Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Martha Stewart's Stock Broker's Assistant Pleads Guilty - Cuts Deal - Adios MS
ABC | ABC

Posted on 10/02/2002 9:52:31 AM PDT by MindBender26

Mop up this, bitch!


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: itsagoodthing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-67 next last

1 posted on 10/02/2002 9:52:31 AM PDT by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

TAKE BACK THE SENATE!

VOTE OUT THE DEMS!

DONATE TODAY!!!.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

2 posted on 10/02/2002 9:53:20 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
I get the indication that Martha Stewart may be in a bit of legal trouble. Is this general consensus?
3 posted on 10/02/2002 9:53:55 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Quite, old boy, quite.... and this insider trading bruhaha, it's just not done!!!
4 posted on 10/02/2002 9:55:17 AM PDT by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Also, she was BIG TIME dem donor.
5 posted on 10/02/2002 9:55:54 AM PDT by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I wouldn't want to be her right now, let's put it that way.
6 posted on 10/02/2002 9:55:57 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
No matter, Martha looks good in pinstripes.

5¢ a day will fund the filth at Salon. What will you donate to FreeRepublic?

7 posted on 10/02/2002 9:57:27 AM PDT by Drango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
I am still hot for Martha. "Think she'll return my letters from the Slammer???
8 posted on 10/02/2002 10:00:16 AM PDT by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: corkoman
New headline:

Stewart's Stock Sinks As Baby Broker Cuts Deal To Squeal. Fashion Felon F**ked

Sorry 'bout that but it's very 1950s New York Daily News

9 posted on 10/02/2002 10:06:07 AM PDT by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
How long before we can see her in designer cuffs doing a PERP WALK??
10 posted on 10/02/2002 10:06:22 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Martha Steward poses with the ghoul Chiat--her "dear, dear, friend" from Planned Parenthood whom she raised thousands of dollars for.


11 posted on 10/02/2002 10:07:32 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
I think Martha shorted her integrity long before this
pathetic performance of hers.
12 posted on 10/02/2002 10:14:37 AM PDT by AdvisorB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
She won't stand for it, I'm tellin' ya!

She won't go to the joint!

She'll take a citrus zester... Right through the roof of her mouth...

13 posted on 10/02/2002 10:17:38 AM PDT by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
WANT TO TAKE BACK THE SENATE??

WANT TO SHOCK HILLARY?

THEN DO YOUR PART TODAY! GO TO:

TakeBackCongress.org

A resource for conservatives who want to help a Republican majority in the Senate

14 posted on 10/02/2002 10:19:25 AM PDT by ffrancone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

15 posted on 10/02/2002 10:25:02 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Another Martha idea..

Martha here

16 posted on 10/02/2002 10:28:24 AM PDT by just me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I get the indication that Martha Stewart may be in a bit of legal trouble. Is this general consensus?

In order to sustain a criminal conviction of MS, the Govt needs to prove she had access to insider info when she sold her ImClone stock, and that she knowingly profited from that insider info.

Nothing I have seen in the press, on TV, or in any chat room leads me to believe that MS knew she had inside info when she sold her stock. OTOH, little Dumbya was an insider when he sold his HEC stock at a profit of about 100x that made by MS. Therefore, the Govt should prosecute little Dumbya, not MS.

17 posted on 10/02/2002 10:30:31 AM PDT by MurryMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MurryMom
Yo mama.
18 posted on 10/02/2002 10:38:55 AM PDT by ThreeYearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MurryMom
Actually, Murry, Terry McAuliffe is the one the gov't should be investigating. But, YOU wouldn't want that, would you.....
19 posted on 10/02/2002 10:41:27 AM PDT by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Coming soon, the new style magazine:
Martha Stewart's Living ... in a Confined Space.
20 posted on 10/02/2002 10:42:12 AM PDT by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Boy, that'll really make your souffle fall.
21 posted on 10/02/2002 10:48:36 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26; Mo1; SamAdams76; Timesink; Drango; corkoman; Dog; SkyPilot; Mr.Smorch; DWSUWF; ...

22 posted on 10/02/2002 10:49:07 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MurryMom
Now that's a laugh -- Whoever bought GW's stock could have made a fortune on it. Remember? -- It rose substantially for months before the company went belly-up.
23 posted on 10/02/2002 10:49:13 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MurryMom
Nothing I have seen in the press, on TV, or in any chat room leads me to believe that MS knew she had inside info when she sold her stock.

You can't be serious! She obviously had inside info --- it's open and shut. And as a former securities broker she knew exactly what that info meant and exactly how illegal it was to act on it. The timeline alone proves her access to inside info. Now that her broker's assistant is tesifying to the specific nature of the info in addition to the sequence of events, Stewart is toast.

What you must mean is that unless you hear a tape recording of someone telling her that the FDA was denying the application, you refuse to believe that a television celebrity whom I assume you like could break the law. My advice to you: Get over it. She's guilty as hell.

24 posted on 10/02/2002 10:49:17 AM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
Oops !! #22.....
25 posted on 10/02/2002 10:50:08 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
In the interest of the rule of law and the integrity of anti-insider trading laws in the Security Act of 1934, Martha should recieve some punishment.
26 posted on 10/02/2002 10:52:17 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MurryMom
You troll freak, how tall are you?
27 posted on 10/02/2002 10:55:46 AM PDT by Xenalyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: beckett
Don't let Murry's Mom get to you, she does not care about any of this, she is just mad at President Bush
28 posted on 10/02/2002 10:55:58 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hap; Bacon Man; MurryMom
Hey, y'all c'mon over and meet MurryMom, FR's resident Gap troll - um, I mean Democratic Underground refugee. She's generally good for a laugh - and she's evidently six-foot-nine, because she calls Dubya "little."
29 posted on 10/02/2002 10:57:05 AM PDT by Xenalyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN; beckett
Don't let Murry's Mom get to you, she does not care about any of this, she is just mad at President Bush.

In the interest of truthfulness, CIB, please restate your thesis, omitting the last three words.
30 posted on 10/02/2002 10:58:03 AM PDT by Xenalyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN
You HAVE to feel for poor little Murray, don't you?
31 posted on 10/02/2002 11:04:27 AM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MurryMom
who is dumya?
32 posted on 10/02/2002 11:06:48 AM PDT by joyce11111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
prolly a purdy homely b*tch as well.
33 posted on 10/02/2002 11:08:16 AM PDT by joyce11111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: justshe
You HAVE to feel for poor little Murray, don't you?

EEEEEEEEW!!!!

Oh, wait . . . you said "feel FOR her."

Different story altogether.
34 posted on 10/02/2002 11:10:13 AM PDT by Xenalyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I get the indication that Martha Stewart may be in a bit of legal trouble. Is this general consensus?

I seriously doubt that Martha could ever be convicted of "insider trading". Importantly, she is not an "insider". To be convicted of "insider trading", she (an "outsider") would have to have been given a tip by an "insider" (such as a company Officer) and she would have to know that the tip had not been given to the general public. That's tough to prove. Executing a trade on a tip from a stock broker or from a non-Officer company employee in not "insider trading". I think Martha is just an easy target for the media. Stories about her sell ads for them.

35 posted on 10/02/2002 11:19:08 AM PDT by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Is "Chiat" a female?
36 posted on 10/02/2002 11:19:18 AM PDT by Semaphore Heathcliffe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
"Mop up this, bitch!"

Do you kiss your mother with that mouth?

37 posted on 10/02/2002 11:28:17 AM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Lets just say that hurricane season is not over.
:o)
38 posted on 10/02/2002 11:29:24 AM PDT by Maximum Leader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
No, only yours.

39 posted on 10/02/2002 11:38:52 AM PDT by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: beckett
You're right...as a former securities broker, she knows more than the average joe...and she also knows insider info when she hears it..

It doesn't leave her much wiggle room.

She'll look okay in stripes with cell to match. Of course, the bars will be transformed into a gate to her secret garden. The cot will become a day bed and the sink will be 50's notalgia.

Such talent!!

What amuses me is that her stock and sales are down, down down. We didn't need her in the first place, did we!!

Sac

40 posted on 10/02/2002 11:39:26 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
Ruins a rump roast, too!
41 posted on 10/02/2002 11:43:50 AM PDT by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I get the indication that Martha Stewart may be in a bit of legal trouble. Is this general consensus?

Probably she is. But I really have to wonder about this. She's most likely a target because of who she is: big name, and irritating. Many will consider it fun to watch her fall. It's a great scandal. And for that reason I am very suspicious.

Considering who she raises money for, it's fair to ask whose bacon is being saved by putting the focus on Martha. McAuliffe? Clinton?

42 posted on 10/02/2002 11:45:42 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
No, only yours.

Shame on you.

43 posted on 10/02/2002 12:12:31 PM PDT by BigWaveBetty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Smorch
The other stock trade she made netted her millions of dollars...she sold KMark, 23 Million I heard. Do you suppose that her relationship with KMart would have given her inside info to unload?
44 posted on 10/02/2002 12:38:13 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MurryMom
Always your interpretation of facts is from the defination of a major and minor operation...yours or mine. Facts do not have meaning to you and nobody wants you confused.
45 posted on 10/02/2002 12:41:30 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: wingnuts'nbolts
She's arrogant, pompous, and apparently, a crook to
boot. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that she received
inside info that prompted her to unload her sizable
block of KM. She is to the world of business and finance,
what hitlary is to the world of politics. There isn't
anything these two old shrews wouldn't do to advance their agenda
or their nasty selves.
46 posted on 10/02/2002 1:08:55 PM PDT by AdvisorB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
I was on a boat tour in Bar Harbor, ME this summer and the tour guide pointed out one of Martha's mansions to us. He followed it up by saying, "Well, it's hers for now. It may be the federal government's before too long." LOL
47 posted on 10/02/2002 1:30:23 PM PDT by WomanofStandard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Where are those scissors pointed? Tooo funny! Watch out, fellah.
48 posted on 10/02/2002 1:38:39 PM PDT by PoisedWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MurryMom
She did have inside information when she sold her own stock from her own company before the news broke, and her own stock tanked, however. George Bush was cleared of any wrongdoing. Your language concerning our latest Commander in Chief sounds as though you belong on a different forum.
49 posted on 10/02/2002 1:39:16 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Looks like some female penitentiary will get spruced up sometime soon, as well as having some pretty decent meals...
50 posted on 10/02/2002 2:15:46 PM PDT by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson