Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conscious Mind Could Be An Electromagnetic Field
Daily University Science News ^ | 16-May-2002 | Daily University Science News

Posted on 06/13/2002 7:25:36 PM PDT by Scully

Are our thoughts made of the distributed kind of electromagnetic field that permeates space and carries the broadcast signal to the TV or radio. Professor Johnjoe McFadden from the School of Biomedical and Life Sciences at the University of Surrey in the UK believes our conscious mind could be an electromagnetic field.

“The theory solves many previously intractable problems of consciousness and could have profound implications for our concepts of mind, free will, spirituality, the design of artificial intelligence, and even life and death,” he said.

Most people consider "mind" to be all the conscious things that we are aware of. But much, if not most, mental activity goes on without awareness. Actions such as walking, changing gear in your car or peddling a bicycle can become as automatic as breathing.

The biggest puzzle in neuroscience is how the brain activity that we're aware of (consciousness) differs from the brain activity driving all of those unconscious actions.

When we see an object, signals from our retina travel along nerves as waves of electrically charged ions. When they reach the nerve terminus, the signal jumps to the next nerve via chemical neurotransmitters. The receiving nerve decides whether or not it will fire, based on the number of firing votes it receives from its upstream nerves.

In this way, electrical signals are processed in our brain before being transmitted to our body. But where, in all this movement of ions and chemicals, is consciousness? Scientists can find no region or structure in the brain that specializes in conscious thinking. Consciousness remains a mystery.

“Consciousness is what makes us 'human,' Professor McFadden said. “Language, creativity, emotions, spirituality, logical deduction, mental arithmetic, our sense of fairness, truth, ethics, are all inconceivable without consciousness.” But what’s it made of?

One of the fundamental questions of consciousness, known as the binding problem, can be explained by looking at a tree. Most people, when asked how many leaves they see, will answer "thousands." But neurobiology tells us that the information (all the leaves) is dissected and scattered among millions of widely separated neurones.

Scientists are trying to explain where in the brain all those leaves are stuck together to form the conscious impression of a whole tree. How does our brain bind information to generate consciousness?

What Professor McFadden realized was that every time a nerve fires, the electrical activity sends a signal to the brain's electromagnetic (em) field. But unlike solitary nerve signals, information that reaches the brain's em field is automatically bound together with all the other signals in the brain. The brain's em field does the binding that is characteristic of consciousness.

What Professor McFadden and, independently, the New Zealand-based neurobiologist Sue Pockett, have proposed is that the brain's em field is consciousness.

The brain's electromagnetic field is not just an information sink; it can influence our actions, pushing some neurons towards firing and others away from firing. This influence, Professor McFadden proposes, is the physical manifestation of our conscious will.

The theory explains many of the peculiar features of consciousness, such as its involvement in the learning process.

Anyone learning to drive a car will have experienced how the first (very conscious) fumblings are transformed through constant practice into automatic actions.

The neural networks driving those first uncertain fumblings are precisely where we would expect to find nerves in the undecided state when a small nudge from the brain's em field can topple them towards or away from firing. The field will "fine tune" the neural pathway towards the desired goal.

But neurons are connected so that when they fire together, they wire together, to form stronger connections. After practice, the influence of the field will become dispensable. The activity will be learnt and may thereafter be performed unconsciously.

One of the objections to an electromagnetic field theory of consciousness is, if our minds are electromagnetic, then why don't we pass out when we walk under an electrical cable or any other source of external electromagnetic fields? The answer is that our skin, skull and cerebrospinal fluid shield us from external electric fields.

“The conscious electromagnetic information field is, at present, still a theory. But if true, there are many fascinating implications for the concept of free will, the nature of creativity or spirituality, consciousness in animals and even the significance of life and death.

"The theory explains why conscious actions feel so different from unconscious ones ­- it is because they plug into the vast pool of information held in the brain's electromagnetic field,” Professor McFadden concluded.

The University of Surrey is one of the UK’s leading professional, scientific and technological universities with a world class research profile and a reputation for excellence in teaching and research.

(Reference: The paper “Synchronous firing and its influence on the brain’s electromagnetic field: evidence for an electromagnetic field theory of consciousness" by Johnjoe McFadden is published in the current edition of the Journal of Consciousness Studies, along with a commentary by Dr. Susan Pockett.)


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bicameralmind; conscious; electromagnetic; faithandphilosophy; julianjaynes; mind; schizophrenia; spirituality; techindex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: Ken H
I'm going to start preparing a little list of candidates for radiation therapy. Let's start in the US Senate....
41 posted on 06/14/2002 8:14:07 PM PDT by MainFrame65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: Scully
My further take on things:

Consciousness, as most people know it, goes beyond whatever is required of the brain to integrate all the senses. Consciousness adds to that capacity a modeling mechanism for interpeting the sensory input in terms of a hierarchy of efficient, abstract generalized models. Beyond that, consciousness has a sense of place in the hierarchy. Human consciousness is capable of evaluating large numbers of potential scenarios, including potential self-placement scenarios. Because of this, consciousness is capable of considering: the act of considering: the act of considering: ... , et cetera, for any concept it can simply consider, if needed. All of this will be emulated by computers eventually, and clear distinctions between conscious and non-conscious will disappear.

43 posted on 06/14/2002 9:31:16 PM PDT by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toddhisattva
I'll take that as a lukewarm response to the proposition. I did get the Crosby reference, though.
44 posted on 06/14/2002 11:18:56 PM PDT by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: toddhisattva
It's probably a lot simpler to consider the brain's experience to be dominated by a low-pass filtered version of the currents it generates. Some have described the brain as running at 100 baud, which implies quite a wide channel with extensive data compression and a tremendously large channel symbol set.
45 posted on 06/14/2002 11:26:01 PM PDT by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: apochromat
I think experience could be further specified fairly accurately as being a low-pass filtered version of the currents nearest the surfaces of the cortex.
46 posted on 06/14/2002 11:51:14 PM PDT by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: toddhisattva
Beautiful post.

Namaste

48 posted on 06/15/2002 10:36:38 PM PDT by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson