Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Complete collapse of North Atlantic fishing predicted
New Scientist ^ | 10:30 18 February 02 | Kurt Kleiner, Boston

Posted on 02/18/2002 2:59:11 AM PST by semper_libertas

Complete collapse of North Atlantic fishing predicted

The entire North Atlantic is being so severely overfished that it may completely collapse by 2010, reveals the first comprehensive survey of the entire ocean's fishery.

"We'll all be eating jellyfish sandwiches," says Reg Watson, a fisheries scientist at the University of British Columbia. Putting new ocean-wide management plans into place is the only way to reverse the trend, Watson and his colleagues say.

Concentrations of biomass of "table" fish have disappeared
Concentrations of biomass of "table" fish have disappeared

North Atlantic catches have fallen by half since 1950, despite a tripling of the effort put into catching them. The total number of fish in the ocean has fallen even further, they say, with just one sixth as many high-quality "table fish" like cod and tuna as there were in 1900. Fish prices have risen six fold in real terms in 50 years.

The shortage of table fish has forced a switch to other species. "The jellyfish sandwich is not a metaphor - jellyfish is being exported from the US," says Daniel Pauly, also at the University of British Columbia. "In the Gulf of Maine people were catching cod a few decades ago. Now they're catching sea cucumber. By earlier standards, these things are repulsive," he says.


Off limits

The only hope for the fishery is to drastically limit fishing, for instance by declaring large portions of the ocean off-limits and at the same time reducing the number of fishing ships. Piecemeal efforts to protect certain fisheries have only caused the fishing fleet to overfish somewhere else, such as west Africa.

"It's like shuffling the deckchairs on the Titanic," says Andrew Rosenberg, at the University of New Hampshire. He says the number of boats must be reduced: "Less is actually more with fisheries. If you fish less you get more fish."

Normally, falling catches would drive some fishers out of business. But government subsidies actually encourage overfishing, Watson says, with subsidies totalling about $2.5 billion a year in the North Atlantic.

However, Rosenberg was sceptical that any international fishing agreements currently on the table will turn the tide in a short enough timescale. The UN's Food and Agriculture Organization and the OECD have initiatives but these are voluntary, he says. A UN-backed monitoring and enforcement plan of action is being discussed but could take 10 years to come into force.

Pauly says only a public reaction like that against whaling in the 1970s would be enough to bring about sufficient change in the way the fish stocks are managed.

The new survey was presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science's 2002 annual meeting in Boston.

Kurt Kleiner, Boston

10:30 18 February 02


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; maine; masslist; newhampshire; nwo; rhodeisland; unlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-291 next last
for info and discussion...

I see no debate here, merely assertions and demands for policy.


"Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges."
The more corrupt the state is, the more numerous are the laws.
-- Tacitus , Annales



1 posted on 02/18/2002 2:59:12 AM PST by semper_libertas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: semper_libertas
This sounds like another "urban sprawl"-type alarum, leading to more laws, taxes, and restrictions. I understand there are groups trying to outlaw all fishing, even sport fishing....
2 posted on 02/18/2002 3:08:57 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semper_libertas
Do you think this means that Mickey D's will discontinue the Fish Filet? God help me, I love it so. With fries and a coke. Also a double cheeseburger from the dollar menu, if the funds are available.
3 posted on 02/18/2002 3:14:39 AM PST by ruxtontowers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semper_libertas
Fisheries and Oceans Canada: Canada Disappointed With Outcome of NAFO Meeting

Story Filed: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 10:06 AM EST

OTTAWA, ONTARIO, FEBRUARY 5, 2002 (CCN Newswire via COMTEX) -- The Honourable Robert G. Thibault, Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, today indicated that he was pleased with the efforts of the Canadian delegation, but deeply disappointed with the outcome of the special meeting of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) last week. The meeting was held in Helsingor, Denmark, from January 29 to February 1, 2002.

"Canada's objective at these meetings has been to ensure that conservation measures are in place to protect and rebuild fish stocks in the NAFO Regulatory Area, and to ensure that there is compliance with these measures by the vessels of NAFO member countries," said Minister Thibault. "It is very disappointing that, even when presented with strong evidence, NAFO would reject some of our proposals, particularly those which would have helped address the increasing trend towards non-compliance by some foreign fishing vessels."

"However, as a result of the Canadian disclosure of non-compliance, NAFO did agree to establish a process to review and assess compliance performance on an annual basis. This is a serious issue for us and, over the next year, we will increase our monitoring of foreign activity to assess compliance and to provide input into that process. We will continue to press member countries, both bilaterally and in multilateral forums such as NAFO, to take action in response to evidence of violations by their fleets."

Canada's aim at the NAFO meeting in Denmark was to introduce new conservation measures to protect and rebuild stocks, particularly those subject to moratoria. To support the need for these new measures, Canada presented information showing an increasing trend in non-compliance by vessels of some foreign countries party to NAFO. This information is the result of Canada's continuous monitoring of the activity of foreign vessels in the NAFO Regulatory Area.

The specific proposals advanced by Canada were aimed at addressing excessive by-catch of moratoria species, mis-reporting and exceeding quotas. While NAFO accepted some of Canada's proposals, including significantly increasing mesh size in the directed skate fishery and implementing daily reporting of catches in the 3L shrimp fishery, it did reject Canada's proposal to restrict the depth in which the Greenland halibut fishery would be conducted.

Restricting depth in the Greenland halibut fishery would have helped ensure that those participating in this fishery would be legitimately fishing just for that species, and not using this fishery as an opportunity to target some of the species that are currently subject to moratoria. NAFO not only rejected the proposal to restrict Greenland halibut fishing to deeper water, but voted to increase the Greenland halibut Total Allowable Catch (TAC) from 40,000t to 44,000t. This decision ignored advice from the NAFO Scientific Council, which had recommended maintaining the TAC of 40,000t.

With the exception of Greenland halibut, all other harvest levels recommended by the Scientific Council for NAFO stocks were adopted by NAFO. Moratoria will be maintained on 3NO cod, 3NO witch flounder, 3LN redfish and 3LNO American plaice stocks.

The TAC for the yellowtail flounder fishery will continue to be set at 13,000t. The Canadian fleet which has the predominant share of the NAFO quota of yellowtail flounder will continue to be managed with a set of strict controls similar to those applied in recent years. Conservation measures include minimum mesh size, 100% observer coverage and a dockside-monitoring program to monitor all landings.

Current management measures for 3L shrimp will continue in 2002 with a TAC of 6,000t, of which Canada receives 5,000t. The remaining 1,000t is fished outside Canada's fisheries waters in the NAFO Regulatory Area and is shared by other NAFO members. The moratorium on shrimp fishing in Divisions 3NO will continue.

Measures adopted at the Special Fisheries Commission meeting will be put in place during the 2002 season.

"I want to thank members of the Canadian delegation for their commitment to the conservation of fish stocks and for their contribution in addressing complex issues associated with the work of the Commission" added Minister Thibault.

NAFO was founded in 1978 to provide for the conservation and management of fish stocks that are found in the NAFO Regulatory Area, which is beyond Canada's 200-mile limit. Its members are Canada, Bulgaria, Cuba, Denmark (on behalf of the Faroe Islands and Greenland), Estonia, the European Union, France (on behalf of St. Pierre and Miquelon), Iceland, Japan, South Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Ukraine and the United States of America.

The backgrounder related to this announcement is available on the automated Fax-On-Demand service of Fisheries and Oceans. It is immediately retrievable -- to users with a touchtone phone and a fax machine -- 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

4 posted on 02/18/2002 3:15:30 AM PST by boston_liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semper_libertas
Complete collapse of North Atlantic fishing predicted

Again?

Seems this same claim is made every few years.

5 posted on 02/18/2002 3:17:54 AM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
"Fish prices have risen six fold in real terms in 50 years. "

Sounds like capitalism will be the MOST effective means of regulation. As fish become more scarce prises will rise, demand will drop and number of fishing vessels will drop accordingly.

This problem was long ago dealt with for freshwater fish with the explosion of fisheries and hatcheries that are dedicated to breeding table fish.

Where there is a $$ there is a way. A concept totally lost on most leftists.

6 posted on 02/18/2002 3:18:57 AM PST by semper_libertas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: semper_libertas
does this mean there aren't "plenty of fish in the sea"?
7 posted on 02/18/2002 3:20:55 AM PST by WolfsView
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WolfsView
Have you even tried to buy cod or haddock lately? And do you know what it's going for a pound? About nine bucks, when you can find it, in my neck of the woods. The overfishing charge is NO chicken little cry.
8 posted on 02/18/2002 3:25:41 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: semper_libertas
"As fish become more scarce prises will rise, demand will drop and number of fishing vessels will drop accordingly. "

Exactly, an equilibrium will always result and self-regulation will occur. This is just like the greenhouse effect (in a way). If worldwide CO2 is on the rise, plants will grow better (that's been proven) and CO2 goes back down. It's like you said, "a concept totally lost on most leftist".

9 posted on 02/18/2002 3:27:56 AM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: semper_libertas
The first paragraph says it all. The rest of the article is like a tuna fish sandwich with out the tuna, or bread.
10 posted on 02/18/2002 3:29:47 AM PST by justrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Don't know where your from, but until a few years ago I lived in FL and never had a problem with getting sea food or the price.
11 posted on 02/18/2002 3:30:12 AM PST by WolfsView
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
So true, Even Alaska is experiencing the destruction by foreign fleets. Crazy thing is for all they yell about global warming, not a peep about their fishing fleets.
12 posted on 02/18/2002 3:32:25 AM PST by Eska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
" Have you even tried to buy cod or haddock lately? And do you know what it's going for a pound? …The overfishing charge is NO chicken little cry. "

I just bought my first cod fillet 2 days ago for 5.99 per/lb. I have no idea how to cook a cod. I guess I'll put jerk sauce on it. What do you think of reply #6?

13 posted on 02/18/2002 3:32:59 AM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: semper_libertas
The left and the EU would rather whine about "global warming" than pick an issue they could actually do something about.
14 posted on 02/18/2002 3:47:50 AM PST by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
You bet there are! And, even to charge a State fee, as Florida does, to fish the ocean.

Yet, the sport fisherman dosen't destroy anything. His problem is not sending enough money to people like the Clintons. So, he's not allowed to take the King's deer. Meanwhile the commercial crowd is hitting it with cables and nets that can go 3,000 ft down.

The sport fishing creates employment and good healthy recreation time. I say, the smaller the fisherman is, the more support he should get.And, get out of the way of the sportsman.

15 posted on 02/18/2002 3:48:40 AM PST by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Let's see, a shortage of table fish? I bought fresh cod filets at Kroger in Lansing, MI. this last Saturday (2-16) for $3.99 lb. and canned tuna in spring water, 2 for a buck.
16 posted on 02/18/2002 3:48:47 AM PST by bullseye1911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: UN_List; *"NWO"
Relentless...
17 posted on 02/18/2002 3:51:14 AM PST by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ruxtontowers
No worries on that. McDonald's gets all their fish from SE Asia.
18 posted on 02/18/2002 3:52:20 AM PST by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: justrepublican
"Putting new ocean-wide management plans into place is the only way to reverse the trend,"........ it is all about control.
19 posted on 02/18/2002 3:52:38 AM PST by Rustynailww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ruxtontowers
Do you think this means that Mickey D's will discontinue the Fish Filet? God help me, I love it so. With fries and a coke. Also a double cheeseburger from the dollar menu, if the funds are available.

I think you're safe, rux. There's about as much real fish in a Filet-O-Fish as there is beef in a Double Cheeseburger :-) (BTW-I love 'em myself)

20 posted on 02/18/2002 3:56:07 AM PST by LoneGOPinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-291 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson