Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Oglala Sioux's Democrat Vote Fraud Scheme Has A Familiar Ring
11-14-02 | Mia T

Posted on 11/14/2002 8:02:54 AM PST by Mia T

But Michael New, a post-doctoral fellow at the Harvard-MIT Data Center, has inspected the South Dakota Secretary of State's Web site to discover other striking facts: While Democrat Tim Johnson ran statewide about 12 percentage points behind what Mr. Daschle got in his 1998 Senate victory, in Shannon County Mr. Johnson ran about 12 percentage points ahead. He got 92% of the vote compared with Mr. Daschle's 80%. Nowhere else in the state did Mr. Johnson improve his vote share relative to Mr. Daschle.

Senate voter turnout was up 27% statewide for this year's close contest compared with 1998, but in Shannon County turnout increased by 89%. Again, no other county in the state showed comparable turnout increases. Shannon County is largely Indian country, home to the Oglala Sioux nation, and is heavily Democratic. But Mr. Thune managed to receive only nine more votes there than did Mr. Daschle's opponent in 1998, notwithstanding the much larger turnout.

Mr. New points out that this is just a 4% increase in GOP votes over 1998. In the other three South Dakota counties where Indians constitute more than two-thirds of the population, Mr. Thune gained between 23% and 43% more votes than the GOP candidate in 1998. The Oglala Sioux would seem to give new meaning to the phrase "bloc voting."

The Oglala Sioux's Senator: The Democrats stole two Senate seats--and still it wasn't enough

Opinion Journal | 11/15/2002 | editorial board

"New meaning to the phrase "bloc voting"???!?


The Oglala Sioux's Democrat vote fraud scheme has a familiar ring to me...









"I did not have any involvement in the pardons that were granted or not granted," insisted Sen. KnowNothing, seeming to forget her presence at the New-Square/Oval-Office schmooze that secured pardons for the four Hasidic felons who set up a phony school in Brooklyn to swindle the government out of millions intended for the poor.

Mia T

Sen. KnowNothing Victim Clinton Effectively Pleads 5TH in Press Conference by Invoking Spousal Privilege




Heard an interesting rumor from several people there. I won't mention names or networks,but they obviously know what's going on. Many feel that the real problem for Hillary is in the Rockland country Hasidic community. Four people were convicted, and pardoned, but millions of dollars disappeared, and MANY other people took the cash..Now, if the US atty, MJ White, gets these folks on income tax evasion, they'll cut a deal to avoid jail, and will spill the beans on Hillary. THis is supposedly where White's investigation is aimed...May not be enough to secure a convinction, but enough to cause her to resign, possibly this summer...There's said to be lots of talk about this in DC, but I haven't read anything about it yet. Too hot for speculation..hmm??? Also, if she does leave, Pataki names the new senator, so it has to happen soon. I think so, cause the pressure will be immense, from all sides, including the Dems.

I thought that Chuckie Schumer's statement at the Senate hearing was very aggressive, and hostile to the Clintons. Chuck has excellent connections into the Jewish community, so he'd know, IMHO, what was going on....and just connect the dots, folks...




"Had she any shame, she would resign."




October 19, 2002 -- IT'S more than a little ironic. On the same day it was announced that Saddam Hussein has been "unanimously" re-elected, the only two senators preventing a unanimous vote in the Senate on the election-reform bill were New York's own Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton.

Why? "This would make it more difficult to vote in New York. It's designed to suppress minority voting participation," said Sen. Clinton.

The "this" Sen. Clinton is referring to is the new anti-fraud provisions in the bill. They require that every person wanting to vote show a driver's license, Social Security number or other approved ID in order to cast a ballot.

Clinton and Schumer preferred a system where a potential voter merely had to sign his or her name.

So who is it exactly that this bill is "suppressing"? U.S. citizens have all the requisite ID - no matter what their ethnicity. Could it be that Clinton and Schumer are "sensitive" to some of the leftist fringe groups in this country who are clamoring for the right of illegal aliens to vote?

It is no secret that New York is home to thousands of undocumented "residents" - who would vote overwhelmingly Democratic if they could just get past these darn ID requirements.

New York's dynamic duo have a lot more 'splainin' to do on this one.


Thou art arm'd that hath thy crook'd schemers straight.

Cudgel thy brains no more, the clinton plots are great.


Mia T, On Neutered and Neutering,

by Mia T and Edward Zehr (EZ)





NEW JERSEY DEBATE: Incoherence and Prevarication Characterize Lautenberg's Performance




Torricelli-Lautenberg-DNC Switcheroo Scheme Not 1st Foray into Virtual Reality


après-ski: Frank's a no-show


See Frank run.



Defining the clintons and clintonism: Nov. 5, 2002 and Q ERTY

NEW!! Election Day Q ERTIES (clintons v. Bush)

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey; US: New York; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: billclinton; blocvoting; clintonbribes; clintoncorruption; clintonpardons; daschlecorruption; democratvotefraud; dncfraud; hillaryclinton; mcauliffefraud; newsquare; oglalasioux; somethingsrodham; southdakota; thune; votefraud

1 posted on 11/14/2002 8:02:54 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Vote Fraud
2 posted on 11/14/2002 8:22:36 AM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Oglala Sioux

3 posted on 11/14/2002 8:28:58 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
read later
4 posted on 11/14/2002 8:31:08 AM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
I am praying that the vote fraud will be unearthed and that Johnson and Daschle will be shown for the fakerooos that I believe they are.

5 posted on 11/14/2002 8:31:52 AM PST by IVote2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
There is no other issue that would have gained the republican party two additinal Senate seats. It is literally the case that vote fraud is the top issue for Republicans - but how serious are they?
6 posted on 11/14/2002 8:36:36 AM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eno_; All
We certainly know the DEMOCRATS are serious about vote fraud. (See below.)
The GOP had better get very serious very soon. There is no greater threat to its power. There is no greater threat to our freedoms.
For aliens to obtain citizenship, federal regulations require that their application be accompanied by a complete set of determine if the applicant has a criminal or arrest record...It was in this area that Mr. Gore's pressure caused the biggest breakdown...
In the end, the White House got their one million voters and re-election. The U.S. got 75,000 new citizens who had arrest records when they applied; an additional 115,000 citizens whose fingerprints were unclassifiable and were never resubmitted; and a final 61,000 who were given citizenship without even having their fingerprints submitted so that no check was possible...
In June 1998, we undertook to again pick up the investigation of the program. Our interest intensified when we heard that a similar plan may be in the works for the 2000 presidential election. Among other things, we wanted to find out if the criminals who were given citizenship in 1996 were continuing their criminal activity in the two years since. My staff pulled out about 100 of the most violent or serious crimes that were committed by aliens prior to naturalization and documented by arrest records...
Of those 100 records, some 20% showed arrests for serious crimes after the subject was given citizenship. The charges included murder, rape and child sexual abuse. Based on those results, we resolved to ask for updates on every arrest record. Had we been given enough time to put together evidence and witnesses, Citizenship USA might even have figured in Mr. Clinton's impeachment trial.

--David Schippers, Abusing the INS, The Wall Street Journal



Voter fraud, again!

© 2000

Stop the presses! I mean it. Stop the election!

Something is going on in Washington and California that will have a great impact on tomorrow's election -- and it stinks to high heaven.

Let me start by telling you how I found out about it.

A very good friend of mine, who shall remain nameless, has a long-time live-in housekeeper from Guatemala. The housekeeper has a daughter who just turned 18. The immigration status of both mother and daughter has been pending for years. Papers have been filed with the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Hearings have been held. But they are not citizens.

This is very important: The daughter has not registered to vote.

But, a few days ago, the 18-year-old got a very attractively packaged "Dear friend" letter from Bill Clinton, paid for by the California Democratic Party.

Here's what it said (on one side in Spanish and on the other side in English): "While every election is important, the November 7th election will determine our future for the next decade, and beyond. The stakes are high for America's Latino families. And California is the critical battleground.

"That's why I'm writing. We need your help to elect a Democratic Congress.

"Despite our strong economy, many hard-working people still struggle to make ends meet. Quality, affordable health care, a world-class education, aging with dignity, and well-paid jobs are part of the American dream -- rather than an American reality -- for too many people.

"Electing a Democratic Congress is essential for our 'Families First' legislative agenda.

"Congratulations on your decision to register. Registering to vote is a basic responsibility of citizenship that far too many people ignore.

"Now that you are registered ...

  • "Can I count on you to vote Democratic on November 7th?
  • "Will you make an extra effort to elect Democrats to Congress -- and to your State Legislature -- by talking to your family, friends and neighbors?

"Remember: Your Vote is Your Voice.

"Su Voz, Es Su Voto. Make your voice heard on Election Day.


"Sincerely, President Bill Clinton"


Clinton letter in English. Click for full size.

Below that letter is a P.S. that explains: "Here is your personal Voter Identification Card. Sign your name, then detach your card. Bring your card with you to your polling place on Election Day. It will help your voting go more smoothly."

Apparently all the recipient needs to do with this Voter Identification Card is sign it to be eligible to vote. Keep in mind, this was sent to a previously unregistered voter.


Clinton letter in Spanish. Click for full size.

As my friend points out, only the U.S. government knows her age and pending residency status, and, obviously her Latino background. How did this information wind up in the partisan political hands of the California Democratic Party? And what kind of impact will a mailing like this -- obviously utilizing a government database for political purposes -- have on the California legislative races? How widespread is this fraud?

This is making my head spin. The recipient of this letter happens to live in congressional and state legislative districts that are very hotly contested in Southern California. But this appears to be a statewide mailing from the Democratic Party headquarters in Sacramento.

It's mind-boggling. The fraud is so blatant. Yet, not a peep out of the Republicans. They apparently won't even know what hit them. The polls in recent days show them making big gains in this once-invulnerable Al Gore stronghold state. A mass mailing like this effectively registering tens of thousands of potential Democratic voters days before the election is a secret weapon held back deliberately to avoid detection, scrutiny and publicity. After the election, the party will be happy to pay a fine for any illegalities involved. Clinton will be out of office and untouchable as always. There will be a new regime in at the INS. And it will all be swept under the rug.

And who knows if this technique is not being deployed by other state Democratic Party units? I don't doubt it for a minute.

This is voter fraud, pure and simple. And those responsible include the president of the United States, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, possibly the Census Bureau and certainly the California Democratic Party.

I'm outraged. Are you?

As I document in my book, Invasion, these countless "catch and release" cases have demoralized rank-and-file INS agents and cost scores of American lives-from cops gunned down by fugitive deportees to victims of illegal border-crossing murderers, and now, quite possibly, to the innocents slaughtered in the Washington, D.C., area sniping spree. Eugene Davis, a retired deputy chief Border Patrol agent in Blaine, Wash., told me: "This is another classic example of how our catch and release policy for illegal aliens remains a danger to us all. What's it going to take for the American people to demand that we fix the system?"


Jewish World Review | 25 October 2002 | Michelle Malkin



The only way they can win is to convince people that we're space aliens.

--bill clinton





June 9, 1999




Peggy Noonan's excellent piece in yesterday's Wall Street Journal is really the story of the death of democracy. At its core it is the description of the human double helix gone terribly awry, of a denatured protein grotesquely twisted, of two mutant, tangled strands of DNA, the basest imaginable of base pairs linked permanently, as firmly as guanine to cytosine, bill inexorably to hillary and conversely, doing what they do best, and doing it relentlessly.
Killing insidiously.
Killing as they pose and pander and feel our pain.
My only complaint is with Peggy Noonan's title.
The Mad Boomer, doesn't begin to capture candidate clinton considered separately or even taken as the self-anointed "twofer," permanently conjoined at that cavity conspicuously empty except for ego, that place where brain and soul and guts and heart normally reside.

This is not to say that she -- that they -- are not both quite mad and of that self-indulgent, arrogantly, ignorantly solipsistic age sandwiched flatly between yesterday's innocence and tomorrow's insouciance. Rather, it is that their madness and their boomerism don't even begin to explain their noxious influence: The cloying, internally inconsistent clinton calculus. The unspoken clinton threats. They permeate the atmosphere like a coiling miasma, choking off all freedom.

Even in New York.

Especially in New York.
When she wrote "The New Colossus," Emma Lazarus hardly had in mind this pair of mutant, deadly, twisted aliens.


So forget Arkansas-Illinois carpetbaggery and standard issue muckraking. The clintons are aliens of quite another sort. They are extrinsic, not of this world. They are inhuman. They are dehumanizing.

You may recall that the first act of this story of two degenerates maintained by iterating idiots, farce of farce ad infinitum, was generated quite by accident by iterated AlGoreRhythm, who, it should be noted, is now himself the object of iterated calculation by said degenerates who want iteration 2004 all for themselves.


And thus the odd bit of bloody Gore in Act II: The ugly sight of a corrupt, bottom-heavy hillary self-impaled on the horns of a Treason-Dilemma- masquerading-as-a-Third-Term-Dilemma-masquerading-as-a-Senate-stampede, for example, or bill's recent unsolicited, underwhelming Times interview on the Gore candidacy.

Act I was called "The Cook, The Thief, His Wife and Her Lover." Ostensibly the tale of the wife of a bloodthirsty crime boss who finds romance with a bland bookseller between courses at her husband's restaurant, it was in fact the Thyestean and moveable -- yet unmoving -- feast of hillary clinton at her husband's sham restitution. (Note the reciprocity. The sham restitution in Act II is all hillary's.)


Food, color coding, sex, murder, torture and cannibalism were the exotic (if mostly horizontal) fare in this beautifully filmed but brutally uncompromising modern memoir which passed as ancient fable about nouveau riche rapacity.


Not for the faint at heart, Purple Hearts or queazy stomachs, this depiction of the gross debasement of America was heavily peppered with irony and dark humor throughout.


Although she baked no cookies, didn't do illicit land or cattle deals and stood by no man, hillary clinton starred in the triple role of the Cook, the Thief and his Wife. Her lover was played at once vaporously and in workmanlike fashion by the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt, with Janet Reno, between her stints rendering intermittent injustice for the Husband, as the reliable stand-in. Sidney Blumenthal was the stand-in for the Cook and Craig Livingstone the stand-in for the Thief. The last-minute addition of Christopher Hitchens as the snitch was a stroke of absolute genius notwithstanding its cerebral accident, its predictable-if-perfect pitch and its facile alliteration.


Although Act I had no rating, the new clinton soccer-mom directive will require a photo ID for any viewer without independent proof of illegal alien DNC or DNA sequencing.




In Act II, rabid anti-clinton voters, roughly 33% of the U.S. populace according to as-yet-unpodded pollsters, become increasingly aware that they are disappearing in droves and being replaced by alien pod replicas which have their physical attributes but lack all anti-clinton affect.


 If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.








  It is natural for man to indulge in the illusions of hope.
We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth,
and listen to the song of that siren
till she transforms us into beasts.
Is this the part of wise men,
engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty?
Are we disposed to be the number of those
who, having eyes, see not,
and having ears, hear not,
the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?
For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost,
I am willing to know the whole truth;
to know the worst, and to provide for it.
Patrick Henry


In a dark time, the eye begins to see.

Theodore Roethke




7 posted on 11/14/2002 10:16:28 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IVote2
Look at the map of California election results, Davis only won/stoled a few counties with heavy population. MOST of the counties went to SIMON the Republican candidate! And look at how far we have come from 1998 election to 2002 election. The only counties the Democrats win are the crooked ones that they can STEAL!!!!
8 posted on 11/14/2002 10:34:39 AM PST by buffyt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

9 posted on 11/14/2002 10:39:45 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All
The 2002 California map looks like the USA 2000 Red/Blue map that had Bush winning MOST of the US counties, cities, states, etc. And it looks like the 2002 NY map that proves Hillary [blue] only won a few counties and Lazio [red] won the rest....

10 posted on 11/14/2002 10:39:56 AM PST by buffyt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Thank you so much for this informative thread.

I am praying that some entity with true integrity gets into this fraud and with heavenly protection for their well being has sufficient favor and intelligence to root it out. I do not care how the chips fall and hope that whomever perpetrates this kind of fraud will be exposed and will pay the penalty.

Our nation these days, however, can prove by impeachment and still reward the impeached. I pray this foul dishonesty will not continue to remain inbedded in the fabric of our national life.
11 posted on 11/14/2002 10:52:18 AM PST by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spirited; All


COROLLARY: Do Democrat Precincts Prefer Punch Card Over More Accurate Optical Scan Ballots PRECISELY to Enable This Type of Election Theft?

"Our strength is not in the ballot but in the counting...As long as I count the votes, what are you going to do about it?"

--Boss Tweed, November 1871



"Downs told me, somewhat tongue-in-cheek, 'You get me within 100 votes and I can steal any election,'" Haueter told WorldNetDaily.
Nolan subsequently hired Downs and "brought him out to train my staff in the techniques they [Democrats] were using" so they could protect themselves against future election-fraud victimization, Nolan said.
Nolan and Haueter said Downs described three basic tactics:
  • "The first rule is, you keep counting until you're ahead. And if that doesn't put you ahead, you recount, re-recount -- you keep counting until you're ahead. If you're behind, then you've got nothing to lose."
  • Second, Nolan said, "the more times those ballots are handled, the more chance there is that chads will break loose" and hence disqualify the ballot.
  • Third, he said, "the minute you're ahead, you stop and declare yourself the victor."


"After that, you don't want the ballots handled any more," Nolan said, "because some of the chads for your candidate might break loose. While you're behind it doesn't matter, but if you're ahead and more break off or become disqualified for your candidate, that's a bad thing."

A favorite tactic, said Nolan, is to ask election officials for ballots, "allegedly so they can look at it more closely." When operatives do, often they will bend or crinkle ballots covertly in an effort to break another chad loose and thus have the ballot thrown out.

"This whole process sounds like exactly what is going on in Florida," Nolan said. "And the more times those ballots are handled, the more chances are you'll break some of them [chads] loose."

Nolan referred to Fox News' Tony Snow's weekend interview with Bush campaign representative and former Secretary of State James Baker, in which he asked Baker why -- after each time election officials run ballots through mechanical vote-tally machines -- there have been more votes counted or taken away from both candidates.

"Baker didn't have an answer to that," Nolan said. "But the answer is, because they've handled those ballots more times, breaking loose more of those chads" -- those that perhaps weren't completely punched through.

'How Democrats steal elections'


"Explicit statistical evidence of massive ballot tampering in Palm Beach, Fl"
Errors Occurred only in Presidential Races?

"Back in Chi' in the old days, we count the votes, and we keep counting them again and again until we get what we want."--Key Largo: Johnny Rocco - Chicago mobster, explaining his rise to power, boasting about fixing elections back in Chicago

Why the Manual Recount is Unconstitutional:
Due Process, Equal Protection and Carol Roberts

The Robert A. Cook, PE analysis of flagrant, standard issue Democratic Palm Beach election fraud is both logically sound and frighteningly insightful; moreover, it provides a retrospective explanation of past Palm Beach (and other) anomalies.



12 posted on 11/14/2002 11:38:06 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Eugene Davis, a retired deputy chief Border Patrol agent in Blaine, Wash., told me: "This is another classic example of how our catch and release policy for illegal aliens remains a danger to us all. What's it going to take for the American people to demand that we fix the system?"

Hey, I e-mailed her that story! It didn't reference this particular retired agent, though. I was quoting a current agent and told her that I couldn't name him.

13 posted on 11/14/2002 1:14:44 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
14 posted on 11/15/2002 9:38:16 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson