Skip to comments.
RESIGNATION IS NOT ENOUGH!
JUDICIAL WATCH ^
| Sep 30, 2002
| © Copyright 1997-2002, Judicial Watch, Inc.
Posted on 09/30/2002 6:46:44 PM PDT by luv2ndamend
Torricelli Must Be Prosecuted to the Fullest Extent of the Law
Judicial Watch Will Pursue the Complaints It Already Has Pending Against the Disgraced New Jersey Senator
(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, said today that it rejoices in the resignation from the election race of the corrupt Senator from the State of New Jersey, Robert The Torch Torricelli . Senator Torricellis withdrawal from the election comes amid growing criticism of Torricelli over ethics violations for bribery and other criminal acts.
Judicial Watch has ethics and other complaints pending against Senator Torricelli, and will pursue those investigations vigorously in order to uncover all of the facts surrounding Torricellis misdeeds.
Senator Torricelli is a national disgrace. He should not be allowed to avoid punishment by simply cutting and running. Torricelli may be able to run, but he cannot hide from Judicial Watch, stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.
TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: diligentstaffofjw; guilty; jail; judicialwatchrules; larryklayman; loser; scumbag; tomfitton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 401-429 next last
To: luv2ndamend
It's All About ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEME!!!!!
2
posted on
09/30/2002 6:49:14 PM PDT
by
cmsgop
To: luv2ndamend
And Judicial Watch is a national disgrace too.
Must be time to fill the pockets with bi-partisan gold coins again.
Now, if you sue Alec Baldwin and Babs Strisand for Breach of Contract (not leaving the US) I'll donate money.
3
posted on
09/30/2002 6:49:48 PM PDT
by
RobFromGa
To: RobFromGa
And Judicial Watch is a national disgrace too.
______________________________________________
That "national disgrace" sure did an excellent job of exposing Clinton corruption.
5
posted on
09/30/2002 6:52:53 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: luv2ndamend
To: luv2ndamend
Judicial Watch is just as corrupt as Torricelli. Those ambulance chasers over at JW should have their tax exempt status revioked and their law offices closed. Larry Klayman should be forced to return all of his ill gotten gains for being the whore he is.
Next I might tell you how I really feel about Judicial Watch
7
posted on
09/30/2002 6:54:24 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
To: luv2ndamend
Any bets on how soon they go back to being a "right-wing attack group" rather then a "political watch dog"?
a.cricket
To: Registered
I knew I'd find you here!
LOL!
To: hole_n_one
Ha ha! I just love those!
To: hole_n_one
LOL, and likewise.
To: luv2ndamend
"Torricelli may be able to run, but he cannot hide from Judicial Watch, stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman."
Why not, Larry? Everyone else has.
To: A Citizen Reporter
I will forever kick myself in the butt for not taking care to save the pic of Klayman and Ozzie Osborne at last year's WH Correspondents Dinner.
To: billhilly
So true!
To: Registered
Even a broken clock is right twice a day. I gave these people money in the past but they now disgust me.
I realize that they have a giant maw to feed and if there are no real scandals available they will manufacture them in their pursuit of lucre.
Can you explain their lawsuits against the Bush administration?
To: another cricket

The second Judicial Watch files an amicus brief on behalf of the Republican Party of New Jersey, Klayman is back in the "right-wing nutcase" doghouse. Howell Raines and the rest of those characters who run the Volkischer Beobachter, also known as the New York Times, would never forgive him.
I think Klayman knows this, and figures that he's gotten all he's going to get out of the Democrats with the Cheney thing. Methinks he's trying to rebuild bridges with the Republican money guys by sticking it to Torch, Daschle, and Clinton.
Hey, if JW works for us in New Jersey, why not welcome Larry back with open arms? At least until he decides to backstab us again, of course.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
16
posted on
09/30/2002 7:06:55 PM PDT
by
section9
To: Registered
I hope you didn't have to re-register.
To: luv2ndamend
Judicial Watch may be looking to make a splash, but it seems to me that if The Torch hid the 25K from Chang and it is now proven that he spent 22K he can't account for as income reported on is IRS form that he can be prosecuted for tax evasion,,,,,,,as you or I would be....... and it is now documented fact. So Judicial watch is redundant!
19
posted on
09/30/2002 7:09:42 PM PDT
by
terilyn
To: luv2ndamend
"When did the American people become so unforgiving".....The Torch.
To: wingnuts'nbolts
I did hear something about a tax issue, but did not know exactly what was being looked at.
To: MJY1288
I can now name one case Judicial Watch won; his mother had to pay him $15,000 to end that lawsuit.
22
posted on
09/30/2002 7:12:31 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: RobFromGa
I realize that they have a giant maw to feed You better believe it. Donations down TEN MILLION DOLLARS from 2000.
23
posted on
09/30/2002 7:13:48 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: mystery-ak
That quote must go to the archives!!
To: billhilly; deport
Where is Donato????
25
posted on
09/30/2002 7:15:22 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
And that came from her insurance company. The guy is a joke
26
posted on
09/30/2002 7:15:51 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
To: Howlin
Awaiting his $100,000 I guess......
27
posted on
09/30/2002 7:16:39 PM PDT
by
deport
To: Howlin
Shouldn't you be working on your *ping* list?
To: hole_n_one
No ping list for JW; nobody except us gluttons care.
29
posted on
09/30/2002 7:17:58 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: deport
I thought it was $100,000,000.......am I wrong?
30
posted on
09/30/2002 7:18:25 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: luv2ndamend

The Pantheon of Hucksters
To: Registered
You pay legal eagles for results, not for clipping newspaper headlines.C'mon, cut bait on these turkeys.Filing motions and issuing press releases isn't a very efficient way to use one's capital, is it?Yuppers, that's "exposing" corruption, hot diggidity...
To: Howlin
I was actually referring to
this.
With 1,700+ replies, I can see how one might miss a post.
To: hole_n_one
They're not ALL on my ping list.......LOL. A lot them are, yes, but not ALL of them!
34
posted on
09/30/2002 7:24:45 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: martin_fierro
You can add Torricelli to that after today.
35
posted on
09/30/2002 7:25:15 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
That action will help Larry go down in history as the consummate lawyer... one who actually DID sue his own mother...
To: hole_n_one
Well, I went to "the store" looking for this....
Illusion Watch ($40.00)
Authentic JW watch with disappearing and reappearing logo on the face. Black leather bands, black face with silver accents.
But I notice that Larry has loaded the place with lots more retail items.
If this watch is a little too pedestrian for you, Larry is offering a Movado one that looks just like it, for $229!
To: hole_n_one
Oh brother, he gets invited to the big wig parties or did he crash it? He wants to be one of the famous.
38
posted on
09/30/2002 7:28:20 PM PDT
by
Brett66
To: luv2ndamend
I hope the DOJ and IRS nail the son of a so and do for tax fraud and he gets 20 years behind bars. That will take care of all the 20 years he spent screwing the public.
To: Brett66
He's a sound byte whore, imo. Never met a camera he didn't want to expose himself to.
40
posted on
09/30/2002 7:30:29 PM PDT
by
justshe
To: luv2ndamend; FreedominJesusChrist
GO Larry GO!!
To: Howlin
They're not ALL on my ping list.......LOL. A lot them are, yes, but not ALL of them!FYI.....I fall into the latter category.
sniff, sniff.....anybody got a hankie?
To: Fred Mertz
Trouble maker!
To: hole_n_one
Well, I don't put people on there unless they ask........but since you're making such a scene, you're on it now......LOL.
44
posted on
09/30/2002 7:32:37 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
To: Howlin
" Slow beginning In 1995, Mr. Klayman said that his group -- himself, an associate and some volunteer attorneys -- collected less than $ 10,000 in donations, with no single check larger than $ 1,500. In 1996 -- the year his Freedom of Information Act suit against the Department of Commerce forced elusive fund-raiser John Huang to come out of hiding and sit for a deposition eight days before the presidential election -- donations rose to $ 68,000.
Then came the Year of Lewinsky, the piece de resistance of American scandal. Mr. Klayman, well positioned to exploit it, became a ubiquitous Clinton critic on cable television talk shows. In June 1998, a conservative foundation funded by anti-Clinton billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife revealed that it had given Judicial Watch $ 550,000. Mr. Klayman characterized the grant as "a minority of our support," which, if true, indicated that the fund-raising ads he'd begun running on television and in three conservative weekly magazines were doing well."
I suspect the size of the target pretty much dictates JW's stamina. Donata is yesterday's news. So is Clinton. Osama could well figure in Larry's FUTURE plans. Only time and media attention will tell.
Thanks, Howlin, for your bookmarks. I lifted the quotes from there.
To: justshe
What do you mean, media whore?
JUDICIAL WATCH DEMANDS RECORDS OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN FLORIDA GOVERNOR JEB BUSH AND HIS BROTHER, THE PRESIDENT, REGARDING CUBA
Public Record Request Seeks to Unravel Mystery Behind Contradictory U.S. Policy Toward Terrorist Nation
47
posted on
09/30/2002 7:34:57 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: billhilly
You should read his 2000 990; he took in almost 26 million and only spent 3 million in legal fees.
48
posted on
09/30/2002 7:37:00 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: martin_fierro
I think Jim Baker or Jimmy Swaggart should've been on there in place of Jan Crouch. Of course the montage may only include hucksters that didn't get caught red-handed and/or go to jail. ;)
49
posted on
09/30/2002 7:37:11 PM PDT
by
Brett66
To: Howlin
OK........since he charges a fee....media prostitute! With stron overtones of slut.
50
posted on
09/30/2002 7:38:03 PM PDT
by
justshe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 401-429 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson