Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I AM KEENLY AWARE OF THE HISTORY OF SLAVERY.
GiveMeLiberty.org ^ | February 2002 | Sherry Peel Jackson

Posted on 03/06/2002 7:46:33 PM PST by one2many

CLOSING COMMENTS
"ADDRESSING THE JURY - THE AMERICAN PEOPLE"

Ladies and Gentlemen:

My name is Sherry Peel Jackson. I became a Certified Public Accountant in 1987, I was an Internal Revenue Agent in the Atlanta District for 7 years, and I became a Certified Fraud Examiner in 2001. I am here to summarize the tales of ignorance and deception that you have heard over the last two days and I am here to inform you of the state of the nation so that you may choose your next course of action.

You have heard the truth of how the Internal Revenue Service, Department of Justice, Federal Reserve and politicians have perpetuated this smoke and mirrors - dog and pony show on you the American people for over 88 years. You have heard of American families devastated by the invasion of privacy and unbridled fear placed upon them through threats of liens, levy's and even jail time. In my tenure as an IRS agent, I personally saw marriages broken, families torn apart, homes confiscated and businesses destroyed - all while my colleagues and I were out making unjust demands on the American people - without the proper authority. Now, you be the judge.

You have seen that Commissioner Charles Rosatti, Dan Bryant, the majority of our congressional delegation and other civil servants have refused to do their jobs. It would have been as simple as answering the questions of these well-educated researchers in a public forum, such as this one. But they have reneged, so you be the judge.

You have learned that the Constitution of the United States of America has been trampled on and ignored through allowing the privately owned Federal Reserve to create paper currency and charge you 47 million dollars in interest per hour - money coming from the mouths of your children and the college education funds of your grandchildren, all the while the children and grandchildren of the owners of the Federal Reserve will never have to work a day in their lives, and that is wrong, on so many different levels.

And let me tell you, that as a black woman I am keenly aware of the history of slavery. But do you understand that we are all slaves to this system? Do you understand that the media and Hollywood play a part keeping the American people so fixated on Alley McBeal, WWF Smackdown, Moeisha and the Practice that we don't take time to read the Creature from Jekyll Island, study the Internal Revenue Code and learn the Constitution?

Now, let me spend just a minute to address my culture. Do you realize that the so called black leaders make millions of dollars every year playing the "us against them" role - keeping blacks focused on the race card and away from the real issue - the theft of our future through taxation.

These publicity mongers are well aware of the oppression brought on by income taxation, they love to march on Washington about racial profiling and civil rights, not to say that these are not real problems, but these leaders have been too afraid to approach the powers that be and have a million man, woman, boy, girl march about economic freedom from income taxation and restoration of constitutional rights.

(And they have the nerve to call Clarence Thomas an Uncle Tom.)

Also, there's been a lot of talk about reparations lately, but know this: If all Americans were able to keep the money withheld from their paychecks every year, that money would enable them to home school, start their own business and boost the economy, save for college and retirement, even buy that 40 acres and a mule. So, you be the judge.

You need to understand that with an Internal Revenue Code, Code of Federal Regulations, and other "official documents" spouting off several different definitions of United States, Internal Revenue Service and other important terms, this deception that keeps people ignorant is not a coincidence. The writers of the Code used semantics and legalese to make us think that we are required to pay the income tax and file an income tax return. Former IRS commissioner Shirley Peterson even stated that, and I quote, "Eight decades of amendments….to (the) code have produced a virtually impenetrable maze….The rules are unintelligible to most citizens….The rules are equally mysterious to many government employees who are charged with administering and enforcing the law." End quote.

This fraud was strung together by people like the former president that said "it depends on what your definition of is is" and "it depends on what your definition of sex is". This incident showed us that definitions are very important to politicians and lawyers, and no word is meaningless. For example, it does depend on what the definition of "source" is.

The opposition, in an attempt to keep the sheeple in the flock, will scoff at us and encourage unaware Americans to ridicule those of us who have been informed, saying, "these people just don't want to pay their fair share." We have already learned from a speech by former Federal Reserve Chairman Beardsley Rhuml that this country doesn't need income taxes for revenue. This money collected from our sweat and tears is used to perpetuate redistribution of wealth, among other things. But the powers that be keep beating the people over the head with this "fair share' garbage. Well, what is fair share? Haven't the families of the victims in New York City and the pentagon paid their fair share? Haven't the men and women that lost sons and daughters, husbands in wives in Vietnam, Korea and the other battles paid their fair share? So you see, this tactic to pit those that are uninformed of the income tax fraud against those who have seen the light is baseless and must be eliminated!

The opposition also uses our religious faith to twist the meaning of authority and to create unjust statutes. People, I know godly authority and our current system does not reflect godly authority. Many of our past and present religious leaders have been jailed for questioning authority. They have been beaten, starved and even killed for their faith and their defiance of injustice. People of America - is what you're living for worth dying for? Are you willing to take a stand? It's your choice.

The creators of this Creature called the income tax, engineered their system to manipulate you into staying in your comfort zones. With a little bit of patriotism and a little bit of fear tactic mixed into a pot of inflation and deflation, they have been able to keep the people confused, intimidated and obedient for over 88 years.

But now the truth about the fraudulent origin and operations of the Federal Reserve System and the Internal Revenue Service have been revealed to the American people. You can no longer claim ignorance of the truth. You must acknowledge it or reject it. The choice is yours. And the consequences of your decision will rest on the shoulders of your children and future generations of Americans.

You can remain an informed slave or you can get off of the plantation. You can remain engrossed in fear, or you can take a stand like Patrick Henry who shouted "give me liberty or give me death." You can stay hypnotized by "As The World Turns" and "The Guiding Light", or you can turn off the bube tube and read the Constitution, then go ask your elected representatives why they refuse to follow it. Remember that those elected representatives have sworn to uphold and defend our constitution.

Remember that each of our elected representatives has pledged to serve our country first-not a political party, or certain privileged and special interests groups-but you, the American People. They are our public servants.

In closing, we have shown you the truth. Now, for the sake of our Country and our children, we ask you to choose justice over injustice, unity over division, courage over fear, truth over ignorance, and liberty over economic slavery.

We ask you to stand with us and let the voice of freedom be heard from every corner of our great country. It is time to end this long-standing injustice and tyranny over the American People.

Thank you.

Sherry Peel Jackson, CPA

Note: These comments were presented at the Close of the Citizens' Truth-In-Taxation Hearing. Washington D.C., February 27-28, 2002


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: govwatch; sovereigntylist; taxreform; taxreformthreads; traitorlist; trashcan; trt; urbanlegends; weaselslist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-146 next last
To: Middle Man

I file a return every year.

You file a return supporting a hoax? Shame on you.

101 posted on 03/14/2002 1:13:47 PM PST by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Middle Man
I like the idea of the NRST. Like you just stated, the CPA and tax-attorneys are making money hand-over-fist due to the complexities of the regulations. Also look at the monies spent by corporations to shelter money and avoid taxes. Even mom-and-pop operations must devote an inordinate amount of time preparing payrolls and meeting federal/state/local guidelines. The people are not represented in Congress - corporations are.
102 posted on 03/14/2002 1:16:43 PM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Middle Man

You make half-baked assumptions, then go off on tangents that take you in the wrong direction.

I make no assumptions whatsoever.

You indicated your lawyer didn't know how to answer your questions properly. Figured you could clue him in, by presenting him with a printed copy of my reply #99.

According to your own claims, he was having a hard time explaining things to you properly.

The last year I used a lawyer ... He became very vague and muttered something like, "Well, taxes have been around since Julius Caesar". By the end of our (last) meeting he couldn't even look me in the eyes anymore.

We really should not leave our lawyers in such sad condition when we can do something to alleviate there afflictions. I mean the poor guy might be suffering from a severe case of insecurity or sump'n. You wouldn't want that would you, especially since you obviously know that one should file proper a tax return as you certainly do:

I file a return every year.

He might accidently not file a tax return, not knowing the score, and end up with a fine or worse. You wouldn't want that would you?

All that frenetic typing and html coding for naught. (sigh)

No problem at all I use a MicroSoft's WYSIWYG html editor, don't you? Just like using a electric typwriter and no problem at all. I do thank you for your concern however. That was kind.

103 posted on 03/14/2002 1:30:00 PM PST by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: one2many

Where is paragraph A of the notice of intent to levy?

There is no paragraph "A" in a notice of Intent to levy, for the paragraphs contained in such a notice are not indexed nor are they required to be.

However, should you ever decide to actually understand subject sufficient to frame a proper question, you might want inquire as to the content of the statutes regarding due process and levy in tax collections under Title 26,(i.e. Internal Revenue Code).

For that:

Refer, Subchapter D Part I. & Part II, there lay the rules for Due Process & Levy in regards to tax collection according to your favorite Congress, enacted under the authority of the Constitution for the United States of America, Article 1 Section 8 Clause 1 and Article I Section 8 Clause 18. And in accord with

295 U.S. 247 (1935)

United States Codes

All that is necessary for your Notice of Intent to Levy is above. Lots of paragraph (a)s for yah there too. Pick whichever you would like.

104 posted on 03/14/2002 8:29:17 PM PST by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
Come now geeze; you KNOW which paragraph A I mean.
The one on a "Notice of Intent to Levy".

Where is it?

105 posted on 03/15/2002 6:32:59 AM PST by one2many
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Middle Man
All that frenetic typing and html coding for naught. (sigh)

Don't think for a moment that geeze is huffing and puffing to get that stuff out. He has it saved in HTML for slapping on any thread like this. He is one good little old chien noire!

106 posted on 03/15/2002 6:35:47 AM PST by one2many
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: one2many
Bump for later reading, off to a meeting.
107 posted on 03/15/2002 6:36:31 AM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
When former IRS agents testify before Congress and the American people that they routinely ignore and break the law -- preparing dummy returns, seizing private property without due process and committing mail fraud with bootleg notices -- they are admitting the tax collection system in this country is a criminal enterprise, a violation of the RICO statutes at the very least. I would be perfectly delighted not to file a return (even though it only takes me about 30 minutes), but the public is dealing with an agency no different from the Cosa Nostra.

Yes, I do file a return every year; I just don't give the government anything it can use against me. 'Nuff said. ;)

108 posted on 03/15/2002 6:41:11 AM PST by Middle Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: one2many
Yeah, I know. When you've seen the first of his posts, you've seen them all.
109 posted on 03/15/2002 6:43:18 AM PST by Middle Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
OK geeze, so after some 100 posts you STILL won't put up paragraph (a). So I will do it for you. Here goes:

§ 6331. Levy and distraint

(a) Authority of Secretary or delegate.—If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax (and such further sum as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by levy upon all property and rights to property (except such property as is exempt under section 6334) belonging to such person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter for the payment of such tax. Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the district of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d) of such officer, employee, or elected official. If the Secretary makes a finding that the collection of such tax is in jeopardy, notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax may be made by tne Secretary and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in this section.

So how does fedgov levy the average citizen who doesn't fall into any of those groups upon whom SPECIFIC authorization to levy is authorized?

110 posted on 03/15/2002 6:51:03 AM PST by one2many
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: one2many
I have an acquaintance whose employer received the fearsome Notice of Levy. He had already educated his boss on the fraudulent means the government uses to extort money from third parties such as your place of work. So his boss called the IRS contact and put him on speakerphone with my friend in the room. The boss asked, "Why is Paragraph A missing from the citation on the back of the notice?" The agent's response was a click and a dial tone.

Neither my friend nor his company has heard from the IRS since. 'Nuff said.

111 posted on 03/15/2002 6:53:30 AM PST by Middle Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: 4ConservativeJustices
The reason I don't like the NRST -- or the flat tax, VAT, what have you -- is they are all just means of replacing revenue the government will lose once everyone realizes the "income" tax is a hoax. The NRST won't do anything to shrink the cancerous growth of government.
112 posted on 03/15/2002 7:03:47 AM PST by Middle Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Middle Man
Better tell "the geezer" about it.

All of that blather and he just
couldn't bring himself to talk about
"paragraph (a)", could he? (grin)

113 posted on 03/15/2002 7:21:40 AM PST by one2many
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Middle Man
You are precisely correct in your 112. Vote buying will probably not be ended by civilized means.
114 posted on 03/15/2002 7:23:41 AM PST by one2many
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Middle Man
I don't care to pay taxes either. And certainly not more than 10%. Unconstitutional expenditures must be eliminated (no pork - nothing unless it benefits EVERY American EQUALLY - national defense etc).

The fed had no legal authotity to force Georgians to subsidize the Big Dig in Massachusetts - originally $2.5 billion, now estimated to be $13.6 billion, and still not complete. Why should every other state be subsidizing this? What benefit will Florida receive?

Individuals vote - corporations don't. But who do politicians cater to? Why do companies contribute - to reduce their taxes or to encourage protection and subsidization. Enron et al donate to BOTH parties so that no matter who wins - they can tug on a few strings. Eliminate corporate taxes (they're just passed on to the consumer anyhow), and corporate donations.

Institute the NRST, and reduce the rate as programs are eliminated. Maybe then the politicians will respresent "the people".

115 posted on 03/15/2002 7:31:53 AM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: one2many
Your question was, to be precise, "Where is paragraph A of the notice of intent to levy?"

The precise question you you are posing was properly answered by my reply #104.

However the following is the actual content of the body of The Notice of Intent to Levy taken from a website found with Google, as is all my material,

refer: http://altereduniv.com/IRS2.htm to see the full text containing header & enclosure list.

 

FINAL NOTICE
(NOTICE OF INTENT TO LEVY)
CERTIFIED MAIL	IMMEDIATE RESPONSE REQUIRED
Your Federal tax in still not paid.  we have previously sent you notices requesting
full payment for this overdue tax, but we have not received it. We may file a notice of 
Federal Tax Lien at any time to protect the government's interest.  That is a public 
notice to your creditors that the government has a right to your interests in your 
current assets,  including assets you acquire after we file a lien.
If we do not receive your full payment within 30 days from the date of this letter,
we may issue a levy without further notice to you.  This means the law allows us to 
seize your property or rights to property such as real estate and personal property
for example, automobile, and business assets)to collect the amount you owe.  We also 
may levy(take) your bank accounts, wages, commissions, and other income.  Please see 
the enclosed publication for additional information.
To prevent enforced collection action, send your full payment today.  Make your check 
or money order for the amount you owe payable to the Internal Revenue Service.  Write 
your social security number or employer identification number on your payment.  Then 
please send your payment to us with a copy of this letter in the enclosed envelope.
If you recently paid this or if you cannot pay it, call us immediately at the telephone 
number at the top of this letter.
	Form	    Tax	    Assessed Amount Unpaid	   Additional
	Number	   Period	       from Prior Notices                    Penalty & Interest          Amount you owe
				





NOTE. The assessed amount unpaid from prior notices may include tax, penalties, and 
interest you still owe us. It also should reflect any credits and payments we received from
 you since the last notice was sent
Enclosures.
Envelope
Copy of this Letter
 Pub. 586A or 594
31 Hopkins Plaza, Baltimore, MD 21201           Letter 1058(DO) (Rev. 11-91) 


	Internal Revenue Service	Department of the Treasury

                                             District                   Baltimore District
                                             Director

 

You will note, NO PARAGRAPH A is in the Notice of Intent to Levy.

Nor is any such labeling of paragraphs required, as I stated very clearly.

This is the subparagraph of the statute governing what is in the Notice of Intent to Levy.

26 USC Section 6331. Levy and distraint(d)(4) Information included with notice
The notice required under paragraph (1) shall include a brief statement which sets forth in simple and nontechnical terms -

(A) the provisions of this title relating to levy and sale of property,

(B) the procedures applicable to the levy and sale of property under this title,

(C) the administrative appeals available to the taxpayer with respect to such levy and sale and the procedures relating to such appeals,

(D) the alternatives available to taxpayers which could prevent levy on the property (including installment agreements under section 6159),

(E) the provisions of this title relating to redemption of property and release of liens on property, and

(F) the procedures applicable to the redemption of property and the release of a lien on property under this title.

No requirement to label paragraphs in the Notice of Intent to Levy.

In regard to "The notice required under paragraph (1) shall include a brief statement which sets forth in simple and nontechnical terms -

The paragraph "A" in that subsection states "(A) the provisions of this title relating to levy and sale of property."

That content is contained with the Notice of Intent to Levy I have provided above.

116 posted on 03/15/2002 7:41:47 AM PST by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: one2many

He has it saved in HTML for slapping on any thread like this

Whatever the source of the material I reply with, you have yet to address its content or show how it is wrong. The information provided does, however go a long way to rebutting the fanciful claims of the TP community. And certainly your commentary is no exception to that rule.

Actually I don't have everything saved in HTML for slapping on any thread like this, other than specific excerpts of Supreme Court cases that are answer to every thread I have seen posted on this subject.

I do however use a good search engine for the web that finds what is needed where hard information is called for, as opposed to mere personal opinions that folks like to spin as their fact.

As I have stated, I have a good html editor that allows me to format compose and incorporate anything I am able to locate on the web into these replies.

Stock answers, sometimes, because they reply to stock prosaic comments.

I assure you the editing, composition and opinions expessed are all mine, usually thrown together on the fly, as my frequent typo's and hurried sentence structure should be ample evidence of.

So come down off your high horse and engage in substance as regard the validity of the tax law, instead of merely sniping from the peanut gallery.

117 posted on 03/15/2002 7:54:56 AM PST by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Middle Man

I just don't give the government anything it can use against me.

So what's required in a truthful return that can be used against you or any one for that matter? The tenor of your initial comment, was that one could not properly fill out a return without incriminating themselves. Or am I wrong in that?

Remember, if one does not fill out a return, that fact can be used in a criminal action against much more readily, than any question the 1040 asks.

118 posted on 03/15/2002 7:59:22 AM PST by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Middle Man
"I have an acquaintance..."

Why is it always "I know a guy who knows a guy whose sister's, friend's, second cousin..."

How come nobody ever says "I did fill in the blank and the IRS ran screaming out of the house..."

Why? Because they don't have internet access in prison....

119 posted on 03/15/2002 8:01:07 AM PST by Mr. Quarterpanel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: one2many

OK geeze, so after some 100 posts you STILL won't put up paragraph (a). So I will do it for you.

Sorry, you have played your game since post 83. This is 110, you aren't too good at arithmetic either are you.

Your verbatim quotation of th e subsection(a) of statue 26 USC 6331, was already provided you by VRWC_minion at reply #86. If that is the what you were looking for, why did you not indicate your pleasure at having found what you wanted?

I note that you did not reply to VRWC_minion, so it was obviously not the answer you were looking for then or when you were inquiring of me.

You now quote verbatim the content of that statute subsection that VRWC_minion had provided previously, at Reply #86, to which you did not respond.

Your question to me was, to be precise, "Where is paragraph A of the notice of intent to levy?"

If you had what you actually wanted, and obviously you did from VRWC_minion previously and I suspect on your own, why didn't you post it instead of playing 20 questions? What a childish game you play.

You were not inquiring as to what was in the statutes governing the authority of the Secretary to Levy against property for non payment of taxes owed. Your inquiry was what was in the actual Notice not the subsection(a) of 26 USC 6331 you decided to throw out in the end.


That having been said lets take a closer look at what you finally posted and VRWC_minion had provided earlier which you chose to ignore to play silly games instead.

26 USC Section 6331(a). Levy and distraint

(a) Authority of Secretary

If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax (and such further sum as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by levy upon all property and rights to property (except such property as is exempt under section 6334) belonging to such person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter for the payment of such tax. Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer, employee, or elected official. If the Secretary makes a finding that the collection of such tax is in jeopardy, notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax may be made by the Secretary and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in this section.

Why did you not highlite the first sentence which is applicable to all those required to file income taxes?

Instead I notice that you go to an instruction regarding a specific subgroup of persons who can come under section 6331 as well. Couldn't be because you are trying to mislead anyone could it. That is a very old tactic of the TP crowd, to exract isolated statement from a whole and claim there partial quote is the whole picture.

Sorry but you attempt at misdirection does not buy it here nor will it buy you any protection in a courtroom.

U S v. FISHER, 6 U.S. 358 (1805)

FindLaw: RODGERS v. U S, 185 U.S. 83 (1902)
"The primary rule of statutory construction is, of course, to give effect to the intention of the legislature."

Given that the income tax is totally within the Constitutional powers of Congress to levy as has been amply proven in prior section of this thread. Are trying to tell us now that Congress does not intend to tax your silly behind off, or that it does not intend to grant the authority necessary to enforce that tax upon you?

If that is what you believe, I have some ocean front property out in southwestern Colorado to sell yah.(at least it will be when global warming raises the sea level abit)

So to answer your question,

So how does fedgov levy the average citizen who doesn't fall into any of those groups upon whom SPECIFIC authorization to levy is authorized?

The average citizen falls under the FIRST sentence of 26 USC 6331. The second sentence you misdirect with is a special instruction regarding federal employees as a special case.

Now ask a hard one, after you learn abit about paragraph reading, composition and the rules of statutory constuction. And especially learn the grammar of properly posing a question so others know what you want.

120 posted on 03/15/2002 8:41:35 AM PST by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson