Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Over 30 homes destroyed; 1,300 evacuated in Kokopelli Fire (NM)
Albuquerque KOB-TV 4 ^ | March 23, 2002 | Staff report

Posted on 03/23/2002 6:32:48 PM PST by CedarDave

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: CedarDave
As of 9:50 a.m. Sunday, additional evacuations ordered in the Ruidoso-Hondo Valley area and two other locations south of the area that burned on Saturday. Winds already gusting 30-45 mph in the area. Gusts up to 60 mph expected in some areas. Number of homes burned down to 30 from 32 last evening. Helicopter shots show the fire skipped and jumped. Some homes burned while those next door were o.k.
21 posted on 03/24/2002 7:57:00 AM PST by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: CedarDave
Noon MST update:

Governor Johnson live at press conference at noon. Both optimistic and pessimistic. Optimistic that no other areas in SW are burning right now and have resources concentrated in this area. Pessimistic that have multiple (thousands)new ignition sources as a result of yesterdays spread of t he fire. Origin is NOT arson. Homeowner took ashes from a fireplace (thought cool) and dumped them outside the house. Wind blew them and started a fire.

Governor Johnson calls for individuals to take action to prepare for fire -- cut brush and grass near house. Federal and state resources are at full disposal to fight fires. Johnson (a libertarian-leaning Republican in his last year of office) is a very articulate speaker and answers questions fully. Of course, this is a long way from the magnitude of the Cerro Grande fire in Los Alamos that caused 400 families to lose their homes.

23 posted on 03/24/2002 10:14:10 AM PST by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda
Unfortunately, the Red Cross is the only entity that I personally know of in this area. However, I'm sure that local churches are opening their doors, also. In rural areas, the Red Cross is composed of local people who are neighbors and volunteers. It's only when a disaster of national scope occurs do you get the type of bureaucratic mentality that leads to power grabs, corruption and a denial of American values (as happened in urban CA with the local and national organization forbidding singing of patriotic songs, or those mentioning God).
24 posted on 03/24/2002 10:21:24 AM PST by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
You have the problem of the mosaic of private and federal land: even if the Forest Service pursues an effective policy, it wouldn't amount to much if private land owners didn't- or vice versa. I wold be reluctant to make someone thin their woods, as it is their property- but still, you might argue that by refusing to deal with a problem they are adversly affect their neighbor's property. It is a rather difficult question, without an easy answer. The Forest Service land obviously should have a good fire ecology plan, but one is left to the problem of private land- keeping property safe but preserving property rights at the same time. What do you think should be done?
25 posted on 03/24/2002 10:41:29 AM PST by Cleburne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cleburne
I doubt logging and controlled burns would be very popular- and burning perhaps not even possible.

Living in the midst of the largest forest of ponderosa pines in the world where sanitary burning is a daily (conditions permitting) event, I can assure you that the commie socialist yuppie scum put up with it. The la-de-da and hoi-poi understand that this practice reduces the likelihood of crown and wild fires and just suck it up, though never forgetting that 'tobacco smoke' is bad.

26 posted on 03/24/2002 1:28:17 PM PST by S.O.S121.500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cleburne
No one is forced to clear the immediate area around their house, and there no penalty if one does not do so. In fact, there are Federal grants that will reimburse you for certain expenses for doing this (though many could easily argue that our tax money should not be used in this manner).

Even if your neighbors do not clear their land, you can usually protect your own residence if you do not build directly under the trees, clear brushy material and grass, and use common sense on building materials -- for example a woodframe house with a cedar shake shingle roof is an invitation for a fire. Today's aerial pictures show houses, even mobile homes, that were still standing as a result of small cleared areas around them.

27 posted on 03/24/2002 1:32:13 PM PST by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
KOB-TV now reading list of names and addresses of residents who lost homes. Lots of homeowners who live in Texas -- Lubbock, El Paso, Snyder, Garland, Houston. Station says all have already been notified so this should not be first notification. I'm sure the list will be posted soon on KOB's web site.
28 posted on 03/24/2002 2:30:52 PM PST by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zandtar
All of the envioromental agencies are products of Agenda 21/New World Order of the United Nations, along with civilian disarmament, open borders, etc.
29 posted on 03/24/2002 3:35:57 PM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson