Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Book says China involved in 9-11 attacks -- Beijing used bin Laden to assault U.S., claims author
WorldNetDaily ^ | 12/15/01 | Gordon Thomas

Posted on 12/14/2001 10:34:47 PM PST by spycatcher

Last spring, President George W. Bush faced his first major foreign-policy challenge when an American EP-3E surveillance plane was hit by a Chinese fighter and forced to land on Hainan Island. Tensions flared even further as China detained the 24 American crewmen for 10 days, the standoff eventually resolving after both plane and crew were finally released. Still, U.S.-Sino relations remained ominously chilly throughout the year, until they were overshadowed by the events of Sept. 11.

Post 9-11, the Bush administration's focus has, of course, been riveted on the terror war, and China has gone off the main radar. But despite Beijing's public support for the coalition's war on terror, regular rumblings of Chinese complicity with the terrorists have surfaced. Among them was a WND report of some Chinese fighters assisting the Taliban.

Now, author Gordon Thomas has written a book claiming that Beijing had an actual role in the Sept. 11 attack on America. In "Seeds of Fire," Thomas purports to show how Beijing is positioning itself to become America's "new major enemy."

An investigative journalist from Ireland and author of 38 books, Thomas points out that on Sept. 11, a transport plane from Beijing landed in Kabul. A Chinese delegation had gone to Afghanistan to sign a deal with the Taliban – reportedly brokered by Osama bin Laden – to provide the Afghans with missile-tracking technology, state-of-the-art communications and air-defense systems. In return, says Thomas, the Taliban would order Muslim separatists in northwest China to stop their activities.

In a Sept. 13 report, the Washington Post confirmed that Beijing had just signed a deal with the Taliban to provide Afghanistan "with much needed infrastructure and economic development assistance."

Due to the fall of the Taliban at the hands of opposition forces and the United States, however, "the goods were never delivered," Thomas told WorldNetDaily.

The delegation, says Thomas, included senior officers of the People's Liberation Army and the Bureau of State Security, as well as managers from two of China's leading defense contractors.

In his book, Thomas contends that hours after the plane landed in Kabul, CIA Director George Tenet received a coded "red alert" message from Israeli Mossad agents that presented a "worst case scenario" – that China would use a surrogate, bin Laden, to attack the United States.

Thomas also claims that the head of Pakistan's intelligence service was in Washington to meet with Tenet on Sept. 11, and that he briefed Tenet that day on the links between bin Laden and China.

The intelligence agent "told [Tenet] that China had made a decisive decision," wrote Thomas. "It was prepared to infuriate America and its allies in supporting bin Laden and the Taliban because Afghanistan fitted into China's own long-term strategic plans."

Saying that bin Laden has traveled to China numerous times to meet with officials there, Thomas contends that "almost certainly he talked to them about obtaining" material to build weapons of mass destruction.

China's President Jiang Zemin, adds Thomas, waited three days to contact Bush about the Sept. 11 attack and told the U.S. president that, vis-à-vis the war on terrorism, China would find itself in a "difficult situation, given our well-known position of opposing any interference in the internal affairs of any country."

Washington sources say that Bush "gritted his teeth and said he would push on without China," Thomas wrote.

The author also cites what he calls the "happy parties in the streets of Beijing" following the 9-11 attacks. "They're selling videos there with commentary saying, 'America had it coming,'" said Thomas. "Their message is: 'America can be defeated.'"

On another note, Thomas believes President Bush's decision to pull out of the ABM treaty will cause Russia and China to strengthen their ties – to the detriment of the United States. "It's in China's interest to see the U.S. destablilized," he added.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-311 next last
To: spycatcher
"You may be right about not using a W88 since we would know who did it."

How would we know it was a specific make/model bomb that exploded? I doubt there'd be a "W88 Copy" label thrown clear and found in the rubble. As to identifying the radiation fingerprint, if anything that would point the finger at China, presuming we know the particulars about their particular flavor of plutonium. They stole the design for the weapon, but they didn't steal fissionable material from us.

21 posted on 12/15/2001 12:06:01 AM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tom Jefferson
Doing battle with China will be a little more difficult than we have encountered against the great Taliban armed forces.

How can you say that...besides, we have been making most everyone else do the fighting in Afghanistan haven't we? Mostly we've been pushing buttons and dropping bombs. The majority of the real fighting has been done by Northern Alliance boys who want their country back. Of course we;ll screw them over once it's all over and tell them they're not ruling their own country unless we get some say-so.

But we'll fare well in China. Maybe we can conscript Indian's. Pakistan won't like it too much, but we don't really care what other countries think. We're America and if you don't like it we'll send a daisy cutter to your town too.

22 posted on 12/15/2001 12:08:47 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
No way. We're too weak right to challenge them as you imply. We need time to build up forces and training from the Clinton "dark years."

Don't underestimate though the immense amount of knowledge we gain from "practice wars" beating up on the little guys. Nobody talks about this much but it's a huge tactical advantage when moving on to bigger fish. Iraq will be the next step up to show how we're back in (pre-season) game shape. Wiping out North Korea will be the first real war against terrorism. And it will go much easier in 2005 than it would have just 5 years ago.

23 posted on 12/15/2001 12:10:44 AM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
I can hardly wait. It will look so cool on T.V.
24 posted on 12/15/2001 12:12:38 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mrobison
I would not be surprised if Russia initiates a first strike against China before China becomes strong enough to knock over Russia. If that happens, I think they may spin it as a "tragic accident", maybe an accidental launch precipitated by bad data indicating a Chinese attack, or something along those lines. Then, the two countries (US & Russia) would "help rebuild" China, in other words, occupy it to make sure it stayed "peaceful", and then rebuild it as a Western type nation. Sort of a replay of what the US did in Japan after WWII ended.

As to the ABM/SDI debacle, I see it as grandstanding for home consumption (in Russia), to shut up the remaining commies. I will be shocked if the SDI system isn't a joint US-Russia enterprise, with both countries covered by the same umbrella.

25 posted on 12/15/2001 12:13:11 AM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
I am trying to see through your sarcasm. What is your point here.
26 posted on 12/15/2001 12:17:17 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
How would we know it was a specific make/model bomb that exploded? I doubt there'd be a "W88 Copy" label thrown clear and found in the rubble.

We would know from the massive yield that a W88 produces (500kt) compared to a backpack nuke (under 1 kt) or a Pakistani nuke (40 kt)

27 posted on 12/15/2001 12:17:36 AM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
We're bullies.
28 posted on 12/15/2001 12:18:54 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
BTTT
29 posted on 12/15/2001 12:21:57 AM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
You mean *high-tech* bullies right Senator Biden? Tell us how sorry you feel for the poor terrorists.
30 posted on 12/15/2001 12:24:42 AM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
good one! who can doubt the chicoms are bin laden's biggest fans?
31 posted on 12/15/2001 12:25:41 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
I see. I don't buy that premise, but I do agree that we have sometimes acted that way. (i:e cruise missles at camels) I think our actions to date are totally justified. There are some who worry about mission creep. There is yet no evidence of that. If we were to attack Iraq tommorro I might agree with you but so far it's all been bluster.
32 posted on 12/15/2001 12:25:48 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
"On another note, Thomas believes President Bush's decision to pull out of the ABM treaty will cause Russia and China to strengthen their ties – to the detriment of the United States. "It's in China's interest to see the U.S. destablilized," he added".

This does not look good at all!

33 posted on 12/15/2001 12:27:51 AM PST by horsewhispersc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher; OKCSubmariner
CHINA
China has developed increasingly close ties with the Taliban and, according to news reports, recently signed a memorandum of understanding for more economic and technical cooperation.

The memorandum is the most substantial part of a series of Chinese contacts with Afghanistan over the last two years. China now has the closest relationship with the isolated Kabul regime of any non-Muslim country, a senior Western diplomat said.

China has helped form the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, which joins it with Russia and four Central Asian countries in a loose grouping. One of its main purposes is to combat cross-border terrorism, specifically from Afghanistan. But at the same time, China has dealt with the Taliban as part of an effort to persuade its officials to close Afghan-based camps that are used to train Muslim separatists from China's restive Xinjiang region. Those separatists on occasion re-enter China and launch attacks on China's security services or civilian targets.

As part of a sweetener to secure cooperation from the Taliban leadership, Asian diplomats say, China has dangled the prospect of providing Afghanistan with much needed infrastructure and economic development assistance. The new agreement was reported on Tuesday. A Chinese delegation signed the deal in Kabul with the Taliban's mining minister, Mulla Muhammad Ishaq, news reports said.

34 posted on 12/15/2001 12:29:55 AM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
Book says China involved in 9-11 attacks -- Beijing used bin Laden to assault U.S., claims author

Obviously a brilliant Chicom plan to boost US arms spending and ensure funding for Ballistic Missile Defense. Very clever, these orientals.

What a load of old bollocks.

35 posted on 12/15/2001 12:30:45 AM PST by Clinton's a rapist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: horsewhispersc
China and the U.S. are linked together by the umbilical cord of trade. I would venture to say they are feeling a drop in exports right now. It is not in their best interest for the U.S. to destabilize. They just want us to stay out of their way.(which we won't)Time will tell.
36 posted on 12/15/2001 12:34:34 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Don't forget that in Iraq and North Korea we're still technically at war.

Unfortuantely Clinton's idiotic military endeavors seemed designed to make us look bad, weaken our military and kill our resolve. Kosovo was like Columbine, where civilians died needlessly because it appeared the guys in uniform were afraid of getting hurt.

37 posted on 12/15/2001 12:36:00 AM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
"time will tell"

I hope it's a long time as I don't think we are near ready for this!

38 posted on 12/15/2001 12:44:18 AM PST by horsewhispersc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
ChiComBoycott.com
39 posted on 12/15/2001 12:44:26 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
I have not forgotten but we have yet to put our full diplomatic and financial weight on these jerks. All we've been doing is pussy footing around since the gulf war. I think Sadaam can be beat without a shooting war of any large size. Possibly without a single bomb. Screw the U.N.! Everytime we let them get involved we end up with egg on our face and then have to buy the whole damn chicken coop.
40 posted on 12/15/2001 12:44:35 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-311 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson