Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attack On Iraq Rejected By 2 In 3 Voters (UK)
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 8-12-2002 | Benedict Brogan/Anthony King

Posted on 08/11/2002 4:16:50 PM PDT by blam

Attack on Iraq rejected by 2 in 3 voters

By Benedict Brogan, Political Correspondent and Anthony King
(Filed: 12/08/2002)

Tony Blair and Labour will suffer a potentially catastrophic loss of support if Britain joins American military action against Iraq, a poll commissioned by The Telegraph says today.

More than two-thirds of British voters believe that a potential attack on Saddam Hussein is not justified in present circumstances, according to the internet pollster YouGov.

The survey shows that Labour voters would reconsider their support for the Government if Mr Blair sent troops into action against Iraq.

It found widespread unease about President George Bush's ability to handle the crisis. More than half feared that Mr Blair was becoming Mr Bush's "poodle".

Saddam Hussein urged Mr Blair yesterday to distance himself from America and adopt a more "independent" approach towards Iraq.

"We will never surrender," the dictator said.

The YouGov findings seem to confirm private surveys carried out for Mr Blair - and denied by No 10 - suggesting that he would have to pay a heavy price at the ballot box if he took Britain into war. Downing Street insisted last week: "The Prime Minister is not wobbling."

More than a third of Labour supporters lack confidence in Mr Blair's ability to handle the crisis and say they would lose sympathy with the Government if America launched a military strike against Saddam with British support.

The findings coincide with a warning from Maurice Fitzpatrick, the head of economics at Tenon, the professional services group, that the consequences of military action could dent the prospects for economic growth.

He said: "If growth over the next four years were to be less than the Chancellor's forecast by just half of one per cent because of a war, the impact would leave a £12 billion black hole in the annual accounts by 2006. This worry must be pressing in on Gordon Brown."

The YouGov poll found that three-quarters of respondents believed that Saddam was a threat to world peace.

But there was widespread doubt about whether American action to topple him would succeed: only 13 per cent thought it would; three times as many thought the chances were "poor".

Sixty-two per cent of respondents thought that military action could result in a wider war in the Middle East and 90 per cent feared Islamic terrorist retaliation against the West.

A majority of Britons do not trust President Bush's judgment, the survey shows.

Two-thirds of those interviewed said they had "not much confidence" (40 per cent) or "no confidence at all" (28 per cent) in Mr Bush's capacity to handle the crisis wisely. Only five per cent had "a great deal of confidence".

Mr Blair fared slightly better. More than 40 per cent said they had "a great deal" or "a fair amount" of confidence in his ability to deal with Iraq. But more than 50 per cent had either "not much confidence" or "none at all".

Menzies Campbell, the Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, said: "A prime minister who goes to war without the knowledge that he has the security of public opinion behind him is taking a very substantial risk."

Mr Blair faced a renewed Labour call for conciliatory gestures towards Iraq.

George Galloway, the Left-wing MP with close ties to Baghdad, said that if Britain were prepared to restore relations with Col Gaddafi in Libya despite his links with the IRA, the murder of Wpc Yvonne Fletcher and the Lockerbie bombing, it should be willing to hold talks with Saddam about allowing weapons inspectors into Iraq.

Referring to last week's visit to Libya by Mike O'Brien, the Foreign Office minister, he said: "If it is good enough for a British minister to kiss Gaddafi, surely we can pick up the olive branch and test the sincerity of Iraq's offer?"

A spokesman for Mr Blair said: "The point about Saddam Hussein is that we are seeking to resolve all this through the United Nations. But how many Security Council resolutions has he failed to implement or broken - 20 out of 23?

"It is a serious problem. We need to tackle the issue of weapons of mass destruction. He needs to let the weapons inspectors in."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: attack; iraq; rejected; voters
The Brits have gone wobbly?
1 posted on 08/11/2002 4:16:50 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
lots of people outside of america think the americans are crazy over war;
2 posted on 08/11/2002 4:20:09 PM PDT by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
If "whether or not we can afford it" is a determinant in whether to send your youth to war, then maybe you shouldn't be sending them at all.
3 posted on 08/11/2002 4:21:48 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
More than two-thirds of British voters believe that a potential attack on Saddam Hussein is not justified in present circumstances

The key phrase is "present circumstances". Once it comes out who REALLY was responsible for the anthrax attack, this will change dramatically. Expect this to happen in the next 2-3 weeks.
4 posted on 08/11/2002 4:23:10 PM PDT by Mohammed El-Shahawi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mohammed El-Shahawi
"Once it comes out who REALLY was responsible for the anthrax attack, this will change dramatically. Expect this to happen in the next 2-3 weeks."

Do you know something or is that just a 'hunch?'

5 posted on 08/11/2002 4:35:20 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
Big deal!

Five of five "men in the street" in Phoenix rejected GWB, and his plan to take care of business in Iraq. If you believe NYT, that is.

Surely, the UK Telegraph could do better than this!

6 posted on 08/11/2002 4:37:47 PM PDT by Don Carlos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Tony Blair and Labour will suffer a potentially catastrophic loss of support if Britain joins American military action against Iraq, a poll commissioned by The Telegraph says today.

So where's the downside? Blair has been useful in the War on Terror, but, ultimately, he's just the UK's answer to Clinton. It was the Tories the produced Margaret Thatcher; I'd like to see what happens if they returned to power.

7 posted on 08/11/2002 5:03:39 PM PDT by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Call it an educated guess. For 10 months the Whitehouse denied that Atta met in Prague with a high level Iraqi espionage planner. For 10 months the Czechs insisted the meeting took place.
Last week that changed. Last week the Whitehouse acknowledged that the meeting probably took place. Clearly a new phase is now being entered.
I expect all of this will come out before 9/11's first anniversary, and it will include the anthrax.
8 posted on 08/11/2002 5:06:16 PM PDT by Mohammed El-Shahawi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LouD
he's just the UK's answer to Clinton

Where do you get that from? Has he been getting BJs in Number 10 that we don't know about? Seriously, it doesn't matter if it's a Labour or Tory prime minister in power. The UK will do what needs to be done. That means fully supporting the US in a war against Iraq. That is what wil happen. Just watch and listen.
9 posted on 08/11/2002 5:10:40 PM PDT by Mohammed El-Shahawi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam
They are scared of islamic reprisals! Islam will control the world through fear! Europe and its people are cowards!
10 posted on 08/11/2002 9:39:33 PM PDT by richardthelionheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson