Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Transsexual to leave prison for operation (time and anatomy to be cut short)
RICHMOND TIMES DISPATCH ^ | 11-18-02 | n/a

Posted on 11/18/2002 3:33:17 AM PST by putupon

Edited on 07/20/2004 11:48:00 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

ROANOKE - A transsexual will be granted early release from prison so he can undergo the final surgery to become a woman.

A Roanoke judge ruled Friday that Michelona Sierra De'Lonta, 27, can be released from the city jail one month shy of completing his six-month sentence for forgery if he pays about $1,200 in court costs by this afternoon.


(Excerpt) Read more at timesdispatch.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; Political Humor/Cartoons; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: drag; jail; transexual
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

1 posted on 11/18/2002 3:33:17 AM PST by putupon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: putupon
Clemens said De'Lonta was rewarded for good behavior.

heh heh heh

2 posted on 11/18/2002 3:35:16 AM PST by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
What your tax dollars go to - creating a tranny. Next question - does "she" go now to the women's prison?? ;-)
3 posted on 11/18/2002 3:36:52 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: putupon
The secret message in this - You can change the way you were born (shhhh don't tell the gays, they won't believe you).
4 posted on 11/18/2002 3:37:04 AM PST by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: putupon
I feel pretty
Oh so pretty
I feel pretty and witty and gay And I pity
Any girl who isn't me today

5 posted on 11/18/2002 3:37:14 AM PST by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Snip off or add parts here and there. Its all in a day's work for liberal social engineering.
6 posted on 11/18/2002 3:38:41 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
If guys want to have sex with guys they all could sex changes to become women, and the lesbians could changes and become men. Problem solved.
7 posted on 11/18/2002 3:44:17 AM PST by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: putupon
so he could keep a long-standing appointment to complete his sex change at a Colorado hospital

I'd assume this is some kind of hormonal device implant. Last I'd heard, the "re-architecture" surgery itself was still banned in the USA and had to be done in Sweden. (Boo, hiss to Sweden)

8 posted on 11/18/2002 3:50:17 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; FreedomPoster; Timesink; AntiGuv; ...
"Hold muh beer 'n watch this!" PING....

If you want on or off this list, please let me know!

9 posted on 11/18/2002 3:56:44 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: putupon
"...A transsexual will be granted early release from prison so he can undergo the final surgery to become a woman..."

The first stages of the process of 'becoming a woman' might be fun...

You get a personal pair of breasts to fondle anytime you want and people will sometimes hold the door open for you.

That final stage, where they whack your pee-pee off, is probably a pretty hard chunk of cheese however.

10 posted on 11/18/2002 4:07:28 AM PST by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: putupon
Considering he is in jail for forgery, one wonders how he paid for the surgery. By check?
11 posted on 11/18/2002 4:13:45 AM PST by YourAdHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: putupon
I noticed the name of the judge was NOT mentioned. I would like to see his name. And what does a "Michelona Sierra De'Lonta" look like? Anyone have pictures?

In any case this is outrageous. What next? The King brothers getting off early for braces? Robert Blake getting time off for a face lift? It sends a disturbing message.

12 posted on 11/18/2002 4:27:02 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dante3
She's a triple Democratic vote: a liberal wuss guy, a tranny, and a single woman.
13 posted on 11/18/2002 4:31:31 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: putupon
If he misses the appointment, it could take more than a year to get another one, said his lawyer, Chris Clemens.

Another year to get another what ?

14 posted on 11/18/2002 4:53:24 AM PST by Zaxis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DWSUWF
The final stage...

"We must make sure that you do not appear here again. Bailiff, whack his pee-pee."

15 posted on 11/18/2002 5:30:24 AM PST by martin_fierro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mhking
"Hold muh beer 'n watch this!" PING....

Count me in please...

16 posted on 11/18/2002 5:37:09 AM PST by g'nad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
LOL-thanks
17 posted on 11/18/2002 5:39:06 AM PST by putupon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: putupon
so he can undergo the final surgery to become a woman.

Hormones, surgery and money can’t change ones gender. The things that homosexuality drives one to do are mind-boggling.

18 posted on 11/18/2002 5:45:13 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: putupon
If it was for rape and not forgery, then it would be a fitting umm... punishment, option, ummm no idea what to call it except weird.
19 posted on 11/18/2002 6:01:01 AM PST by doc30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
It would be nice if that were the case, but it isn't. I knew two men who were gay, underwent sex change operations, and in not too much time began dating women. Can't figure out if that makes them lesbians or not. (They were not friends so their experiences were unrelated.)

The reason they gave is that the men they dated treated them so poorly once they became women that they'd rather date women. Go figure.
20 posted on 11/18/2002 6:04:42 AM PST by TankGurrrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DWSUWF
I bet he/she was popular in jail. :-P
21 posted on 11/18/2002 6:05:50 AM PST by TankGurrrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TankGurrrl
LOL, sounds like the basis for a lifetime movie.
22 posted on 11/18/2002 6:07:14 AM PST by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Barbra Streisand would be perfect for the part.
23 posted on 11/18/2002 6:43:14 AM PST by YourAdHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: YourAdHere
Do you think she will eventually get a sex change too and become a woman?
24 posted on 11/18/2002 6:45:43 AM PST by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: putupon
If I was the judge, (now this is only my opinion) I'd let him/her out, then return his/her arse to the slammer to complete the sentence.....Boy, would the guys in the slammer be surprised to see him/her return..... heh heh heh heh
25 posted on 11/18/2002 6:52:54 AM PST by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
LOL. Good one.
26 posted on 11/18/2002 7:01:38 AM PST by YourAdHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: putupon
Before...

After...


27 posted on 11/18/2002 7:12:00 AM PST by Kerensky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Check out Trinidad, CO

http://www.moss-fritch.com/biber.htm
28 posted on 11/18/2002 8:25:14 AM PST by 11x62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: putupon
This is just fine - if it were California, the state would be paying for the operation (they do for state employees!
29 posted on 11/18/2002 8:42:02 AM PST by TheBattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
It would have been better to have operated on his brain and to help him know who he really was instead of working on the other end.
30 posted on 11/18/2002 9:10:51 AM PST by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: putupon
I bet the hardened (so to speak) cons were passin' this dude around!
31 posted on 11/18/2002 10:05:42 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Snip off or add parts here and there. Its all in a day's work for liberal social engineering.

Well, we whack kids out of perfectly good families and sell them to other families, and call it adoption. That's liberal social engineering too. PS Don't get me wrong, trannies make me want to hurl.

32 posted on 11/18/2002 10:28:08 AM PST by ladysusan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: Motherbear
The kids who come out of "perfectly good families" are voluntarily placed for adoption,

Why don't you ask some women whose children were taken by force in the 50's, 60's and yes, even the 70's about that? Do you deny that children were stolen from their mothers in this country and then sold during that time period?

You and I have been through this already. As for more recent aquisitions of children, you need to look at marketing techniques and the LIE of open adoption to understand what it is I am saying.

I suggest you take the time to learn the difference between the charitable act of adoption, which is the taking in of children in need of a home, and the immoral and unethical baby selling schemes that exploit women and children, povide a product for infertile couples, and hide themselves under the mantle of adoption.

Honestly.

34 posted on 11/18/2002 11:10:17 AM PST by ladysusan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Thanks for that blast from the past!
35 posted on 11/18/2002 11:10:33 AM PST by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: putupon
I'll bet he doesn't have the balls to go back to prison.


36 posted on 11/18/2002 11:13:55 AM PST by Fintan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Motherbear
The kids who come out of "perfectly good families" are voluntarily placed for adoption,

Why don't you ask some women whose children were taken by force in the 50's, 60's and yes, even the 70's about that? Do you deny that children were stolen from their mothers in this country and then sold during that time period?

You and I have been through this already. As for more recent aquisitions of children, you need to look at marketing techniques and the LIE of open adoption to understand what it is I am saying.

I suggest you take the time to learn the difference between the charitable act of adoption, which is the taking in of children in need of a home, and the immoral and unethical baby selling schemes that exploit women and children, povide a product for infertile couples, and hide themselves under the mantle of adoption.

Honestly.

37 posted on 11/18/2002 11:14:36 AM PST by ladysusan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ladysusan
Apologies for the double post.
38 posted on 11/18/2002 11:16:35 AM PST by ladysusan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: putupon
"A transsexual will be granted early release from prison so he can undergo the final surgery to become a woman."

Looks like he won't have to do any more hard time.

39 posted on 11/18/2002 11:17:32 AM PST by Fabozz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
And very dangerous. What a wierd world we've become.
40 posted on 11/18/2002 12:52:48 PM PST by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Nope, HTR, there is actually a doctor in Colorado. Couple of years ago one of the newsmags did a show on it.
41 posted on 11/18/2002 1:46:49 PM PST by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fabozz
Looks like he won't have to do any more hard time.

LOL!

42 posted on 11/18/2002 5:02:04 PM PST by Fraulein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
their unsuspecting partners might not be as open minded as yourself
43 posted on 11/18/2002 5:03:57 PM PST by ContentiousObjector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Where's it say who paid for the operation?
44 posted on 11/18/2002 5:06:37 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

To: Motherbear
Your post is present tense, and implies that we still have the same adoption practices that we had in the past. WE DON'T!

They wouldn't DARE treat women the way we did in the 50s and 60s. If they tried, they'd land in court and on the front page. Of course there has never been any official recognition or apology for the abuse of women back then.

No, you're right. We don't drug women and then have them sign consents. We don't lock them up in the loony bin against their will and give them shock treatments because they won't sign consents. We don't snatch the baby out of their arms and run away with him, as happened with one young woman. We don't lock them up in maternity homes , take away their personal clothing and money so they can't flee, deny them access to the baby's father, to attorneys, to friends, to any counsel of any sort except their own.

NOW what we do is start preaching surrender to them when they are eleven and twelve. Did you know the Gladney Center has produced a tape that is shown to sixth and seventh graders talking about child surrender that is shown in health and home ec classes in DF/W? We don't show them any tapes telling the other side of the story, although such tapes exist. We pair them with adoptors well before they ever deliver, and tell them about the wonderful "gift" they are going to give these infertile people. We don't tell them that they are under no obligation to solve the reproductive problems of complete strangers. We tell them how much these wonderful people deserve, how entitled they are to someone else's baby. We don't tell them about extended family and parenting options, nor do we tell them that their difficulties are temporary. We tell them about happily ever after, but we don't tell them about conflicts of interest and how the agency doesn't get paid if she doesn't place. We promise her there will be openness, pictures, perhaps phone calls, update letters and the like. We don't tell her that open adoption agreements are unenforceable legally, nor do we give her figures on how frequently open adoptions are closd after the first year or two. We paint rettty pictures of a halcyon life, and we make the period in which she can change her mind only 72 hours after she signs. We tell this sweet young thing that she is in control, in charge, but we allow complete strangers into the delivery room to witness her giving birth, so they can bind with "their" baby immediately. That's not even enough time to recover from the birth, to think with a clear head. Worst, most damning of all, we don't tell her what the sequelae of surrender are. We don't tell her that she will have a lifetime of pain after surrender. We don't tell her that she stands a 30% or greater chance of developing severe recurrent depression. We don't tell her that she stands 40% or greater chance of never having another child. We don't tell her that she runs an 80% or greater chance of being diagnosed with same degree of PTSD later in life from surrendering a baby. We don't tell her this, and yet you insist these surrenders are voluntary. How can a surrender be voluntary when the mother of the child is not fully informed? If a surgeonn in the hospital operated on a patient without telling him/her the probability of complications and what those complications are, that would be malpractice. That would be coercion, and that's exactly what I think the way these "voluntary" surrenders are. I think they are malpractice and coercion. In countries where women considering surrender ARE given this information, the adoption rate plummets. Australia is one such country.

Do you have anything to say that you can support, or are you just going to continue to attack and make assertions without presenting any supporting data?

47 posted on 11/18/2002 8:15:45 PM PST by ladysusan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: putupon
I once had two of these...err...beings to supervise on a job. One was 6'5" tall and 300 pounds. The other was about 6 feet tall, and tipped the scales at 270 pounds. Now here's the REALLY bizarre part! They both met in the Army, were discharged, and had the "operation", and went on to live with each other as lesbians. I shi'ite you not!
48 posted on 11/18/2002 9:01:29 PM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dante3
In any case this is outrageous. What next? The King brothers getting off early for braces? Robert Blake getting time off for a face lift? It sends a disturbing message.

The guy was serving time in city jail for forgery. He had to pay to get out early. The situation seems a teeny, weeny, bit different - doncha think?

49 posted on 11/18/2002 9:09:29 PM PST by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson