Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Democrats' budget 'solution' (Davis complicit)
San Diego Union Tribune ^ | 4/16/02 | Assemblyman Jay LaSuer

Posted on 04/16/2002 8:09:18 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan

It wasn't difficult to read between the lines when Gov. Gray Davis pledged in his State of the State Address last January not to "advocate" for a tax increase. The governor's crafty election-year rhetoric provided the perfect escape: he wouldn't advocate for a tax hike, but he wouldn't veto one either.

Taking their cues from the governor like nervous freshmen in a high school theater production, Davis' fellow Democrats in the Legislature stepped in to do the one thing they're really good at: finding creative, new ways to soak taxpayers.

Not only were they creative, they were amazingly thorough.

Since the governor's address, Assembly and Senate Democrats have introduced 22 tax-raising bills. Some will hit California families hard; others targeting products like soda and snack foods may be easier to swallow. But their cumulative effect will be devastating to the state's taxpayers and its economy.

For example, SB 1520 by state Senator Deborah Ortiz, D-Sacramento, slaps a 21-cents-per-gallon tax on soft drinks - roughly five cents per can. Another Ortiz bill, SB 1890, would raise the tax on cigarettes by 70 cents per pack. Since soda and cigarettes can cause health problems, argues Ortiz, we should tax the products into oblivion - make them so expensive that people give up their bad habits. But that's not the point.

What Ortiz and other Democrats seemingly don't understand is that taxes aren't instruments of social change. They're a means of providing citizens with basic services - things they can't do themselves, like build roads, keep the streets safe and deliver water to cities and farms. It's clear that in recent years Davis and Democratic leaders in Sacramento have expanded government far beyond its appropriate role.

Today, California's personal income tax - nearly 10 cents on every dollar earned - is at its highest level in decades. Last year, desperate to close a gaping hole in the state budget, Davis authorized a $1.2 billion increase in the state's sales tax - costing California families roughly $120 per year. This year, Democrats want to triple the state's tax on automobiles.

Meanwhile, the governor wants you to believe he's a hapless victim - that he bears no responsibility for the deplorable state of California's finances. He wants you to believe that all of these problems began post-Sept. 11 - that his lack of leadership and fiscal restraint had nothing to do with it.

While you listen to his empty rhetoric, remember: this is the governor who turned a multibillion-dollar surplus into a $17.5 billion deficit in three short years. This is the governor who panicked during the height of the energy crisis and signed $40 billion in overpriced, long-term power contracts. This is the governor who promised you he was a fiscal conservative, "tight with your dollars."

This summer, should Davis sign a budget that includes a bevy of tax increases, bear in mind: he didn't want to do it (or so he'll say). Don't be fooled. Since Davis assumed office three years ago, state spending has increased 37 percent - more than five times the growth in population.

Davis and legislative Democrats knew they were on a path of fiscal destruction and ignored all the warning signs. And now their only option is to come begging for more money.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; davis; lying; megalomaniac; obfuscator; taxincreases
Of course if a Republican Governor tried this, the press would be all over him trying to get him to clarify what "not advocate a tax increase" means before he even left the room. With Daivs so far though it has been eerie silence. Sure boss whatever you say.

Good for LaSuer for bringing it up again. Davis has skated free on this for far too long.

1 posted on 04/16/2002 8:09:18 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gophack; TheAngryClam; BibChr; CalGov2002; Brad's Gramma; Dan from Michigan; broomhilda; .38sw...
TAXPAYING PING (...and PAYING, and PAYING and PAYING)
2 posted on 04/16/2002 8:14:23 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Only 201 days til we can throw the bums out! www.simonforgovernor.com
3 posted on 04/16/2002 8:26:10 AM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
On 1 Jan 2002, thanks to Davis and the Tax and Rape Rats in Sacramento, a huge stealth tax increase went into effect across Kaliland.

These rats, who tax and rape the taxpayers increased the sales tax by 1/4 of a percent. So basically everything we buy and use in Kali land except for food and RX drugs had a tax increase.

Did anyone read about this Stealth Sales Tax Increase in the LA Slimes, the Bees, The Gayrhonicle or anyother fishwrap? Did any Kaliland tv phoney news channel address this increase?

Most people are not aware that we had a stealth sales tax increase.

SIMON THE SANE ONE!

4 posted on 04/16/2002 8:35:24 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
GraYouT DeVious .. A Hapless Victim? Yeah, Right!

This sumobitch IS lucky he wasn't fragged in Nam.. He won't be so lucky in NoVember

Enough IS Enough Already.. CaliPornia ... Wake the Hell UP!!!!



SEMPER FI
Norm

5 posted on 04/16/2002 8:48:35 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
OMG--these people are insane!

Since Davis assumed office three years ago, state spending has increased 37 percent - more than five times the growth in population.

There is NO excuse for this BS. A 37% increase in spending and what do we have to show for it?

Davis needs to be held accountable and needs to go!

6 posted on 04/16/2002 8:51:25 AM PDT by BornOnTheFourth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
So much for Rat fiscal conservatism. The definition of a Rat fiscal conservative is one who's never met a tax that wasn't necessary or never encountered spending that wasn't critical. Governor Gray Davis and the Rats obese as they are simply can't control their weight problem. Taxes and spending to them are a force of nature and constitute a fact of life. And they won't hear of any one who thinks the key to gaining control over both is accepting that government must live within its means like the rest of society.
7 posted on 04/16/2002 8:59:49 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Morally bankrupt, ethically corrupt, fiscally irresponsible. Yup!!! Those are the Dems. Stupid SOBs. November should be a bloodbath for the dems. Its too bad the coddled media dont inform the voters of who is robbing the childrens piggy banks.
8 posted on 04/16/2002 9:03:00 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
**Bump**
9 posted on 04/16/2002 9:42:43 AM PDT by TwoStep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
BTTT
10 posted on 04/16/2002 9:48:54 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Proposition 13 requires that any tax increase has to pass by two-thirds. Any Republican voting for one should be drawn and quartered. Also, another proposition that passed had a provision that state spending could only increase proportionate to population increases and inflation. It seems to me we must have violated that by now. I wonder why we haven't heard anything about it?
11 posted on 04/16/2002 9:49:54 AM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
I do feel sorry for you guys. I'm a Texan, so it's not so bad over here. No state income tax! But sales tax just went up here to 8.25% from 8%, which hurts, and I'm sure property taxes are high ( I rent) but housing costs here are frightfully low (average cost is about $35-45 per square foot) so I don't feel it.
12 posted on 04/16/2002 2:47:55 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
What is your sales tax rate? I know Texas isn't allowed to raise ours anymore (I think the limit is 5%).
13 posted on 04/16/2002 2:49:59 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
The sales tax in Kali varies from county to county as certain counties passed bond measures just for their counties.

Our county sales tax went from 7.5% to 7.75% on 1 January, 2002. The increase of .25% was for the state, and it was a complete stealth increase. Most people still don't even realize that there was an increase. I carry around a receipt dated 31 December 2001 to show the old rate and a receipt dated 2 January 2002 to show the new rate.

Our property taxes have limits that can be applied each year due to prop 13. The newer home buyers get clobbered. However, as I told my son and DIL who moved into a new home last year, they are the primary reasons for the increases. They are in a new development with new roads, sewers, water mains, increased fire and police protection.

Our state income taxes are a good size hammer. Then the rats are constantly coming up with new fees or investments as they call new taxes.

14 posted on 04/16/2002 3:05:29 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Davis and legislative Democrats knew they were on a path of fiscal destruction and ignored all the warning signs. And now their only option is to come begging for more money.

Democrats don't beg for more money, they just take it. In my book, that's called stealing.

Fortunately, we still live in a Democratic Republic. Let's vote these guys out of office and elect people accountable to the citizens of our great state.

Go Simon!

15 posted on 04/17/2002 10:23:42 AM PDT by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
It's no surprise that cutting back on the state's generous 'safety net' of social services isn't considered an option.
16 posted on 04/17/2002 10:28:17 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
What is your sales tax rate?

7.25% CA state sales tax, plus up to 1% county sales tax, plus up to 0.5% city sales tax.
Including the county tax, these are the sales tax rates along the Southern California coast:
Santa Barbara 7.75%
Ventura...... 7.25%
Los Angeles.. 8.25% *
Orange....... 7.75%
San Diego.... 7.75%


* In the city of Avalon on Catalina Island, the sales tax is the highest in CA: 8.75%.

17 posted on 04/17/2002 3:53:57 PM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
SB 1520 by state Senator Deborah Ortiz, D-Sacramento, slaps a 21-cents-per-gallon tax on soft drinks - roughly five cents per can.

1 gallon of liquid = 128 ounces
1 can of Coca-Cola = 12 ounces
($0.21)*12/128 = $0.0197 = 2 cents per can
Ortiz: "I think you guys can afford 2 cents a can"

I think this SDUT author needs to learn math; our public schools don't do a good enough job.

18 posted on 04/17/2002 4:10:43 PM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heleny
I would like to propose a new tax law for CA.

It seems to me, that the solid emissions from a car are equally as harmfull as those from tobacco.

Thus, if a gallon of gas results in the same particulate emissions as, say, a pack of cigarettes, then they should be taxed at the same rate, for the children.

Why don't you guys sponsor a ballot amendment to tie the tax on gas to the tax on cigarettes? Whatever one must pay on a pack of cigarettes, one must also pay per gallon of gas.

The referendum would surely pass - after all, polution is polution.

Isn't it?

(/sarcasm off)

Honestly, the CA economy would implode in 15 minutes.

19 posted on 04/17/2002 4:28:16 PM PDT by patton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: patton
I know what you mean. The state legislature likes to propose taxes that will only affect a selected minority -- such as smokers, drivers, snackers, etc. -- so that the opposition will be limited and might even be too ashamed to "support" smoking, pollution, obesity, etc.

The state then legislates that the extra revenue will go into a special fund and that future legislators will allocate the funds to social programs.

Often the justification for the new tax is that it will deter harmful behavior and that the money will help defray costs associated with the victims. This has never worked, and often the money is spent on the general fund (especially when there's a deficit, which was caused by overspending). Each new tax, however innocent in appearance, eventually increases overall costs and is simply an overall tax on all of us.

20 posted on 04/17/2002 7:34:48 PM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson