Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

L.A. shooter exploited 'loophole'
The Washington Times ^ | July 11, 2002 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 07/11/2002 10:12:39 AM PDT by robowombat

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:55:21 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The man who killed two persons at Los Angeles International Airport on July 4 gained legal residence in the United States through a limited amnesty program that has since expired but that President Bush and Democrats in Congress want to reopen.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: hadayat; hadayet; immigration; jihadinamerica; laxshooter; moslems; redcross; section245i; terrorism
Another example of your government protecting our interests.
1 posted on 07/11/2002 10:12:39 AM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: robowombat
OH DAMNIT! I'm so sick of the endless parade of these stories. Oh the criminal ALWAYS exploited some loophole and now they need to pass new legislation to make more laws and end more freedoms and on and on and on...heil! heil! heil!
2 posted on 07/11/2002 10:14:47 AM PDT by BlessingInDisguise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
phew....

and here I thought that they were getting lazy and the American people might suffer - guess not.

thanks - I can sleep now.

3 posted on 07/11/2002 10:16:36 AM PDT by phasma proeliator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlessingInDisguise
I'm so sick of the endless parade of these stories. Oh the criminal ALWAYS exploited some loophole and now they need to pass new legislation to make more laws and end more freedoms and on and on and on...heil! heil! heil!

Exactly what freedoms does this story suggest ending? I hardly consider background checks on foreign nationals -- something the State Department routinely fails to do -- as an assault on any American's freedom.

As far as making more laws, the gist of the complaints against 245(i) is that it should not be reinstated, since it provides a loophole. We need less laws that allow potential terrorists to enter the country.

4 posted on 07/11/2002 10:20:14 AM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HangFire; AnnaZ; abigail2; NewDestiny; rebuildus; Cortez; brat; MissAmericanPie; miss print; ...
immigration bump
5 posted on 07/11/2002 11:04:09 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
Bullseye.
6 posted on 07/11/2002 11:05:20 AM PDT by Marine Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan; Wphile; Mo1; Luis Gonzalez; Howlin; Miss Marple; Texasforever; ArneFufkin; ...
Steven A. Camarota, director of research for the Center for Immigration Studies, said the problem with 245(i) is twofold: Not only are the background checks more thorough in home countries, because they are done by embassies and consulates with local connections, but 245(i) applicants who are turned down in the United States can ignore the decision and the INS usually won't find them. Hadayet reportedly had failed in an application for asylum before applying under section 245(i). "Just like other terrorists in the past, he has exploited a host of loopholes," Mr. Camarota said.

Weren't we told that Section 245(i) only applied to foreign nationals who were the victims of INS paperwork snafus, and that it couldn't be exploited by terrorists?

More than a million Illegals have benefitted from various incarnations of Clinton's Section 245(i) Amnesty. Every one of them, including Hashem Hadayet, displaced a legal immigration applicant who was playing by the rules and waiting their turn in line.

Is this really the way we want to do business?





7 posted on 07/11/2002 11:31:08 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlessingInDisguise
Freedom is not the same as a national death wish.

Unless of course, you want to be free to destroy our nation.

8 posted on 07/11/2002 11:45:09 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Phew!

For a second there I was afraid they were going to say that the shooter's ability to leave his home without first being scanned for weapons was the "loophole."

9 posted on 07/11/2002 11:48:27 AM PDT by Fixit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Weren't we told that Section 245(i) only applied to foreign nationals who were the victims of INS paperwork snafus, and that it couldn't be exploited by terrorists?

Yes, we were. And I remember who did the telling.

You weren't waiting for a retraction, were you?

10 posted on 07/11/2002 11:58:29 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Hadayet's wife won legal residence through the diversity lottery, through which the State Department awards about 55,000 immigrant visas a year to applicants from a list of countries with low rates of immigration to the United States.

diversity = applied racism

apply liberally, lather, rinse, repeat.

11 posted on 07/11/2002 11:58:49 AM PDT by glock rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Interesting, this explains why information about the terrorist identity and why the INS would not immediately disclose how he was able to avoid deportation. It's apparent they wanted this story to cool off some before they had to disclose he was granted 245i. Wouldn't want to sour the public on the rewards of 245i.
12 posted on 07/11/2002 12:11:14 PM PDT by healey22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; *JIHAD IN AMERICA; Grampa Dave; Clovis_Skeptic; ladyinred; veronica; Travis McGee; ...
As always , excellent comments!

Boy this is an easy way for the Jihad group to implant their sleepers.

JIHAD IN AMERICA:

To find all articles tagged or indexed using JIHAD IN AMERICA, click below:
  click here >>> JIHAD IN AMERICA <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)



13 posted on 07/11/2002 12:44:19 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Thanks for posting this important article!
14 posted on 07/11/2002 12:46:50 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
U.S. authorities have not termed Hadayet's attack "terrorism," arguing that he seems to have acted alone...
Since when did terrorism become a TEAM sport?

Are the innocent victims any less dead if they were only killed by a SINGLE gunman?

15 posted on 07/11/2002 12:47:06 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
But haven't you all heard. Islamism is no longer a real problem.

Bin Ladenism Is Dead

16 posted on 07/11/2002 12:53:55 PM PDT by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
bttt
17 posted on 07/11/2002 1:16:11 PM PDT by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
bttt
18 posted on 07/11/2002 1:16:13 PM PDT by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
bttt
19 posted on 07/11/2002 1:16:15 PM PDT by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BlessingInDisguise
[Oh the criminal ALWAYS exploited some loophole and now they need to pass new legislation]

No, this story has a different twist. The loophole was in the amnesty legislation which has expired, but which GW wants to pass again. The article is more a warning about allowing 245i to be slipped back into law.

20 posted on 07/11/2002 1:28:08 PM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Twodees
The article is more a warning about allowing 245i to be slipped back into law.

Watch what happens after the November elections. Things are going to start popping again.

21 posted on 07/11/2002 1:48:27 PM PDT by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Typical government employee, doing everything in triplicate.
22 posted on 07/11/2002 2:12:07 PM PDT by Marine Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Brownie74
You are absolutely correct.

I predict 245(i) by Christmas.

23 posted on 07/11/2002 2:15:35 PM PDT by Marine Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector
I predict 245(i) by Christmas.

I sure hope you are wrong but you are probably pretty much on target.

24 posted on 07/11/2002 2:22:00 PM PDT by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Is this really the way we want to do business?

Molly Hennenburg had a good segment on this on Fox last night and wrapped it with the Qatar visas for sale scandal. She ended the report by stating that many caitol hill people are starting to change their minds.

Tonight FOX Pulse program should really light a fire in formerly complacent public. Mexicans smuggling Arabs.

25 posted on 07/11/2002 2:45:07 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
"Every one of them, including Hashem Hadayet, displaced a legal immigration applicant who was playing by the rules and waiting their turn in line."

Now, that's a new one. Are you certain that's the case? I have never seen that mentioned anywhere, and I've read a lot on 245(i).

Having said that, it's a damned shame that evil people take advantage of what was designed primarily to benefit good people. But criminals will be criminals, and they will take advantage of loopholes and opportunities to do evil...it's their nature.

We also saw terrorists walk into the country legally, no way to stop that either, unless you are willing to completely shut-off the ability for anyone to come to the US, for business, vacation, family visits, anything at all...

To keep this incident in perspective, our representative Republic form of government saw us vote a criminal into office not once, but TWICE in the past ten years. Does that mean that the system doesn't work and should be abandoned?

No, it simply means that NOTHING is perfect.

Thanks for the ping.

Luis

26 posted on 07/11/2002 2:48:04 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
"Weren't we told that Section 245(i) only applied to foreign nationals who were the victims of INS paperwork snafus..."

I said that, as did others, and it's still one of the many designed functions of the extension.

"...and that it couldn't be exploited by terrorists?"

I didn't say that, but there's little that couldn't be exploited by terrorists, including a Visa for a homicide bomber and his family to go visit the Mouse in Orlando.

Face it, a terrorist could enter the nation as part of a visiting orchestra, to visit family, conduct a legitimate business transaction...any reason.

27 posted on 07/11/2002 2:55:06 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
The less foreign nationals are checked the more likely it will be that terrorists and criminals will enter the US.
28 posted on 07/11/2002 3:13:00 PM PDT by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez; Marine Inspector
Now, that's a new one. Are you certain that's the case? I have never seen that mentioned anywhere, and I've read a lot on 245(i).
I thought I'd pinged you to this Washington Times article...
More than one-quarter of all immigrants winning legal residence in the United States in the past three years were once here illegally and took advantage of an expired law letting them gain legal status, according to an advocacy group's report released yesterday.      

The Federation for American Immigration Reform, which wants stricter limits on immigration, said the number of people adjusting their status skyrocketed after Congress passed a law in 1994, named 245(i) after its location in the immigration code, that let them apply for a green card without having to leave the United States.      

Since then, almost 1 million people who entered the country illegally or overstayed their visas have gained green cards. In 2000, they made up 28.3 percent of new legal residents; in 1999 they made up 25.4 percent, and in 1998 they made up 29.4 percent.     

"People aren't getting the truth about 245(i) — it's literally taking over our legal immigration system," said Dan Stein, executive director of the federation. "You're crowding out people who play by the rules and transforming the program into a permanent feature of the immigration system."

... "Apparently our elected officials in Washington see no correlation between giving one-quarter of all legal immigration slots to people who came here illegally, and other people making the decision to come here illegally," he said.
LINK

Note that the figure of nearly a million doesn't cover all of the Illegals Amnestied by various incarnations of Clinton's Section 245(i).

The law, called 245i, was first enacted in 1994 and allowed all illegal immigrants to apply to become permanent residents.

First they had to find a sponsor, an immediate family member here legally or an employer, then pass an INS background check and pay $1,000. Nearly 1.5 million illegal immigrants have become legal under 245i, nearly 12,000 of them from countries considered sponsors of terrorism.
LINK

I've just seen a note from Marine Inspector that indicates I may have been in error in my statement that all of the Amnestied Illegals displace law-abiding immigrant candidates (flagging him for clarification here). He's indicated that the number is closer to 50%. If that's the case, then given this figure of almost 1.5 million Amnesties under 245(i) since 1994, about 750,000 legal immigrants were displaced by Illegals.

The other 750,000 Amnesties apparently busted our immigration caps.

Is this all acceptable to you as an immigration policy?




29 posted on 07/11/2002 4:49:01 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Well isn't that special?

And how many people opposed to 245i get tagged as cold hearted, racist, evil, anti-immigration isolationists? Why is it so hard for the federal government to enforce the law in one of the few areas they are actually empowered to have authority?

Bush is dead wrong on this particular issue.I have yet to see anyone, including Bush, explain why it is advantageous to the legitimate,legal, citizens of the USA, current and future, to "amnesty" illegal invaders.

There are already exemptions to "normal" immigration routes such as claiming asylum for emergency situations.To reward people whose first act on US soil is to break our laws is ludicrous!

30 posted on 07/11/2002 5:55:29 PM PDT by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I've just seen a note from Marine Inspector that indicates I may have been in error in my statement that all of the Amnestied Illegals displace law-abiding immigrant candidates (flagging him for clarification here). He's indicated that the number is closer to 50%. If that's the case, then given this figure of almost 1.5 million Amnesties under 245(i) since 1994, about 750,000 legal immigrants were displaced by Illegals.

The illegal has to have a sponsor to benefit from 245(i). If that sponsor is a US citizen husband/wife, then the illegal will not displace anyone, as there is no limit on husband/wife immigration.

A son/daughter, under certain circumstances, can sponsor the father/.mother illegal. In this case, the illegal will displace an alien in their home country waiting for an immigrant family visa.

A employer can also sponsor the illegal. If this is done, then that alien displaces an alien in their home country waiting for that work visa.

31 posted on 07/11/2002 6:38:55 PM PDT by Marine Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Thanks for the ping.
32 posted on 07/11/2002 7:47:06 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brownie74
Yep, that's what the Mexican pols keep talking about, so apparently someone has told them that's when they'll get their wish list fulfilled.

So, the GOP is promiosing them that they'll open the flood gates all the way and the democrats are just champing at the bit to do so. Looks like we have a "damned if you do, damend if you don't" choice coming up this fall, huh?
33 posted on 07/12/2002 6:15:41 AM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Face it, a terrorist could enter the nation as part of a visiting orchestra, to visit family, conduct a legitimate business transaction...any reason.

Agreed. However there's no sense in the federal govmnt actually making it easier for him to do so.

34 posted on 07/12/2002 6:48:05 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Headline you'll never see:
"Amnestied Illegal Alien Commits Terrorist Act at LAX"

Gee, we don't know why this average ordinary fellow did this...he's just a hardworking immigrant...

35 posted on 07/15/2002 1:50:07 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
Gee, we don't know why this average ordinary fellow did this...he's just a hardworking immigrant...

He was only here to murder the Jews that Americans don't want to kill.




36 posted on 07/15/2002 1:56:24 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Yeah, he did it for free, those greedy American teenagers would have demanded they be paid exhorbitant wages! The horror!
37 posted on 07/15/2002 2:04:20 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson