Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Parents becoming focus of public's interest in case

By Bruce Lieberman and Preston Turegano
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITERS

February 9, 2002

All week, media across the nation buzzed about the abduction of a child from her bedroom in northern San Diego.

Danielle van Dam is still missing, but by yesterday the public's attention was shifting to the girl's parents, as accusations and talk-radio diatribes threatened to drown out news of the investigation.

The founder of a group that posted a $10,000 reward for Danielle's safe return suggested the police investigate her family. Radio talk-show conversations questioned the lifestyle of Brenda and Damon van Dam; television and newspaper reporters began asking them about it.

The Internet has been teeming with messages about Danielle and her parents. While some come to the van Dams' defense, the bulk are angry with the parents, and many of the messages are mean-spirited. They address everything from rumors of the parents' lifestyle to their statements that they didn't check on their children after a door was found open at night.

The van Dams, who discovered their 7-year-old daughter missing from her bed a week ago today, became household names almost overnight as they made the rounds of national television shows, pleading for Danielle's return.

They have used the reach of the Internet to ask for help in finding her. A Web site set up by neighbors provides a downloadable poster of the child and asks viewers to distribute it as widely as possible.

The shift in the response to the van Dams – from sympathetic to nasty – was swift as the couple tried in vain to keep the focus on the search for their daughter.

A family spokeswoman said the van Dams would not comment yesterday about the flurry of allegations.

One of the most outspoken critics was Douglas Pierce, who only days before posted a $10,000 reward for Danielle's return. Pierce, who describes his group, the Millennium Children's Fund, as a nonprofit advocacy group for abused children, said he was disturbed by what he saw during his eight hours in the van Dam home Wednesday.

He felt the parents lacked emotion, and said he was put off by what he described as their repeated rehearsals before facing the media.

The van Dams and several advisers plan what the parents say and how they look on television and in newspapers, Pierce said. "They were talking about their makeup and how they look in the camera," he added.

Pierce said the van Dams' two sons, 5 and 10, should be taken from the home while police search for Danielle.

Although he found no evidence to believe the van Dams are tied directly to their daughter's disappearance, Pierce said he decided to ask for outside protection for the children after observing the family, its public-relations team and a journal entry by Danielle that he said suggested conflict with her father.

Pierce said he was shocked when Brenda van Dam showed him Danielle's journal. " 'Daddy, please forgive me,' " Pierce said one entry read. " 'Daddy please love me. Danielle.' "

"After my personal observation, I'm asking for a wake-up call from the San Diego Police Department to investigate the family," Pierce said.

Pierce's comments enraged the van Dams.

"Douglas Pierce is some kind of freak who came into our house," Damon van Dam told a Los Angeles radio station Thursday. He called Pierce "evil."

"He is trying to start trouble for us," Brenda van Dam said. "We did not invite him into our house."

A few days ago, the van Dams began to get questions on television about their private life. Delicate questions became pointed yesterday when San Diego radio talk-show host Rick Roberts criticized the van Dams on the air for "not being honest" about "what really occurred" the night their daughter disappeared.

Roberts told his listeners that a "reliable" source "high in law enforcement" said the van Dams have engaged in "lots of wife-swapping." Saying he believes the source, Roberts reported activity by the van Dams on the night of Feb. 1 dramatically different from their description to the news media.

Roberts repeated his source's allegations for four hours, interrupted mainly by callers angry at the van Dams.

During a break in his 3-to-7 p.m. show on KFMB-AM 760 titled "The Court of Public Opinion," Roberts told The San Diego Union-Tribune he decided to go public with what his source told him because the van Dams' two young sons remain at home and "may be exposed to the couple's lifestyle."

When asked if he thought his comments were slanderous or unethical, Roberts said: "No, not at all. This is not a court of law. It's a court of public opinion. If anyone thinks they're slanderous, they can subpoena me."

Roberts said he told his program director he intended to disclose the source's information and that the director did not object.

Ed Trimble, president and chief operating officer of KFMB-TV and radio, could not be reached for comment after the show.

Roberts' comments prompted a flurry of new messages on the Internet.

A woman who runs a Danielle van Dam message board from North Carolina said, "It is the kind of situation that will show every wart they have – and it will horrify us to think how little privacy anyone really has."

In the meantime, Pierce continued to post the reward offer on the Web.

His Millennium Children's Fund is listed with the state of California as an active corporation first registered Feb. 26, 2000. In April 2001, Pierce filed a 990-EZ form with the Internal Revenue Service, listing the fund as a "children's public benefit charity."

Accomplishments listed on the form included creating Web sites for adults and for children, and "implementing" public-service announcements. Pierce reported no income and no expenses for the 2000 tax year on the form.

2 posted on 02/09/2002 6:58:51 AM PST by crypt2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: crypt2k ; terilyn
Pierce said he was shocked when Brenda van Dam showed him Danielle's journal. " 'Daddy, please forgive me,' " Pierce said one entry read. " 'Daddy please love me. Danielle.' "

Pierce is attempting to propel himself into some type of major role here. That quote, if true, can be attributed to a multitude of non-abuse related situations. For example, Danielle may have been punished for not doing her homework and, being a child, got a little dramatic in her personal diary. Notice Pierce does not reveal what the cause of Danielle's distress was.

There can be big money in salaries and perks while running a non-profit agency that garners large amounts donations. Getting your name and the name of your organization in the public eye helps alot. Pierce clearly oversteps his bounds when calling for outside protection for the renaining children. That is not his call to make and he is impeding the investigation by the San Diego PD.

131 posted on 02/09/2002 1:59:59 PM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson