Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Marx turned Muslim
Independent. co.uk ^ | 7/27/02 | John Gray

Posted on 08/14/2002 5:36:26 AM PDT by Valin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Heuristic Hiker
When Marxism failed, as Arab Nationalism had failed, radical elements gravitated towards Islamism. To a small degree this even happened in the West with the communist ideologue Roger Garaudy, and others. And you're also right that some become Islamists because of the restraints Islamicist regimes impose on trade.

But I'm skeptical of the "communist" elements of traditional Islam. All the Western religions had rules against usury and communal elements in their early years. All of them downgraded trade in their earliest phases.

21 posted on 08/14/2002 10:46:20 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Thanks for the post. I've been collecting articles about the synthesis between Marxism and radical Islam.

In spite of their significant apparent differences, the two ideologies share the same vital belief--that the individual has no rights--and this belief will continue to bring both ideologies together.

22 posted on 08/14/2002 10:55:08 AM PDT by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
So this presstitute likes both Marxism and Islam ... why am I not surprised?
23 posted on 08/14/2002 11:07:53 AM PDT by Smile-n-Win
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
One difference is that Communists don't have apocalyptic views, or beliefs of an afterlife, especially an afterlife where if you had commited murder for the cause, you get extra heavenly benefits - which, in a sense, made Communist states more predictable.
24 posted on 08/14/2002 11:10:19 AM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Valin; Guillermo
The bottom line is that Islam, like Marxism, is a man made unappologetic form of proselitism. Jews, save for a minority cult from time to time, refuse to proselytise because that is the job of G_d. Christians let G_d proselytise but provide a human mean to do it that is not invasive but mindful of balance of powers so as not to pretend ownership of G_d's word, namely admit your sins politely before asking for something. On the other hand, the muslim is a god proselytising hack in Islam, making it a vicious and heretic religion of pagans and materialist pigs.

An equaly and maybe more enlightning proposition would be that Islam was a form of Marxism preceding Marx by centuries. The main difference being that Muhammad praised traders and belittled farmers, same difference, still a class warfare. Now the Islamists support the farmers and steal the traders in true Marxist tune, same difference.

25 posted on 08/20/2002 12:31:22 PM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny

If you can find it, there's a small book recently published, "Occidentalism"
The West in the eyes of it's enemies
By Ian Burama & Avishai Margalit


26 posted on 11/04/2004 9:31:09 PM PST by Valin (Out Of My Mind; Back In Five Minutes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson