Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Porta-Nukes Waiting in the U.S.?
Steel on Steel ^ | 04/06/02 | John Loeffler

Posted on 04/10/2002 10:37:14 AM PDT by Jefferson Adams

Run, don't walk (figuratively, that is) to the Steel on Steel website and listen to the latest program, about porta-nukes in the U.S. John feels that all the recent "leaks" in the media concerning things nuclear are pointing directly at us being set up for a nuclear event on U.S. soil. That *is* frequently how "our" government works, by priming us with the controlled media before an event happens.

From the Steel on Steel website -

"Islamic studies scholar Dr. Robert Morey reports on his intel info from the Middle East that indicate one to three porta-nukes are already in the US awaiting for terrorist use at the right moment."

This is very interesting stuff, and at no additional charge (the RealPlayer and MP3 downloads are free, by the way) you'll also get to hear Dr. Morey speak in depth about the Islamic threat in general. He's no lightweight - he holds a masters degree in Islamic studies, and his book "Islamic Invasion," written in the mid-90's, was banned in Canada and destroyed by the original publisher immediately following 9/11, due to its extreme political incorrectness - labeling Islam as the threat that it is.

So go have a listen - you'll be glad you did.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: islam; nukes; terror

1 posted on 04/10/2002 10:37:14 AM PDT by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
Okay, I'll buy this. I mean with about 1,000,000 or more illegal aliens pouring over our border every year and our government doing nothing about it, I just wouldn't be surprised if there are one to three nukes here.

Let's assume they are here and will at some point be detonated. Who'll get the blame on that one?

2 posted on 04/10/2002 10:39:43 AM PDT by Kobyashi1942
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
Yes, who would they blame it on? Chicoms? Iranians? Russians? Will we just start blasting everything in sight? It could get ugly fast.
3 posted on 04/10/2002 10:48:31 AM PDT by Eternal_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
bump
4 posted on 04/10/2002 10:58:17 AM PDT by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
more bumpage
5 posted on 04/10/2002 10:58:32 AM PDT by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge;AnnaZ;Mercuria
Go have a listen.
6 posted on 04/10/2002 10:59:06 AM PDT by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; harpseal
You too :)
7 posted on 04/10/2002 10:59:44 AM PDT by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
bump
8 posted on 04/10/2002 11:28:28 AM PDT by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
(Humming to self) - "Nobody cares...."
9 posted on 04/10/2002 11:28:59 AM PDT by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
Git yer red hot Potassium Iodate, RIGHT here. Red hot Potassium Iodate, RIGHT here.
10 posted on 04/10/2002 11:29:43 AM PDT by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
ka-BOOM!!!
11 posted on 04/10/2002 11:30:02 AM PDT by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
Git yer red hot Potassium Iodate, RIGHT here. Red hot Potassium Iodate, RIGHT here.

The best selection at ROCK-BOTTOM prices can be found right here. Don't get caught glowing in the dark without some!



12 posted on 04/10/2002 11:35:39 AM PDT by who knows what evil?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
Rumor has it the Russians built dozens of "suitcase nukes" that were going to be smuggled in and detonated remotely in case of a nuclear war. The plan was never implemented because they didn't have any suitcases.
13 posted on 04/10/2002 11:36:38 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
"Islamic studies scholar Dr. Robert Morey reports on his intel info from the Middle East that indicate one to three porta-nukes are already in the US awaiting for terrorist use at the right moment."

There was a Russian colonel that defected to the U.S. (Lunev?) that did an interview on Geoff Metcalf’s show on KSFO a few years ago. He claimed that the Russians had cached portable nuclear weapons in the U.S. and several European countries back in the early ‘70’s.

Later on there was an interview in which people were speculating whether Osama could have bought some of them and another ex-Russian said that because Russia was worried about a rogue state getting their hands on one, the Russians had designed them so that a code had to be broadcast from Moscow in order to arm them.

He said that you could buy them all day long but without the code it would be useless. Supposedly they were constructed in such a way that taking them apart would damage certain components that are needed for it to be a nuclear weapon.

There’s really no way to know whether it’s true or not but it makes a good story.

14 posted on 04/10/2002 11:48:19 AM PDT by Who dat?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
If they had them, they'd have used them already. To sit on them risks detection, capture and retaliation.
15 posted on 04/10/2002 11:58:11 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
I would have to agree. An attack on say, Oct. 11, would have finished off our economy for a long time and might have had us sealing our borders instead of nailing Afghanistan.
16 posted on 04/10/2002 12:15:12 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
Somehow, the people who bring up these stories never seem to talk about the shelf life of these things.

I'm not a physicist - and I don't play one on TV. But I do understand that the tritium in small nukes will degrade to the point where the bomb is useless in something like 7 years. This was a big problem during the Clinton years, where the DOE shut down the reactors producing the stuff, and didn't make any effort at all to replace them. Meaning, our entire nuclear arsenal was ticking down to non-existence.

Fortunatly, and quietly, Bush has set up several sites to produce the stuff in commercial nuclear reactors.

Anyway, whatever suitcase nukes the Commies produced, they're almost certianly useless by now.

17 posted on 04/10/2002 12:19:18 PM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narby
Somehow, the people who bring up these stories never seem to talk about the shelf life of these things.

Thank you. Nobody ever talks about the shelf life or maintainence of these bombs. They act like once they are built that they last forever and any idiot can detonate them. Like you, I don't know much about them, but from what I've heard, it takes a little more expertise than the average camel hearder has to maintain them.

18 posted on 04/10/2002 12:37:43 PM PDT by Nate505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Eternal_Bear
"It could get ugly fast."

I expect that it will. Get your survival kit in order, now.

19 posted on 04/10/2002 12:56:10 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?
has anyone purchased potassium iodate?
20 posted on 04/10/2002 1:01:19 PM PDT by BronzePencil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?
The best selection at ROCK-BOTTOM prices can be found right here. Don't get caught glowing in the dark without some!

Yep, that's where I got some of mine :)

21 posted on 04/10/2002 1:35:40 PM PDT by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Who dat?
Indeed, Col. Lunev. Interesting fellow.
22 posted on 04/10/2002 1:36:36 PM PDT by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
If they had them, they'd have used them already. To sit on them risks detection, capture and retaliation.

I would tend to agree. But the Steel on Steel program talks about a lot more than just the nukes.

And I hope you're (we're) right.

23 posted on 04/10/2002 1:37:39 PM PDT by Jefferson Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
Me too.
24 posted on 04/10/2002 3:25:05 PM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
The scariest part is, it all makes perfect sense!!

Maybe there is something to that Mayan calender predicting the end on 12/21/2012!

25 posted on 04/10/2002 5:54:59 PM PDT by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Ditto to your #15. Besides, the nukes people say they have are at least 15 years old. If so, they most likely won't work.
26 posted on 04/10/2002 8:13:57 PM PDT by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PatrioticAmerican
The suitcase nukes might not work but what about conventional explosives and some radioactive material?
27 posted on 04/10/2002 8:18:53 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jefferson Adams
Uh Oh. They have Baseball size nukes made from RED MERCURY.
RUN FOR THE HILLS!
28 posted on 04/10/2002 8:21:47 PM PDT by My Identity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson