For the time being.
Congress should make it a federal offense to tamper with a federal election from the bench. A case like that would probably go to the US Supreme Court, but it would shine spotlight on this gross judicial impropriety.
Posted on 10/02/2002 5:16:31 PM PDT by Politico2
The media loves anybody who supports the killing of babies. It is definitely the key media tests for who is a moderate. In the case of McCain, the media loves him because he dumps on corporations and hates Christians, the other key media tests for determining a moderate.
Well, the democrats made the tie between the two; Forrester is simply reminding the voters of that fact.
Good statement on his part, BTW.
Great idea.
For the time being.
Congress should make it a federal offense to tamper with a federal election from the bench. A case like that would probably go to the US Supreme Court, but it would shine spotlight on this gross judicial impropriety.
It's great news that they are pursing an appeal. The Republicans need to put the brass knuckles on and let the leftists feel some pain. We cannot let these creeps do what they want. We need to fight using every instrument available. Each election court case the Republicans win makes it that much harder for the cheaters to use these unlawful means in the future. If we don't stop them here, they will do it again.
Gee, I wonder if I am not doing too well in my driver's license renewal test if the State Supreme Court would let me select a replacement to take the test on my behalf.
I mean it is very vitally important to my family's continued power, that I drive?
EXCELLENT IDEA!!
I second that motion.
This is pretty good, but I would just start addressing Lautenberg as Torricelli, and explain to the citizens that a vote for Lautenberg is a vote for Torricelli, because Lautenberg will resign shortly after taking office, and Torricelli will be appointed to replace him.
>The numbers I've seen run in the 67 to 69 cents on the dollar range. Connecticut is about as bad.
The Tax Foundation puts those numbers together in their report, Federal Taxing and Spending Benefit Some States, Leave Others Footing the Bill.
According to the report: "Combining the second highest tax burden per capita with low federal spending (33rd highest), New Jersey had the lowest federal spending-to-tax ratio (0.67). The 0.67 ratio means that New Jersey only receives 67¢ in federal spending for every dollar its taxpayers send to Washington and is therefore the nation’s biggest loser from federal fiscal operations. Other states that had low federal spending-to-tax ratios in FY 2001 are Connecticut (67¢), New Hampshire (71¢), Nevada (76¢) and Illinois (78¢)."
As I said on another thread:
Is Forrester really so bad that the only candidate he can beat is a proven cheater? I mean, geez, I hate the SCONJ's ruling too, and it's sad, but if Forrester had an ounce of worth it seems he should be up to taking on all comers...right?
Nice move. He is already tying Torrecelli and Lautenberg together. He should only refer to Lautenberg in the context he used above.'
He needs to have one of those commercials where the Torch morphs into the Laut!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.