Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RESIGNATION IS NOT ENOUGH!
JUDICIAL WATCH ^ | Sep 30, 2002 | Copyright 1997-2002, Judicial Watch, Inc.

Posted on 09/30/2002 6:46:44 PM PDT by luv2ndamend

Torricelli Must Be Prosecuted to the Fullest Extent of the Law

Judicial Watch Will Pursue the Complaints It Already Has Pending Against the Disgraced New Jersey Senator

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, said today that it rejoices in the resignation from the election race of the corrupt Senator from the State of New Jersey, Robert “The Torch” Torricelli . Senator Torricelli’s withdrawal from the election comes amid growing criticism of Torricelli over ethics violations for bribery and other criminal acts.

Judicial Watch has ethics and other complaints pending against Senator Torricelli, and will pursue those investigations vigorously in order to uncover all of the facts surrounding Torricelli’s misdeeds.

“Senator Torricelli is a national disgrace. He should not be allowed to avoid punishment by simply ‘cutting and running.’ Torricelli may be able to run, but he cannot hide from Judicial Watch,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: diligentstaffofjw; guilty; jail; judicialwatchrules; larryklayman; loser; scumbag; tomfitton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 401-429 next last

1 posted on 09/30/2002 6:46:45 PM PDT by luv2ndamend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
It's All About ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEME!!!!!
2 posted on 09/30/2002 6:49:14 PM PDT by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
And Judicial Watch is a national disgrace too.

Must be time to fill the pockets with bi-partisan gold coins again.

Now, if you sue Alec Baldwin and Babs Strisand for Breach of Contract (not leaving the US) I'll donate money.

3 posted on 09/30/2002 6:49:48 PM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
And Judicial Watch is a national disgrace too.

______________________________________________

That "national disgrace" sure did an excellent job of exposing Clinton corruption.
4 posted on 09/30/2002 6:52:06 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

WIPE THE SMILE OFF OF THIS MAN'S FACE.

VOTE THE RATS OUT!!

DONATE TONIGHT.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

5 posted on 09/30/2002 6:52:53 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend



6 posted on 09/30/2002 6:53:53 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
Judicial Watch is just as corrupt as Torricelli. Those ambulance chasers over at JW should have their tax exempt status revioked and their law offices closed. Larry Klayman should be forced to return all of his ill gotten gains for being the whore he is.

Next I might tell you how I really feel about Judicial Watch

7 posted on 09/30/2002 6:54:24 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
Any bets on how soon they go back to being a "right-wing attack group" rather then a "political watch dog"?

a.cricket

8 posted on 09/30/2002 6:54:24 PM PDT by another cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Registered
I knew I'd find you here!

LOL!

9 posted on 09/30/2002 6:55:00 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Ha ha! I just love those!
10 posted on 09/30/2002 6:55:21 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
LOL, and likewise.

11 posted on 09/30/2002 7:01:50 PM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
"Torricelli may be able to run, but he cannot hide from Judicial Watch,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman."

Why not, Larry? Everyone else has.
12 posted on 09/30/2002 7:02:42 PM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter
I will forever kick myself in the butt for not taking care to save the pic of Klayman and Ozzie Osborne at last year's WH Correspondents Dinner.
13 posted on 09/30/2002 7:03:06 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
So true!
14 posted on 09/30/2002 7:03:51 PM PDT by luv2ndamend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Even a broken clock is right twice a day. I gave these people money in the past but they now disgust me.

I realize that they have a giant maw to feed and if there are no real scandals available they will manufacture them in their pursuit of lucre.

Can you explain their lawsuits against the Bush administration?

15 posted on 09/30/2002 7:04:29 PM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: another cricket

The second Judicial Watch files an amicus brief on behalf of the Republican Party of New Jersey, Klayman is back in the "right-wing nutcase" doghouse. Howell Raines and the rest of those characters who run the Volkischer Beobachter, also known as the New York Times, would never forgive him.

I think Klayman knows this, and figures that he's gotten all he's going to get out of the Democrats with the Cheney thing. Methinks he's trying to rebuild bridges with the Republican money guys by sticking it to Torch, Daschle, and Clinton.

Hey, if JW works for us in New Jersey, why not welcome Larry back with open arms? At least until he decides to backstab us again, of course.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

16 posted on 09/30/2002 7:06:55 PM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Registered
I hope you didn't have to re-register.
17 posted on 09/30/2002 7:09:07 PM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
Judicial Watch may be looking to make a splash, but it seems to me that if The Torch hid the 25K from Chang and it is now proven that he spent 22K he can't account for as income reported on is IRS form that he can be prosecuted for tax evasion,,,,,,,as you or I would be....... and it is now documented fact. So Judicial watch is redundant!
18 posted on 09/30/2002 7:09:31 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC DONATE TODAY OR..... MEET BIFF... YOUR NEW ADMIN MODERATOR!
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD


19 posted on 09/30/2002 7:09:42 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
"When did the American people become so unforgiving".....The Torch.
20 posted on 09/30/2002 7:10:30 PM PDT by mystery-ak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wingnuts'nbolts
I did hear something about a tax issue, but did not know exactly what was being looked at.
21 posted on 09/30/2002 7:11:57 PM PDT by luv2ndamend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
I can now name one case Judicial Watch won; his mother had to pay him $15,000 to end that lawsuit.
22 posted on 09/30/2002 7:12:31 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
I realize that they have a giant maw to feed

You better believe it. Donations down TEN MILLION DOLLARS from 2000.

23 posted on 09/30/2002 7:13:48 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
That quote must go to the archives!!
24 posted on 09/30/2002 7:15:17 PM PDT by luv2ndamend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: billhilly; deport
Where is Donato????
25 posted on 09/30/2002 7:15:22 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
And that came from her insurance company. The guy is a joke
26 posted on 09/30/2002 7:15:51 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Awaiting his $100,000 I guess......
27 posted on 09/30/2002 7:16:39 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Shouldn't you be working on your *ping* list?
28 posted on 09/30/2002 7:16:39 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
No ping list for JW; nobody except us gluttons care.
29 posted on 09/30/2002 7:17:58 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: deport
I thought it was $100,000,000.......am I wrong?
30 posted on 09/30/2002 7:18:25 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend

The Pantheon of Hucksters

31 posted on 09/30/2002 7:22:02 PM PDT by martin_fierro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Registered
You pay legal eagles for results, not for clipping newspaper headlines.C'mon, cut bait on these turkeys.Filing motions and issuing press releases isn't a very efficient way to use one's capital, is it?Yuppers, that's "exposing" corruption, hot diggidity...
32 posted on 09/30/2002 7:22:06 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I was actually referring to this.

With 1,700+ replies, I can see how one might miss a post.

33 posted on 09/30/2002 7:22:54 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
They're not ALL on my ping list.......LOL. A lot them are, yes, but not ALL of them!
34 posted on 09/30/2002 7:24:45 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
You can add Torricelli to that after today.
35 posted on 09/30/2002 7:25:15 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
That action will help Larry go down in history as the consummate lawyer... one who actually DID sue his own mother...
36 posted on 09/30/2002 7:26:10 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Well, I went to "the store" looking for this....

Illusion Watch ($40.00) Authentic JW watch with disappearing and reappearing logo on the face. Black leather bands, black face with silver accents.

But I notice that Larry has loaded the place with lots more retail items.

If this watch is a little too pedestrian for you, Larry is offering a Movado one that looks just like it, for $229!

37 posted on 09/30/2002 7:26:54 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Oh brother, he gets invited to the big wig parties or did he crash it? He wants to be one of the famous.
38 posted on 09/30/2002 7:28:20 PM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
I hope the DOJ and IRS nail the son of a so and do for tax fraud and he gets 20 years behind bars. That will take care of all the 20 years he spent screwing the public.
39 posted on 09/30/2002 7:30:12 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
He's a sound byte whore, imo. Never met a camera he didn't want to expose himself to.
40 posted on 09/30/2002 7:30:29 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend; FreedominJesusChrist
GO Larry GO!!
41 posted on 09/30/2002 7:31:16 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
They're not ALL on my ping list.......LOL. A lot them are, yes, but not ALL of them!

FYI.....I fall into the latter category.

sniff, sniff.....anybody got a hankie?

42 posted on 09/30/2002 7:31:44 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Trouble maker!
43 posted on 09/30/2002 7:32:08 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Well, I don't put people on there unless they ask........but since you're making such a scene, you're on it now......LOL.
44 posted on 09/30/2002 7:32:37 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
LOL!

Thanks, sweetie!

45 posted on 09/30/2002 7:34:20 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
" Slow beginning In 1995, Mr. Klayman said that his group -- himself, an associate and some volunteer attorneys -- collected less than $ 10,000 in donations, with no single check larger than $ 1,500. In 1996 -- the year his Freedom of Information Act suit against the Department of Commerce forced elusive fund-raiser John Huang to come out of hiding and sit for a deposition eight days before the presidential election -- donations rose to $ 68,000.

Then came the Year of Lewinsky, the piece de resistance of American scandal. Mr. Klayman, well positioned to exploit it, became a ubiquitous Clinton critic on cable television talk shows. In June 1998, a conservative foundation funded by anti-Clinton billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife revealed that it had given Judicial Watch $ 550,000. Mr. Klayman characterized the grant as "a minority of our support," which, if true, indicated that the fund-raising ads he'd begun running on television and in three conservative weekly magazines were doing well."

I suspect the size of the target pretty much dictates JW's stamina. Donata is yesterday's news. So is Clinton. Osama could well figure in Larry's FUTURE plans. Only time and media attention will tell.

Thanks, Howlin, for your bookmarks. I lifted the quotes from there.
46 posted on 09/30/2002 7:34:22 PM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: justshe
What do you mean, media whore?

JUDICIAL WATCH DEMANDS RECORDS OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN FLORIDA GOVERNOR JEB BUSH AND HIS BROTHER, THE PRESIDENT, REGARDING CUBA

Public Record Request Seeks to Unravel Mystery Behind Contradictory U.S. Policy Toward Terrorist Nation

47 posted on 09/30/2002 7:34:57 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
You should read his 2000 990; he took in almost 26 million and only spent 3 million in legal fees.
48 posted on 09/30/2002 7:37:00 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
I think Jim Baker or Jimmy Swaggart should've been on there in place of Jan Crouch. Of course the montage may only include hucksters that didn't get caught red-handed and/or go to jail. ;)
49 posted on 09/30/2002 7:37:11 PM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
OK........since he charges a fee....media prostitute! With stron overtones of slut.
50 posted on 09/30/2002 7:38:03 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 401-429 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson