Skip to comments.Iraq - Saddam Wins 100 Percent in Referendum with 100 Percent Turnout - 11,454,638 say yes, 0 say no
Posted on 10/16/2002 12:17:53 AM PDT by HAL9000
From Reuters -
Saddam Wins 100 Percent in ReferendumBAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraqi President Saddam Hussein won 100 percent of votes in a referendum for a new term in office, official results showed on Wednesday.
Saddam's top deputy Izzat Ibrahim, reading official results at a news conference in Baghdad, said turnout was also 100 percent in Tuesday's referendum.
Nearly 12 million Iraqis were eligible to answer a simple "Yes" or "No" for another seven-year term for Saddam, who has ruled Iraq for 23 years through the tight grip of the military and police.
The authorities had urged voters to turn out in force to show massive support for Saddam in the face of U.S. threats of military action and President Bush's declared desire to remove him from power.
The United States has dismissed the vote and said it lacked any credibility.
From AFP via Babelfish translation -
Iraqi referendum: 100% of "yes" for Saddam, participation of 100%
Wednesday October 16, 2002 - 7h04 GMT
BAGHDAD, Oct. 16 (AFP) - Iraqi president Saddam Hussein was re-elected for seven years at the time of the referendum of Tuesday, with 100% of the voices and a rate of participation of 100%, announced Wednesday the number two of the mode and president of the electoral commission, Ezzat Ibrahim.
"president Saddam Hussein, that God keeps it, gained 100% of the voices", said Mr. Ibrahim, by specifying that the rate of participation was also "100%".
According to him, "on the whole 11.454.638 people said yes to Saddam Hussein".
The Iraqi voters had to answer by yes or by not the question: "Etes you of agreement so that Saddam Hussein does remain president?"
The number two Iraqi had predicted unanimous Tuesday evening one "yes" in Saddam Hussein.
"the people voted unanimously for his leader", had it says. "the participation was absolute and yes was absolute", had ensured Mr. Ibrahim, also vice-president of the Council of command of the revolution, the highest leading authority of the country.
Saddam Hussein was the only candidate for his succession. It carries out a better score than at the time of the preceding referendum, in 1995: it had then been elected with 99,96% of yes.
Saddam the dictator likes to call himself 'president' because the idea of democracy is a very powerful one.
I'll bet Gore is really jealous over this ....he was so sure the NOV 2000 results would read "America - Gore wins 100 Percent in election with 100 percent turnout - 274,000,000 say yes, 0 say no.
But, around this point, you can't help wondering, ''Why exactly does Saddam Hussein need a campaign song?'' According to the Times, at his last presidential election seven years ago, the old butcher got 99.89 percent of the votes. As the 0.11 percent foolish enough to write in Pat Buchanan have since been killed, you'd have thought Saddam would do even better this time. But who knows? Perhaps there's a Zogby poll with him plummeting to 99.83 percent. Perhaps Dick Morris has some internal numbers showing Iraqi soccer moms want more spending on education and less on anthrax.
So the guy's out there on the stump pressing the flesh. I mean, as opposed to the flesh he presses with the hot pokers down in the basement. His managers have come up with a snappy campaign slogan: ''Yes, Yes To Our Beloved Leader, Saddam Hussein.'' The agency had toyed with ''Four More Decades,'' ''I'm Pro-Saddam And I Vote,'' ''Guns Don't Kill People. Saddam Kills People,'' ''It's Mourning Again In Halabja,'' ''Ask Yourself Are You Better Off Now Than You Were Four Centuries Ago?'' and ''It's The Dictatorship, Stupid!''
I have to confess to a sneaking admiration for the old mass murderer. What's happening on Tuesday wouldn't pass the smell test in any functioning polity, even New Jersey. Voters will find one question on the ballot--''Do you agree that Saddam Hussein should remain president?"--and will have to tick either "Yes" or "No." They have to write their names on the ballot, and in case they're tempted to put ''John al-Smith'' or ''Jane bin Doe,'' they have to fill them out in the presence of ''officials.'' It's not the kind of election you really need a campaign song for.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.