Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Course On African-American Men Offered At Temple
KYW 1060 ^ | Sunday, March 31, 2002 | Karin Phillips

Posted on 03/31/2002 6:17:54 AM PST by South Hawthorne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-74 last
To: rmvh
The impact of Blacks owning other Blacks is STILL going on in today's world.........

Just watch Jesse, ETAL.......

51 posted on 03/31/2002 3:24:58 PM PST by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Got any more stereotypes?

Those pesky stereotypes - the problem is, there's usually an underlying truth in them.

52 posted on 03/31/2002 4:20:50 PM PST by glockmeister40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
Nah! I'm going to spend my $1,000 on peanuts. I.ll have peanuts in the basement, the kitchen, the dining room, the living room, the den , in the bedrooms, in the attic. I'll have peanuts up the@ss. You spend your money on black studies, I'll spend mine on peanuts. LOL
53 posted on 03/31/2002 4:28:16 PM PST by Temple Owl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
"In fact, I’d be hard pressed to think of a University that doesn’t have an African American Studies program..."

Please tell me what are you going to do with a degree in African American Studies? Be a doctor, lawyer, accountant or engineer? NOT. You'll probably end up in the remote window asking customers "do you want fries with that?". You'll probably contunue to go through life hating white people ( and most everybody else ) and thinking racism is the problem when all that really happened is you were duped by the liberal university you went to. They took four years of your (probably the taxpayers ) money and gave you nothing in return. Are you going to homecoming?

54 posted on 03/31/2002 4:29:39 PM PST by glockmeister40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
Oh you are a supporter of George Washington Carver. You go boy.
55 posted on 03/31/2002 4:39:24 PM PST by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: glockmeister40
Those pesky stereotypes - the problem is, there's usually an underlying truth in them.

Really? Gee, I did not know that. < /sarcasm>

That's not the problem. The problem is when stereotypes, which contain a "grain" of truth, are inflated with falsifications then used to smear a whole group.

Since you seem to know it all, how come you didn't complete the definition of the term? Your flippant response to my post calls into question your true motives. It may be wrong, but, it definitely begs the question.

It's so much easier for people to think in stereotypical terms than it is to judge people individually, which is what I thought conservatism was all about.

So, which is it, glock? If you see me, do you see a stereotypical black, or do you see an individual MAN?

56 posted on 03/31/2002 5:17:55 PM PST by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle

On a more pragmatic note:
The students would be better served learning Latin.


57 posted on 03/31/2002 5:18:30 PM PST by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glockmeister40
Please tell me what are you going to do with a degree in African American Studies? Be a doctor, lawyer, accountant or engineer? NOT. You'll probably end up in the remote window asking customers "do you want fries with that?". You'll probably contunue to go through life hating white people ( and most everybody else ) and thinking racism is the problem when all that really happened is you were duped by the liberal university you went to. They took four years of your (probably the taxpayers ) money and gave you nothing in return. Are you going to homecoming?

Please, please, try and re-read my posts on this thread. The fact that you seem to have mistaken me for an African American Studies major really makes me wonder if you have any sense of humor or an idea of what sarcasm is at all.

Hopefully, I’ve missed yours, but the fact that you referred to me eight times without a disclaimer, I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Owl _ Eagle

58 posted on 03/31/2002 5:27:54 PM PST by South Hawthorne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: mafree
"This is the same girl that wrote a letter to a Sudanese boy at the home, calling him sexy man and telling him that she wanted him to do a threesome with her and her Native American friend.

ANY 13 year old talking like she was (see above) NEEDS fatherly advice, and fast......because she's made it clear what kind of dude she's interested in....read ALL the post before getting on your high horse, please.

59 posted on 03/31/2002 6:22:27 PM PST by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
I wasn't sure if your concern was over her age or the fact that she is into "black dudes." If it's the former, then I would be wrong for accusing you based on the latter. It looks like we're on the same page about this and there's nothing for either of us to take offense with.
60 posted on 03/31/2002 6:48:11 PM PST by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: mafree
It is NOT just her age, but her language, actions, etc. that make a statement to young men which says.....hey, I'm here for you to use......and she WILL be used, no matter the color of the guy, if she continues on her current path....here come the abortions, the heartbreak, the diseases, the babies out of wedlock with out fathers, the poorness, etc.....
61 posted on 03/31/2002 7:02:22 PM PST by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
I agree with you on that and I do hope someone with some sense gets to her before she messes her life up. She needs someone to protect her, even at the risk of being a little strict.
62 posted on 03/31/2002 7:07:58 PM PST by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Calculus_of_Consent
It is part of the diversity indoctrination. The intention is to blend all of the races.
63 posted on 03/31/2002 7:20:45 PM PST by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: OneidaM
These kids are a product of their indoctrination. If you want to take them off the streets and try to strip away their indoctrination, feel free to do it. I feel that this generation is lost. It would be like trying to rescue a person from a cult after she has been thoroughly brainwashed in the ways of the cult.
64 posted on 03/31/2002 7:24:00 PM PST by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mafree
"You can only say that if you're as ignorant as the poster is."

You are either in denial, or lying.

65 posted on 03/31/2002 7:28:15 PM PST by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Don Myers
I have been informed by some younger, female relatives that it is not unknown for white girls to be harrassed by other white girls and black boys as well, if they do not date interracially . They're told that this proves they're racists, and the girls have been indoctrinated with the idea that "racist" is the worst thing you can be, so...

This isn't too much different from my HS years, when girls were told that if they didn't "put out" (archaiac slang even for my time) that proved they were "lezzies" (ie, lesbians). There's always people out there who try to use anything to manipulate the insecure into doing their bidding.

And then there's cases like that of my 18 year old adopted niece . Her Biomom was a drug addict and an alcoholic. She is bipolar, ADD/ADHD, possible FAS-she will never have a normal life. She's by no means retarded, but she's incapable of concentrating, and so she cannot go to college. She won't take her meds. Anyhow, she moved out on my sister, and has since tried to blackmail her into paying rent, buying her a car, etc, by threatening to get pregnant. Her idea was to have the kid, and then force my sister to support it. When that didn't work, she tried to "up the ante" by threatening to go with, and get pregnant by, "a black guy". (Guess just any "black guy".) Still didn't work. My sister told her that if she (the niece) had a child , it was her responsibility, and she would not be financially responsible for the child.

I applaud my sister for sticking to her guns, and for refusing to be blackmailed . But it just goes to show that for some girls (not all of them with mental/emotional problems) "a black guy" is not a person in their eyes, he's just a "thing" to use to annoy their parents. Or a trophy to parade around, silently proclaiming,"See! I'm a nonracist! Aren't I noble?"

My niece is not a monster, though I realize my story makes her sound like one. Right now, she's living with a 21 year old TOOTHLESS white guy who gets SSI , and his mom.(ie, a crack addict and his mom. Loss of teeth at so young an age is a sign of severe drug abuse.) They live in a filthy single wide trailer. She is not (yet) pregnant. The two seem to think my sister is rich, and they want to use my niece as a cash cow, and she's too naive to see what they're up to. Frankly, I pity any "black guy" who goes near her, if she's not given up her little scheme, as he's risking 18-21 years of CS payments. And I pity any child she conceives, no matter who the father. S/he'll have very little chance at a decent future.

66 posted on 03/31/2002 7:29:07 PM PST by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kaylar
Well, I just cannot believe the kids of this generation. They are so different from my generation that there is no real comparison. They seem to have no sense of morality or decency. They just do whatever they want to do, and God help the person who tries to tell them no.
67 posted on 03/31/2002 7:40:52 PM PST by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
The REAL problem, is that this prof, is using the basest of all steriotypes, for his course. The way the article presents it, this prof is excluding the vast black middle class, and the upper middle cass, and the upper class ( excluding atheltes and performers here ... I mean the black aristocracy ! ) ones. The CEO of Beatrice Foods, was better bred, more affluent, better educated, and better spoken, than the majority of whites, in this country ! He didn't have any apparent baggage, from slavery. Neither do Walter Williams, Thomas Sowell, and at least 100 other black men, whom I either know personally, or have read / listened to.

Those, who revel in " victimhood ", are the ones who need a class !

68 posted on 03/31/2002 7:44:48 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Don Myers
"You can only say that if you're as ignorant as the poster is."

You are either in denial, or lying.

In denial of what? Lying about what?

69 posted on 03/31/2002 7:45:10 PM PST by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Don Myers
What about the crackwhore boomer parents...
70 posted on 03/31/2002 9:59:10 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Yes, many of the parents have used heavy drugs, and they have a tough enough time just knowing the time of day without the added burden of raising kids. I have said over and over that drugs are bad for a society.

And then there are people who try to change society into the image of what they think it should be in the mistaken belief that their ideas will make society function better. There are also space-cadets who have only superficial working brains. Those who persuade girls to date people just to prove that they are not "racists" fall under these two categories.

71 posted on 04/01/2002 1:28:00 AM PST by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Don Myers
I don't use drugs myself but I think they should be legal it would erase the black market and associated violence, and by making them more available the addicts will die quicker and the quicker they die the better for the rest of us( what can I say I'm not a compassionate conservative).
72 posted on 04/01/2002 2:10:44 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: weikel
There is a problem with your line of thinking on drugs. The drug addicts won't all die out. New ones would be made every day.
73 posted on 04/01/2002 5:16:58 AM PST by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Don Myers
If they caused any trouble they'd be locked up for that not drugs all the while the number of drug addicts and stupid people would decrease. Its better for the species if the stupid ones don't reproduce and drug laws are a huge unconstitutional waste of tax money.
74 posted on 04/01/2002 5:19:02 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson