What are you mentally deficient? And if I post from the Koran where Allah directs his followers to kill the unbelievers to show the nature of the enemy does that mean I endorse the friggin Koran? How else can I show the nature of the enemy?
... What are you mentally deficient? And if I post from the Koran where Allah directs his followers to kill the unbelievers to show the nature of the enemy does that mean I endorse the friggin Koran? How else can I show the nature of the enemy? ...
Posting from the Koran to make your case would have perfectly legitimate. But you didn't do that. And you miss the distinction, and it is a critical distinction. The article you posted bases its claims about the so-called relationships among the groups that
you want to say are related on grounds of Nazi-Zionist collaboration, on grounds of concentration camps ravaged by disease instead of Zyklon B and gas ovens, on the notion that the Nazis were simply the good-hearted, mis-guided dupes of Himmler, on the notion that RACE is the determining factor in world history. For you to buy into the one notion, you have to buy into the other.
If you deny the authors grounds, you deny the author's claims, in which case you deny your own claims, so why bother posting the article? Find other, more factual grounds to make your claim, or simply admit that it was your intention to post white-power-identity propaganda on FR in the guise of an anti-Muslim rant.