Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

London Gun Crime Up 90%
SkyNews ^ | 19 December 2001 | staff

Posted on 12/20/2001 12:06:39 PM PST by 45Auto

Revenge killings among drug gangs have fuelled an explosion in gun murders in Britain. According to latest figures the number of gun murders in London has leapt by 90% this year.

In April to November 2001 there were 30, compared to 16 in the same period last year. This year 16 of the murders were 'black on black' killings compared to nine last year, an increase of 77%.

All-night garages

There were more shootings in the trendy West End rather than in boroughs like Lambeth, Hackney and Brent.

At least two people a day are now robbed at gunpoint in London.

Armed robbers are also increasingly targeting all-night garages, off licences and shops rather than banks and cash in transit.

Jamaica drug route

Commander Alan Brown of Operation Trident said there were "clear links" in many gun murders to Jamaica, the major drug route into this country. But he added: "If we take someone out there is an immediate struggle to take over the drug dealing of that particular gang." Detectives estimate as much as four tonnes of cocaine is making its way into London through drug mules - mostly women - travelling from Jamaica on commercial flights each year.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; britishfriends
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-98 next last
Its the same old story everywhere in the world: "When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns."

England is finished.

1 posted on 12/20/2001 12:06:39 PM PST by 45Auto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 45Auto; bang_list
...and one bang to find them...
2 posted on 12/20/2001 12:09:55 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
At least two people a day are now robbed at gunpoint in London.

Impossible. Guns are outlawed over there.

3 posted on 12/20/2001 12:10:10 PM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto; bang_list
Good find.

Stay well - stay safe - stay armed - Yorktown

4 posted on 12/20/2001 12:11:06 PM PST by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer
BANG
5 posted on 12/20/2001 12:11:53 PM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
The British answer to this will be to ban all possession of handguns.

What?!?!? They are already banned????

BAN 'EM AGAIN! HARDER THIS TIME!!!

6 posted on 12/20/2001 12:13:21 PM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
the gun control idiots cant make the mental leap that criminals dont obey laws. Its one of the perks of being a crook.
7 posted on 12/20/2001 12:13:52 PM PST by tm61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
Detectives estimate as much as four tonnes of cocaine is making its way into London through drug mules - mostly women - travelling from Jamaica on commercial flights each year.

You've got to be effing kidding me.

You mean they cannot stop FOUR TONS of drug smuggling via COMMERCIAL JETLINERS and they expect us to win the war on drugs here in America with all those big wide juicy borders?

Foo's.

8 posted on 12/20/2001 12:15:46 PM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
"When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns." England is finished.

Yep.

9 posted on 12/20/2001 12:16:21 PM PST by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
Its the same old story everywhere in the world: "When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns."

I guess that will make most of us outlaws if they ban guns here.

10 posted on 12/20/2001 12:19:24 PM PST by lideric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
The people at the Baltimore Sun know what to do about this. They can explain that the solution is to pass even more gun control laws.

Incidentally, there was an article in First Freedom recently about how gun control has ruined Jamaica. The place is crawling with heavily armed criminals, and the tourist trade is drying up because nobody wants to subject themselves to being disarmed in a war zone.

11 posted on 12/20/2001 12:19:55 PM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto,madivan,tonycavanagh
Blighty Bump.
12 posted on 12/20/2001 12:20:05 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Britishfriends
Hey old chaps.
13 posted on 12/20/2001 12:23:17 PM PST by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Campion
the tourist trade is drying up because nobody wants to subject themselves to being disarmed in a war zone.

Sounds reasonable to me I certainly would not view dodging fire as a great way to spend a vacation especially if I was prevented from returning fire.

Stay well - stay safe- Stay armed - yorktown

14 posted on 12/20/2001 12:25:50 PM PST by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
The War on Drugs, the War on Terrorism, your rights are screwed either way. Now back in line and pee in this cup you individualist terrorist!
15 posted on 12/20/2001 12:28:59 PM PST by Hard Case
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
Thanks for posting this.

The good news was this: "This year 16 of the murders were 'black on black' killings compared to nine last year, an increase of 77%."

Apparently they are learning from their American Gangs on how to reduce and minimize competition.

If our black on black, brown on brown, white on white and asian on asian gang killings are subtracted from people killed by guns in the US, basically all that remains are the bad guys getting offed by cops and citizens! There is the occassional left winged Ritalin/anti depressant addict who kills innocents! When gang members kill each other, we have less bad people!

16 posted on 12/20/2001 12:38:10 PM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
Totally false reporting. Must be investigated. They have GUN CONTROL. There is NO crime! Now, what does "all night garage" mean? Does it have anything to do with the rest of this phoney crap/lies?????
17 posted on 12/20/2001 12:52:22 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: 45Auto
I think you're on to something.
19 posted on 12/20/2001 1:05:48 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
London Gun Crime Up 90%

That has to be a misprint. Everyone knows they don't allow guns in the UK you silly man.

It probably should read "London gum crime up 90%". You see old chap, more of those naughty Cockneys are spitting their used Juicy Fruit on the sidewalks nowadays. Terribly messy wouldn't you say old bean, and unsanitary as well. There should be a law against it.

20 posted on 12/20/2001 1:06:03 PM PST by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
Gun control isn't working in Britain because all criminals have to do is go next door to America where they can buy machine guns over the counter.

hahahahahahaha!

21 posted on 12/20/2001 1:07:36 PM PST by agitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lideric
"I guess that will make most of us outlaws if they ban guns here."

No problemo
(Best flinty-eyed look:)Are you feeling lucky, copper?

22 posted on 12/20/2001 1:12:52 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
England is finished.

Truer words have seldom been spoken. The last of any Brits worth their salt fled England during the "brain drain" of the late 1950 to the early 1970's. What you got left is what you've got now. Winston Churchill would hardly reconnize the place.

23 posted on 12/20/2001 1:13:45 PM PST by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
This isn't possible! There are no guns in London. There can't be, they are against the law. Just like there is no cocaine here in the U.S.
24 posted on 12/20/2001 1:22:55 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Impossible. Guns are outlawed over there.

Hey, I was going to say that.

Impossible. Guns are outlawed over there.

There must be an echo in here.

25 posted on 12/20/2001 1:24:13 PM PST by Barnacle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Barnacle
Hey, I was going to say it too.

The only thing gun-control does, is to make it safer and easier for the criminal to conduct their business with less fear of dying in the process.

26 posted on 12/20/2001 1:27:07 PM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lideric
I guess that will make most of us outlaws if they ban guns here.

Damn straight.

They banned handguns in Australia, and only 35% were turned in by the citizens. They can't arrest everyone.

27 posted on 12/20/2001 1:37:18 PM PST by SunStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Campion
This article was written by someone who used to live in Jamaica:

HOW GUN CONTROL "WORKED" IN JAMAICA

by Tina Terry (c) 1998

(Published in THE FIREARMS SENTINEL, the quarterly publication of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO) - P.O. Box 270143, Hartford, Wisconsin, 53027 - phone: 414-673-9746; web site: http://www.jpfo.org)

Those who stridently and self-righteously lobby for the seizure of all guns by the government in America, particularly women like Sarah Brady, Barbra Streisand, Senators Diane Feinstein and Barbara Boxer and Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy, would do well to study the results of forced disarmament in other countries.

I have personally lived through a government-instigated disarmament of the general public, and its subsequent, disastrous consequences: From 1961 to 1977 my father (who is a white American, as are my mother, sister and I) was stationed with his family and business in Kingston, Jamaica.

Around 1972, the political situation in Jamaica had so seriously deteriorated that there were constant shootings and gun battles throughout the city of Kingston and in many of the outlying parishes (counties). In years past no one had even had to lock their doors, but now many people hardly dared venture out of their homes. This was especially true for white people, and even more especially for Americans, because of the real risk of being gunned down or kidnapped and held hostage by Jamaicans, who had become increasingly hostile towards whites and foreigners. My father took his life into his hands every morning simply driving to work. Going to the market or to do a simple errand was often a terrifying prospect. The open hatred and hostility which was directed at us seemed ready at any time to explode into violence, and indeed did so towards many people on many occasions, often with tragic or fatal results.

The Jamaican government decided that the only solution to this Volatile situation was to declare martial law overnight, and to demand that all guns and bullets owned by anyone but the police and the military be turned into the police within 24 hours. The government decreed that anyone caught with even one bullet would be immediately, and without trial, incarcerated in what was essentially a barbed-wire enclosed concentration camp which had been speedily erected in the middle of Kingston. In true Orwellian fashion, the government referred to this camp as "the gun court."

My father and all of our American, Canadian, British and European friends, as well as middle class Jamaicans of all colors (locally referred to as "black," 'white," or "beige") knew that we were all natural targets of this kind of draconian government punishment. The relentless anti-American propaganda spewed forth by Michael Manley, Jamaica's admittedly pro-Castro Prime Minister, had resulted in the widespread hatred of Americans, British and Europeans by many Jamaicans. Racial hatred of whites and "beiges," as well as class hatred of anyone who appeared to have money or property, were rampant.

Consequently, we all dutifully and immediately disarmed ourselves, and handed our weapons in at the nearest police station. It was either that or be sent straight to the gun court. Even after we had disarmed ourselves, we lived in deathly fear that the cops, not known for their integrity, and well-known for their hatred of whites and Americans, would plant a gun or bullet on our property or persons.

So there we all were - government-disarmed, sitting-duck, law-abiding citizens and expatriates. Anyone can guess what happened next: the rampant and unfettered carnage began in earnest. Robberies, kidnappings, murders, burglaries, rapes - all committed by the vast populace of still-armed criminals. Doubtless the criminals were positively ecstatic that the government had been so helpful in creating all these juicy and utterly defenseless victims for their easy prey.

We've all heard the phrase, "When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns." I can personally confirm that this statement is absolutely and painfully true, because that is exactly how the Jamaican disarmament worked. At the time of the disarmament order, I was away at boarding school in the United States. However, I remember vividly coming home for the summer. I remember the muted but pervasive atmosphere of tension and terror which constantly permeated our household, affecting even our loyal black servants, who worked for and lived with us, and whom we took care of. (Practically every household in Jamaica, except the very poorest, had live-in servants. There was no welfare or public school in Jamaica, so middle-class families became completely responsible for the well-being of their servants, who were considered to be part of the family, including taking them to the doctor, and helping to educate their children.)

I remember lying awake in bed at night, clutching the handle of an ice-pick I had put under my pillow, and listening to the screaming of car-loads of Jamaican gangs going by our house, praying that they wouldn't pick our home to plunder. The favorite tactic was for a group of thugs to roar up to a house, pile out, batter down the door and rape, steal, kill, kidnap... whatever they felt like. They knew the inhabitants had been disarmed, and that they would be met with only fear and defenselessness. My pathetic ice-pick seemed incredibly puny, but it was all I could think of. Our family didn't even own a baseball bat.

I remember lying awake thinking about how our beloved dogs were old and feeble, and that they could not protect us. And that I could not protect them either.

I can barely describe the abject terror and helplessness I felt as both a white American and as a young woman during that time. Jamaica was then about 90% black. Although I was (and still am) an American citizen, my family had lived in Kingston for almost 12 years when this situation occurred, and I considered Jamaica to be my real home. Many of my friends were Jamaican. My first serious boy-friend was Jamaican. For all its faults, I loved this beautiful, suffering island dearly, and I felt like a stranger when I was away at school in America, where I was always homesick for Jamaica.

When we had first moved to Jamaica in 1960, my sister and I (both Blonde and obviously white) had been able to ride our horses up into the hills, and, whenever we encountered local Jamaicans, their salutation to us was open and friendly, as was ours to them. As things deteriorated into the reign of terror, and then the government instituted overnight citizen disarmament, when we ventured outside our home, we almost always encountered hate-filled stares and hostile hisses of, "Eh, white bitch! Eh, look 'ere, white bitch!" and other unprintable epithets.

Jamaica was, in the 1970's, a country with at least 50% illiteracy and an illegitimacy rate of over 50%. If a Jamaican girl wasn't pregnant by the age of 15 or 16, she was often derisively branded "a mule," since mules, the offspring of horses and donkeys, are almost always sterile. Being a woman, let alone a white woman, in such a climate, especially after the disarmament of the citizenry by the government, was one of the most terrifying experiences one can imagine.

At that time, I had never held or fired a gun. I had rarely ever even seen a gun. No one in my family had ever learned about, used or even talked about firearms, except my father, who had been in the U.S. Army. In our social circle, guns were deemed "unseemly" and "inappropriate" for polite society, and especially for young ladies. I had never given much thought to any of the Bill of Rights, let alone the Second Amendment. Yet we Americans all knew the Bill of Rights did not protect us in Jamaica, just as it hadn't applied to us at our previous station in Singapore.

My dad had fought in World War II, however, and had brought back a Luger pistol, which he had taken with him to Jamaica when we moved there after having spent 6 years in Singapore. No law had prevented his bringing a gun to Jamaica in 1960. When my dad handed that pistol and all his bullets in to the police, I vaguely realized that he was no longer allowed by the government to protect my mom, my sister or me, or our household.

I was pretty confused at the time. Terrified of being kidnapped, raped, murdered, robbed, at the same time I was still mindlessly anti-gun, because the criminals all had guns, and the government had declared guns to be contraband, and we were all terrified of being hurt by bad guys with guns, all of which somehow meant that guns must be "dangerous" and "bad" and therefore should be banned, just as the Jamaican government had decreed. As white Americans, our status was that of Permanent guests in a foreign and increasingly hostile country. In fact, after 6 years in Singapore, and 12 in Jamaica, we well knew how to strive to be "model guests," which meant that questioning or challenging the Jamaican government's authority was unthinkable -- even when such government authority decreed that we be made helpless. None of us had any illusions about any "rights" to defend ourselves. We might have been able to do so with the government's blessing in the good old days, before chaos and violence and racial hatred had taken over. But now it was different. Now we were white, visible, foreign, sitting ducks in a hostile black sea. And I was a white, visible, foreign, female sitting duck.

As obedient as I was to authority, I grasped that our household was defenseless, and that I as a woman was particularly defenseless. And I realized that, had my dad still had his pistol, I would have felt much safer. I even realized that I would be willing to pick up a gun if my life were threatened. For a person who claimed to be anti-gun, these feelings really confused me. At least eleven friends and acquaintances of my family were raped, kidnapped, murdered or robbed within about a year after the disarmament, and I believe it is a miracle that we are all still alive. I am convinced that many of these people would not have been victims had they not been disarmed by the Jamaican government. It was tragically ironic that the government had sold this whole disarmament program to us with the promise that: "We're here to help you, and this is for your own good and safety." Because of this horrid and indelible experience, and of my interest in and undying loyalty to the American Bill of Rights, I have made it my personal business to study the history of the Second Amendment. I have studied related topics, too, such as police responsibility to citizens. It is my belief that many people believe that disarmament is no big deal, because it is the job of the police to protect us. Particularly many women seem to believe this. The media and of Government authorities continue to generate pervasive and corrosive propaganda aimed at creating a helpless and disarmed populace. I used to completely believe this propaganda, but I have learned the following realities:

1. The police have no legal duty to protect individual citizens, and cannot be held responsible if they fail to do so. Even if a citizen's 911 call gets through to the emergency center, the police can simply choose not to show up, and the citizen has no legal recourse against the police. The courts have repeatedly ruled on this. As the court wrote in Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616 (7th Cir. 1982): "There is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen. It is monstrous if the state fails to protect its residents against such predators but does not violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, or, we suppose, any other provision of the Constitution. The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties: it tells the state to let the people alone; it does not require the federal government or the state to provide services, even so elementary a service as maintaining law and order." The U.S. Supreme Court, in South v. Maryland, __ U.S. ___, ruled in a similar vein as far back as 1856.

2. The police carry guns primarily to defend THEMSELVES, not to protect us.

3. Because of items 1 and 2 above, we should all consider the police to be, essentially, HISTORIANS. They show up AFTER the crime has been committed and attempt to reconstruct and document the history of the crime. If the history is satisfactorily re-constructed, then the perpetrator is apprehended (if he can be found) and then (perhaps) prosecuted. This after-the-fact law enforcement does little good for the dead or wounded crime victims.

4. Women have a particular stake in preserving the right to bear arms. There is no way to describe the helplessness a woman feels when she is disarmed and made helpless by anyone. Add to that the rage she feels when the agency who is disarming her and leaving her at the mercy of rapists, murderers, goons and thugs, is a sanctimonious government telling her that it's "for her own good."

Although there are many serious issues in today's roiling political And social stew, I believe that preserving and restoring the Bill of Rights in general, and the Second Amendment in particular, is the most pivotal and basic issue to all Americans, and particularly female Americans, even if they don't yet know it. The consummate idiocy propounded by some folks (including some women) that the Second Amendment exists only to protect sportsmen's rights is particularly ridiculous and relevant to women, most of whom don't hunt, and who care more about being able to get a decent hand-gun for self-protection than a hunting rifle to pursue deer or elk.

Anyone who thinks the Bill of Rights is either "out of date," "hokey" or "needs revising" - all of which I've heard from well-meaning but tragically ignorant and complacent Americans - should try living in a country which doesn't have one. I have been there and done that, and I don't want to go through it ever again -especially not in my own native nation. So I am dedicated to preventing today's government nanny from turning, as so often has occurred in history, into tomorrow's government despot.

Finally, I implore anyone reading this, particularly women, to likewise dedicate themselves to studying this issue carefully, and to likewise taking an active stance to preserve the Bill of Rights in general and the Second Amendment in particular.

Postscript: As of the latter part of August of this year (1998), it doesn't appear that the situation in Jamaica has changed much for the better. Many Jamaicans of all colors have immigrated to America to start businesses and to escape the hopelessness of the situation in their homeland. I recently spoke with a black Jamaican named Marcus, who has opened a wonderful Jamaican restaurant in Phoenix named "Likkle Montego," where I can go and eat Jamaican food, and catch the latest news from my long-lost home. When asked how things are today in Kingston, Marcus simply shook his head: "Nottin' change attahly know. Everyt'ing still de same. Crime is still bad, mon. Gov'ment still de same. T''ings dere is bad and terrible, mon. Bad and terrible."

And guns are still outlawed in Jamaica. Armed criminals still Terrorize disarmed citizens, since still in Jamaica only outlaws (and the government) have guns. Like the man said: Bad and terrible, mon. Bad and terrible.

==================================================
Please include the following re-publication information with any republishing:

Permission is given to republish this article, as long as none of it is changed, shortened or altered, the author and JPFO are given full credit in any such republishing, and this entire republishing message is included. Author may be reached by writing to:
Tina Terry
c/o JPFO
POB270143
Hartford, WI, 53027

28 posted on 12/20/2001 1:42:59 PM PST by DuncanWaring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lideric
I guess that will make most of us outlaws if they ban guns here.

The future has arrived in Illinois. Our enlightened politicians made a felon of any citizen who carries concealed. But, that's not a problem here. Their brilliant laws have eradicated all crime in the state. Illinois; a regular utopia!

(Until you or a loved one is a victim.)

29 posted on 12/20/2001 1:52:30 PM PST by Barnacle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
It’s not England’s fault or gun prohibition’s fault. Depriving people of self-defense tools didn’t work because other places have lax gun laws. Criminals buy guns in states with lax laws and drive them to England. If the whole world were disarmed there would be no crime.

Oh, wait…. England is an island and all the countries close to that island also have draconian gun laws. Never mind what I said above. I’ll think of some other excuse and get back to you.

I know, I’ll call Chucky Schumer and ask what Goebbels would do.

30 posted on 12/20/2001 2:18:29 PM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
The last of any Brits worth their salt fled England during the "brain drain" of the late 1950 to the early 1970's.

You got that right. My dad left England in 1965 and never looked back.

-ccm

31 posted on 12/20/2001 2:19:27 PM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
BTTT
32 posted on 12/20/2001 2:21:12 PM PST by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
At least two people a day are now robbed at gunpoint in London.

...and how many are robbed by thugs wielding other weapons? When your "prey items" have no access to firearms, other weapons, such as knives, become very useful. This is especially true when, by government mandate, your "prey" must be unarmed.

33 posted on 12/20/2001 2:24:51 PM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
You mean they cannot stop FOUR TONS of drug smuggling via COMMERCIAL JETLINERS and they expect us to win the war on drugs here in America with all those big wide juicy borders?

And if they can't stop cocaine from getting on an airliner, how are they going to stop plastic explosive? While Barney Fife is confiscating my tweezers, Mrs. Osama is lugging a chunk of detonating jihad aboard. I don't think I'll be flying for a while.

34 posted on 12/20/2001 2:28:58 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Well I suppose that makes me worthless. I left in 1983!

BTW I still love my country.

35 posted on 12/20/2001 2:36:52 PM PST by Churchillspirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: maica
Interesting look at Jamaica in the 1970s at #28.
36 posted on 12/20/2001 2:55:40 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
When we had first moved to Jamaica in 1960, my sister and I (both Blonde and obviously white) had been able to ride our horses up into the hills, and, whenever we encountered local Jamaicans, their salutation to us was open and friendly, as was ours to them. As things deteriorated into the reign of terror, and then the government instituted overnight citizen disarmament, when we ventured outside our home, we almost always encountered hate-filled stares and hostile hisses of, "Eh, white bitch! Eh, look 'ere, white bitch!" and other unprintable epithets.

"Among other evils caused by being disarmed, it renders you contemptible" Niccolo Machiavelli, "The Prince", Chapter XIV, 1514 AD (L. Ricci translation, pg. 81, 1952)

37 posted on 12/20/2001 3:01:22 PM PST by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Niccolo Machiavelli again:
"Rome remained free for four hundred years and Sparta eight hundred, although their citizens were armed all that time; but many other states that have been disarmed have lost their liberties in less than forty years." The Art of War, 1521 AD (E. Farneworth translation, pg. 30, 1965)

38 posted on 12/20/2001 3:08:31 PM PST by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: epow
No! You are wrong! They are not guns! They are not gums! They are gubs! (remember Woody Allen in his "crime" movie when he tried to rob a bank and his note was so illegible, the guards and bank people argued that it really said "gubs")?
39 posted on 12/20/2001 3:14:39 PM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
In Fabian Socialist England, it is fast becoming a criminal offense to draw a rational conclusion from this. They will continue to focus on the guns, rather than the Jamaicans. They have taken any debate over immigration and ethnic issues off the table, except as to how to make sure no one dares even discuss those questions publicly.

This is a very far cry from the England that was once master of the seas, and which ushered in the Industrial Revolution which improved conditions for all mankind. In another generation, no one will ever be able to figure out why that past was even possible. To understand that, you must understand the unique characteristics of a subject population, and the Fabians mean to suppress that subject so long as there are any unique characteristics left.

We are very far along down the same rat hole in American public debate. For ammunition to fight back against the cultural nihilists, see Myths & Myth Makers In American Higher Education. For useful material on Immigration questions, see Immigration & The American Future.

Come to think about it, we have at least six chapters in the Debate Handbook, which are directly in point on one or another issue in this thread.

William Flax

40 posted on 12/20/2001 3:14:58 PM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Waco
what does "all night garage" mean

Gas station. Excuse me, petrol station.

41 posted on 12/20/2001 3:15:06 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
"When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns."

But you'll never hear about this from the American Big Lie Industry
42 posted on 12/20/2001 3:19:12 PM PST by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
My brother moved to London a week ago. His partner was mugged there 5 months ago.
43 posted on 12/20/2001 3:22:07 PM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
"England is finished."

They have been a sad sack of a country for over 30 years. Socialism will do that to ya.

44 posted on 12/20/2001 4:22:16 PM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
You're right! It was gubs. I had forgotton that one, thanks for bringing it back to mind. Hilarious.

Even funnier was an incident that really happened in San Francisco. A would-be robber stood in line at a bank with a hold-up note he had written on a deposit slip. He got tired of waiting in line, so he went down the street to another bank and handed the note to a teller. She apparently sized him up as a doofus because she told him she couldn't honor his note since it was written on a deposit slip from the other bank. She recommended he take it back to the 1st bank, which he did. After he left her bank she called the police who were there to greet him at the 1st bank as he handed his note to the teller. Too funny.

I can't personally vouch for the veracity of this story, but it was told as a true story in a nationally circulated magazine.

45 posted on 12/20/2001 6:33:40 PM PST by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto, tonycavanagh, Da_Shrimp, di_canio_volley, Kate22, hermoine_granger
Auto: England is finished.

Crap and a half. We are still less likely to get our heads blown off walking round our green and pleasant land. And what business is it of yours anyway?
46 posted on 12/21/2001 12:18:57 AM PST by jjbrouwer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto, peabers
In April to November 2001 there were 30, compared to 16 in the same period last year.

Is that all?
47 posted on 12/21/2001 12:21:56 AM PST by jjbrouwer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
They banned handguns in Australia, and only 35% were turned in by the citizens. They can't arrest everyone.

Bullsh*t! Hand guns have not been banned in Australia. Only semi-automatic rifle and shotguns, and assualt weapons, which have always been restricted. Graziers and farmers who require semi-automatic weapons for controlling feral animals are still allowed to own them.

In order to own a hand gun or long arm in Australia, you must meet the following criteria:

1.) For hand guns - you must be a member of a gun club, and regularly shoot there.

2.) For long arms - you must have a letter of permission from a landowner to hunt on his/her property. Or, be a member of a sport shooting association, and regularly compete.

3.) For all weapons, you must keep them properly locked away.

4.) You must have a clean police record.

48 posted on 12/21/2001 12:38:01 AM PST by peabers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: Pissed Off Janitor
The difference between me and you is that I have an understanding of both countries. You know next to nothing about Britain and use articles like this to confirm your prejudices. It would not surprise me to learn that you had never even visited Europe.

Our legal system is infinitely better than yours. Or do you think OJ Simpson and the Benet Ramsays (who still have not been indicted) are innocent?

And it really is a bore to have to keep explaining my position. I have said time and time again that I would always carry a gun in a US state where I was allowed to. I just don't think we need them in Britain.

It has nothing to do with socialism either. The Conservative Party who I support have no wish to adopt this policy.
50 posted on 12/21/2001 1:49:14 AM PST by jjbrouwer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson