Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Medical school applications: A disconcerting drop
American Medical News ^ | 10/21/02

Posted on 10/16/2002 5:10:33 PM PDT by RJCogburn

It's conventional wisdom in academia that a bad economy is good for higher education. That's why yet another drop in medical school applications seems especially telling.

When the economy hits the skids, as it has recently, people often flock to colleges and universities. Some are hoping to make themselves more attractive to employers in a tightening job market. Recent undergraduates apply to graduate school in hopes that by the time they emerge, the economy will have improved. Others return to school to learn a new profession -- one they hope will be recession-proof.

The health care field has long been considered such an opportunity.

Indeed, the institutions that educate people to work in certain sectors of health care have experienced an application boom since the economy began slowing in late 2001. Nursing and pharmacy made the list of programs seeing application increases.

Medical schools, however, did not. Their absence is made even more conspicuous by the fact that several professional schools outside the health care sector also made the list.

Here's a look at application trends as reported by The Chronicle of Higher Education in February 2002.

Law -- up 21% from the same time in 2001. Business -- 65% of the MBA programs surveyed by the Graduate Management Admission Council said applications were up. Engineering -- many schools are reporting double-digit application increases. Nursing -- the American Assn. of Colleges of Nursing reported a 4% increase in enrollment in baccalaureate programs, and applications appear to be up as well. Pharmacy -- PharmD programs reported an 8% increase. Now, a look at medicine's numbers.

According to a study published in the Sept. 4 issue of JAMA, the number of medical school applications for the class of 2001 was down 6% from 2000 and nearly 10% from 1999. It's the fifth straight year of decline, a sign that a career in medicine is slowly losing much of its luster.

Experts cite several reasons for the fading attraction of medicine, including concern about the status of medicine, loss of physician autonomy in the managed care era, government regulation and litigation woes. It shouldn't be surprising that these difficulties, all too familiar to practicing physicians, are poisoning the well for medicine's future.

The fact that medical students now finish their education with an average debt of $100,000 isn't helping either.

The decline in applicants has not yet translated into medical school slots going unfilled. There are still two applicants for every open slot.

But that does not minimize the trend's troubling implications. The profession of medicine prides itself on its selective nature, and patients deserve care provided by the most capable individuals the system has to offer. The reality has long been that only the best and the brightest college graduates get into medical school. But a continued decline in applications, with the prospect that many of the best and brightest students will seek careers in less problem-prone fields, most certainly threatens that reality.

Indeed, it would seem the practice of medicine is in danger of becoming entangled in a classic vicious circle. The more damage done to the profession's reputation as a solid career choice, the fewer the number of college graduates interested in it. And the fewer the number of college students who choose it, the greater the chance the profession's reputation will start to suffer under a perception of mediocrity.

Some experts believe the application decline may have bottomed out with the class of 2002. Let's hope that's the case. The future well-being of patients, and of the medical profession, depends on keeping medicine a field that our best still strive to enter.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last
only the best and the brightest college graduates get into medical school

While being the best and brightest does not necessarily mean the individual will be an excellent physician, when I need care I would generally prefer my doc to have been relatively bright.

1 posted on 10/16/2002 5:10:33 PM PDT by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
There are plenty of qualified applicants every year rejected by the schools with too few spaces. Thousands of great potential physicians with B+ to A averages are rejected every year.

2 posted on 10/16/2002 5:18:41 PM PDT by chyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
"only the best and brightest?..." what about those of the right "diversity" too.......?
3 posted on 10/16/2002 5:23:32 PM PDT by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chyk
I do a lot of consulting work with Doctors, Hospitals etc., They have told me that where they used to get 15 applications for each availible slot, they now get 3. Quality is rapidly dropping, which is compounded by early retirement of many Doc's due to the cost of malpractice insurance, and the criminal laws surrounding Medicare.

Look at those three idiot Muslims that got into med school, you know the resturant braggers.

You guys in your thirties are going to be treated by the left overs.
4 posted on 10/16/2002 5:26:56 PM PDT by stubernx98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
You can major in anything and go to law or business school, that is why is so popular- med school requires that you take certain courses, if you didn't, you have to go back for a baccalaureate.
5 posted on 10/16/2002 5:33:24 PM PDT by LWalk18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stubernx98
Why in hell would ANYONE in his/her right mind want to be a DOCTOR in this country today?

Medical malpractice or tort lawyer -- THAT'S the ticket to the big time. As Al Pacino's character said in "Devil's Advocate," it's the ultimate back-stage pass. Lawyers are in EVERYTHING. Perhaps they can cross-train into medicine. That way, they can sue themselves and cut out the middle-man.

So next time you need to visit the old ER, hope the place has enough lawyers on staff -- cause, thanks to the growing hoardes of ambulance chasers, there probably won't be any doctors there.

Hell, if a few more OB/GYNs throw in the towel, there may not be any PEOPLE in a few years.

6 posted on 10/16/2002 5:44:10 PM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn; Beauty
Who wants to go to medical school? Spend years and years in study and classes, rack up tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt, and all for the privilege of having to spend 60+% of what you earn by saving ungrateful, fat patients' lives on malpractice insurance. One mistake in diagnosis or practice can not only end your career but literally your entire life.

You're expected to be superhuman, infallible, and perfect in every way. As the population continues to age you will increasingly have to deal with hysterical, selfish Baby Boomer A**HOLES who devoutly believe (because they have been raised to believe) they are the center of the universe and the one human being in the history of the universe who shouldn't have to die. Oh, and by the way, you're also the bad guy who wants them to give up their fattening treats and their self-destructive habits. You literally couldn't pay me enough to put up with what the average doc has to. To all medical FReepers, my sincere salute and thanks.

People who want to bitch about how much doctors make are usually ignorant f**kheads who wouldn't make it through the first DAY of med school and have no idea of what the job actually entails. "Doctor? Dem's de ones dat gotta coat and makesuh tunna munny! Dey just play-uh da golf and get dat munny! Zackly! Zackly!"

7 posted on 10/16/2002 5:49:14 PM PDT by Jonathon Spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
LOL..."perhaps lawyers can cross-train into the medical profession".....

I have told my nieces, nephews, grandkids, etc....that if any of them becomes a lawyer, they stand to be dis-owned! (Unless of course, they want to REFORM the legal field.)
8 posted on 10/16/2002 5:50:25 PM PDT by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
"The profession of medicine prides itself on its selective nature, and patients deserve care provided by the most capable individuals the system has to offer. The reality has long been that only the best and the brightest college graduates get into medical school."

"Best and brightest" -- what does that mean? Reminds of the old "Coke is Love" slogan .... meaningless. When I was at huge state university early-70's it meant that grades were viciously bell-curved to eliminate by percentile -- but not by knowldege or wisdom is the bell curve. You can make a test that will pick out 5% out of any group, but that test says little of knowledge or the ability to use it. Med students were the most focused and vicious cheats I ever saw. In those days no med student went to college to learn -- they could not afford that indulgence. They went to pass the pre med curricula in the topmost percent they can beg borrow or cheat to.

And there in that quoted paragraph is another bit of socialist poison "patients deserve care provided by the most capable individuals the system has to offer" -- indulgent socialist claptrap. "Patients deserve ..." Gee, golly molly -- let me be the choser of mine own physician in specific and in general, and not some elitist creeps narrowing the pack for me! The public is wise when let to be so, but the medical profession since the mid-1800's in the US has been a well-formed gang keeping out whoever they deem.

Aye! Now we are all to pay the piper... *Unless* we can open up the gates and let the free market work its wonders. You shouldn't need a license fallen off a very few poisoned trees to practise medicene and who may do what in medicene should be greatly more open and less "doctored" of a game!

9 posted on 10/16/2002 5:52:31 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonathon Spectre
Great post! Let me add, essentially being forced to treat illegals who do not pay, then being called greedy because you actually want to make a living, and having all the problems related to health care blamed personally on you, the doctor. Sad.
10 posted on 10/16/2002 5:54:58 PM PDT by luckodeirish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
My son, a white male, just received news he is a National Merit semi finalist. He is a good kid, smart, good student, Eagle Scout candidate. We visited a campus recently and talked to the woman who advises college seniors on getting into Med School, she assured us the odds would be against him for two reasons: He's white and he is a male. She said he would have to be twice as good as all other applicants. V's wife.
11 posted on 10/16/2002 5:55:34 PM PDT by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn; goodnesswins
Bwahaha... Well the medical profession passed up one of the best and brightest when *I* applied years ago and got waitlisted, so they can all go to hell...

I wouldn't reapply, even though I'd bet extravagant amounts of money that I'd be a shoo-in now. They didn't get me then, they ain't gettin' me nohow. I'm too old anyway.

The thing is, goodnesswins has a point. The whole application process is a game-- and the ones who have the best chances of winning are female minorities who've spent their summers doing coffee runs for AIDS researchers or some such bullsh!t. That is the bottom line. Excellent academic record? Outstanding work ethic? Huh.

12 posted on 10/16/2002 5:57:36 PM PDT by maxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
My father and my brother are MDs. They say the good times for doctors is over, and that anyone who applies to be a doctor in order to become wealthy has a screw loose. Managed health care, indigent patients, and malpractice insurance eats up everything.

There are easier ways to make a living.

13 posted on 10/16/2002 5:57:44 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Med students were the most focused and vicious cheats I ever saw.

I can attest to THAT...

14 posted on 10/16/2002 5:58:24 PM PDT by maxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LWalk18
A baccalaureate is the degree awarded for the standard four-year undergraduate program. What you're thinking of is the POST-baccalaureate programs which many colleges offer, in which people whose undergraduate program didn't include the requirements for medical school, spend a year or so taking only the med school prerequisites.
15 posted on 10/16/2002 6:03:40 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
You know, as a doctor malpractice is not really the biggest concern I have. I just decided a long time ago that no matter what, I will be sued, and that's why I have the insurance. Actually, I have not been sued yet, but only a matter of time.

What bothers me more is the increasing criminalization and threats by the government to physicians in particular. The government and others would have the public believe that waste, fraud and abuse are the real problems with Medicare, for example. Nope. It's just that politicians make promises that cannot be paid for in order to be elected, and then the government has to start screwing the health care providers since there are only a few of us, vs millions of voting beneficiaries.

Government is heaping layers of bureaucracy on physicians with useless and expensive regulations, and threatens us with fines if we make a mistake. Meanwhile, reimbursement falls for our work, and the government knows full well we have to cost shift and charge other patients more money for the same service.

Totally screwed up system, and the kowtowing to government bureaucrats, on a day to day basis, is much more aggravating to me than the thought of a malpractice suit.

Bush and Tommy Thompson aren't helping; true to his pantomime conservatism Bush allowed these last minute Clinton regs to stand. They implemented a version of the so called HIPAA regulations, or privacy regulations, which are a sham. Basically, they say the government can get your health care records and do anything they like with them, but doctors trying to practice medicine will be treated like children now when it comes to using health care information on people.
16 posted on 10/16/2002 6:12:09 PM PDT by Jesse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
rooster...

Little off subject but did you see CA is going to let Mexican doctors practice with three year non renewable contracts. They will be assigned to underserved areas.

17 posted on 10/16/2002 6:12:33 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maxwell
.......female minorities who've spent their summers.........

Actually, the best way to get into med school is to go to South Dakota and do a study on the rectal temperatures of an Indian tribe. Medical schools eat up that 'social' bullsh*t.

18 posted on 10/16/2002 6:15:47 PM PDT by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jesse
Jesse...

I know not all do it but did you see the one last week, doctor saw 160 patients in one day????? Of those 32 were dead. Medicare caught him but after "years" of cheating.

19 posted on 10/16/2002 6:16:20 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
The pre-med baccalaureate involves many courses intended to prepare one for medical school. There's no way they could all be taken in a one-year postgrad program after getting (for example) a degree in business. My course of study included 8 consecutive semesters of chemistry and 8 semesters during which I took at least one and sometimes two zoology courses per semester. I was one of those white, male, B+ students that got shut out in the early 70's.
20 posted on 10/16/2002 6:26:01 PM PDT by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
A baccalaureate is the degree awarded for the standard four-year undergraduate program. What you're thinking of is the POST-baccalaureate programs which many colleges offer, in which people whose undergraduate program didn't include the requirements for medical school, spend a year or so taking only the med school prerequisites.

Oops...you're right. I can't believe that- and I happen to have a baccalaureate!

21 posted on 10/16/2002 6:33:05 PM PDT by LWalk18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Magic Fingers
The pre-med baccalaureate involves many courses intended to prepare one for medical school. There's no way they could all be taken in a one-year postgrad program after getting (for example) a degree in business. My course of study included 8 consecutive semesters of chemistry and 8 semesters during which I took at least one and sometimes two zoology courses per semester.

Yes you pretty much have to decide on becoming a doctor during your early college career- it's very hard to catch up, especially if you go to a top, high priced school where you must graduate in four years. Then there are the MCAT's-many in my freshman class (including myself) stated that they were pre-med; five years later few are in medical school. I think the dot com boom also attracted a lot of science minded kids who didn't want to spend four more years in school.

22 posted on 10/16/2002 6:42:24 PM PDT by LWalk18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
The decline in applicants has not yet translated into medical school slots going unfilled. There are still two applicants for every open slot.

--------------------

That's unbelievably low. In the '50s it was many times that.

23 posted on 10/16/2002 6:49:43 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
They are bailing because of trial lawyers. Simple as that.

I work for a privately held company, headed by a Physician CEO. Him and his friends (Physicians) all say the same thing. Trial lawyers ("sharks") make it not worth it. And they are all altruistic guys; they would save your butt in a heartbeat if you needed it. Anytime, any where.

Except airlines. They are afraid to tend to you, becuase some family will sue you if you jump in and don'tmanage to save their precious person.

Because trial lawyers are ready to pounce.

The Doctors are Atlas Shrugging.
24 posted on 10/16/2002 6:53:09 PM PDT by MonroeDNA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LWalk18
>many in my freshman class (including myself) stated that they were pre-med; five >years later few are in medical school.

Exactly - my freshman class had 126 "pre-med majors". Eight of us graduated with a BS, three got accepted to medical school.
25 posted on 10/16/2002 6:53:23 PM PDT by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RLK
When I applied in the early 70's, I was told the ratio of applicants to openings was 19 to 1.
26 posted on 10/16/2002 6:55:18 PM PDT by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: chyk
[There are plenty of qualified applicants every year rejected by the schools with too few spaces. Thousands of great potential physicians with B+ to A averages are rejected every year. ]

Wasn't there a program in, I believe, the Clinton years that paid medical schools in lieu of accepting students as there were too many applicants. Was it just discussed but never happened?

Also, this sounds to me like - hey we need to import more foreigners, we don't have enough doctors? I will confess, I see immigrants behind every bush - no pun intended.

27 posted on 10/16/2002 7:17:41 PM PDT by nanny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jonathon Spectre
But seriously...tell us how you really feel!

I think it's just too hard to expect today's lazy, unmotivated, publik skool edjookated kids to put in sooo many hours and sooo much of their time to devote to medical school! Not when today's Kollege offers "funner" classes like "Pop Culture", "Latina Writing", "Friends of the Environment", "Lesbian Marxism" and "The Simpsons" How do you compete with that?

28 posted on 10/16/2002 7:20:42 PM PDT by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Leaders criticize binational health plan

Jennifer Shubinski
El Paso Times

El Paso medical professionals and one of El Paso's state senators told the Texas insurance commissioner and his committee that a binational health coverage plan won't work and that Mexico's standard of care is not acceptable.

Jeannette Skinner, a nurse and director of case management at Del Sol Medical Center, told the committee she had seen many patients who had suffered medical complications or had died after receiving care in Mexico.

"It's an atrocity that you would send people to Mexico and expect us to clean up the mess," she said. "Answers (to health care) do not come from encouraging people to seek out care in a Third World country."

Texas Insurance Commissioner Jose Montemayor and other members of the Interim Committee on Binational Health Benefit Plan Coverage were in El Paso Tuesday to gather testimony from local medical providers and health officials about health insurance coverage for Texas residents in Mexican clinics.

House Bill 2498 was passed during the 77th Legislative Session. The bill ordered the Texas Department of Insurance to conduct hearings on the feasibility of letting Texas residents on U.S. insurance plans get services in Mexico.

State Sen. Eliot Shapleigh, D-El Paso, was one of the people who testified against the idea.

"What you have here is an insurance company's dream ... ," Shapleigh told the committee. "What this creates is a separate health-care system at lower costs and lower standards. This is not what Texas wants or needs."

Shapleigh said the proposal threatens standards for preventative care for children, for immunizations for children and for information as to what is and is not covered.

"The primary obligation under this plan is to the insurance company, not to the patient," he said.

Shapleigh told the committee that border communities, such as El Paso, need to market themselves as world-class health care centers to draw paying clients north of the border to increase the economic vitality of the area.

El Paso City-County Health and Environmental District Director Jorge Magaña told the committee that the plan "is not in the best interest of residents."

"We don't have any control over the type of services that are available over there," he said. "In America, doctors have high qualifications, and the quality of care is not a concern."

State Sen. Eddie Lucio Jr., D-Brownsville, said one thing was clear in Tuesday's testimony and in other hearings.

"We want to make sure qualifications and standards are kept at a high level, like anywhere else in the country," he said.

Lucio said the idea of binational health insurance is a "challenge that we may not be able to resolve this session."

Rep. Pat Haggerty, R-El Paso, author of the bill, was not at the hearing. A secretary in his El Paso office said Haggerty was in town Tuesday but was busy and had not received an invitation to the public hearing. The woman said Haggerty was not available Tuesday afternoon because he was on his way back to Austin.

29 posted on 10/16/2002 7:23:53 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Fitz....

Very interesting, had not seen that one.

I did see the other day that health insurers are quietly telling their customers that they will pay for drugs bought in Mexico and Canada. I dont think anyone has "the answer". It is too late to get the governments out of medicine, like the 600 pound gorilla, they will never go away.

30 posted on 10/16/2002 7:35:20 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
why would a young person want to spend many, many years taking the most difficult and time-consuming classes and come out of college, med school, intership and more only to be in total debt, work weekends, holidays, nights evenings and be on call, hasseled by the government and the insurance industry let alone be the prey for many a malpractice lawyer only, only to make little more than a teacher makes after a few years.taking into account the amount of hours worked.?

a teacher comes out of relatively easy schooling, works no weekends, no holidays, no summers, short days, gets terrific benefits including extra vacation and sick time during the year as well as "personal" time as if they needed more time off, guarenteed seniority, can set their own school year, and if not immediately, they can at least look forward to having a steadily rising income over the years...........................

so why would a young man or woman want to become a doctor?

31 posted on 10/16/2002 7:35:27 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw
You shouldn't need a license

I agree, but I still want a bright person to be my doc. And those who are determined to succeed are more likely, though clearly not guaranteed, to be the more skilled physicians, whether or not they have 'bedside manner'.

32 posted on 10/16/2002 7:36:16 PM PDT by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
It's alarming what direction they're trying to take this country. A doctor in Mexico doesn't have the education or skills, they also don't have the regulations and huge load of paper work because of our tremendous government intervention. They don't have the malpractice insurance to pay either so they're of course much cheaper. American doctors won't be able to compete of course.

I don't think they plan to stop with Americans having to cross the border to use cheap Mexican clinics for their healthcare, next it'll be letting Mexican doctors practice in this country. Just like the Mexican trucks soon to take over our highways.

33 posted on 10/16/2002 8:09:05 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Fair enough. I do not say there is no fraud, I just say that the amount of real fraud, as you detail, is miniscule in comparison with what is alleged to be fraud.

The OIG released a study a few years ago. Basically, about 5% of Medicare dollars were lost to true fraud from scammers. Frankly, I think the system encourages fraud for criminals...the more cumbersome and bureaucratic the system, the riper it is to be picked, but I digress.

The other 95% of so called waste fraud and abuse broke down about like this. About 1/3 was for medical procedures deemed not necessary by Medicare. Now, medicare denies lots of things ordered by doctors. Doesn't mean it isn't medically indicated. Just means some bureaucrat says it is not indicated. Take a preoperative chest xray, for example...medicare will say that without certain indications, like a history of heart disease, a preoperative chest xray is not necessary, but no doctor is going to take a 70 year old patient to major surgery without a chest xray...it would be malpractice. Yet medicare calls this test unnecessary.

Another 1/3 of so called waste fraud and abuse cases were for inadequate documentation. This does not mean that a test or procedure was not needed...just that medicare did not accept the reason as sufficient to pay. I can tell you from experience that Medicare is constantly changing the rules of engagement here, and it is not fraud for a doctor to do a test in good faith, only to have it denied by the morons at medicare. What a doctor thinks is necessary is not what Medicare thinks.


The final 1/3 of cases alleged to be waste and abuse were for incorrect coding, meaning that medicare did not accept the diagnosis codes submitted with a claim. In other words, the procedure may be indicated, but the numbers which are assigned to designate the procedure were incorrect as deemed by the Medicare rules, which are constantly changing.

In other words, 95% of the cases alleged to be waste, fraud and abuse by medicare are paperwork errors, inherent in the system. or capricious denial of legitimate claims by the medicare bureaucracy and not real fraud as you would think.

But they do milk the read fraud cases for all they are worth.

But you prove my point. Nobody really understands this stuff unless they live it, and to the uninitiated it is very easy to demonize the physicians and health care providers. Hell, even doctors fall for this scam.
34 posted on 10/16/2002 8:24:16 PM PDT by Jesse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: stubernx98
There is a lot of stuff going on to make us in medicine unhappy, and I know of very few physicians who are satisfied in their practice at present.

Yeah the lawsuits, and more so the constant THREAT of suit by people who have less then ideal outcomes. The cost of the insurance, and the endless paperwork and extra tests and procedures to protect ourselves gets old.

Pressure by the insurance companies HMO's and government to save money. Pressure by the patients to evaluate everything to the max, at of course great cost.

At the same time pressure by the hospital to have excellent patient satisfaction. This in an ED which is overcrowded, understaffed, lab and xray and other ancillary services cut back, not enough staffing of nurses on the floors, so long waits for a bed.

An insane system where patients who are at the end of life, demented with no quality of life constantly shuffle from the nursing home, to the ED, to the hospital ward and back to the nursing home, getting expensive tests, treatments and pouring resources out only to prolong their misery and agony.

While I and the nurses don't expect to be treated in any special way, common courtesy would be nice. We get cursed at, threatened, punched and spit on. But our complaints are never acted on.

I could go on and on. I've been working in ER's for over 20 years, and the situation is deteriorating, and the rate of deterioration is increasing. Like many of my colleagues I'm starting to head to the door. I figure I need to suck it up for 5 more years, at which point my youngest will be off to college. At that point if I don';t leave practice all together, I will cut back my hours to a minimum, maybe limit myself to working in an urgent care or some other lower intesity setting. Who knows, maybe I'll go to law school at that point and fight the pricks on an even field for once.



35 posted on 10/16/2002 8:31:11 PM PDT by Kozak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: Magic Fingers; Atlantin
When I entered the University of Iowa in the '50s there were 600 people in the freshman class who were pre-meds.There was room for 120 in the medical school. Approximately 20 of those positions were reserved for people whose parents were physicians so that they would continue the family practice.

The undergraduate school was rated very selective by Cass and Bernbaum's Guide To American Colleges. Only the top 20% of high school classes would get in. In those days you were expected to know something to graduate from high school. As entering freshmen we were often told most of us didn't belong at the school and that we ought to go back home and Every attempt would be made to send you there. Your chances of graduating with a B. S. or B. A. overall was roughly equal to your percentile ranking on the entrance exam. Chance of making it through pre-med was about 1/4th that.

Grading was on the fang and claw system. Premed was a rough curriculum. Midway 5through the first semester 100 students would be washed out. By the end of the second stmester you had about 350 of the toughest sonofbitches imaginable to compete with. Pre-med there was nearly as roungh as medical school. If you graduated, you needed to compete against the best from four year and other colleges for acceptance to med school.

If you were accepted, when you signed up for class you were given a 600 page reading assignment to be tested upon on the first day of class. Flunk the exam and you could pack your bags for home. There was the traditional greeting at the introductory lecture on the first day of medical school. "Look to your left. Now look to your right. Don't fall in love with each other because one of you won't be here this time next year." I had a healthy acquaintance who lost 35 pounds during his first year of med school from strain. After making it through that year he came home for the summer and cried.

In the last 35 years I have been seeing Ph.Ds. who never would have graduated from undergraduate school when colleges and universities were selective and serious. Med schools have become a joke compared to what they were. In recent years people have been turned loose as graduates from colleges and universities like hughe flocks of blackbirds each spring. Very few of them have graduated from what I knew at college at any level.

37 posted on 10/16/2002 11:06:20 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Atlantin
P.S. If you are "THE" RLK, it is about time for you to publish an essay!

---------------------------

I've had people pleasantly bugging me. I have a complex study on economics coming out in a week. Zola and I don't agree on economic theory so it will be published on my own site. So far it's about 22 pages long. Send me a priviate email so I will notify you when it's done.

38 posted on 10/16/2002 11:12:21 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
No one in their right mind would want to be a physician today.
39 posted on 10/17/2002 12:20:25 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jesse
Jesse...

I passed that along just as info, not to rouse your ire. It made me sick that it took them "years" to catch the man.

Did you see my post about CA importing Mexican doctors under State contract?????

40 posted on 10/17/2002 4:34:25 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Little off subject but did you see CA is going to let Mexican doctors practice with three year non renewable contracts. They will be assigned to underserved areas.

That's news to me.

I suppose the thinking is 'underserved' is worse than 'maybe served', but there is no reason for the state to be involved with 'contracts' in the first place.

41 posted on 10/17/2002 7:59:30 AM PDT by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: maxwell; ventana; RJCogburn; All
All I can say ......is....keep yourselves healthy.....I, for one do NOT want to spend much time in the future with today's crop (of which I am sure there are some good ones) of Doctors. It is unfortunate that when I see a minority doctor, I think, they probably got there because of the color of their skin....when, they MAY have been at the top of their class, (and they may have NOT). And, on further thought, 3 out of the 4 women doctors I have visited I found to be "lacking".......(and, I'm a woman.)
42 posted on 10/17/2002 9:02:02 AM PDT by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Honestly, being a Doctor, is not a great career choice any longer, between malpractice premiums, ambulance chasers and all the other issues... why would anyone spend 8 years of their life and 100k plus in debt to come out to a 60k fixed income job for some HMO?

43 posted on 10/17/2002 9:10:39 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maxwell
My husband had excellent grades in college, did volunteer work at the local VA hospital, was Biology student of the year his senior year, had very high MCAT scores but couldn't get into a state medical school. They had enough white males, thank you very much. He did get into a private medical school, but of course, the cost was much, much higher. There were several private med schools that wanted him, no problem there. But the debt load was about 4 times what it would have been had he been able to get his MD at a state university.
44 posted on 10/17/2002 9:18:56 AM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cherry
so why would a young man or woman want to become a doctor?

I did, back in the day, because I knew the medical profession needed folks like me-- I don't have much in the way of bedside manner, but I had the integrity and the guts and the will to make something of myself and try to give some folks a break...

It held the promise of being one hell of a challenge, and there's nothing I like better to sink my teeth in...

Still bitter about being passed up for some coffee-fetching bimbo, I reckon, haha... Being in an academic environment, I see quite a few premeds come and go and a bunch of knockkneed grayfaced gradegrubbers I have yet to see the like...

45 posted on 10/17/2002 9:20:54 AM PDT by maxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: stubernx98
They have told me that where they used to get 15 applications for each availible slot, they now get 3.

Approx 6000 for 160 slots at the state Med Coll in my home town in 1996. 3000 for 55 slots at the out of state school the better half finally got in and graduated from last June.

VA is worse than most states. They average 40% out of state students, (most of whom are Arabs) compared to nationwide average of 12%.

We owe $240,000 compared to $36,000 had she been able to get an in-state school.

46 posted on 10/17/2002 9:40:35 AM PDT by putupon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Yes, I did. Sorry, didn't mean to go off on you, but this whole subject gets me mad. Government is much more disruptive to medical care than malpractice and maybe this is one reason there are no solutions to malpractice...keep this as a straw man issue so docs won't recognize real problem.
47 posted on 10/17/2002 10:39:31 AM PDT by Jesse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RLK
So all of you that are knowledgeable about the Medical profession, what do I tell my sweet, smart, bright eyed and bushy tailed High School senior? Pick another field? And if you were to suggest a field in medicine what would it be? For some reason, he has said for years he wants to be in orthopedics! Although neurology is interesting to him. (Oh, and he is altruistic, too. Another negative these days, I guess. V's wife.
48 posted on 10/17/2002 11:42:31 AM PDT by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Jesse
Jesse,

My late brother-in-law -- a cardiovascular surgeon in Ohio -- was a year from cashing in early when he passed at age 57. In addition to being subjected to meritless suits on an average of twice a year, he, too, was becoming fed up with the bureaucratic BS.

My niece -- his daughter -- is a 40 year-old OB/GYN who is phasing out of her practice and into teaching (if she can find any kids to TEACH!) for the same reasons.

You know, don't you, that Thomas Jefferson predicted what we have going on here. He warned that if the socialism then sweeping Europe ever came here, at least two things would occur: We would become an increasingly litigious and contentious people as we shouldered one another out of the way to get OURS from the public trough and the trough would soon be empty. Both have come to pass.

What might surprise Tom, however, is how that has spilled over into the private sector as the public trough emptied.

I HOPE you and your colleagues who are familiar with the process now destroying what once was an efficient and quality health care system become active in helping to find and implement common-sense and efficient ways to salvage it.

Hang in there, doc!

49 posted on 10/17/2002 12:01:45 PM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ventana
I'm not an M. D. Just when my life was fitting together for a good chance at medical school, I was drafted into the army. When I completed my military serice I went into other things. I would recommend medicine as a serious calling. Defer interest in specialization until third year of med school.Hell
50 posted on 10/17/2002 1:52:49 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson