Posted on 04/19/2002 8:41:43 AM PDT by Registered
Our press is too well managed for that to happen.
Any idea why they used a Serbian word? Was this yet another attempt to blame the Serbs for the dirty work done by the muslims and their NWO collaborators? (Remember that the first World Trade Center bombing WAS first blamed on the Serbs, until it became obvious that it was an act of islamic terrorism.)
This is just the word of some woman in the Phillipines. I don't doubt for a minute that it's absolutely true, mind you, but media-wise, it doesn't seem like it can compete with Robert Blake.
Our inability to gain media traction with the truth of clinton crimes all goes back to the biggest villain in modern American history. No not Bill Clinton, someone much WORSE in my opinion. Ken Starr. He messed this country up worse than even slick willie, because after Ken Starr, the sheeple have no more stomach to hold their leaders accountable for anything.
In the minds of 90% of the American people, Starr was given unlimited time and unlimited money to get the goods on Clinton (if there were any). All he came up with was a blowjob. Now, no matter what facts/evidence comes out about the horrible real attrocities that occured during Clinton's despicable regieme, we are just "clinton-haters who cried wolf".
I pray that God lets this story have legs, but is it much different than the thousand other clinton crime evidence that dantompeter have successfully swept under the rug?
..and in Insight Magazine.
Period.
That's about the only place anybody will read it. This will go nowhere. The arrest of Robert Blake is much more important to our idiot Media.
OKCbombing:
| To find all articles tagged or indexed using OKCbombing, click below: | ||||
| click here >>> | OKCbombing | <<< click here | ||
| (To view all FR Bump Lists, click here) | ||||
And, from this post...
Items in McVeigh Trial on Way Out
"The federal judge who presided over the Oklahoma City bombing case gave prosecutors and defense attorneys 60 days starting Tuesday to request the disposition of the more than 1,000 exhibits from McVeigh's trial, which began March 31, 1997. . .
"Normally, exhibits are returned after trials to the lawyers who introduced them into evidence. "But this is not a normal case," court clerk James R. Manspeaker said."
Hmmm.
While reading it, I was trying to imagine a sensible motive for the Government's desire to cover up any foreign involvement in OKC.
At post 12, Arthur McGowan suggests that Clinton wanted it to appear to be a domestic plot so that he could pin the blame on domestic enemies:
"So foreign terrorists were responsible for OKC? Covered up by Clinton--who then attempted to pin the blame on HIS enemies, not the COUNTRY'S enemies? It was more important to him to damage his political opponents than to defend the country against an external threat."
Then at post 17, the gillman@blacklagoon.com suggests that Clinton would actually have liked to have had a Middle Eastern terrorist act occur during his Presidency:
"He was hoping for the big event, 911, to happen on his watch, which would have made him king. Can't trust those middle easterners. No sense of time or dates.
Has anyone yet come up with a sensible and internally consistent theory as to why the Government would have wanted to distort the history of this event? Or are people still just trying to gather the facts?
It is very interesting stuff. Good work!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.