Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOCTORS EXPOSE US CENTRE FOR DISEASE CONTROL SEX ED SCANDALS & CORRUPTION OF SCHOOL CHILDREN
Family Research Council, News Headlines & The Washington Times ^ | 4/15/2002 | re report by Physicians Consortium & Robert Stacey McCain

Posted on 04/17/2002 12:16:55 PM PDT by RWBaral

I. FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL, News Headline Retrieved: "Physician's Consortium-Sexual Messages in Govenment-Promoted Progrqams"

Story: The Centres for Disease Control (CDC) is using taxpayer dollare to promote explicit and graphic "comprehensive sex education" curriculum for teenage consumption, according to a Physician's Consortium report released April 10. "Sexual Messages in GOvernment-Promoted Programs" describes the kind of messages and activities included in CDC-sponsored programs, some of which are promoted as "abstinence-plus."

The Consortium's findings were egregious enough that researchers preparing the report for publication found it necessary to warn readers sardonically that "the content of the enclosed report is intended for teens and may be too explicit for adults." Because of the sensitive nature of the report's contents, FRC has chosed to post only the introductory summary of the report.

To obtain a copy of the full report, contact the FRD Press Office at (202)-393-2100.

FIRST PAGE ONLY OF PHYSICIANS CONSORTIUM REPORT, "SEXUAL MESSAGES IN GOVERNMENT-PROMOTED PROGRAMS AND TODAY'S YOUTH CULTURE:

While it is safe to say that most parents have the desire to raise health, well-informed young adults, it is likely that a great nuymber of them would be shocked if they know what was actually being taught to their children. In a review of the various "CDC Programs That Work," it was found that the concept of abstinence was typically only briefly mentioned, if at all.

Many "Programs That Work" promoted by the CDC have been referred to as "Abstinence-Puls" or "Abstinence-Based" education. Despite this benign name, a review of many "Abstinence-Plus" programs seem to be only thinly-disguised "safe sex" programs preoccupied with promoting condom use among young people.

In the typical "Abstinence-Plus" program, students are required to go to the store to find condoms, learn about lubricants (including "grape jelly, maple syrup and honey,"), and brainstorm "ways tomake condoms fun and pleasurable" (such as planning a special day when they can experiment). In tyhe classroom, students practice using condoms by unrolling them on items such as cucumbers or dildoes. The implicit message in most of these programs is that sexual activity by young people is both expected and accepted by society.

Abstinence is the only practical and safe way to prevent the sexually transmitted diseases and non-marital pregnancy epidemics. In the pages that follow, it can be seen that the information currently being taught to the young people in our society, whether in schools, outside programs or via teen websites and magazines, does a great disservice to the cause of protecting this generation from physical and emotional harm. --------------------------------------------------------- II. "CDC links to pro-sex teen site (blackline-small.gif)," by Robert Stacy McCain, THE WASHINGTON

A Federal web site features a link to the internet pages of "pro-sex" activists who provice teenagers with explicit advice about homosexuality, sodomy and masturbation.

Listings for "youth" resources on a Centres for Disease Control and PRevention (CDC) site, includes a link to the COaltion for POsitive Sexuality (CPS), a self-described "guerrilla sex education" group.

"If you think you might be queer, relax!" the CPS site urges teens, and offers this suggestion: "If you think you are queer, try to find a lesbian/bisexual/gay/transgender community centre near you, where you can meet other queers your age."

THe CDC site's "youth" links include the Advocates for Youth site, which promotes activism to overturn FEderal abstinence education policies.

A Department of Agriculture spokeswoman said yesterday the department would remove a link to CPS from one of its websites. THat site, www.cyfernet.org, includes "positive youth development" links to the sex advice site Go Ask Alice and to Planned Parenthood's Teenwire site.

"We are in the process of taking down the link to CPS," public affairs specialist Maria BYnum dais yesterday afternoon. "And we will work with the Cyfernet program office and the university partners to review the other sites and determine what the next steps are."

The Federal internet links have come under fire from the Physicians Consortium, a Pennsylvania-based public policy group.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Free Republic; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Technical; Unclassified; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: cdc; dishonest; government; lies; medicallyinaccurate; negligent; safesex; scandals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-74 next last
MY NOTES RE US CDC "PROGRAMS THAT WORK:"

First, the US CDC does not directly author these sex ed programs, but rather reviews and then promotes outside private sources & their sex ed curriculum products, such as SIECUS and ETR Associates. This eliminates direct accountability and liability for same.

US Fed law requires that, if any Fed money is spent on sex ed-specifically re the high known ineffectiveness of male lates condoms ("safe sex") in preventing HIV, STD's & prewgnancy-that sex ed info must be medically accurate, diligent and honest. US CDC "reviewing" outside private programs, rather than "authoring" such "Programs That Work" themselves, is an attempt to circumvent this Fed law.

Second, because these US CDC "PRograms That Work" are not produced by the Feds, but are privately owned, they are NOT available under US Fed Freedom of Information Act. One must BUY them from the private companies. One State Dep't of Ed. official told me that only teachers and people directly involved in offering these programs can obtain them! (THankfully, the PHysicians Consortium has managed to obtain same for their professional review.)

Third, these US CDC "Programs That WOrk" are supposedly effective, not based on objective, scientific-based studies, but rather on subjective, psycho-social-based teen questionairres. For example, there is no comparison between control and study groups of school children re the hard numbers of teen pregnancy, teen births, abortions, HIV & AIDS cases, STD cases, etc. Rather, the control and study groups of school children are asked personal questions about their sexual behaviour patterns & risk behaviours.

Lastly, these and similiar programs are disseminated to local public schools & teachers, via State Dep'ts of Education. One State Dep't of Ed. "Health Education Resource Centre" (where "approved" teaching materials by the State is made available to public school staff), told me that the same office that offers these US CDC "Programs That Work" to children is 100% US CDCX grant funded.

Thus, this source of medically inaccurate, dishonest and negligent sex ed curriculum disinformation is being pushed across the entire country, via States, to local public schools. If any child suffers any pain, distress, loss, disease or death as a result of acting upon such sex ed disinfo, I urge immediate consultation with a trusted Clergy, Physician and Lawyer without delay. Partental questions and concerns should be answered first by consulting a

trusted CLergy, Physician and Lawyer.

1 posted on 04/17/2002 12:16:55 PM PDT by RWBaral
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
Oooookay. But is it Breaking News?
2 posted on 04/17/2002 12:26:12 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
When will parents wake up to this???? I think what gets me mad more than anything is that most parents continue to send their kids off to these institutions each and everyday.
3 posted on 04/17/2002 12:26:13 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
Pretty sickening stuff in this article. Fortunately, my children attend private Christian school and abstinence was all they learned in their sex ed course. We were informed of the content beforehand and then discussed it together when they came home.

I believe this moral decline in the public school system was greatly accelerated in that horrid time period I refer to as "the last eight years." The damage Clinton has done to this nation's honor will never fully be realized.

4 posted on 04/17/2002 12:33:12 PM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
But is it Breaking News?

Why for the second time in as many days is this the first response to RWBaral. If there is a problem with the way this is posted why not mail suggestions to RWBaral?

5 posted on 04/17/2002 12:34:42 PM PDT by codder too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
I'm sure everyone has heard how the Catholic church found homosexual activity but instead of eliminating the molesters from the church, simply transfered them.

A teacher in NY was accused and confessed to being guilty of the same thing. He resigned, and left the state with a letter of recommendation from the school district. That was the agreement. Because this man still has his teaching licence, and a wonderful letter of recommendation, where is he now?

If this can happen in a house of God, imagine what's going on in the liberal public schools, where it's protected by the federal government! Where Planned Parenthood and GLADD are welcome to teach the children at their own discretion and with the schools blessings and endorsements.

For the love of God, get your children and grandchildren out of the public school system. It's time to accept the truth of what's really happening to them. It's your fault if anything happens to them. They need you. They can't raise themselves or go it alone.

6 posted on 04/17/2002 12:35:14 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: codder too
Why for the second time in as many days is this the first response to RWBaral.

Maybe because some people understand the definition of Breaking News and some don't.

7 posted on 04/17/2002 12:41:58 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: RWBaral
specifically re the high known ineffectiveness of male lates condoms

I'll assume that his was supposed to say "of male latex condoms", though I never knew they had a gender per se.

The assertion that condoms frequently fail, either to prevent pregnancy or disease transmission is based on faulty information. Condoms are tested and have repeatedly proven to be quite strong and reliable. The statistics regarding pregnancies and transmission of diseases from condom "failures" are generated in large part by people who do not wish to admit that they were in fact NOT using a condom when they got pregnant/infected.

9 posted on 04/17/2002 12:43:37 PM PDT by Sicon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: RWBaral
In the typical "Abstinence-Plus" program, students are required to go to the store to find condoms, learn about lubricants (including "grape jelly, maple syrup and honey,"),

You've got to be kidding me. That's not sex ed, that's American Pie III!

11 posted on 04/17/2002 12:45:44 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: codder too
My response at #2 WAS a suggestion openly mailed to RWB.
12 posted on 04/17/2002 12:47:43 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
BTTT
13 posted on 04/17/2002 12:51:34 PM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infowars
Amen. I've thanked God numerous times for the wonderful school they attend and for the beautiful people they have turned out to be.
14 posted on 04/17/2002 12:54:55 PM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
When will parents wake up to this???? I think what gets me mad more than anything is that most parents continue to send their kids off to these institutions each and everyday.

Amen, Sister!
It's crossed the line from being a "choice" that concerned parents can make, like say between wearing the Navy or Maroon shirt; no, it's the difference between feeding your child strychnine or feeding them a banana. Public School as a whole has become another outpost of Hell and parents are as deceived as their children in the government schools if they think otherwise.
When, oh WHEN will parents (especially religious parents) wake up and smell the fall out? PULL YOUR KIDS OUT IF YOU CAN! If you know someone who wants to but can't, have your church take them on, but for their soul's sake, GET THEM OUT.

15 posted on 04/17/2002 12:55:49 PM PDT by CaptBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EdReform
mega bump - expose government sposnored molestation of children's minds and the conspiracy of silence by others in the govt and the media
16 posted on 04/17/2002 12:56:42 PM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
One big homeschool BUMP

My children are safe from this horror. Thank God, my kids are safe.

17 posted on 04/17/2002 12:59:41 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
My sister is married to a priest and they have their kids in govt. schools. They seem to think they're good enough to keep the kids in. No matter how many articles from FR I have sent to her, she still turns the other way. She also feels that her kids need to know how to live in the real world. Like homeschooled kids don't know how? It really makes me want to shake the you know what out of some people and tell them to get a clue. Homeschooling is not good enough for people like her. I know it's not for everyone but there are alternatives to govt. schooling.
18 posted on 04/17/2002 1:00:18 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Information about the homosexual agenda in the public schools posted in this thread:

Assemblyman MOUNTJOY opposes promotion of homosexuality in public schools.

19 posted on 04/17/2002 1:00:43 PM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
My sister is married to a priest and they have their kids in govt. schools. They seem to think they're good enough to keep the kids in. No matter how many articles from FR I have sent to her, she still turns the other way.

It's the lazy way to parent. Throw them on the bus, and mommy is free for the day. Some mothers just don't want the burden of raising their own kids. Let the school have them. It's ok, they just won't look.
They know what's going on, but ignore it for selfish reasons.

20 posted on 04/17/2002 1:04:22 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
My sister is married to a priest and they have their kids in govt. schools. They seem to think they're good enough to keep the kids in. No matter how many articles from FR I have sent to her, she still turns the other way. She also feels that her kids need to know how to live in the real world. Like homeschooled kids don't know how? It really makes me want to shake the you know what out of some people and tell them to get a clue. Homeschooling is not good enough for people like her. I know it's not for everyone but there are alternatives to govt. schooling.

Our relatives give us the same song and dance. Meanwhile, of the 9 children (6 of schooling age) that my 3 siblings have produced:

By the sheer Grace and blessing of God, none of my children have any of those issues above (despite the fact that my 12 year old is an unmitigated knucklehead). All three perform WELL above their peer group in the public schools (as adjudged by standardized test scores), both girls are in ballet, one is in piano, my son is learning guitar and self-defense and the TV and/or game machine stays off except on Friday nights and Sat afternoons where Dad or Mom has final say over what is watched/played, and yet, when the adults get together to talk about how the kids are doing, I'M THE WEIRDO for homeschooling/private schooling my kids!!!!

And, I forgot to add, that of COURSE part of the problem according to my family, is that we do, after all, live in a racist society (we are black).
BIG SIGH.
I can't think about it too much or I'll run off a cliff somewhere.

21 posted on 04/17/2002 1:15:31 PM PDT by CaptBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
I thought we weren't supposed to call 'em "queer" anymore. Wish they'd make up their damn minds.

It don't matter anyway, they'll never get around to liking what I call 'em...

22 posted on 04/17/2002 1:17:21 PM PDT by maxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Private faith based schools or homeschooling are the only way to go. My children are in a Private Christian school. I am Catholic, but I felt the the Christian school was more compatible with our moral beliefs as a family.

The more I learn about the (governement)public school system, the more happy I am that we made the choice that we did.

23 posted on 04/17/2002 1:19:02 PM PDT by all4one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
Its funny to think that it is "suspect" to NOT let the kids watch whatever they wish to on TV and engage in whatever sort of unsupervised pastimes they choose.

I would think those who fail to monitor the kids consumption of such trash are guilty of child neglect.

24 posted on 04/17/2002 1:25:59 PM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration; Alamo-girl
FYI

More U.N. subversion.
IMHO
m

25 posted on 04/17/2002 1:26:10 PM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Parents don't know. They are fed thier info by the DNC propaganda machine...ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN!
26 posted on 04/17/2002 1:41:06 PM PDT by jungleboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral; all
Alliance for the Separation of School and State

27 posted on 04/17/2002 1:50:02 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
What every happened to teaching:

1.) Reading/writing
2.) Math
3.) History
4.) Science

People graduate from these schools and can not read/write or even fill out a simple EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION!

But they know how to put on a condom, etc..

This is pitiful.

Where are the "Christians"? They are asleep and a DISGRACE

Franklin


28 posted on 04/17/2002 1:53:45 PM PDT by survivalforum.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: survivalforum.com
Folks, you do have rights and can have your children excused from any inappropriate material. At least in my son's middle school, they are respectful of parents' wishes. Because of more rigorous academic requirements, the previous touchy-feelie semester of "life education" was mercifully replaced with a few days of basic reproduction and gestation in biology class which every 12-year-old should already know.

However, less than 10% of the parents showed up at a preview of this info and one incredible dolt asked "how" they were going to demonstrate the condoms. The teachers just about passed out and the principal said this was an urban legend - never happened in any school she knew about. Parents said they were embarrassed to talk to their kids and wanted the school to do it or at least give them books to give to their kids. Mind you, the school is right next to both the library and Barnes and Noble and all of these are affluent folk with internet access and presumably had sex themselves at least once if they managed to produce a seventh grader. I think this embarrassment/ignorance is the main reason these programs are tolerated despite their proven tendency to increase teen sex. One mom actually asked if kids would be told to abstain. Principal said, "You're the parent. You're going to tell them." Good for her.

29 posted on 04/17/2002 2:16:24 PM PDT by littleleaguemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
And, I forgot to add, that of COURSE part of the problem according to my family, is that we do, after all, live in a racist society (we are black).

I'm glad you brought that up. We're "white", and our homeschooling group has a number of wonderful families . The great part? No one even notices "color". We have some from China as well. We have all colors (but no purple). The children all play together. Because the "race issue" is not an issue, it doesn't exist. There's no difference at all. The "racist society" is kept alive in the public schools. That's where it is bread and nutured!

30 posted on 04/17/2002 2:19:15 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
PS....

We have all colors (but no purple).

As a matter of after thought, we do have a "purple" dad that pops in once in a while. I think he has really high blood pressure or something. I hope he takes medication. I worry for him whenever I see him around.

31 posted on 04/17/2002 2:25:18 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sicon
Herpes and genital warts (#1 cause of cervical cancer) transmission is NOT, nor ever has been prevented by condoms.

There is no such thing as safe sex, except it is a media myth created by the purveyors of the sexual revolution.

32 posted on 04/17/2002 2:50:05 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
Ah, but Sicon has a point.

A condom, ditributed by institutions/ authorities, is both a license and prophylactic. In the heat of passion, only the license part, the most important aspect, is often remembered.

33 posted on 04/17/2002 3:22:37 PM PDT by Z.Hobbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
Sounds like you are doing quite well with "your" children. You hit on something about relatives in the public schools.

My sister has six kids. The oldest, age 17, may have Parkinson's Disease, the 15 year old girl has a growth disorder and has been on growth hormones for about three years, the 12 year old has been labeled as having disabilities. He can't comprehend or remember things. I told my sister to homeschool but the bottom line is it would cramp her style. Sometimes I think God gives us problems such as the ones mentioned as a wake up call to take better care of the family.

Just my .02 worth.

34 posted on 04/17/2002 3:33:42 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Z.Hobbs
Since their (condom) failure as a prophylaxis is documented and well known, might we assume that those handing them out like halloween candy are engaged in licensing sex rather than preventing disease?
35 posted on 04/17/2002 4:02:40 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sicon
Dear Sicon: You are wrong re your statements of effectiveness of male latex condoms-Physicians Consortium reports that, at best, they are no more than 85% effective against HIV. THe National Institute of Health recently issued a report that condoms are not proven to protect against a large number of STD's, Physicians Consortium reports that, for some major STD's that are skin/lesion to skin/lesion transmitted, they offer no protection at all. One such STD is HPV human papiloma virus, the major cause of genital cancer in women in the USA. Many reports note male latex condom failure rates re pregnancy for women in first year of use from 23 to 72 %. This is due to many factors. Condom slippage. Condom spillage. Condom tears. Poor condom technique. Condom defects. Microscopic holes in latex condom fabric itself. Failure to cover infected areas. The Physicians Consortium are lobbying for the US COngress to require condoms to be labeled with a warning disclosing the known significant failure rates of same re preventing HIV, STD's & pregnancy. Thank you for your interest in this post. RWBaral
36 posted on 04/17/2002 7:51:44 PM PDT by RWBaral
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
Why is this article so full of typos and misspelled words? Is this an actual article published somewhere or a vanity you put together?
37 posted on 04/17/2002 8:05:31 PM PDT by upchuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
Please use a spell-checker.
38 posted on 04/17/2002 9:51:30 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
bump
39 posted on 04/17/2002 10:04:34 PM PDT by GrandMoM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
We must also make a concerted effort to help parents get the voucher programs they need to give their kids an alternative to Perversion 101!
40 posted on 04/17/2002 10:39:40 PM PDT by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
By the sheer Grace and blessing of God, none of my children have any of those issues above

I'm guessing there is a little bit of hard work necessary from you too. Keep up the good work.

41 posted on 04/18/2002 5:11:29 AM PDT by Joe Driscoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
I can't think about it too much or I'll run off a cliff somewhere.

Please don't do that. The world needs more loving, caring parents like you.

42 posted on 04/18/2002 6:10:15 AM PDT by ELS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
Spell-checking is a GOOD thing.
43 posted on 04/18/2002 6:41:15 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
ALL of them have gaming machines, e.g., Nintendo, Sega, etc., UNMONITORED

Heh, gaming machine's are evil, EVIL I tell you. Dont be silly, most gaming 'nerds' are the ones making straight As in school and most druggies, etc even if they do play video games are playing sports games, because its about as difficult a concept as they can understand. Believe me. Very very very few games have ANY sexual themes in them at all. The only one I can think of that is mainstream that did was Duke Nukem 3d which came out in 1996 I believe and it wasn't even close to the main theme.

44 posted on 04/18/2002 7:29:53 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Bro...you should have posted your message to him privately. I don't think the public humiliation was necessary...
45 posted on 04/18/2002 7:30:31 AM PDT by =Intervention=
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: rb22982
You may want to look a little bit closer...many, many video games take their clothing tips straight from MTV. Check out SF III for instance. While there's no "sex as theme" there are plenty examples of "constant barrage of sex as backdrop." Tomb Raider is another good example of that...the cover packaging on Everquest (haven't played the game), etc...
46 posted on 04/18/2002 7:33:09 AM PDT by =Intervention=
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: =Intervention=
Think what you will, but as someone who has been playing games since I was age 5 through now (just over 20) and have played with 1000s and 1000s of gamers from my state NC and across the entire globe (canada, mexico, europe, korea, china, etc) most gamers are 'nerds' by almost all definitions of the word. While EQ may have a pic of a girl on the front, it is hardly the content of the game. Most druggies, very sexually active teens, etc do NOT play many games. Most of them consider it 'uncool' and like I said, even if they do play, its usually video games. Games like EQ and other RPGs take a lot of thought and effort to become good at, driving most of the 'lazy' druggies, etc away
47 posted on 04/18/2002 7:37:56 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: rb22982
bleh should read usually just play sports games
48 posted on 04/18/2002 7:38:46 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
When will parents wake up to this???? I think what gets me mad more than anything is that most parents continue to send their kids off to these institutions each and everyday.

They will never wake up because there are precious few Americans who know how to be a parent. They all rely on TV and the experts and the govt. schools to socialize and raise their children for them. Most parents today are products of bad parents themselves and do not have the ability or the will to parent properly. They can't convey what they themselves do not possess. If daddy is an amoral clueless parent, it is likely that sonny will be also as the apple never falls far from the tree.

49 posted on 04/18/2002 8:10:44 AM PDT by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWBaral
Good post.
50 posted on 04/18/2002 8:49:22 AM PDT by conserve-it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson