Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What happened to the 3,052 people who voted 'no' in 1995?
1 posted on 10/16/2002 12:17:54 AM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: HAL9000
NO! You've got to be kidding ? That Saddam! What a popular guy!
2 posted on 10/16/2002 12:25:15 AM PDT by hoosierskypilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
boy that was a close one!!! ... how many votes did Janet Reno get BTW?
3 posted on 10/16/2002 12:25:34 AM PDT by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Well, I was concerned that he might have a repeat problem with the 0.06% of swing voters. Seems he reached them somehow. Now that he's literally 100% legit, I wonder which whack job will be the first to use this vote to bash the U.S.?
4 posted on 10/16/2002 12:25:44 AM PDT by polemikos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
BBC News-

Wednesday, 16 October, 2002, 06:55 GMT 07:55 UK

Saddam 'wins 100% of vote'

Iraqi officials say President Saddam Hussein has won 100% of the vote in a referendum on whether he should rule for another seven years.

There were 11,445,638 eligible voters - and everyone of them voted for the president, according to Izzat Ibrahim, Vice-Chairman of Iraq's Revolutionary Command Council.

Saddam Hussein was the only candidate.

Voters had been urged to show their support for the Iraqi leader in defiance of the demands for military action against him from the US and Britain.

During polling, many voters trampled American flags and some signed their ballot-papers in their own blood in a display of loyalty to their leader.

Before the vote, Washington dismissed the referendum as a farce after the last such vote gave the Iraqi leader 99.96 % of the vote.

"Obviously it's not a very serious day, not a very serious vote and nobody places any credibility on it," White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said on Tuesday.

In London, the Foreign Office painted a stark picture of the "choice" facing the Iraqi voters:

"You can't have free elections when the electorate goes to the polls in the knowledge that they have only one candidate, that candidate routinely murders and tortures opponents of the regime and the penalty for slandering that sole candidate is to have one's tongue cut out."

Undeterred

Tuesday's 12-hour-long voting was technically a secret ballot but few people bothered with the curtained booths - if only because they feared a "no" vote could be traced back to them.

Polling stations were bedecked with posters of Saddam and biscuits and drinks were served as children put on shows of patriotic songs.

The BBC's Caroline Hawley, reporting from Baghdad, notes that despite the festive air during polling, the Iraqi regime is well aware that the Americans are determined not to allow Saddam to serve the new term he is assured.

US Secretary of State Colin Powell met British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw in Washington on Tuesday to discuss the continuing wrangle over a new United Nations resolution on Iraq's alleged remaining weapons of mass destruction.

Washington has threatened to take unilateral action against Saddam if the UN fails to find a solution.

The two ministers said that the weekend car bomb attack in Bali, Indonesia, would not distract them from their campaign against Iraq.


5 posted on 10/16/2002 12:48:05 AM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
This just in - 1000's of absentee votes from Iraqis living abroad in Florida were found to have voted for Pat Buchanan.
6 posted on 10/16/2002 12:51:01 AM PDT by Sunnyvale CA Eng.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
In Iraq, a hanging chad is someone who votes "No" for Saddam.
8 posted on 10/16/2002 1:43:54 AM PDT by PaulJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
In Iraq, a hanging chad is someone who votes "No" for Saddam.
9 posted on 10/16/2002 1:45:24 AM PDT by PaulJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
If 100% of the people of Iraq support the lying murderous Saddam....does that mean we are relieved of feeling guilty if millions of "innocent" Iraqi citizens are killed in the next few months.?

Semper Fi
10 posted on 10/16/2002 1:56:55 AM PDT by river rat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Watching Imus this morning he talked with the NBC correspondent in Baghdad about the "election". After joking about the obvious setup the guy made an interesting observation, he said that he had been in many countries where there were anti-American demonstrations, and the anger was deeply felt. But he said in Baghdad, he didn't get that feeling. I missed his one comment, but it sounded like he had even signed some autographs!

Doesn't sound good for Saddam.

12 posted on 10/16/2002 3:33:42 AM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Well, that settles it.

The Iraqi people love Saddam, and don't want regime change.

America was wrong once again.
14 posted on 10/16/2002 4:18:06 AM PDT by Guillermo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Democrats take note: this is how you stage a rigged election.



16 posted on 10/16/2002 4:22:26 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Why not even Jimmy "the peacemaker" Carter needed to monitor that "free-election". He could have had assistance from Bonoir and McDermott. The Democrats are working on getting those types of returns, not just in the inner cities.
17 posted on 10/16/2002 4:22:56 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Oh, rats !! You beat me to it. I was gonna post this with the subtitle referencing "Landslide Victory for SADdam", lol !!

We can nickname him "Landslide Joe" after his hero !!


20 posted on 10/16/2002 5:25:01 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Of course, Iraq strictly enforces the "no dead can vote" policy. That is, anybody voting for somebody other than Saddam is immediately killed, thus rendering their vote invalid.
22 posted on 10/16/2002 5:30:46 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Even the Clintons couldn't to that. Well, there's always next time.
23 posted on 10/16/2002 5:36:57 AM PDT by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Iraq - Saddam Wins 100 Percent in Referendum with 100 Percent Turnout - 11,454,638 say yes, 0 say no

I'll bet Gore is really jealous over this ....he was so sure the NOV 2000 results would read "America - Gore wins 100 Percent in election with 100 percent turnout - 274,000,000 say yes, 0 say no.

25 posted on 10/16/2002 7:09:26 AM PDT by Mopp4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
HAL9000 wrote: What happened to the 3,052 people who voted 'no' in 1995?

Here's Mark Steyn's answer:

But, around this point, you can't help wondering, ''Why exactly does Saddam Hussein need a campaign song?'' According to the Times, at his last presidential election seven years ago, the old butcher got 99.89 percent of the votes. As the 0.11 percent foolish enough to write in Pat Buchanan have since been killed, you'd have thought Saddam would do even better this time. But who knows? Perhaps there's a Zogby poll with him plummeting to 99.83 percent. Perhaps Dick Morris has some internal numbers showing Iraqi soccer moms want more spending on education and less on anthrax.

So the guy's out there on the stump pressing the flesh. I mean, as opposed to the flesh he presses with the hot pokers down in the basement. His managers have come up with a snappy campaign slogan: ''Yes, Yes To Our Beloved Leader, Saddam Hussein.'' The agency had toyed with ''Four More Decades,'' ''I'm Pro-Saddam And I Vote,'' ''Guns Don't Kill People. Saddam Kills People,'' ''It's Mourning Again In Halabja,'' ''Ask Yourself Are You Better Off Now Than You Were Four Centuries Ago?'' and ''It's The Dictatorship, Stupid!''

I have to confess to a sneaking admiration for the old mass murderer. What's happening on Tuesday wouldn't pass the smell test in any functioning polity, even New Jersey. Voters will find one question on the ballot--''Do you agree that Saddam Hussein should remain president?"--and will have to tick either "Yes" or "No." They have to write their names on the ballot, and in case they're tempted to put ''John al-Smith'' or ''Jane bin Doe,'' they have to fill them out in the presence of ''officials.'' It's not the kind of election you really need a campaign song for.

26 posted on 10/16/2002 9:20:18 AM PDT by Forgiven_Sinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson