Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DVD-compatible optical disk hits 100 Gbytes
EE Times ^ | May 24, 2002 | Mike Clendenin

Posted on 06/18/2002 12:04:57 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

EE Times DVD-compatible optical disk hits 100 Gbytes
By Mike Clendenin, EE Times
May 24, 2002 (9:18 AM)
URL: http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20020524S0063

TAIPEI, Taiwan — Forget about 100-gigabyte portable hard drives — too bulky. A physics professor at a leading Taiwanese university has led a group of researchers in developing a recordable optical disk capable of packing in 100 Gbytes of data and slipping into a pants pocket.

That's about 30,000 of your favorite songs, or enough tunes to toe-tap to for a few months.

The disk is compatible with today's CD and DVD technology, running off the same red laser pick-up heads used in a typical disk player. "That's the most attractive part of this technology," said Wang Shyh-Yeu, director of research at Ritek Corp., a disk maker that co-funded the study and will likely commercialize the disk in 2005 or 2006.

To achieve the 100-Gbyte density target, the research team at National Taiwan University, led by professor Tsai Din Ping, used near-field optics — where the distance used for the interaction of the laser and media is shorter than the wavelength of light used to make the recording marks on the disk.

Two layers were added to the disk to achieve the near-field effect. The first is a transparent dielectric spacing layer, about 20 nanometers to 40 nanometers thick, which keeps the distance constant in the near field. The other layer is an active layer, which will interact with the focus point of the laser beam, generate the near-field effect and then transfer the mark to the recording layer.

Smaller mark

Using a standard sized disk, 12 centimeters in diameter, the researchers drew down the mark size to about 100 nm, less than about 400 nm for today's DVDs and 900 nm for CDs. "Even with such a small mark size, we can still have about 35 dB on the readout signal," Tsai said. "If you check your DVD disk today, the readout range is about the same, from 30 dB to 40 dB. So that's a very good result because the mark size is much smaller than 400 nm but the carrier-to-noise ratio is still very good. That's not easy."

Japanese companies and university researchers have also been developing high-density prototypes. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd. developed a dual-layer rewritable optical disk last year that could store 50 Gbytes per side, enough for four hours of high-definition movies. It used violet lasers, however, not red lasers.

Tsai said his prototype is ready to hit the market today, but Wang doubts the market is ready. The disk may be capable of recording dozens of Star Trek episodes, but there aren't any drives available to utilize it and no one is working on one. Such systems would also require a new chip set. "Today's technology still has a ways to go before this is needed," Wang said.

In the meantime, Wang said Ritek should work on polishing the signal-to-noise characteristics on disks in the 40-Gbyte to 60-Gbyte range, which would still far outstrip today's 9.4-Gbyte maximum capacity for a dual-sided, dual-layer DVDs. Even next-generation proposals, such as Blu-ray DVDs, top out at about 27 Gbytes. Besides, they use pricier technology — they are based on blue lasers — that is not backward compatible with today's red laser standard. "The next two years will be very important for this technology," Wang said. "If we can get through the big breakthroughs we need, this will be a threat to Blu-ray."

During that time, however, Tsai will be prodding his team to push the limits of density even further. Ritek and Taiwan's National Science Council are funding the research until February 2003 with $660,000 — the project started in March 2000. "Our goal is to make an even smaller mark size that will still be stable within the near field. To do this, we will have to find a nanostructure to make this happen in a much easier way," Tsai said.

"One hundred gigabytes is not the limit; it is just the beginning. Our goal is terabit," he said.





TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Technical
KEYWORDS: cd; dvd; storage; techindex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 06/18/2002 12:04:57 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ;tech_index; Mathlete; Apple Pan Dowdy; grundle; beckett; billorites; ErnBatavia...
To find all articles tagged or indexed using tech_index

Click here: tech_index

2 posted on 06/18/2002 12:06:30 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Cool. Wonder how this will shake out with the nanomachine terabit rewriteable memory.
3 posted on 06/18/2002 12:28:45 AM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
And more on future storage technology is here:

Extra: stretching the storage of today's DVDs

4 posted on 06/18/2002 12:28:57 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"One hundred gigabytes is not the limit; it is just the beginning. Our goal is terabit," he said.

Sounds like an misstatement here. A hundred gigabytes is just short of a terabit already.

5 posted on 06/18/2002 12:32:45 AM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Post Toasties
Dunno, just came across this:

Darpa awards next-generation computing contracts

WASHINGTON — Four computer makers will study concepts for a new generation of affordable, scalable computing systems under contracts awarded on Wednesday (June 12) by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa).

.........more at the link..............

High Productivity Computing Systems (HPCS)>/a>

6 posted on 06/18/2002 12:34:51 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
And about Quantum Computing:

Quantum Computation/Cryptography at Los Alamos

7 posted on 06/18/2002 12:38:48 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
And a Dilbert cartoon:


8 posted on 06/18/2002 12:41:31 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Post Toasties
There's roughly one thousand gigabytes to a terabyte. Thus a hundred gigabytes is roughly one tenth the capacity of a terabyte.

Megabyte = 1,048,576 bytes
Gigabyte = 1,073,741,824 bytes
Terabyte = 1,099,511,627,776 bytes.

9 posted on 06/18/2002 1:20:25 AM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Zon
That was my take as well. Thanks.
10 posted on 06/18/2002 1:26:38 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Zon
Note that the excerpted phrase included the quantitative terms 'gigabyte' and 'terabit', hence my comment.
11 posted on 06/18/2002 1:28:18 AM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Post Toasties
A byte, of course, consists of eight bits which accounts for most of the order of magnitude difference here between 100 gig and 1 tera.
12 posted on 06/18/2002 1:30:05 AM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Post Toasties
Hope this clarifies my comment.
13 posted on 06/18/2002 1:31:58 AM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Post Toasties

"A hundred gigabytes is just short of a terabit already."

I guess I still don't see what you mean because a hundred gigabytes is not just short of a terabyte. There's a tenfold difference

14 posted on 06/18/2002 1:39:25 AM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Zon
I did not refer to a terabyte in that post, but a terabit.
15 posted on 06/18/2002 1:40:55 AM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Zon
Petabyte = 1,125,899,906,842,624 bytes
Exabyte = 1,152,921,504,606,846,976 bytes
Zettabyte = 1,180,591,620,717,411,303,424 bytes
Yottabyte = 1,208,925,819,614,629,174,706,176 bytes
16 posted on 06/18/2002 1:41:31 AM PDT by Alan Chapman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Post Toasties
You're right, I didn't catch the byte versus bit.
17 posted on 06/18/2002 1:55:13 AM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Post Toasties

Hope this clarifies my comment.

Yes, and for future clarity it is comparing bits to bytes. I'll try to remember phrasing it that way.

18 posted on 06/18/2002 2:00:54 AM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Alan Chapman
"A petabyte here, a zettabyte there -- pretty soon you're talking some real storage ..." ;^)
19 posted on 06/18/2002 6:02:58 AM PDT by mikrofon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This just in. The RIAA and the MPAA are demanding that Congress pass legislation banning this kind of technology, citing piracy concerns.
20 posted on 06/18/2002 7:09:31 AM PDT by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson