Skip to comments.
Take the Torricelli Case - Wall St. Journal Editorial
Wall St. Journal ^
| Friday, October 4, 2002
| Wall St. Journal Editorial Board
Posted on 10/03/2002 11:09:29 PM PDT by pittsburgh gop guy
Edited on 04/22/2004 11:47:14 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
To: nicmarlo
Preliminary briefs have been filed before David Souter (the SCOTUS justice that handles requests for emergency stays from Jersey - thread
here). Also, the GOP has filed suit in the Trenton federal district court on behalf of two absentee voters who already returned their ballots (thread
here).
41
posted on
10/04/2002 3:38:47 PM PDT
by
steveegg
To: steveegg
Thanks, I'll get over to those threads and do some reading.
42
posted on
10/04/2002 3:53:27 PM PDT
by
nicmarlo
To: D-fendr
Even if they did, the new law wouldn't apply to this election. The Constitution also forbits ex-post-facto laws, as I recall. Ooops! What am I thinking!!!! These are Dems we're talking about here. So never mind what the Constitution says.
43
posted on
10/04/2002 4:19:22 PM PDT
by
Wolfstar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson