Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumsfeld attacked over Cuba prisoners
The Guardian (U.K.) ^ | 02/25/2002 | Richard Norton-Taylor

Posted on 02/24/2002 7:20:32 PM PST by Pokey78

British lawyers accuse US defence secretary of 'horsetrading with human beings'

Lawyers acting for British detainees at the US military base at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba yesterday stepped up pressure for their release and attacked Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, for saying that they could be repatriated only on condition that they were prosecuted here.

Gareth Peirce, who is acting for the families of Shafiq Rasul and Asif Iqbal, both from Tipton in the West Midlands, accused Mr Rumsfeld of "horsetrading with human beings".

She said the prisoners were being unlawfully detained and there was growing evidence that they had been interrogated in a vulnerable and distressed state. Mr Rasul's family had received a letter saying he had lost three stone in weight. Foreign Office consular officials agreed at a meeting in London last week that he was "very thin", she said.

The FO admitted that it did not know on what basis five British prisoners were being held at Camp X-Ray in Cuba, Ms Peirce said. It also did not know in what circumstances they had been captured in Afghanistan.

Mr Rumsfeld told the Daily Telegraph that he would send the prisoners back provided they were dealt with by the British courts rather than "simply turning them loose, putting them back out on the streets and having them go get more aeroplanes and flying into the Pentagon and the World Trade Centre again".

The US would demand "a chance to go back and interrogate" them, Mr Rumsfeld added.

Other detainees kept at the base could be tried by military commissions. Asked whether they would face the death penalty, Mr Rumsfeld replied: "Oh, sure."

The US describes the detainees as "unlawful combatants", not prisoners of war. According to the Geneva conventions, in cases of doubt the status of detainees should be decided by an independent tribunal.

It emerged yesterday that the first letter home from a Briton held in Camp X-Ray was marked "prisoner of war mail".

Feroz Abbasi's brief message of reassurance sent to his mother in Croydon, south London, was a surprise, said London-based lawyers acting on his behalf.

Solicitor Louise Christian said: "This is very important, because if they are being recognised as prisoners of war they should be released immediately, as hostilities have now ceased."

The 22-year-old's handwritten letter, the first from a Briton held in high security at Guantanamo Bay, arrived on Thursday. Today, his mother, Zumrati Juma, is to make a public statement demanding that lawyers and medical experts be allowed immediate access to prisoners at Camp X-Ray. Her appeal is backed by the Law Society.

· The British-born chief suspect in the kidnap and murder of reporter Daniel Pearl could go on trial in front of an American military tribunal, Mr Rumsfeld said yesterday. Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh has confessed to playing a part in the kidnapping of the 38-year-old Wall Street Journal reporter, whose murder was confirmed last week.

Mr Rumsfeld said Mr Saeed, who is from Wanstead, east London, and dropped out of the London School of Economics before becoming an Islamic militant in Pakistan, met all the criteria for going on trial in front of an American military tribunal. The American Department of Justice is reportedly moving to extradite Mr Saeed from Pakistan.

Mr Rumsfeld told NBC's Meet the Press programme: "He certainly is someone that has committed a crime against an American and would be someone that I assume that our law enforcement people would extradite."

Police in Afghanistan revealed that they are searching for three Arab nationals believed to have played a part in the kidnapping and murder.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: detainees; iqbal; pearl; rasul; rumsfeld; rumsfeldpinglist; saeed; tribunals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Pokey78
"This is very important, because if they are being recognised as prisoners of war they should be released immediately, as hostilities have now ceased."

What? The game is over, so put the checker board away?
I don't think this person knows what this war is.
When it slows down to a dull roar, we just don't tell the guys "Good war, thanks for playing. You can go now"
Geeeez !! Shouldn't the Muslim terrorists surrender first or something?

21 posted on 02/24/2002 8:34:56 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The US should slit their throats and be done with them.
22 posted on 02/24/2002 8:38:35 PM PST by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wanker
No, actually Danny Pearl's murderers, and most of the people in Gitmo, believe that it isn't a serious crime to murder a Jew, or a Christian.

The people that started this whole thing believe that you can punish people for the crimes of others, so do the prisoners at Gitmo.

Terrorists believe that you can punish people for the crimes of others, as long as they're Jews or Christians.

It's a bitch to be treated as you treat others, isn't it?

23 posted on 02/24/2002 8:39:55 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: Wanker
LOL, nice screen name fits you perfectly:)
25 posted on 02/24/2002 8:59:43 PM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: Wanker
do you believe that people should be punished for the crimes of others?

You are correct in that they have nothing to do with Pearl. However, they are terrorist criminals, arrested in a zone under military control. They are not American citizens, they are not in the United States, and therefore they have no rights under the U.S. Constitution. They are subject to military, not civil, jurisdiction.

The detainees were followers and associates of known criminals, bin Laden et al, who had previously conspired to murder Americans, and had done so at Khobar Towers and elsewhere. Their leaders spoke openly of their plans to attack innocent civilians in the United States. These plans were disseminated throughout the criminal organizations, through personal meetings, video and audio tapes, and the media - And there is considerable evidence that there was a uniformly high level of knowledge of these plans throughout the organization.

The detainees either took direct action resulting in the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, or aided and abetted those who did. Either way, it was done with full malice aforethought.

They are all, by virtue of their membership in this criminal conspiracy, either murderers or accessories to murder, if not before then certainly after the fact.

Those are the charges. The penalty ought to be death. These were crimes committed against Americans, and it is our right to exact our justice, in any way we deem appropriate, and I don't give a rat's ass what the leftist Euro-trash have to say about it.

27 posted on 02/24/2002 9:32:03 PM PST by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
...Mr Rumsfeld replied: "Oh, sure."

Gotta love this guy.

28 posted on 02/24/2002 9:43:31 PM PST by barker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wanker
Sorry man, there comes a point when the lofty ideals of civilized people must be put aside in order to protect the continued survival of the lofty ideals of those very same civilized people.

The argument that you are making is the exact argument the terrorist need for civilized people with lofty ideals to make: that it is OK for them to butcher you, but not OK for you to butcher them in return.

I happen to like the way we live here, I like the fact that I can assume the reasonable expectation of not being butchered by some Islamic religious f#%k on my way to work on your average work day.

I like that.

I don't want to live the way Israel lives.

So when a group of people show the willingness, and the ability to do what they did to us on 9/11, we have to take them out.

I don't want to enact draconian laws, and do more damage to our already damaged civil rights. I don't want military police at the airpost, I don't want to spend more hours just trying to get on an airplane to go somewhere within my own friggin' country.

And I really don't like the fact that someone else is dictating all these policies to me via killing innocent people, our people, on our own soil.

It's like being trained to become Pavlov's Nation.

I want the things they used to be, unless WE decide to change them.

So what do you do? You go out, and make damned sure that the whole world understands three damned things:

1) You are not going to take this crap from any individual, group, or nation out there without some serious massive retaliation.

2) You are not allowing any foreign government to harbor, foster, or in any way protect people who would do these sort of thing without bringing it down.

3) You got the muscle to do whatever you want to do.

Then you go out and waste a few that needed wasting just to let everyone know that you are dead serious.

They will bitch, and moan, and not like us very much (they don't know), and they'll leave us the hell alone.

Then I we go back to having the ability to assume the reasonable expectation of not being butchered by some Islamic fanatical f#%k on our way to work on an average work week.

Works for me.

29 posted on 02/24/2002 10:17:01 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Wanker
Hey Wanker, there are several million other people on that island whose civil rights are being violated daily, been that way for over 40 years, whom you didn't mention on your defense of human rights.

Just thought I'd remind you.

30 posted on 02/24/2002 10:20:49 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I wonder how often they criticize Fidel for his prisoners??
31 posted on 02/24/2002 10:23:06 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
He just tells the truth.

LOL!

32 posted on 02/24/2002 10:26:42 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics; Pokey78; cool guy
Shouldn't the Muslim terrorists surrender first or something?

RIGHT ON c.a.p.!! And Pokey...how in the world can you say the hostilities have ceased????? You can't believe that, can you????

I can sure tell that so many arguing for "lamb and rice", 8 hours of sleep and a rec center with masseuse for the "Guantanamites" have never been in a street fight, batlle, or war, and never studied their history or have anything resembling common-sense!

There are still Fundamentalist Muslims around the world gearing up to take down the infidels (me and you) and will do it with horrific disregard of courtesy, decency, civility, and humanity. You will not be allowed to have a prayer time before bed, eat your turkey for Thanksgiving, or have a Ham for Christmas while whistling "God Rest Ye Merry Gentlemen"

Here is a message for all of you who think this war is even close to over:

Take cover and go wet your pants in a corner, the real men are going to protect you whether or not you deserve it. When it is over, you can watch some documentaries on this war and learn what it took to protect your grandchildren from certain doom...you'll probably try to claim some of the credit for the victory....go ahead, just stay out of the way for now!

33 posted on 02/24/2002 10:32:01 PM PST by thunderdome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Lawyers acting for British detainees at the US military base at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba yesterday stepped up pressure

Geesh. Can hardly stand this intense pressure. Let's release them immediately.

34 posted on 02/24/2002 10:35:06 PM PST by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I know Pokey sid not say this....the article referenced this comment and I caught a reply to Pokey further in the conversation, spacing out here!

Good Post Pokey!

35 posted on 02/24/2002 10:40:39 PM PST by thunderdome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: thunderdome
When are these stupid liberals going to get it? The last time anyone actually paid attention to them was on September 10th. On September 11th the vacuouseness of their position was clearly displayed.
36 posted on 02/24/2002 11:01:28 PM PST by The Cuban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Then I we go back to having the ability to assume the reasonable expectation of not being butchered by some Islamic fanatical f#%k on our way to work on an average work week.

Works for me.

Well said, Luis!

37 posted on 02/25/2002 4:31:19 AM PST by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

38 posted on 02/25/2002 4:36:37 AM PST by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
perfect!
39 posted on 02/25/2002 4:38:45 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2

"...Solicitor Louise Christian said: "This is very important, because if they are being recognised as prisoners of war they should be released immediately, as hostilities have now ceased..."




"...Hostilities have ceased...?"






BAWHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA


40 posted on 02/25/2002 4:43:26 AM PST by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson