Does Anyone know what's going on with the Supreme Court RE: NJ

10/5/02 | Grammymoon

[firebrand]

Not this supporter of the good guys. I have been arguing with all minority-party supporters to play it as it lays for this election. Don't throw your vote away. Make it count politically to keep the worse guys out.

Then, no matter what, get involved early next time. Don't let your excitement die down after the election. Get started on a better major-party candidate very early in the game. It's harder to do than to volunteer near an election, because things aren't as organized, but it's essential.

[Wolfstar]

You are most welcome. Personally, I think those people among the founders (Jefferson, Madison, Patrick Henry and their followers) who argued for a comparatively weak federal government and strong state governments were very wise. Unfortunately, their side lost the argument during the period when the Constitution was first being ratified, although they lost much more narrowly than is understood today.

[Neanderthal]

"Don't forget, the deadline for toricelli to resign his senate seat and have the governor appoint a replacement is today..."

Are you being ironic? There are no deadlines for 'Rats. Ask the Supremos.

[GirlShortstop]

Are you being ironic? There are no deadlines for 'Rats. Ask the Supremos.   

[Always Right]

Why would the court rule against the NJSC after the election while in failing to grant an injunction before the election refuse to correct the unconsitutional action?

It doesn't make much sense considering the NJ Supremes have ignored previous rulings in Gore. This court needs to be slapped now to make a point.