Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Levi Strauss: Making More Relevant Trousers
Forbes.com ^ | 9/12/02 | Davide Dukcevich

Posted on 09/12/2002 5:06:20 PM PDT by GeneD

NEW YORK - Levi Strauss pants were tough enough to outfit 19th-century gold rushers, but do they have what it takes to block radioactive waves that may or may not emanate from wireless phones?

The question has already stirred debate. Although from a scientific standpoint the cell-phone-proof pants may be silly, Levi's latest offering shows its creativity in trying to recapture something it hasn't had in years: relevance.

Privately owned San Francisco-based Levi Strauss introduced a pair of Dockers brand pants that will feature cell-phone pockets with "anti-radiation lining to prevent possible health risks." The pants will hit shelves in Europe next February. The company said the new product was in response to customers concerns, not to any scientific proof that mobile phones actually emit harmful radiation.

The move has put a Levi's product in the headlines--a rarity for the company in recent years. Most of the recent media coverage of the 149-year-old firm has been negative, such as last spring, when it reduced its workforce by 20% and shuttered all but one of its seven American factories.

The company, which had debt of almost $2 billion as of last April, had sales of $4.65 billion in 2001, a giant drop from the $7.1 billion it reported for 1996. In 1999, seven members of the Forbes 400 list of richest Americans owed their fortune to the Levi Strauss empire. Last year, only one remained on the list.

How did this come about? Levi Strauss' fashions, which include the Dockers and Slates brands, stagnated; the company ignored the smaller players, which wound up devouring market share, and became deaf to changing styles (such as baggy jeans popularized by hip-hop culture). Two years ago, the company tapped Philip Marineau, former chief executive of PepsiCo, to reintroduce the historic name to young consumers. To catch up with Generation-Y, in recent months the firm has been aggressively promoting its sexy low-rise jeans with the sales pitch "Dangerously low."

It also has created tech-friendly clothes. Levi partnered with Philips Electronics last year to create jackets equipped with a mobile phone, an MP3 player, a remote control, a microphone and earphones. The Dockers Mobile Pant, meanwhile, has pockets designed to carry wireless phones and handheld computers.

But since the dot-com meltdown, tech isn't quite as cool as it used to be. In a show that Levi is more attune to the times, it is now making clothes to protect consumers from technology.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: bluejeans; cellphones; dockers; levistraussandco; philipselectronics; radiation

1 posted on 09/12/2002 5:06:21 PM PDT by GeneD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Here is another article on the same topic.

U.S. jeans maker Levi Strauss & Co. denied on Thursday it was playing on consumer fears by launching a line of trousers fitted with "anti-radiation" pockets for mobile phones.

The trousers, with a lining which the makers say shields against radiation, are designed by Dockers, a brand name of Levi Strauss -- famous for its classic "501" jeans.

Retailers were currently viewing the new line, called Icon S-Fit, with an eye to sales from next spring, a Levi's spokesman said.

"We're not implying in any way that mobile phones are dangerous," Levi's European communications manager Cedric Jungpeter told Reuters.

"Our intention is not to cash in on consumer fears but provide the consumers with what they want," he said from Levi's European headquarters in Brussels.

The finished design was the fruit of extensive market research showing that the fashion conscious were also health conscious, Jungpeter said.

"The debate is open. Although no study has proved mobile phones are harmful, no study has proved the contrary either," he added.

Officials from Dockers, which announced the launch of its new line in July, were not immediately available for comment.

Worldwide studies into the possible dangers of mobile phones produce often conflicting conclusions.

A recent one carried out by Australian researchers over a three-year period showed that radio emissions from mobile phones did not trigger the growth of tumors in mice, and therefore probably did not do so in humans either.

That research followed another Australian study on mice five years ago that concluded cellular phones could foster tumor growth.

Swedish research published in August concluded that long-term users of first generation mobile phones faced an up to 80 percent greater risk of developing brain tumors than non-users and the World Health Organization ( news - web sites) said last year more research was needed.

But a Danish study last year of 400,000 mobile phone users showed no increased cancer risk.

"Our intention is not to cash in on consumer fears but provide the consumers with what they want," he said from Levi's European headquarters in Brussels.

Yeah, right.

2 posted on 09/12/2002 5:10:44 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Levi Strauss has been around too many liberals who talk out of their a**. Cell phones are purported to cause brain cancer, not colo-rectal cancer. Therefore, if Levi Strauss wants to be "relevant" they should sew tin foil into a new line of dungaree hats.
3 posted on 09/12/2002 5:15:23 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
That's not a cell phone in my pocket darlin', I'm just real glad to see ya'!

(idiots)

...Wranglers as long as I can remember, kj

4 posted on 09/12/2002 5:16:34 PM PDT by AzJP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
I'd only buy them if they had a special pocket for my .45.
Not likely.
5 posted on 09/12/2002 5:29:52 PM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo
It seems like they'd have a genuine market for that actually. It's obvious why they wouldn't make it though.
6 posted on 09/12/2002 5:30:57 PM PDT by Bogey78O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Don't buy their brand anymore....seems to me they should put protection in the crack area - weren't they taken over by a certain tiny segment of the population some time ago?
7 posted on 09/12/2002 5:31:30 PM PDT by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
In the case of liberals, the pocket is appropriately placed to prevent brain tumors.
8 posted on 09/12/2002 5:33:31 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Fifty years ago, you went and got a pair of Levi's with two inches longer legs and one inch bigger waist and washed them in hot water to shrink them (at $2.75 a pair) Now you have to remember whether you want 501's, 510's, 505's, etc. (at $39.99 a pair) or try and figure out why anyone would buy wrinkle up Dockers that don't really fit, etc. Now I need a radiation pocket to protect the family jewels? They should have stuck with the jean work pants and the choice of a bib overall. Old man grumbling.
9 posted on 09/12/2002 5:35:56 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Screw Levis.
10 posted on 09/12/2002 5:52:02 PM PDT by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Levis once were known for their quality and value, now they are known for their "relevance?"

They need to come up with a way to make a profit.

11 posted on 09/12/2002 5:53:10 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
Agree, but I gotta put in a good word for pre-softening.

Back then, new jeans had to be washed about 12 times before they became really comfortable. A year was a long time to wait before my new jeans felt right.

12 posted on 09/12/2002 5:58:42 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
Don't buy their brand anymore...

I quit buying their products years ago, when the got on the homosexual bandwagon. I doubt that it did any good, although it makes me feel a bit better.

I quit shopping at K-mart a few years ago when they chose Rosie for a symbol. I doubt that that did any good either.

I'm currently considering avoiding all things Disney, though I doubt that it will do any more than giving up K-mart and Levi..

13 posted on 09/12/2002 6:02:48 PM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Quote of the Day by Blue Screen of Death
14 posted on 09/12/2002 6:06:10 PM PDT by RJayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
You have got the real reason cowboys are bow legged!
15 posted on 09/12/2002 6:08:41 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Cell phones are purported to cause brain cancer, not colo-rectal cancer.

Sound like some leftist have their heads where the sun don't shine.

16 posted on 09/12/2002 7:05:55 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Levi Strauss pants were tough enough to outfit 19th-century gold rushers, but do they have what it takes to block radioactive waves that may or may not emanate from wireless phones?

wireless phones do not emanate radioactive waves. Radioactive refers to the decay of unstable isotopes (atoms).

17 posted on 09/12/2002 7:11:15 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo
I'd only buy them if they had a special pocket for my .45.
Not likely.

Not likely indeed. For those who don't know, what NHDuo's referring to here is that the Levi's corporation is a MAJOR gun control organization funder.

My Wranglers fit just fine, thank you. (Who in the world keeps a cellphone in their jeans pockets anyway?)

18 posted on 09/12/2002 7:18:17 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: templar
Your not alone, our FAMILY switched to Lee's Rider Jeans because of Levi's pro homosexual stance. I guess our boycott is having an effect, give how deep they are in debt... poor things. They pandered to 2 - 5% of the population WHO CAN NOT REPRODUCE, while we heterosexual families, our children and grandchildren are avoiding them like the plague. We are also passing along our anti Disney, Levis, IBM and other pro perversion family values I along to our decedents.

It is reported that Disney's stocks are also heading into the toilet as well. I wonder why? Answer: Example, we went to 6 Flags and Water Country water park (owned by evangelical Christians) the last four years instead of Disney World and have not spent a cent on the perverted mouse’s merchandise.

People and these businesses laughed when we declared a boycott based on their decision to promote and support homosexuality. They said it wouldn't effect their prophets or businesses... They were wrong and it is costing them Billions of dollars. We are not alone, MILLIONS are also doing likewise and we are demonstrating our opposition with our pocketbooks.

19 posted on 09/12/2002 8:24:45 PM PDT by Jmouse007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Sound like some leftist have their heads where the sun don't shine.

Well, Levi Strauss sure does.

20 posted on 09/13/2002 8:08:34 AM PDT by pray4liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson