Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BARBARA OLSON, CONSERVATIVE HERO IN BATTLE AGAINST ISLAMIC TERROR AND CLINTON CRIMES, IGNORED ON NBC
Elenchus File | December 31, 2001 | S. Elenchus

Posted on 12/31/2001 12:27:48 PM PST by elenchus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-72 next last
Please note that as the counterpart to Barbara Olson's heroism, there is the behavior of former Joint Chiefs Chairman Admiral Crowe which has raised questions about whether he sold out his country for stock in the Arab-owned corporations which control US anthrax stockpiles. See yesterday's Elenchus File original report using the timeline to place Admiral Crowe's anthrax stock deal together with an alleged betrayal of America in letting Arab investors gain control of America's principle source of the deadliest forms of anthrax as well as the anthrax virus--and US citizenship for the Arab corporate chieftan to top it off. The report then couples these coincident events with Clinton's appointment of Admiral Crowe as Ambassador to Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

I will have a new report out shortly with additional details, but the original report raises these questions, though there are no certain answers on whether there was any quid pro quo. The article entitled "CLINTON CREW ONCE AGAIN BETRAYS AMERICA? -- HINTS", may be seen by clicking on this Free Republic website link: CLINTON CREW ONCE AGAIN BETRAYS AMERICA?--HINTS

More information to come on that shortly...Developing....

1 posted on 12/31/2001 12:27:49 PM PST by elenchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: elenchus
To be fair to NBC (boy does this hurt) couldn't her absence be explained by the fact that she was a contributor on a competitor?
2 posted on 12/31/2001 12:35:10 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
Another well written post by Elenchus.Im not worrying about it,I believe the public now knows Liberalism is not the answer.
3 posted on 12/31/2001 12:35:23 PM PST by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
Last nite on Fox they had a quickie special salute to those who dies during 2001. Was it just me or did they seem to go thru Barbara Olson might fast while showing multiple pics of most everybody else. The segment ended with George Harrison's pic up there - which was cool cause I always dug the Beatles. But based on the selection of the last pic, my guess is even Fox has its share of leftist editors. Maybe I'm just paranoid but boy did they whiz by Olson's name and pic.
4 posted on 12/31/2001 12:36:36 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
I don't want to be picky or anything, but I can't even find the usual year-end list of "this year's dead" on MSNBC.com at all. I'll admit I'm intentionally ignoring the TV news for the next day or so, because I always find the Dec. 31 - Jan. 1 combination of empty New Year's party coverage and "looks back" at the prior 365 days to be exceedingly dull.

And I have to vehemently disagree that NBC is the "worst, most corrupt" of the Big Three. I think ABC and CBS are demonstrably far more to the left than NBC.

5 posted on 12/31/2001 12:39:25 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
oh, come on.
6 posted on 12/31/2001 12:39:33 PM PST by wildwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
I don't think we want any president controlling the media.

That said, it is incredibly sad that NBC doesn't include BKO in their list of prominent Americans who lost their lives this year, if indeed they are not including her. Fox includes Olson - I had hoped they would end with her, but I think they went by date of death.

Barbara Olson is as inspiring today as she was prior to her death. My heartfelt prayers are with Ted and her family and friends.

7 posted on 12/31/2001 12:41:14 PM PST by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Maybe I'm just paranoid but boy did they whiz by Olson's name and pic.

I think we just have to accept that in the grand mess that was 9/11, Barbara Olson is a mere footnote. And it doesn't have anything to do with her politics. One could easily make the argument that they should focus on her even less, since there were dozens of other people on that plane too who got no recognition at all.

8 posted on 12/31/2001 12:41:38 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: elenchus; Mercuria; AnnaZ; 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; AFVetGal; susangirl; mtngrl@vrwc; ALL
. . . NBC news divisions have apparently made the decision not to include Barbara Olson in their visual obituaries or profiles of the most important Americans to die in 2001.

Despicable. Purely despicable. I do so try not to use words like this, but in this case -- well, damn it, NBC just plain sucks!! I hope FOX decides to ignore that SOB in their retrospective after he croaks! I know I'll be ignoring him. He has become like Arafat -- "irrelevant!"

Pardon me while I go clear the air of all the smoke and steam that has been coming out of my ears!!

Barbara K. Olson is no less a hero than all the others who valiantly fought to save lives on 9/11. She is, most decidedly, our FReeper Guardian Angel.

May God bless her eternally. She is missed, and she is loved, by those who matter.

9 posted on 12/31/2001 12:44:13 PM PST by Beep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
Barbara Olson was a great woman. I have read "The Final Days," and it is an exhaustive and damning indictment not just of the final few weeks of the Clinton Presidency but of the former first couple in general.

That said, if you want to compare her "star power" to George Harrison and many other "celebrities" who died this past year, she comes up way short.

I would only take offense if lesser lights of the left who died in this past year receive more prominence.

10 posted on 12/31/2001 12:47:34 PM PST by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor
Agreed, Endeavor, that none of us wants the president controlling the media, That is not what I meant. The president, just by virtue of being president, attracts the media--particularly at this time. President Bush could step out and say a prayer--for Barbara; in fact Ted Olson is probably more in need of the nation's prayers at this time! I am not very worried that President Bush will use the opportunity to take over the media.

Simply at will, the president could insure that the media informs the American public about this fallen hero. Does he owe any less to his Solicitor General, to impress the memory of his beautiful and smart and good wife on the mind of the American public--merely because she objectively deserved it?

By the way, I meant to remind everyone that it was on Ted Olson's birthday that his wife's was murdered in that hijacked plane.

(Please excuse the overlooked typo on principle/principal in the article.)

11 posted on 12/31/2001 12:53:46 PM PST by elenchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Was it just me or did they seem to go thru Barbara Olson might fast while showing multiple pics of most everybody else.

I would imagine that the absence of unique tape was the cause of that. Political commentators are on TV to talk. Multiple shots of pundit footage may have seemed a bit much, and come off looking silly. In this case, I feel that less was more. Perhaps the editors thought so as well?

12 posted on 12/31/2001 12:54:39 PM PST by Beep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
NBC ignored (killed) the Broderick story also. They won't air much on Barbara because she is everthing they despise. NBC mangement and their talking heads are not much better than puke in my book. I boycott EVERTHING the networks air, including MTP, sitcoms, everything! All I need for news is FreeRepublic and Fox news (not even Drudge, who FR often scoops).
13 posted on 12/31/2001 12:54:56 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SLJP
"May God bless her eternally. She is missed, and she is loved, by those who matter."

AMEN
14 posted on 12/31/2001 12:55:23 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
Barbara Olson was one of those rare few who was both a great Republican and a true American hero. The RNC should have Fox News devote a special show just to her memory.
15 posted on 12/31/2001 12:57:47 PM PST by christianswindler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
You say: "I would only take offense if lesser lights of the left who died in this past year receive more prominence."

Well, start taking offense. Again we are talking about NBC-related material. There is no absence of focus on the sister of Katie Couric who died this year, a wild leftist activist/politician virtually unknown outside the state of Virginia. She got attention today, even on Fox, while NBC omitted mention of Barbara Olson.

S. Elenchus

16 posted on 12/31/2001 12:58:22 PM PST by elenchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: plain talk; wildwood
I thought it was just me, but I agree that BKO is given less time than the others. At least they put her in there. I never watch network news anymore so I have no clue what the others are doing.
17 posted on 12/31/2001 1:08:12 PM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
One of the few network show I watch is Sunday Morning with Charles Osgood. He also profiled about 25 famous and semi-famous people who died in 2001. Come to think of it, he did not mention Barbara Olson either. However, I am going to defend the editorial decisions of the networks just this once. This is pure speculation but my guess is that they have separated the horrible losses the country experienced on 9-11 from the traditional year-end shows in which they profile the famous who left us the previous year. Just a thought.
18 posted on 12/31/2001 1:08:12 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
Offense taken. Thanks for the info.
19 posted on 12/31/2001 1:10:13 PM PST by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
Charles Schultz Philosophy

You don't actually have to take the quiz. Just read straight through, and you'll get the point, an awesome one, that it is trying to make!

Take this quiz:

1. Name the five wealthiest people in the world.

2. Name the last five Heisman trophy winners.

3. Name the last five winners of the Miss America contest.

4. Name ten people who have won the Nobel or Pulitzer prize.

5. Name the last half dozen Academy Award winners for best actor and actress.

6. Name the last decade's worth of World Series winners.

How did you do?

The point is, none of us remember the headliners of yesterday. These are no second-rate achievers. They are the best in their fields.

But the applause dies. Awards tarnish. Achievements are forgotten.

Accolades and certificates are buried with their owners.

Here's another quiz. See how you do on this one:

1. List a few teachers who aided your journey through school.

2. Name three friends who have helped you through a difficult time.

3. Name five people who have taught you something worthwhile.

4. Think of a few people who have made you feel appreciated and special.

5. Think of five people you enjoy spending time with.

6. Name half a dozen heroes whose stories have inspired you.

Easier?

The lesson:

The people who make a difference in your life are not the ones with the most credentials, the most money, or the most awards.

They are the ones that care.

"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia."

----- Charles Schultz

20 posted on 12/31/2001 1:17:13 PM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Just to clarify. The little special was on deaths throughout 2001 not just 9/11. So she was probably the only 9/11 casualty shown. Her pic seemed to get about the shortest air time in the whole segment which implied at least to me that it was an intentional slant towards her because she was conservative. No way to prove it. But that's how it looked to me. No big deal.
21 posted on 12/31/2001 1:17:27 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
Another thought....we all know who Barbara Olson was. We admired and respected her. But we are Freepers. My in-laws would not have the slightest idea of who she was.

They vote Democrat
Politics bores them.
They are not unique.

Ted Olson argued one of the most important cases in our history in front of SCOTUS. I doubt they even recognize his name.

22 posted on 12/31/2001 1:18:57 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SLJP
Your beautiful graphic is so very Barbara........she will be missed by us all....... and thanks for the pic.
23 posted on 12/31/2001 1:19:02 PM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: umgud
Boycotts do work; just look at what was done to Dr. Laura. For NBC, you need to boycott its parent General Electric(GE Finance credit cards and installment loans, turbines, jet engines, kitchen white goods, locomotives, etc.) for ABC boycott Disney (Disneyland, Disneyworld, Mickey Mouse and Donald's toys and games, Disney film and Broadway shows, e.g. Lion King,ESPN, Buena Vista Films,etc.) and for CBS, its Viacom (Paramount Pictures, Simon & Schuster, Infinity Broadcasting, various record labels, etc.)
24 posted on 12/31/2001 1:23:50 PM PST by masadaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
"BARBARA OLSON, CONSERVATIVE HERO IN BATTLE AGAINST ISLAMIC TERROR AND CLINTON CRIMES, IGNORED ON NBC"

I give up, what is nbc?

25 posted on 12/31/2001 1:27:11 PM PST by S.O.S121.500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
I think that Bush has to be careful not to appear to favor one fallen hero over another. And too, I think he may feel that highlighting Barbara's death would appear to politicize his own personal feelings about losing her, which must be great given his closeness to Ted, and he's just not that kind of guy.

I didn't mean to infer that you were for presidential control of the media and now better understand your point.

26 posted on 12/31/2001 1:28:37 PM PST by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
BARBARA OLSON WAS A DISCIPLE OF DAVID HOROWITZ

Those who knew Barbara Olson best knew that she was a big fan of DAVID HOROWITZ and his website Frontpagemag.com. Until now, most Americans have been forced to watch our country and its culture drift further and further to the left. Not knowing the true reasons for this degeneration, we have felt helpless to stop it. We have wasted our time and our money supporting political candidates who have cynically sold us false promises about their ability to restore true American values. Now, after years of investigation and with precious little time to spare, DAVID HOROWITZ has finally found the ACTUAL SOURCE of this foul tide. Armed with irrefutable proof, he has exposed the CONSERVATIVE HOLOCAUST that has until now been secreted behind the tall, ivy-covered walls of academia.

Freepers, I personally urge you to support Mr. Horowitz's campaign in every way possible. Forget the politicians. Instead, speak to your neighbors. Form committees. Demand to see what is actually written in the textbooks given to our kids. Write letters demanding protection for conservative students and faculty. Show up at David's campaign stops. Visit Frontpagemag.com. Finally, and most importantly, I urge you to immediately send David as much money as you possibly can to save our conservative values from extinction. And please, FReepers, DIG DEEP because this is no time for half measures. DO IT NOW FOR BARBARA!

With David's leadership, we can and we will DEFEAT INTELLECTUAL TERRORISM and save our country from the evils of FULL BLOWN SOCIALISM.

Thank you, America, LET'S ROLL!

27 posted on 12/31/2001 1:29:50 PM PST by IanSherwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Yes, but anyone who is politically aware knows of Barbara Olson. And we all know how the networks and cable news shows love to prove how politically aware they are. I certainly know the Left's folks.

Barbara was and remains, through her writings and through those of us who loved and so appreciated her, a person of consequence in her own right and should be mentioned as such in a "prominent American" lost life retrospective.

28 posted on 12/31/2001 1:39:04 PM PST by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
You wrote to leadpenny:
"Another thought....we all know who Barbara Olson was. We admired and respected her. But we are Freepers. My in-laws would not have the slightest idea of who she was.

"They vote Democrat Politics bores them. They are not unique.

"Ted Olson argued one of the most important cases in our history in front of SCOTUS. I doubt they even recognize his name."

But that's just the point:

(1) Our heroes must be celebrated and those ignorant of their sacrifice must be informed about their greatness. We all need those heroes. Our children need to know about them. Ignorant democrats need to know. Your relatives, too. The American public has few heroes. The military no longer allows the celebration of heroic exploits in battle due to secrecy and safety concerns and media abuses in opposing and jeopardizing the military. We are a nation desperately in need of heroes. Now we have a few--and we must celebrate them and publicize every one of them. We must not permit the left to consign them to oblivion. We must raise them up. They must be examples to all our families and friends and neighbors. It is desperately important to preserve the memory of the few heroes we are given today.

(2) Keep this in mind too: The networks only retain their licenses to broadcast on the public-owned (that's you!) airways if they serve the public, and part of their responsibility is to provide information and objective news reports. When they no longer fulfill that responsibility, do they deserve the license with which they broadcast--our license, our airwaves--do they deserve their near monopoly on televised information?

S. Elenchus

29 posted on 12/31/2001 1:41:03 PM PST by elenchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
NBC can jam it where the sun don't shine. I don't watch their crap anyway.
30 posted on 12/31/2001 1:45:16 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
I also noticed that there was no obituary of Barbara Olson in the New York Times Magazine yearly obituary round-up, "The Lives they Lived."

But I guess the Times would explain it by the fact that Barbara's life didn't have as much impact on the world as some of the people they *did* profile:

Troy Donahue
Pricilla Davis
Joey Ramone
and Abe Beame.

Of course, we all know that the real reason such an exalted person (as well as a heroine) was left out is because she had the nerve to write something less than flattering about the boy president and his lovely and charming wife.

31 posted on 12/31/2001 1:47:21 PM PST by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
Not all networks ignored her Fox aired her funeral and Larry King mentioned her a couple of times. While Barbara's death is tragic, like the deaths of thousands who die young every year from AIDS and various other diseases, the networks have to make judgements on who to mention. Being the wife of a Bush Administration official is probably not enough to get mentioned.
32 posted on 12/31/2001 1:49:22 PM PST by Nightstalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
Here's a note that may encourage you - more than $200,000 has been donated to the "Barbara K. Olson Memorial Scholarship Fund" at Cardozo Law School by friends, family and admirers of Barbara and her values. The endowed scholarship will be given to a student who best represents Barbara's values. What better way to insure that we are shaping young leaders with the values of our heroes?
33 posted on 12/31/2001 1:51:19 PM PST by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
I don't want to take anything away from the memory of Barbara Olson. She was a grand lady and it still pains me deeply that she is gone. I just think it was a tough call by the networks when it came to the traditional year-end rememberances. The whole 9-11 thing is still just to hard for most of us to get our emotions around.

On a personal note, I have a brother who, upon learning about the death of Barbara, made a crude remark to another brother. He doesn't know that I know he made the remark and I'm not speaking to him anyway.

You're right about much of the country not having a clue about her.

34 posted on 12/31/2001 1:59:02 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 07055
You've "got the NY Times' number" -- and it's not 07055 I'm talking about.

That said, though, there is still a categorical difference between the NY Times, which is far left of left and is simply dedicated to nothing but the destruction of this country and any standards remaining, but nonetheless is a private newspaper printed on private paper, one among hundreds in this country, and one only a fool would take seriously--and the three networks which broadcast on our airwaves and have an expressed responsibility to report the news objectively.

We should recall that the exposure of our heroes to the public, the list of those included and those they decide to exclude, is not the list for the network's Xmas party. They invite their friends and exclude their enemies from the party. This is the heart of what our nation is about, what gives us spiritual life's blood. They are sucking that blood, sucking us white.

S. Elenchus

35 posted on 12/31/2001 2:01:14 PM PST by elenchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
Don't get me wrong -- I am certainly no fan of CNN -- but last Tuesday Ted Olson was on Larry King Live and they put together a wonderful tribute to Barbara for the full hour.

Last Thursday, December 27, was BKO's birthday. There was a memorial service for her in Houston, where BKO was born and raised, and I was lucky enough to be able to attend. It seems that many of her family members were unable to attend the one held in Washington. There were about 60 members of her family there, and the rest of the Mausoleum was packed. BKO's brother mentioned that Larry King had sent him several boxes of videos -- a copy of each of her appearances on his show. Also, for the memorial service, Larry King also narrated a 7 or 8 minute tribute with her life story. The last few seconds of the tape was a close-up of a piece of paper that simply contained the words "I Love You, Ted."

What a remarkable woman.

36 posted on 12/31/2001 2:05:49 PM PST by RedWhiteBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nightstalker
To Larry King's credit (a rare thing), he also interviewed Ted Olson about Barbara. I saw about half of it, and the part that I saw was very professionally done
37 posted on 12/31/2001 2:09:24 PM PST by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor
It heartens me that she is honored, but it concerns me even more that the funds will be used to create more lawyers who are in a vast majority cunning leftists and who make like miserable for the rest of us. Why to a law school? Why not to a select, qualified group of students. I doubt that the school will direct the funds to conservative-minded or even -aware students. Barbara and her husband were lawyers but lawyers of a special stripe. We can only hope that those contributions will not all be used to promote the very hatred of values and civility which Barbara so vigorously opposed.

Look at the fate of the great foundations and museums--and universities of America, so many of which were created by great achievers but now bankroll and mindroll the engine of the left, political correctness and hatred of western values.

38 posted on 12/31/2001 2:09:32 PM PST by elenchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Nightstalker
If you think that Barbara's life and contributions boil down to being "Being the wife of a Bush Administration official," then you do not know very much about her. She was a prominant, well-accomplished figure in Washington years before she married Ted.
39 posted on 12/31/2001 2:09:50 PM PST by RedWhiteBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
Charles Schultz Philosophy

Great post. Thanks.

40 posted on 12/31/2001 2:36:19 PM PST by balls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
Elenchus,

Maybe you could do with a bit of perspective brightening. I'll give it my best shot:

First of all, not all universities are evil empires of the Left, nor are all academics evil Leftists, which surely you must know.

Secondly, when one establishes an endowment, one designates in a formal document, the purposes for which the endowment MUST be used - I work in this area and know full well that these are solemn documents which stand the test of time and liberals.

Thirdly, the endowment was established with the approval of her family and by her friends as a way to honor Barbara at the school through which she entered her chosen profession, the law.

Lastly, I am encouraged that we who donate to this fund are part of creating a living legacy and are supporting students who will go on to be the EXACT kind of lawyer that Barbara and Ted Olson have been.

Ted Olson's recent address to the Federalist Society , which can be found at their website, speaks directly to Barbara's love of the law, her choice to attend Cardozo, and why the scholarship fund was established. It is a truly moving speech which all those who loved Barbara should read.

Elenchus, Barbara Olson did not run from difficult choices, difficult people, nor from controversial stands that put her in the crosshairs of the powerful media elite. We must not run from the fight either, and I believe you feel that way, too. Hence our need to take it to the Left directly where they live - in our academic institutions, in our corporations, in our media, in our neighborhoods. This memorial scholarship fund is simply one powerful way of doing so.

Best regards!

Endeavor

41 posted on 12/31/2001 2:38:29 PM PST by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
To be fair to NBC (boy does this hurt) couldn't her absence be explained by the fact that she was a contributor on a competitor?

Stay well. It would be like John Lot not morning the death of Bernard Goldberg or vice versa. Just because the parasitical elite news media is diametrically opposite of value producing Lott and Goldberg (both compete for the readers attention) doesn't exclude them from fundamental integrity, no matter how hard they try to prove otherwise.

42 posted on 12/31/2001 2:38:34 PM PST by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
........the behavior of former Joint Chiefs Chairman Admiral Crowe.........whether he sold out his country for stock in the Arab-owned corporations which control US anthrax stockpiles............letting Arab investors gain control of America's principle source of the deadliest forms of anthrax as well as the anthrax virus--and US citizenship for the Arab corporate chieftan..........Clinton's appointment of Admiral Crowe as Ambassador to Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

???????!!!!!!!!!!

43 posted on 12/31/2001 2:46:14 PM PST by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
We are a nation desperately in need of heroes. Now we have a few--and we must celebrate them and publicize every one of them. We must not permit the left to consign them to oblivion. We must raise them up.

You are so right. If it was Gloria Steinem instead of Barbara Olson on that plane, can you imagine what the coverage would be? There would be no end to the liberal fawning worship of the feminist goddess. She would be posthumously honored in all the women's magazines, guaranteed.

Only liberals can be heroes in the Land of Ought-to-Be.

44 posted on 12/31/2001 2:50:35 PM PST by pray4liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: elenchus
Well, NBC Nightly News didn’t show a retrospective of people who died, but they did wind up their newscast with a retrospective of Sept. 11th. They even included Mike Moran, saying “and you can kiss my white, Irish . . . “ They also included some nice clips of President Bush.
45 posted on 12/31/2001 3:03:58 PM PST by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pray4liberty
Only liberals can be heroes in the Land of Ought-to-Be.

I prefer Nought-to-Be.

46 posted on 12/31/2001 3:17:36 PM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: AmishDude
Larry King (I know, I know) mentioned her last night. Had a few nice pics, talked about her and even had clips of an interview with Ted Olson post 9/11.
48 posted on 12/31/2001 4:15:53 PM PST by Aaron_A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lonestar; OLDWORD
Phil,

Plesae read the "Charles Schultz" quiz in post 20. This is so good that I think you will want to use it on the air. You can shorten it but still get the point across by using less of the items in each list -- perhaps four of each.

This, like "Peanuts" itself, is simple, basic and touching. I'm certain you will like it.

Congressman Billybob

Click and bookmark for fun in the morning. FReepers especially invited to call in.

49 posted on 12/31/2001 4:22:58 PM PST by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I agree with whoever said the pics were by time frame on FOX.

More importantly,.. Solicitor General Ted Olsen and his wife Barbara would NOT have wanted her life to be valued above anyone elses. They are/were a class act.

I imagine all those families who lost loved ones would resent her being elevated above their lost loved ones.

President Bush isn't the type to try to be in the forefront and is well known to want credit to go to others. I have a sneaking suspicion that Barbara Olsen and her wonderful husband Ted are the same way.

I could tell that those on FOX were deeply disturbed by the loss of Barbara. They DID show her face repeatedly in the beginning.

It isn't disrespectful to her.. or demeaning to her that she isn't in the forefront. She wasn't like that. Probably why we will mourn her forever..and remember her forever. I have saved SC Ted Olsens response to us here...and will keep it forever.

Ted if your reading this.. remember the "smile". Her beauty and grace, I know we will. Along with her heart, her genious and mind.

God Bless you through the holidays. We have honestly thought of you during this time. Our hearts go out to you...

50 posted on 12/31/2001 4:23:41 PM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson