Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Navy Patriot
...it seems to me that only those illegals with accumulated assets here would be motivated to cash out and go. Those that send everything home they earn and live on the fringes and entitlements would stay.

To some extent this is true... not all 12 million would deport themselves.

But asset forfeiture would definitely make a smaller haystack, and provide less incentive for newcomers. Also, guest worker programs would become far more attractive.

And the INS would have a profit motive to enforce the law, though it's sad that's necessary.




32 posted on 02/16/2002 9:45:02 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Sabertooth
And the INS would have a profit motive to enforce the law, though it's sad that's necessary.

Actually, the way you want to use this appeals to me. As your statement is accurate, paying assets siezed as commissions to the INS and Border Patrol agents directly would motivate them to enforce the law regardless of the recalcitrance of their superiors. You've got something here.

ijcr and others suggestions about employers have merit also, but your point about existing law is the place to start to sort out who is a "knowing" illegal employer.

I enjoy reading your opinions, go ahead and submit some to likely venues, I think you will be pleasntly surprised.

37 posted on 02/16/2002 10:11:38 AM PST by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson