Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese officials in Washington Meetings Threaten US Businesses and War
Taipei Times ^ | 1-20-02 | Charles Snyder

Posted on 01/19/2002 10:33:01 PM PST by tallhappy

Chinese officials taking tough line on US arms sales

VEILED WARNINGS: A top official from Beijing's Taiwan Affairs Office also warned US businesses that they would suffer if the arms sales continued
By Charles Snyder
STAFF REPORTER

IN WASHINGTON
The No. 2 man in Beijing's Taiwan Affairs Office, Zhou Mingwei, has again warned that Taiwan's failure to approve reunification with China will mean war and issued a veiled threat to US businesses operating in China if the administration of George W. Bush continues selling arms to Taiwan.

Zhou was indirect when he met reporters at the end of four days of talks in Washington with US government officials, members of Congress, overseas Chinese groups and scholars.

He also ruled out any talks with President Chen Shui-bian (³¯¤ô«ó) or the DPP, saying the party has still not adopted the "one China" principle.

Zhou and other members of his delegation declined to give specifics of their discussions while in Washington, but called the meetings useful in advancing mutual understanding. Many of their answers to specific questions were vague and limited to diplomatic formulas.

Nothing that Zhou or the others said was new, but it was significant that they were saying it in Washington after the first discussions in recent history between US officials and Chinese officials dealing with Taiwan affairs.

The prospect of fresh US arms sales to Taiwan in April was clearly an important concern for the group, whose visit comes a month before a planned visit to Washington by Deputy Premier Qian Qichen (¿ú¨äµ`), Beijing's top foreign policymaker, who will also talk about arms sales while in Washington.

"The most painful and destructive experience for US-China relations is arms sales to Taiwan, which we do not want to see," Zhou said, warning that if the Bush administration sells more arms to Taiwan, "consequences will happen."

Wei Youlong, the director-general of Beijing's Taiwan Affairs Office, who was accompanying Zhou, said: "Arms sales deeply hurt the feelings of the Chinese people."

"It's like when the two sides have differences over the question of unification, the US gives a gun to the Taiwan side. It is like adding fuel to the fire. It will only make matters worse," he said.

Another official in the delegation said the arms sales hinder cross-strait talks.

"Arms sales to Taiwan have served to harden or inflate the arrogance of the hardliners in Taiwan," said Xu Shiquan, the president of the Institute of Taiwan Studies of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. "The sales make it more difficult for the resumption of dialogue across the Strait."

Zhou warned the US that arms sales could hurt US commercial interests in China, which have grown rapidly in recent years and are expected to mushroom now China has entered the WTO.

Zhou drew a parallel with 1992, when the elder George Bush approved F-16 sales to Taiwan and China could do nothing about it.

"Now look at how many American business companies are engaging their corporations in joint ventures in China. Thou-sands and thousands," he said.

"With WTO entry, we are look-ing forward to having more American business sectors having long-term investment in that region, which all requires peaceful, stable surroundings there.

"To create such a hot spot, which could be explosive any time, it would eventually hurt bilateral relations and hurt US interests," he said.

"If there is a new war in the region, it very clearly will hurt the interests of both sides, which is very contradictory to America's basic interests in the region," he said.

Zhou reiterated China's commitment to peaceful reunification with Taiwan. "But at the same time you cannot simply talk about peace without talking about reunification. Otherwise, what is the purpose of peace," he said.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-118 next last

1 posted on 01/19/2002 10:33:01 PM PST by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tallhappy; AGAviator

Yeah, like China is going to reposition its forces in the West near Kashmir/India/Pakistan/Afghanistan all the way across their nation to the East in order to display some form of credible threat to Taiwan right now!

What a joke. All that the PLA can do is tell their diplomats to talk tough these days. They have no war option at all in today's environment.

Generals in Taipei must be laughing themselves silly seeing the poor PLA diplomats reduced to such a lousy "negotiating" position...

2 posted on 01/19/2002 10:41:10 PM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Who cares what the government of China says or thinks!
The Chinese government is our enemy, that is why they held our service people hostage last April.
3 posted on 01/19/2002 10:42:28 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Amelika, you must now make you own tennis shoes! Chinee people tired of doing all you sweat shop work for you! And no more toys with you Happy Meal.

Still supporting break-away provinces? Now we get tough - we take home all our grad students!

4 posted on 01/19/2002 10:44:22 PM PST by struwwelpeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
I'm glad you keep a eye on this stuff with china. Many media outlets refuse to report it. Why? ......If it were the Russians who made the threat, the news feeding frenzy would be buzzing. This, I find to be the most interesting thing of all.
5 posted on 01/19/2002 10:45:46 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
If it were the Russians who made the threat, the news feeding frenzy would be buzzing. This, I find to be the most interesting thing of all.

Excellent point.

6 posted on 01/19/2002 10:49:04 PM PST by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
These blowhards are growing tedious. Time to send Taiwan a little "thank you for purchasing our products" appreciation gift-- some DON'T TREAD ON ME flags.
7 posted on 01/19/2002 10:49:44 PM PST by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy,super175,Uncle Bill,Hopalong,golitely,ChaseR,Chapita
Condoleeza Rice and GW Bush and Colin Powell are under a delusion by believing that China can be changed by continued trade, military transfers to and appeasement of China.

Bush says forget about further prosecuting and further investigating Chinagate, illegal Chinese campaign contributions and illegal transfers of US military tecnology to the CHinese because both Repubs and Democrats are guilty of the same treasonous behavior with China

China is continuing to threaten nuclear war with the US and is threatening US business in China. But Bush and Rice and Powell continue to appease and there is no complaint from the Democrats or Repubs about the Chinese.

Nothing will stop China when they nationalize US businesses in China after the businesses spend billions in CHina and build factories and transfer know how to the Chinese.

Rice, Powell, Bush and the Repubs and Democrats are absolute fools when it comes to China policy. They will be responsible for the economic and military destruction of the US at the hands of the CHinese.

8 posted on 01/19/2002 10:49:51 PM PST by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
I think the uS should pull our Empire out of Asia. It's none of our business.
9 posted on 01/19/2002 10:50:27 PM PST by aspide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

Good.

Since we don't have the balls to stand up to China, perhaps this will help force our hand.

Very Telling..


From the Michigan Primary Debate, Calvin College:


BUSH. ..I want to say something about Cuba in our hemisphere. There are some folks in our country who believe we ought to trade with Cuba. I don't. I think that would be wrong-headed. I think it's be a mistake. Capital that goes into Cuba will be used by the Fidel Castro government to prop itself up. There is a commission-type system in Cuba. Dollars invested will be dollars that will end up supporting this totalitarian regime. It's in our best interests for us to promote freedom in the island right off the coast of Florida. It's in our best interest to keep the pressure on Fidel Castro until he allows free elections, free press and free the prisoners in that island. And for those Americans that believe that trade with Cuba will cause Castro to become less totalitarian, in my judgment are naïve and wrong.

BAUER. Governor, you just made the case for withdrawing most favored nation status from China.

BUSH. I did not.

BAUER. Everything that you just said about Cuba applies to China.

BUSH. Let me answer that. Let me answer that.

RUSSERT. The difference between China and Cuba.

BUSH. May I answer that please?

RUSSERT. Please.

BUSH. There is a huge difference, a huge difference between trading with an entrepreneurial class like that which is growing in China and allowing a Fidel Castro government to skim capital moneys off the top of capital investment. There's a huge difference, a huge difference.

BAUER. Governor, one-third of the trade with China is with companies controlled by the People's Liberation Army.

BUSH. Gary.

BAUER. You know that and I know that. Tell the people rotting in the prisons of China that there's any difference between Castro's Cuba and Communist China. There is none.

BUSH. Let me say this. If we turn our back on the entrepreneurial class that is taking wing in China, we're making a huge mistake. If we turn our back on those that have gotten a whiff of freedom as a result of the marketplace taking hold, we're making a big mistake.

BAUER. Listen, I --

BUSH. We're making a big mistake. We're making a big mistake.

BAUER. The People's Liberation is O.K.?

BUSH. No it's not. I'm talking about the entrepreneurial class that is growing in the country of China.

BAUER. Sir, they are using that money for a massive arms buildup that our sons will have to deal with down the road.

BUSH. Only if you're the president.

BAUER. You can't be tough on China and not on --

BUSH. If I'm the president --

(BOTH TALKING AT ONCE)

RUSSERT. Mr. Bauer. Mr. Bauer, Mr. Bush. Let me move to another area

10 posted on 01/19/2002 10:53:37 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
I don't think the reason for the media's ignorance of China, is just the fact that they don't consider China a threat.(this is what someone has said to me before) It seems like some sort of government control on this subject.

Just a theory! I have no evidence, other than a complete lack of information from normal sources.

11 posted on 01/19/2002 10:57:38 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: tallhappy
They want something from us and are trying to 'set us up' for something, jmo.
Evidently, they also threatened the Press Club and 'warned' the Bush administration....and then of course there was this 'discovery' of 'bugs' on their plane.
What do you think is going on, tallhappy?
13 posted on 01/19/2002 11:00:11 PM PST by Born in a Rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born in a Rage
What do you think is going on, tallhappy?

Panic, power struggle, paralysis.

Your question is so simple, but very good.

14 posted on 01/19/2002 11:04:37 PM PST by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
"They will be responsible for the economic and military destruction of the US at the hands of the CHinese."

Sorry OKC, but I would not say that. I would say that Bush has yet to firm up a China policy. By that I mean, it is not completed. He has taken alot of the Clinton speak out of the dialoge and has peed them off. They want to go back to the non-statement statements of the past.

15 posted on 01/19/2002 11:05:02 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
"Many media outlets refuse to report it. Why?"

You can bet Rupert Murdoch won't allow Fox to report it.

Here is a real eye opener
News Corporation List of Companies, Chairman and Chief Executive: K. Rupert Murdoch
Check the location of Chinabyte.com
Administrative Contact:
Li Wei
Xinnet
Haidian
Beijing Beijing 100044
China
tel: 86 10 68492333
fax: 86 10 68492758
yyang@newscorp.com.cn
FOX NEWS OWNER RUPERT MURDOCH SET FOR CHINA TV CLEARANCE;
MUST ENSURE COMMUNIST CHANNEL WIDELY AVAILABLE IN USA!


China AOL Time Warner and News Corp (aka Fox News) "Deal" - The REAL Story - from China
16 posted on 01/19/2002 11:08:11 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Southack
This is mainly a trade person and not a diplomat or a military person. As far as war goes they have missiles, they'er getting the carriers, submarines and destroyers, and they don't need troops which would come last.

Now look at how many American business companies are engaging their corporations in joint ventures in China. Thousands and thousands," he said.
Now just what would happen to the US economy if these thousands and thousands of businesses were to experience something adverse?
17 posted on 01/19/2002 11:16:36 PM PST by AGAviator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
I agree that Bush was caught with his pants down on that debate question. But it can't be used to hammer his policies as president. The Chinese do not need to be appeased, but delt with firmly and clearly. I think he is doing just that.

They were once our friends, a long time ago. The communists are the problem. Just like it was with the former Soviets.IMHO

18 posted on 01/19/2002 11:18:01 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper

And an example would be?

19 posted on 01/19/2002 11:23:41 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
YUP! I know. The Chinese appear to be using these American and other parnerships as a lever to convice Bush to cowtow to them. Let's watch and learn where our Gov. draws the line. This is interesting history to behold. I hope Bush won't let me down. He has done pretty well so far. China is critical to so called fair trade. I wish I was a fly on the wall in the O office.
20 posted on 01/19/2002 11:26:13 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Zhou warned the US that arms sales could hurt US commercial interests in China...

Great. Then we can get the Made in China goods out of our stores.

21 posted on 01/19/2002 11:27:19 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struwwelpeter
And if really get mad, repatriate tongs and triads! Then what you degenerates do for China White!
22 posted on 01/19/2002 11:31:33 PM PST by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Arms sales to Taiwan.

The ep-3 hostage situation.

Statements to the effect that we would honor our defense pact with Taiwan

Clinton danced around on these issues during his second term while he took money from them.

23 posted on 01/19/2002 11:32:21 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
I'm just glad that President Bush knows that the liberal media giants
like Rupert Murdoch and Ted Turner are NOT to be trusted.
24 posted on 01/19/2002 11:33:51 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Taiwan, yes.. but that's sop isn't it?

EP3? You mean the plane they forced down, boarded, took hostages from then dissassembled and we apologized for?

That Plane?

25 posted on 01/19/2002 11:35:10 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
Do I detect a note of sarcasm? LOL! I promise I'll let you beat on me if Bush does not do the right thing. In fact I would be reeeeeeeaaaaaallllllllllll disapointed.
26 posted on 01/19/2002 11:37:04 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Ya! That plane. I wish we would have blown it up after we got our people back. Nobody listens to me though. Not even my wife. But then, that what wives do.
27 posted on 01/19/2002 11:40:11 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
What are they gonna do? give more weapons to the taliban, bribe bill clinton?
28 posted on 01/19/2002 11:41:19 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper

I had the same thought.

rofl, that would have been so beautiful.

"Uh, well we did arrange air transport for the plane in a manner of speaking.. We thought we would just let the prevailing winds carry it back"

29 posted on 01/19/2002 11:44:14 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
I don't know what the buggers are going to do, but I believe they are going to be a painfull burr under our saddle.
30 posted on 01/19/2002 11:44:53 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
"Do I detect a note of sarcasm?"

Oh, not at all. He was very clear with the media's "antics."
And the daily Pentagon briefings are just to funny some days.
This administration has realized there are no major media outlets that are trustworthy.
31 posted on 01/19/2002 11:45:38 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
LOL! They would have just sent us a billion dollar bill for the cleanup.
32 posted on 01/19/2002 11:47:05 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
And another thing!! Bernie Schwartz and Loral vs. Ken Lay and Enron.. who did more damage in the big picture? Enron employees can sue to get back their 401k money, who do I sue to get back our ICBM technology?
33 posted on 01/19/2002 11:48:47 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
The Loral deal looked like a payment for something.IMHO. Nowbody would be that stupid. They got all our MIRV tech. at one time. I wonder how they are doing on the backward engineering? This was definately the big boner of the two.
34 posted on 01/19/2002 11:56:53 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

35 posted on 01/19/2002 11:58:24 PM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Big boner... LOL! We underestimated the chinese in Korea and Viet Nam, no need to give them a third chance.
36 posted on 01/19/2002 11:59:52 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
I'm doing my best on the boycott. I don't want to hurt Taiwan. They must have a law somewhere about saying made in China when actually made in Taiwan. I recall reading someting about it. Hard to ID the products if that is the case. Clinton did it if I remember correctly, back when O'leary was there.

Someone please correct me if I am wrong. I am beat and about to take a 8 hr nap. My spelling is starting to suck.

37 posted on 01/20/2002 12:08:11 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
We are letting Taiwan slide on a lot of copyright stuff because they are who they are and need all the help they can get resisting the mainland.
38 posted on 01/20/2002 12:11:42 AM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
I heard the Taiwanese were trying to do something about the knockoffs. We are probably not making them pay fines. This Kockoff thing is good for prices and benifits consumers but sure hurts some businesses. As a consumer I am happy to get a cheap and reliable product but you gotta draw the line somewhere.

The customs people have made a lot of arrests, but I don't know how many have been procecuted. The govt. often has been lax in the past.

39 posted on 01/20/2002 12:20:45 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
i just CANNOT believe that we even deal with these murdering bastards!
where are the american products?
'most favored @$$holes' is what they should be called!
you kissing their favored @$$es, dubya?
40 posted on 01/20/2002 12:41:47 AM PST by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
If it says "Made in China," it's made by slave labor in Communist China. If it says "Made in Taiwan," its is. (The labels used to say "Made in R.O.C.," which meant "Republic of China," which is Taiwan - but that stopped after we cozied up to the Reds.)

41 posted on 01/20/2002 12:45:51 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rockfish59
Any of you fellas ever played Chess? China is being surrounded and hemmed in. Lobster style. Surely you would recognize there was a very explicit message TO China by the use of Guantanamo as a field prison for the scum of the earth. There were other places they could have gone, but it's Guantanamo that gets the publicity. What do you suppose that's about?
Then there is a speech urging the inclusion of Central America in the Americas Trade agreement. Zemin had a junket there not so long ago. What do you think suddenly including Central America has to do with the worldview of things Chinawise?
There is a method behind what looks like madness right now, but the ducks are lining up. Europe won't like it. China will hate it. And W is about to whup their butts, even if you don't see it yet.
42 posted on 01/20/2002 1:03:09 AM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Wei Youlong, the director-general of Beijing's Taiwan Affairs Office, who was accompanying Zhou, said: "Arms sales deeply hurt the feelings of the Chinese people."

ah cripes.. we hurt someones feelings.. maybe we should pay them reparations? cry me a river!

Zhou reiterated China's commitment to peaceful reunification with Taiwan. "But at the same time you cannot simply talk about peace without talking about reunification. Otherwise, what is the purpose of peace," he said.

No peace with the Commies, unless they can enlarge their real estate.. havent i heard that before? (WWII?)
if we can keep the commies boxed in long enough they will fall apart.
43 posted on 01/20/2002 1:11:02 AM PST by wafflehouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
Maybe we should spend billions more on submarines and nuclear missles for them! Target everything on Chinese industry and military posts.
44 posted on 01/20/2002 1:11:12 AM PST by Chapita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
I don't think the reason for the media's ignorance of China, is just the fact that they don't consider China a threat.

The media ignored the China threat for all those years to protect Clinton. After all, had they reported the truth as it exists while Chinagate was going on, the heat on Clinton would've been MUCH stronger. So, they conditioned themselves to ignore the China threat and refuse to report it. That conditioning is still in place. China is our friend. Clinton said so. That's it.

MM

45 posted on 01/20/2002 1:59:54 AM PST by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
"Arms sales deeply hurt the feelings of the Chinese people."

Sounds like someone needs their TS card punched, eh?

46 posted on 01/20/2002 2:08:58 AM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
"They were once our friends, a long time ago. The communists are the problem. Just like it was with the former Soviets.IMHO"

Aye, there's the rub.

The former Soviets! But no such thing in China, is there.

So, why are the Soviets "former", while the Chinese communists are not "former"?

The answer is one that will not be popular in this country.

The Soviets are "former" because the US 1) applied pressure (Afghanistan, "star wars", etc.) that caused the communists to bankrupt their regime, and 2) stood by and let them bankrupt it without us rescuing them.

Now, they're our friends (while China remains a foe).

What's different with China?

We're doing the exact opposite of what we did vis-a-vis the Soviets, that's what! And we'd be utter fools to think we'd get the same result!

Instead of applying pressure, we're greasing the way for them. MFN, WTO, etc.

And instead of standing back and letting the communist regime fall apart, we're giving them billions and billions of US dollars! Dollars that were invested in US businesses, farms, industries, and jobs.

I guess you might say I see a bit of a problem with the idea that the situation is, "Just like it was with the former Soviets." :)

47 posted on 01/20/2002 2:18:47 AM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: semper_libertas
Good figures to ponder. Do you remember in the not so distant past when much of those trade deficit figures belonged to Japan? At least the Japanese were sending us something useful like automobile factories and polite, free spending tourists.

A BIG share of Japan's economic troubles is due not only to the fact that a lot of those dollars have moved to China, but the globalists here have followed by moving production out of Japan.

48 posted on 01/20/2002 2:56:22 AM PST by Rubber Duckie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP
And if really get mad, repatriate tongs and triads! Then what you degenerates do for China White!
What? Blackbird.
49 posted on 01/20/2002 3:01:23 AM PST by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: struwwelpeter
Stru, geez, where have you been? I haven't seen you around in ages. Hope all is well with you and you are safe.
50 posted on 01/20/2002 3:05:11 AM PST by patj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson