- What is the evidentiary basis for the Evolutionists' faith in the god named "random?"
- How is the presumption of random causation anything other than a dogmatic leap of faith?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: Sabertooth
Saber, this is a GREAT post. You ask tough questions of both sides....they certainly deserve much consideration.
To: Sabertooth
I don't understand, why there is such a heated debate between the Creationist, and the Evolutionist. Isn't evolution simply a process of creation? In the same way that walking, driving, flying,.. is simply a process of getting ourselves from place to place? Or, studying, and passing exams, from kindergarten to a PhD, to become an Einstien?
To: Sabertooth
You don't have to be an athiest to believe that God created the world via evolution.
330 posted on
02/05/2002 12:12:59 AM PST by
Demidog
To: Sabertooth
A good question to ask the evolutionists is "where are all the bones/fossils of the evolving species??? To the best of my knowledge, there aren't any.
To: Sabertooth
The two question we should each ask an evolutionist are:
1) When did the Universe begin?
2) Who created that?
The evolutinist, it seems, have a real first cause problem. For all their theories, a simple "who created that?" leaves them unable to explain themselves.
To: Sabertooth
Let's face it, evolutionists have their heads up their ass.
To: Sabertooth
As a non scientist, I am curious. Can anyone site one piece of hard scientific evidence in support of the theory of evolution?
542 posted on
02/08/2002 5:14:22 AM PST by
rrr51
To: Sabertooth
You make a good point. Suppose a person made the statement. "God does not exist". Since one can only perceive God through personal experience, this person, obviously, has not experienced God but that does not prove that He isn't there. It is simply an expression of that persons state of being at that particular time.
Now if a person asserts that God does not exist, this, by it's very nature is a contradiction because to claim this degree of knowledge one must elevate themself to the level of God in order to make the claim. How can a person make an absolute claim unless they themselves know absolute truth?
It seems to be the universal human condition that at every opportunity, the tendency is to cater to our pride and exalt ourselves above all things rather than to humble ourselves by admitting just how mortally ignorant we truly are, especially in matters of the soul and spirit. Like we can arrive at a logical explaination of how we came to be and leave God out of it.
The problem is not in thinking about such things but in the conclusions that are drawn from such thoughts. And our children are being taught some of these conclusions as though they are absolute facts. ...God have mercy on us.
576 posted on
02/09/2002 7:58:48 PM PST by
slimer
To: Sabertooth
that about summarizes it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson