange the sale of U.S.-made arms to individuals in Pakistan and Afghanistan, where U.S. military personnel are currently at risk -- raises further alarm.
Although Ingram was not at Deutschebank when the insider trades were placed, his history (as well as a star-studded cast of international financiers connected to the CIA) reveals a frighteningly dark saga showing the degree to which dirty money influences "the Street" and the world’s financial markets. It also provides more evidence that the CIA knew of the September attacks in advance.
Ingram is also an acknowledged former protÈgÈ of former Goldman Sachs CEO and current New Jersey Senator, Jon Corzine who sits on the Senate Banking Committee. He has also worked closely with another former Goldman Sachs, CEO – Robert Rubin, who served as Secretary of the Treasury under President Bill Clinton.
Related to Deutschebank-Alex Brown’s role as the broker for the UAL and other suspicious trades, Ernst Welteke, President of the Bundesbank (Germany’s central bank), said recently that a Bundesbank study pointed strongly to "terrorism insider trading" in the days leading up to September’s carnage in the U.S., according to the London Observer on September 23, 2001.
But reporter John H. Berlin also made the ominous prediction that "their decision [to investigate] provided by far the most authoritative support for persistent rumors that the terrorists could have funded their next strike with huge [insider trading] profits from the [first] attacks." This seems an unlikely proposition since experts acknowledge that attacks of the magnitude of 9-11 take years to plan and perhaps millions of "up-front" dollars to finance.
Other motives, such as generating funds for covert operations by the CIA, have also not been ruled out. Nor has the possibility been excluded that Deutschebank, which handled key but unquestionably suspicious transactions, was generating money for itself by placing "put" options on United Airlines and then putting the profits back into its own tills -- perhaps to "prop up" poorly performing divisions at the global banking giant.
This last scenario is a possibility, given the fact that Deutschebank has been demonstrated in Part I of this series to have intelligence links that might have forewarned the bank of the attacks.
There is precedent for the "slush fund" theory, as Deutschebank’s U.S. affiliate, Bankers Trust (BT) pled guilty to it in March 1999. BT diverted $19.1 million from "unclaimed" funds to prop up profitability at other units, according to a May 30, 2001 New York Times report.
The revelations referred to the growing scope of BT’s misuse of unclaimed client funds, and on the laxity of state and federal bank regulation of BT by claiming "a closer look at the scheme reveals that it goes well beyond the transgressions the bank owned up to."
And as the investigation was heating up, a high-ranking BT executive with long-time intelligence ties had to be thinking that it was getting near time to get out of Dodge City.
Times reporter Tim O’Brien said that it was the auditors at the NY State Comptroller’s Office who uncovered BT’s diversion of funds after noticing that BT’s unclaimed account dropped from $10.2 million in 1993 to only $3.9 million in 1994; so they started requesting documents which the BT executives subsequently refused to provide.
According to analysis by lawyer Matthew Lee, executive director of Inner City Press, it was not the primary regulators of BT -- the Federal Reserve (Fed) and the NY State Banking Department (NYSBD) -- who discovered the fraud. And O’Brien and Lee question why the limited-budget NY Comptroller’s office detected the scam; and whether the Fed and NYSBD just swept their findings under the rug to keep them out of the public eye.
The revelations led O’Brien to conclude that when the Fed became aware of the scope of the Comptroller’s investigation and what was being turned up, it ordered BT to find a merger partner (maybe even suggesting Deutschebank) and then took the investigation out of the hands of the (uncontrollable) NY State Comptroller.
Buzzy the Banker Joins the CIA
According to a CIA press release, in February 1998, A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard, former CEO of Deutschebank-Alex Brown (the nation’s oldest investment banking firm) and Vice Chairman of the Board of Bankers Trust, left BT and the investment banking community to join the CIA full time.
As a matter of fact, the Washington Post reported that Krongard helped engineer the $2.5 billion BT merger with Deutschebank shortly before sliding over to the intelligence side of the stage.
Buzzy (as his friends call him) had served a long-term "moonlighting" stint as a "consultant" to a series of CIA Directors. He left his banking position to become counselor to CIA Director George Tenet just 11 months prior to the final $19.1 million guilty plea by BT, which was by then a subsidiary of Deutschebank.
Given Krongard’s lofty intelligence and investment banking positions, there are no reports available dealing with important questions concerning his knowledge about such relevant issues as the disposition of "unclaimed" funds, monitoring of global stock trades for national security purposes, and wealthy "private client" operations -- let alone whether the developing investigation into BT fraud had necessitated his, "leaving town just ahead of the sheriff," as it were.
Yet Krongard has since risen to new heights, having received a March 16, 2001 Bush Administration promotion President George W, Bush to Executive Director, the number three position at the intelligence agency.
Ingram’s Last Trade
On August 28, 2001, 14 days before the Trade Center attacks, former Deutschebank senior bond investment trader Kevin Ingram, pled guilty in a $2.2 million dollar money laundering conspiracy, resulting from a government sting operation investigating the illegal sale of night vision goggles, Beretta machine pistols, M-16 machine guns with silencers, rocket-propelled grenade launchers, mortars, surface-to-air missiles (SAMs), TOW anti-tank missiles, and Stinger missiles, according to court papers examined by the New York Post.
The next day, Alert Global Media, Inc., publishers of Money Laundering Alert, reported that Ingram "pled guilty on August 28 to money laundering conspiracy as part of an agreement [plea bargain] with the U.S. government, which will drop other charges and receive Ingram’s testimony against two co-defendants from Egypt and Pakistan." Some published reports say that both of the other defendants were from (current U.S. ally) Pakistan.
"Bin Laden has long-standing contacts with senior officials [of Pakistan]...," said Andrew Pearce of the Rand Institute in Washington. The Times of India also reported on June 17, 2001 that one of three Pakistani middlemen working illegally with Ingram asked undercover agents about the chances of obtaining components for nuclear weapons.
Earlier (July 7) Associated Press reported that "Kevin Ingram, 42, an investment counselor at the World Trade Center, was indicted June 28 on three counts of trying to conceal at least $350,000 and one count of violating the Arms Export Act."
"Ingram allegedly laundered $100,000 and $250,000 for federal agents, both times taking a 9 percent cut before being asked to launder the $2.2 million," according to court papers examined by the New York Post in a June 15, 2001 report.
AP added that "Ingram is also named in two other counts...for trying to launder $2.2 million in illegal arms sales. Ingram, out on $250,000 bond, faces a maximum of 100 years in prison if convicted of all charges."
Arrested with Ingram were two New Jersey-based Pakistanis who had offered to make a partial payment for the arms "in the form of heroin," also according to both AP and the New York Post.
A September 29, 2001 Bloomberg News/St. Louis Post Dispatch report revealed that Ingram had angered his judge in July by failing to disclose his Swiss bank account. Bloomberg reported that the Swiss account contained $1,086,000 in cash and 75,800 shares of Carver Bancorp, Inc. worth $650,000.
"He was afraid of the implications, and he just panicked," attorney Richard Lubin told U.S. Magistrate Judge Ann E. Vitunac at a bail hearing on July 10. Vitunac raised Ingrams’s bond to $1.25 million and ordered him jailed two days later.
Curiously, however, given the terrorism that has transpired, federal agents refused to divulge the name of the country that would have received the arms according to court papers examined by the New York Post and others. However, the documents confirmed that the defendants "referred to their foreign arms buyer...as a well-known, former military official who wanted to partially pay for the weapons with heroin."
On June 15, 2001, the New York Post, reported that experts said the most likely buyers connected to the former Deutschebank securities trader and the two Pakistanis were current U.S. ally Pakistan or Osama bin Laden.
The Associated Press reported on 12/1/01 that Ingram had been sentenced to 18 months plus two years probation and a $20,000 fine on the money laundering charges in this case. All other charges were dropped in the plea bargain.
AP quoted Ingram as saying at his sentencing hearing, "I made a horrible mistake and I did something wrong. I’m very sorry about it, sorry for my family." Ingram’s sentence will likely be served at a minimum security facility in Fairton, New Jersey.
Interesting confirmation of the U.S. government’s familiarity with banking operations connected to terrorist activities was revealed in an 11/16/01 AP story by Catherine Wilson.
In describing events in a Florida prosecution of Egyptians connected to Ingram’s case she wrote, "Numerous promised wire transfers never arrived, but there were discussions of foreign bankers taking payoffs to move the money to purchase weapons into the United States, said [federal] prosecutor Rolando Garcia."
This is yet another clear indication that intelligence agencies routinely monitor banking transactions in terrorist-related cases. It has not been disclosed whether Ingram’s plea bargain produced testimony in this case.
In spite of these revelations, no reporter or government official has asked or disclosed how many times Ingram had laundered money or completed arms shipments before he was finally nabbed. The extensive array of military hardware in the possession of the Taliban and al Q’aeda beg this question.
A "Trader’s" Powerful Friends
Deutschebank-Alex Brown’s role in brokering the insider trades that scream foreknowledge of the attacks further provides a common denominator -- given the activities and histories of key executives at the highest levels of the world’s financial markets. Ingram’s history speaks of access to power and financial policy making at the highest levels.
Not only was he an associate of Robert Rubin before Rubin left Goldman Sachs to become Clinton’s Treasury Secretary, he has had ongoing relationships with Corzine, who also sits on the Senate’s Subcommittee on Securities and Investment -- a subcommittee which should be investigating the insider trading.
Prior to working for Deutschebank, Ingram was a highly placed executive with the investment bank Goldman Sachs. Both Rubin and Corzine have served as CEOs at Goldman. Rubin currently sits on the board of Citigroup -- a bank which has been cited for drug money laundering by the U.S. government and which (May 2001) purchased a Mexican bank (Banamex) which has now lost two suits and one appeal over press reports that its former owner, Roberto Hernandez, was a world-class drug money launderer.
Hernandez currently sits on the board at Citigroup as a result of the buyout. So too does former CIA Director John Deutch. (See FTW: Vol. IV, No. 3 – May 31, 2001 or visit www.copvcia.com.)
Kevin Ingram joined Goldman Sachs in 1988 after a brief stint at Lehman Brothers, and by 1992 was promoted to run Goldman’s Collateralized Mortgage Obligations desk, overseeing all trading of mortgage and asset-backed securities, according to the New York Observer. Mortgage trading has long been suspected of being a vehicle for the laundering of "hot" money.
In Black Enterprise (BE) magazine’s 1992 "Top 25 Blacks On Wall Street," Ingram was said to have left his (nine-year) high profile Goldman Sachs treasury securities and options desk position in 1996 to head Deutschebank’s U.S. mortgage-backed securities department -- and ultimately their global securities operations in 1998.
BE added that "at Deutschebank, Ingram and his team of 25 professionals structure and issue securities for an international clientele, including...high net-worth individuals. These deals can range from $1 million to several billion dollars."
No member of the House or Senate has even broached the subject of hearings to question either Ingram or recent Deutschebank-Alex Brown Vice Chairman and current CIA Executive Director A.B. Krongard as to whether they dealt with any wealthy Middle Easterners or Saudis in particular. Almost all of the September 11 hijackers were of Saudi nationality.
Since both men had high supervisory positions connected to the secretive "private client" operations of Deutschebank, and Deutschebank handled the insider trades, this is an obvious course of inquiry. Ingram’s position at Deutschebank became tenuous when the bond market crashed in 1998 and the protÈgÈ of Corzine and Rubin likely felt insecure.
The tumbling bond market combined with periodic absences where "he would sometimes go incommunicado for days -- unusual for someone who ran a trading desk and was responsible for open positions of $7 billion and more." Deutschebank asked for his resignation in September 1999, according to the New York Observer.
The Reverend Jackson to the Rescue
From Fox-TV News’ Bill O’Reilly to well-experienced citizen researchers with monikers like "Uncle Bill, Alamo Girl, and John Huang2" (who post startling, yet often under-publicized findings on grass-roots websites like Jim Robinson’s "Free Republic"), evidence of "shakedowns" related to the race-card continue to surface -- even when connected to terrorism.
Ingram turned to "Rev. Jesse Jackson’s Wall Street Project [for help with the financial settlement of his resignation process]. The Wall Street Project is a Rainbow Coalition-sponsored organization that pushes for increased minority hiring on the Street," according to the New York Observer.
And with the specter of a racially-charged lawsuit looming, Deutschebank ultimately settled with Jackson and Ingram for an undisclosed multi-million dollar figure in February 2000.
According to Observer sources, Ingram then made a contribution to Rainbow Push of "around" $100,000 -- as a fiscal tribute to his benefactor.
The "Blind Trust" of a Senatorial Patron?
After the February 2000 Deutschebank settlement, Ingram moved on, raising funds for a soon to-go-bankrupt dot-com company called TruMarkets. Astonishingly, some of TruMarkets $30 million seed money came from the blind trust of Ingram’s former Goldman Sachs patron, U.S. Senator Jon Corzine, according to the New York Observer of 11/29/01.
But federal prosecutors and fellow Senators have never questioned whether Corzine was aware that investigators had been targeting the former Deutschebank executive at the same time regarding money laundering of illegal narcotics proceeds (both drugs and cash) to support the unlawful purchase of U.S. arms to sell to Muslim terrorists in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
It is also a reach to wonder why Corzine -- who took office in January 2001 -- would not have been aware of a Federal banking investigation into dealings with terrorists that had been engineered by a former associate to whom he had been a mentor. It was during this period of time that an undercover agent began holding a series of meetings with Ingram in which Ingram let it be known that "funds coming in from arms sales needed to be laundered," again according to the New York Observer.
Larger questions remain as to whether strings were pulled for Ingram by influential individuals at a time when the prison population has exploded into a cottage industry full of poor and middle class Americans convicted for possession or use of small amounts of drugs. Most of these people -- like Ingram -- are minorities.
Neither Ingram nor his lawyer would comment or return calls. And no one has successfully interviewed the prosecutors regarding decisions which influenced what most would consider to be incredibly soft treatment, given the nature of the charges and what happened on September 11.
That there is serious interest or enough courage to seek answers about prior knowledge of the attacks from Deutschebank-linked key players and associates under their supervision by America’s elected legislators is not even remotely assured at present.
Tom Flocco is a freelance writer and researcher. (email: TomFlocco@cs.com)
Previous stories in this series:
- Part I of this series is located at: http://www.copvcia.com/stories/dec_2001/death_profits_pt1.html
- FTW’s original groundbreaking story on insider trading and September 11th is located at: http://www.copvcia.com/stories/oct_2001/krongard.html.
(I know I've missed some folks!)
"Investigative journalist Tom Flocco also revealed dramatic new links to the growing mountain of evidence that puts the Central Intelligence Agency at the heart of America’s and the world’s financial markets.
There was this guy used to post on here went by the moniker Ndcorp ndcorupt, something like that, that started calling the CIA "Maggots" about 4-5 years ago. Well, he got banned over Mena, THe CIA has their own Hero Show, They've got a Dead Hero (not a sandwich) and folks still don't believe they're maggots.
What's a guy to do?
They're Maggots.
Let's see now, haven't things like this happened before? Probably only with Democrats though. They're responsible for 'bout everything "Bad" going on, aren't they?
Must be that guy Rubin's Fault, or maybe it's Greenspan's fault, or............
The highest placed maggots are Senile and trying to relive their Glory Days. The spawn that they produced came up short in many areas, but they put them in key positions anyway, after a good "Blueblood" education and membership in all the right "clubs".
But they're retarded anyway.
Is paisano Flocco good, or what?
It's very well done.
Say there...perhaps cousin Flocco has some insight as to why the FTC permits these kind of xactions in light of the above statement?
"According to a CIA press release, in February 1998, A.B. 'Buzzy' Krongard, former CEO of Deutschebank-Alex Brown (the nation’s oldest investment banking firm) and Vice Chairman of the Board of Bankers Trust, left BT and the investment banking community to join the CIA full time."
Now does this make any sense to anyone?
For Christ's sake; just what in the hell's wrong with that picture? Geehezzzz.
Is this nation & her intelliegence community that corrupt & that sick??
Because if we are; it can't be fixed. It's simply broke beyond repair.
But then there's this...
"Yet Krongard has since risen to new heights, having received a March 16, 2001 Bush Administration promotion President George W, Bush to Executive Director, the number three position at the intelligence agency."
It's really hard being a "good" American; I'm not sure what that even means.
Seems good has become synonomous with stupid & bad with successful?
Stoopid question, but...are/can any of these people be linked to the Chicom shenanigan(s) & BSchwartz of Loral?
The smell's getting mighty familiar since there ain't too much that can stink that bad.
What's almost worst of all?
Many of the facts, figures & sources are via, "The Associated Press," & folks?
That fact alone has me suspicious beyond belief.
Most intune people know damned well just *what* the AP is & represents.
...shazam; no way was Clinton going to be going anywhere, impeached or not. >doink<
sounds like the old tried and true: "REASONS OF NATIONAL SECURITY" defense.
You've got to have an open mind to see it, and most folks are afraid to answer that.
It CAN'T be fixed for the simple reason that was given to me, very proudly, "We ARE the Government!"
NBC NEWS AND WIRE REPORTS
Sept. 17 — Responding to news reports, a spokesman for the German stock exchange Sunday said an investigation had found no evidence that Osama bin Laden or others profited from advance knowledge about Tuesday's terror attacks through stock trades.
THE COMMENTS BY the spokesman for the Deutsche Bourse, the Frankfurt stock market, came after NBC News and newspapers in the United States and Europe reported that investigators were checking stock movements of three big European reinsurance companies to see if there were evidence that bin Laden reaped a financial windfall.
"The market supervision of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange has looked into the trading data of some stocks but didn't find any irregularities on the basis of this data," said the spokesman, who spoke with Reuters on condition of anonymity.
He said the investigators looked at share trading on Sept. 11, the day of the attack — which occurred at about 3 p.m. Frankfurt time. He declined to say which stocks were checked or whether other days were investigated.
NBC News reported Saturday that German officials had asked the FBI and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to look into whether bin Laden's associates may have "sold short" stock in a Munich company that holds secondary insurance on the World Trade Center.
A report in the New York Times indicated that investigators were also checking whether airline stocks may have been sold short.
Short selling can produce huge profits when a stock plummets because of unanticipated bad news — unanticipated, that is, by all except those involved in a conspiracy to cause that bad news.
In a short sale, an investor would borrow a certain number of shares from a broker, immediately sell them, and then once the stock price had fallen, buy shares to return to the broker.
Those who reaped profits from the European short sales may have deposited their profits in American banks, giving U.S. law enforcement agencies jurisdiction.
The Italian newspaper Corriere della Serra reported Saturday that the FBI is looking into possible short selling of the stocks of reinsurance companies in the four trading days before the terrorist attacks on the United States on Tuesday. Reinsurance firms assume risk by providing backup insurance for insurance companies.
The stocks of the three reinsurance companies — AXA in France, Munich Re in Germany and Swiss Re in Switzerland — dropped 13 percent to 15 percent in the week before the attack.
Analysts suggested at the time that the drops were anomalous — unexplained — since the reinsurance business was healthy and premium payments were on the way up.
In fact, before the terrorist attacks, the Financial Times on Tuesday published a positive report on the industry.
Munich Re spokesman Rainer Kueppers said Sunday the legal department of his company knew nothing about an investigation by German authorities into suspicious trades in its shares.
At Swiss Re, spokesman Johann Thinnhof declined to comment.
In France, AXA officials couldn't immediately be reached for comment.
NBC's Robert Windrem and Andrea Mitchell and Reuters contributed to this story.
next stop? DCIA. (until this nasty little put option complication came up)
Krongard becomes the perfect man to replace George Tenet, one of a long list of "holdovers from the 2nd Xlinton dynasty".
Buzzy was groomed with that perfect blend of outside the beltway private "enterprise", a long term "friendly" relationship with the mob er...company er...whatever. plus he's had a little OJT wit the agency under his belt now.
Now does this make any sense to anyone?
sure. the guy obviously needed the cut in pay.
You would think that for as many times as that has been used, we would be the most secure nation on earth. So how come 9/11? DUH!
Other motives, such as generating funds for covert operations by the CIA, have also not been ruled out. Nor has the possibility been excluded that Deutschebank, which handled key but unquestionably suspicious transactions, was generating money for itself by placing "put" options on United Airlines and then putting the profits back into its own tills -- perhaps to "prop up" poorly performing divisions at the global banking giant.
This last scenario is a possibility, given the fact that Deutschebank has been demonstrated in Part I of this series to have intelligence links that might have forewarned the bank of the attacks.
There is precedent for the "slush fund" theory, as Deutschebank’s U.S. affiliate, Bankers Trust (BT) pled guilty to it in March 1999. BT diverted $19.1 million from "unclaimed" funds to prop up profitability at other units, according to a May 30, 2001 New York Times report.
Even though there is absolutely no doubt that the name of the entity that placed the “unclaimed put option” trades exist in hard copy and electronic records, let’s take a minute to play the game by looking at the alternatives posted above:
1. terrorists could have funded their next strike with huge [insider trading] profits from the [first] attacks."
for a “high income private client” with insider knowledge of the 9/11 attack to buy put options would be like signing their own death warrant because they left a paper trail.
2. generating funds for covert operations by the CIA
Attempting to hide the proceeds of their winning put options in one of their “incubator” front companies may be possible, but picking up a few million bucks from insider trading on the 9/11 attack would be no more than chump change to an enterprise of this stature.
3. Deutschebank, was generating money for itself by placing "put" options on United Airlines and then putting the profits back into its own tills.
may be the most likely of the three stated scenarios. Accepting this premise would make Deutschebank guilty of criminal conspiracy to commit murder. Hardly worth it to the good international citizen.
Could Buzz or Ingram have given a heads up to an old banking buddy, intentionally or otherwise? Maybe getting warmer, here. especailly for Ingram who may become the designated patsy in this one.
Regardless, Deutschebank KNOWS WHO PLACED THE TRADES. somebody just needs to ask them.
A good book to help one understand how this came to be is "Double Cross", by the brother and nephew of mobster Sam Giancana.
But I'm glad we gottem right now!
Kinda like havin' AIDS to keep from gettin' Raped?
But then, I have a Very Intense Dislike for the CIA. ;-)
And what type of person(s), entity or other type investor would be inclined to walk away from it?
It would be a bit absurd to speculate that any of the highjackers would be either smart enough or in a position to claim the profit. And any innocent party would just say "Hey, I hit the Trifecta";-) and cash in.
Maybe somebody can 'splain how this could happen.
I ended up finding a pretty interesting conspiracy article that I posted here.
"It is not all that uncommon in the investment banking business for a client to walk away from a trade.
Failing to settle a securities transaction on settlement day is known as "D.K." within the industry. The term is a contraction of "Don't Know."
The typical "D.K." occurs when a speculator or trade enters into a transaction for himself or for a client and refuses to settle the trade as agreed.
A "D.K.d" trade is typically associated with a losing trade.
In other words someone is trying to ride the bull market to new highs, and the market corrects itself downward. The long position the trader has placed has loses on settlement day, and they attempt to walk away from it.
Conversely, a trader that is short a position in a bear market (who anticipates the market going down and settling the trade by buying the security at a lower price than they sold it.) would lose money if the market rallied up in prices.
In both of these cases an unscrupulous trader may "D.K." the trade because it has losses in the trade that they either don't want to take, are unable to take, or unaware of the fact that a trade has been made in their name.
Never until the 9/11 put options, have I heard of anyone "D.K.ing" a trade that had millions of dollars of profits in it.
"D.K.ing" this trade is obviously a violation of security laws, but to walk away and leave millions on the table is because the person who made the trade know it is criminal blood money."
"...a spokesman for the German stock exchange Sunday said an investigation had found no evidence that Osama bin Laden or others profited from advance knowledge about Tuesday's terror attacks through stock trades."
All it says is that anyone who profited through stock trades (buying a put or selling a call is not a "stock trade") could not be shown to have had advance knowledge.
We also have to remember that "no evidence" has been morphed into "no conclusive proof" by attorneys and politicians, and the sheeple who let them get away with such phrases.
I've been told by a ranking member in the House and a friend was told by a U.S. Senator "If it's about the CIA, I don't want to hear it."
Does it matter? Seems to me that it might, but I'm not sure how.
... and if this post posts, he's not really banned.
"Between 6 and 7 September, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 "put" option contracts in UAL versus 396 call options – where a speculator bets on a price rising. Holders of the put options would have netted a profit of $5m (£3.3m) once the carrier's share price dived after 11 September. On 10 September, more trading in Chicago saw the purchase of 4,516 put options in American Airlines, the other airline involved in the hijackings. This compares with a mere 748 call options in American purchased that day. Investigators cannot help but notice that no other airlines saw such trading in their put options.
It was not just airlines that were targeted by remarkably canny investors. One of the biggest occupants of the World Trade Centre was Morgan Stanley, the investment bank. In the first week of September, an average of 27 put option contracts was bought each day in its shares. The total for the three days before the attacks was 2,157. Merrill Lynch, anotherWTC tenant, saw 12,215 put options bought in the four days before the attacks, when the previous days had seen averages of 252 contracts a day.
Attribution ---- UK Independent
... and if this post posts, he's not really banned."
I know somebody who talks to himself... him fairly often. Probably his only friend, I'll e-mail him.
I'd like to see an amendment to the Constitution voted on that made Lawyers and Politicians have to use Sign Language Only. No writing, no talking, nothing but signing.
Maybe then we could get this Country Operating Constitutionally again.
hey now!
I used to like him before he started posting that ignorant Mena crap. He actually thinks Beelzebubba knew about the drugs that went through the B bush there.
Sheeeesh.
...yea.
I almost feel as if I've been hypnotised into buying that line, myself.
Until one reads this kind of thing.
...then it's as-if someone snapped their fingers.
Yeah, that's where he lost me too. Always tryin' to make it look like the CIA was involved in it, and then Vince F. and Bubba, finally in desperation tryin' to drag the Bush Family into it. Yellin' about Money Laundries, Drug Movement, ha, he even got into a shootin' incident just to get attention. Man, Good Ridance!
BTW, I don't know what Thinden's bit is with the guy. Don't suppose it's .........................nawww, nevermind.
Tell his only friend to tell ND we miss him, the ol' coot.
Young Coot! At least in his Mind.
"Some of this action involving Ingram is taking place in that same corridor in southeast Florida that stretches in a sraight line on I-95 from Vero Beach, FL. to Miami in which certain of the 9/11 terrorist were using this area as a training and staging area for their attacks."
Any Detective *or* Investigator worth his/her salt would tell you straight-away the instances of *coincidence* happening during an investigation are so rare as to be insignigicant.
When one does pop-up?
The *coincidence* is often actually regarded as an indicator they're getting pretty close, to something.
...& this coincinence is no different for me.
"He was afraid of the implications, and he just panicked," attorney Richard Lubin told U.S. Magistrate Judge Ann E. Vitunac at a bail hearing on July 10.
Apparently this was taking place in the West Palm Beach,FL. federal court.
I'm familiar with two of the federal prosecutors in the West Palm Beach, U.S. Attorneys office and also the FBI field office in West Palm Beach, FL.
Is that right, Don?
I'd bet you are, at that.
...lemme *guess*; they'll have to bury these people using a cork screw, eh?
After 3.5 months, State Farm stopped paying presidential attorney fees to defend a sexual harrassment case that had been ongoing for over 3 years--another Larry Klayman legal victory.
I am bipartisan against political corruption. You can read my past work via the archives of the following:
copvcia.com--Deutschebank, criminal insider trading, CIA ties to "pre-attack" stock monitoring.
worldnetdaily.com--corruption of George W. Bush
newsmax.com--China, Clinton campaign finance, "normal" trade relations, Congressman Curt Weldon's China campaign finance conflicts via national defense.
judicialwatch.org--corruption of Senator Arlen Specter, corruption and insurance fraud of William J. Clinton via State Farm case.
While I am one-half Italian descent, I prefer to be called an "American."
Tom Flocco
Alex Brown defrauds federal government
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 14:48:54 EDT Alex. Brown pays $15 million to settle yield-burning case Largest amount paid by an investment bank so far
Nov. 17, 1999 -- Investment bank BT Alex. Brown Inc. has agreed to pay more than $15 million to settle charges that it had defrauded the federal government in the municipal bond market through a practice known as "yield burning."
It is the largest amount paid by an investment bank so far to settle allegations that it had engaged in yield burning by overcharging municipalities for U.S. Treasury securities.
"Alex. Brown and other investment banks took advantage of their positions as trusted financial advisors and deal managers to enrich themselves at taxpayers’ expense," said Erika A. Kelton, an attorney with Phillips & Cohen LLP, a Washington, D.C., firm which represents the whistleblower who initiated the case. "The Treasury lost hundreds of millions of dollars because of yield-burning schemes."
Todays settlement covers transactions from 1990 through 1995 where Alex. Brown & Sons Inc. the predecessor to BT Alex. Brown ” had been a financial advisor or financial manager to municipalities, counties and agencies in:
Pennsylvania
Maryland (Montgomery County, Prince Georges County, Calvert County, Frederick County, St. Marys County, Charles County, Carroll County, Cecil County, Ocean City, city of Cumberland, Maryland Transportation Authority and the Maryland Health and Higher Education Facilities Authority);
North Carolina (cities of Charlotte, Asheville, Goldsboro and Fayetteville and Mecklenberg County);
Louisiana (city of New Orleans);
Virginia (city of Leesburg and Virginia College Building Authority); and Washington, D.C. metro area (Washington Suburban Sanitary District)
The Justice Department, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Internal Revenue Service agreed to a global settlement of potential False Claims Act, security law and IRS liabilities against BT Alex. Brown, which has been acquired by Deutsche Bank.
The government investigated the practices of Alex. Brown and other investment banks in the municipal bond market as a result of a "qui tam" (whistleblower) lawsuit filed by Michael Lissack, a former managing director of Smith Barney.
Out of the total settlement, BT Alex. Brown is paying $15.17 million to settle charges made by Lissack.
"Municipal bond sales are arcane and complex transactions," said attorney John R. Phillips of Phillips & Cohen. "Without the help of an insider, the government may never have become aware that Wall Street was defrauding the Treasury of hundred of millions of dollars."
Two other investment banks previously settled qui tam cases brought by Lissack. Alex. Browns settlement brings the total to about $39 million that banks have paid so far as a result of Lissacks decision to blow the whistle on Wall Street using the False Claims Act.
Lazard Freres & Co. agreed to pay the federal government a total of $11 million last April to settle federal yield-burning charges. In November 1998
Lazard agreed to pay the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority $9 million to settle charges brought under the California False Claims Act that the investment bank fraudulently overpriced securities by $3 million on a single municipal refinancing transaction. (Phillips & Cohen also served as counsel to the LAMTA in the case.)
A separate qui tam case brought by Lissack resulted in Meridian Securities (now CoreStates Financial Corp.) paying the Justice Department $3.8 million in April 1998 to settle yield-burning charges.
Yield burning occurs when banks improperly inflate the price of securities above their fair market value. The excessive mark-ups lower or "burn" the securities yield.
In the case of municipal debt refinancings known as "advance refundings," underwriters pocketed profits that should have gone to the federal government.
Phillips & Cohens empirical study of pricing practices in the municipal bond market found that when banks sold securities competitively, they charged average mark-ups of just 25 cents per $1,000 bond. But when they sold clients the same securities on a sole-source basis, the banks added about a $5 mark-up per bond. The profits made on non-competitive sales were on average 20 times higher than those made on competitive deals.
Lissacks false claims lawsuit against Alex. Brown was filed in 1995 in the southern district of New York (Manhattan). It was brought under the False Claims Act, which permits individuals with knowledge of fraud against the government to file suit on its behalf.
For more information about this case, see the following news stories:
"BT Alex. Brown agrees to pay $15.3 million in bond case," David Barboza, The New York Times, 11/18/99.
"U.S. near sweeping pact on yield burning, Charles Gasparino and John Connor, The Wall Street Journal, 11/18/99.
"Alex. Brown overcharge case settled," Bill Atkinson, Baltimore Sun, 11/18/99.
"Broker to pay for Pa. markups," Tom Cahill, The Philadelphia Inquirer, 11/18/99.
"SEC fines, censures lawyer, two investment firms for gouging state," Ken Zapinski and Frank Reeves, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 11/18/99.
About the firm | The False Claims Act | Whistleblower's reward | Have a case?
Whistleblowers' stories | Resources | What's new © 2000 Phillips & Cohen. All rights reserved Credits
Looks like this means that all possible future charges for any previous acts by the firm, currently known or unknown, are wiped off the slate. Is that the way you read it? If I'm right, this could have been a way of hiding something much worse, either to protect principals of AB, BT, or to protect Deutschbank from contingent liabilities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.