Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LAURA INGRAHAM'S WEEKLY E-BLAST - IMMIGRATION
LauraIngraham.com ^ | Nov. 18, 2002 | Laura Ingraham

Posted on 11/19/2002 9:30:47 AM PST by madfly

E-Blast
Nov. 18, 2002

By Laura Ingraham

When most people think about the "American Dream," family, hard work, God, love of country come to mind. But if "immigrant rights" groups and their supporters in Washington have their way, the dream will also include law-breaking.

With Republicans poised to take control of both house of Congress in January, a legislative quandary awaits them -- a bill called the "Dream Act," the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act. Introduced by Utah Senator Orrin Hatch earlier this year, it would make it easier for states to offer in-state tuition rates at state colleges, and also would grant students lawful residency upon graduation from high school if they had lived in the country at least five years. (They could file for a conditional green card, and thus could legally drive and work.)

Why do conservatives like Hatch, and his House colleague Rep. Chris Cannon, support a bill that would reward illegality? Colorado's Rep. Tom Tancredo, a bulldog for enforcing our immigration laws, thinks it's a combination of politics (attracting Latino votes) and money (insuring business-owners a constant source of cheap labor). Hatch insists that the undocumented students -- by some estimates as many 600,000 in our high schools-"are assimilated into American culture…and grow up to be contributors to society."

That the majority of the illegal immigrant students want to work hard and better their lives is not in question. The problem is that for each slot an illegal immigrant takes at a state college or university, it is one less spot for American students or for immigrants who have followed immigration laws and procedures. (Illegals can also apply in the category of "international admissions.") And let's not forget, our new Homeland Security Department will have enough on its hands with 8 million illegals here, along with the 300,000 subject to deportation but on the loose.

For some outlandish reason, there is no specific federal prohibition against colleges and universities enrolling illegal immigrants. However, federal law places some restrictions on allowing such students to pay in-state tuition rates, and it prohibits them from receiving federal financial aid.

The pending Hatch-Cannon legislation will be a test for Republicans, who are ever-mindful of the growing influence Hispanics have in elections coast to coast. In the 2002 mid-term elections, many Republican candidates nationwide did better than expected among Hispanic voters. New York Governor George Pataki improved his support among Hispanic voters, chiefly due to his support for legalizing some illegals in the state. Governor Jeb Bush won a majority of the Latino vote, receiving strong support from Cuban-Americans.

Fearful of reprisals at the voting booth, the GOP has largely avoided taking on such these immigration-related issues. "When it comes to immigration, the president's approach is guided by compassion and fairness," said Sharon Castillo, an RNC spokesperson.

But isn't fairness supposed to be ensured by following the rule of law? President Bush's message on everything from fighting terror to corporate corruption is grounded in respecting the laws of the land. When people who set out to thwart our legal system are rewarded with benefits that are designated for law-abiding Americans and immigrants, why should we expect any would-be immigrants to go through the hassle of following our immigration laws?

Some states such as California, New York and Texas are already dangling carrots along the border. All passed bills allowing admission and in-state tuition for illegals. Several other states are considering similar measures.

Yet if there is a national trend toward bending the rules to allow greater access to education for illegals, Virginia's Republican Attorney General Jerry Kilgore wants no part of it. To the great consternation and outrage of groups like the Mexican American Legal Defense Fund, he recently directed his state's public colleges not to enroll illegals. And get this-he also told the institutions to report illegals they discover on campus to federal authorities. (The horror!)

Kilgore is right. Since September 11th, all universities nationwide should be doing everything they can to help the INS track foreign students, not create problems by looking the other way when illegals attempt to take advantage of benefits designated for those here lawfully. Yet our federal government is on the verge of giving state universities the green light to do just that with the so-called Dream Act. It is already a nightmare for our understaffed, under-funded Border Patrol to enforce our borders, it will only get worse with the beacon of more benefits for law-breakers.

WORD OF THE DAY

Avatar, noun. 1.The incarnation of a Hindu deity, especially Vishnu, in human or animal form. 2. An embodiment, as of a quality or concept; an archetype: the very avatar of cunning. 3. A temporary manifestation or aspect of a continuing entity. As in--

Yoga is in its present avatar, with studios popping up coast to coast.

 



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 000unknown; 300; borderpatrol; chriscannon; dreamact; foreignstudents; illegalsoncampus; immigration; ins; senatorhatch; tomtancredo; universities
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-77 next last

1 posted on 11/19/2002 9:30:47 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clinton Is Scum; norton; Under the Radar; BrowningBAR; IllegalAliensOUT; Slip18; Teacher317; ...
Ingraham ping
2 posted on 11/19/2002 9:31:56 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: american_ranger; engrpat; LADY J; Ahban; shiva; Nebr FAL owner; isee; KingKongCobra; wonders; ...
Ingraham ping!
3 posted on 11/19/2002 9:32:56 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA; Tancredo Fan; Marine Inspector; Ajnin; agitator; Sabertooth; Tancred; Spiff; ...
Ingraham ping
4 posted on 11/19/2002 9:34:26 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Well, isn't that just great... I have three kids in college, get no tuition breaks, no loans, no gov. help, no grants, no breaks, no nothing. We are US citizens, lived here legally all our lives. My husband busts his buns daily to earn our living, legally. We are white Christian, law abiding, voting, normal, good US citizens. I think we are fast becoming an endangered species! Maybe we should give up our citizenship and come back to US illegally so we can get a break on tuition. SHEESH!
5 posted on 11/19/2002 9:34:44 AM PST by buffyt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Yet if there is a national trend toward bending the rules to allow greater access to education for illegals, Virginia's Republican Attorney General Jerry Kilgore wants no part of it. To the great consternation and outrage of groups like the Mexican American Legal Defense Fund, he recently directed his state's public colleges not to enroll illegals. And get this-he also told the institutions to report illegals they discover on campus to federal authorities. (The horror!)

The nerve of that guy, actually believing that, as governor, he should enforce the law. Next thing you know someone will say that a president who has lied under oath should be removed from office.

6 posted on 11/19/2002 9:36:13 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Memo to Laura: "Don't ever darken the doors of thw WH again!"

LOL, but seriously, when is Duhhbya gonna send her the memo?

7 posted on 11/19/2002 9:36:33 AM PST by oldvike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly

8 posted on 11/19/2002 9:39:04 AM PST by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom; 2sheep; Aliska; Alabama_Wild_Man; Aquinasfan; anniegetyourgun; ArGee; arielb; ...
Ingraham ping
9 posted on 11/19/2002 9:43:39 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
There should be no appeals made by elected officials of the Republican Party, to illegal aliens. NONE! We shoudln't be rewarding lawbreakers of any kind. Hatch and Cannon are dead wrong on this one.
10 posted on 11/19/2002 9:47:15 AM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
I will not vote for anyone that plans on replacing me with the vote of an illegal. Bush and the Republican party have had their last vote from me, my family, my friends and co-workers.

They all had better hope they have swung enough illegals to make up the difference. I'll write in Tancredo for President, but I will not vote for Cornyn, Perry, et al, ever again.

The future of conservatism, the demographics of the country, taxes, and the constitution hang in the balance on this one issue. Bush has spit on his oath, he is attempting to rip the Constitution in half and destroy the most important laws in the land regarding our sovereignty.
11 posted on 11/19/2002 9:48:07 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
'Dream Act' my fanny. Hatch and his cronies truly are living in a bubble.

Do the wishes of the majority of Americans mean anything to these people?

12 posted on 11/19/2002 9:51:39 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buffyt
We are white Christian, law abiding, voting, normal, good US citizens. I think we are fast becoming an endangered species!

You are among the only group that can be racist and politically incorrect. I bet your family owns guns too. The horror! I know all about this new oppression -- I am a straight, white, conservative male from the South -- the most reviled creature possible for the "let 'em all in, diversity is our strength, kumbyya crowd". Of course, I pay full price for everything, as well as about 40+% of my income in taxes. Guess I am just 'fortunate' in that regard.

I am hoping that all the focus on immigration lately will force politicians to clearly state their positions. I hope that more like Jerry Kilgore will step up and enforce the law.

But I am not holding my breath. Bush, Racicot, and Rove are calling the shots now, and they are for amnesty and doing anything but discussing immigration in a way that indicates that there is a problem.

13 posted on 11/19/2002 9:53:17 AM PST by spodefly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Her article is a major reason why legal immigrants are backlashing against Bush. They see him as soft on the very laws they were held to just because they weren't from Mexico. I know of a number of South Africans who came here legally and have followed all the rules and became US Citizens. They are proud to have done so. Now, one of these people can't seem to get her parents here. I told her to vacation in Mexico and then cross the border as tourists. Why not? It seems our southern border is open to all who want to cross.
14 posted on 11/19/2002 9:53:31 AM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
People like Hatch do love that cheap labor, illegal though it may be.

Policies of this type always remind me of that 18th century tune "The World Turned Upside Down". I am given to understand that this was not a favorite of Lord Cornwallis although Mr. Hatch seems quite fond of it.



15 posted on 11/19/2002 9:57:34 AM PST by Bacons Rebellion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Way to go Laura!

I am so pleased to see "my fave" come down on the right side of this issue!
16 posted on 11/19/2002 9:58:44 AM PST by navyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: MissAmericanPie
To: madfly

I will not vote for anyone that plans on replacing me with the vote of an illegal. Bush and the Republican party have had their last vote from me, my family, my friends and co-workers.

This is a pretty strong statement.  I can't argue with it.  The fact is our Constitution and national laws (and interests) are being sold out to pander to millions of foreign nationals which are occupying our territory.  Our infrastructure cannot continue to handle the flood coming across our borders.

They all had better hope they have swung enough illegals to make up the difference. I'll write in Tancredo for President, but I will not vote for Cornyn, Perry, et al, ever again.

So it becomes clear that the President and other Republicans are willing to pander to a few million foreign nationals in hopes of pleasing them, in deference to the well being and political stability of our nation and it's legal citizens.

The future of conservatism, the demographics of the country, taxes, and the constitution hang in the balance on this one issue. Bush has spit on his oath, he is attempting to rip the Constitution in half and destroy the most important laws in the land regarding our sovereignty.

A nation that doesn't have borders, is no longer a nation.

11 posted on 11/19/2002 9:48 AM PST by MissAmericanPie

18 posted on 11/19/2002 10:03:35 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: madfly
There seems to be no limit as to what our government will give away to the Illegal Alien Contingent at the American Taxpayers' expense for money and votes. This is raw Tyranny In Action. These Traitors in Congress don't work for us. They work for themselves. This is disgusting beyond words. Only by voting out these Anti-American Opportunists masquerading as our "elected representatives" will we alter the 3rd World Course America is presently on.
19 posted on 11/19/2002 10:04:58 AM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spodefly
Well, MAYBE when a dirty nuke goes off in Houston or Orlando or New Mexico or AZ, or CA, MAYBE they may think about guarding the border. MAYBE. I am not holding my breath.
20 posted on 11/19/2002 10:17:02 AM PST by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
The leadership of the United States is doing it worst to create a Quebec situation within our nation. As in Canada, this will not come to any good. I'll use discression and fogore giving my opinion of this. Needless to say the rhetoric would be strident and unacceptable to people who are having a hard time coming to grips with all the realities surrounding this issue and it's impacts on our nation.
21 posted on 11/19/2002 10:17:59 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Thanks D-1. I understand your point.
22 posted on 11/19/2002 10:24:15 AM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; MissAmericanPie
The leadership of the United States is doing it worst to create a Quebec situation

Bienvenue a Free State Project

Free
                                                                              State Project

23 posted on 11/19/2002 10:28:19 AM PST by watcher1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: madfly
"Fearful of reprisals at the voting booth, the GOP has largely avoided taking on such these immigration-related issues."

On balance, I don't think it's a partisan issue because the same could be said of the democraps. Looking at the long-term agenda, it could only be a continuance of plans to dispense with borders. This should have become evident to everyone on 9/12/01 when the first thing we should have done was seal the borders, as any nation under attack with any sense of survival should have done. Mexico, Canada and the U.S. must already be linked on the drawing board as a single political/economic entity in the minds of the 'planners.'

Sovereignty? An archaic expression once used by fledgling republics back in the 20th Century.

26 posted on 11/19/2002 10:36:07 AM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
I have decided that Bush may well give my tax dollars to illegal aliens. But the Ba$tards will wait until April 15 to get it. In Jan. I plan to tell my employer not to take out federal income tax from my check. I will put the money in the bank (draw interest) and send the govt. a check on April 15th.

At least that's what I plan to do. As far as I can tell it's legal. As long as you pay the taxes on or before the 15th of April then I don't think they can do anything.

Maybe the whole Republican base should start this. It would be one way to show our displeasure. Maybe Bush will not be able to hand out houses to minorities.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH
27 posted on 11/19/2002 10:37:28 AM PST by georgiabelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: watcher1
Thanks for the link.
28 posted on 11/19/2002 10:39:25 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: georgiabelle
As long as you pay the taxes on or before the 15th of April then I don't think they can do anything.

I could be wrong, but I believe there are penalties if you end up owing too much. If that's not the case, then it's a great plan.

29 posted on 11/19/2002 10:46:19 AM PST by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: georgiabelle
I plan to tell my employer not to take out federal income tax from my check. I will put the money in the bank (draw interest) and send the govt. a check on April 15th.

I don't believe the feds allow that.

At least that's what I plan to do. As far as I can tell it's legal. As long as you pay the taxes on or before the 15th of April then I don't think they can do anything.

First of all, self-employed people are required to pay their taxes on a quarterly basis. And second, if you are significantly under-withheld, the feds can assess a penalty.

I would get some better tax advice before departing on the course of action you are proposing here.

30 posted on 11/19/2002 10:46:32 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: georgiabelle
I have decided that Bush may well give my tax dollars to illegal aliens. But the Ba$tards will wait until April 15 to get it. In Jan. I plan to tell my employer not to take out federal income tax from my check. I will put the money in the bank (draw interest) and send the govt. a check on April 15th.

I agree and sympathize with you but you should check this out with a tax accountant. Depending on how much you make, you could by liable for IRS penalties if you earn a certain amount over last year's income. I was on the treadmill with the IRS for years with estimated taxes that I had to pay up-front for the current tax year because my prior year's income was not fully paid until April 15th.

31 posted on 11/19/2002 10:55:24 AM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Thanks for the link

Tell everyone you know.
Help spread the word

Free
                                                                              State Project

32 posted on 11/19/2002 11:02:11 AM PST by watcher1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
Now Sinkspur has another to put on his dimwit list - the one that when you don't agree with Bush 100%.
33 posted on 11/19/2002 11:04:25 AM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Well said ma'am. I agree 100 percent
34 posted on 11/19/2002 11:09:10 AM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Bump!
35 posted on 11/19/2002 11:35:47 AM PST by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
I will not vote for anyone that plans on replacing me with the vote of an illegal. Bush and the Republican party have had their last vote from me, my family, my friends and co-workers.

If the Republicans can take a vote away from the Dems to replace yours, they still gain...as long as you (evil anti-immigration pro-life extremist that you are) don't vote or vote for a party that isn't trying to win.

In Massachusetts for Governor this time we had Shannon O'Brien (D) saying 16 year olds didn't need parental permission for an abortion. We had "conservative" Mitt Romney (R) saying that he would of course support abortion rights, but only for those 18 or older.

I voted Green. If I didn't have an option to save baby's lives, I figured I'd at least vote to save trees and walruses or whatever.

This immigration thing...it must be a ratings winner. All of the talk folk are beginning to sound like anti-illegal, secure border freepers. Keep emailing them and praising any show they do that highlights the issue.

36 posted on 11/19/2002 11:39:45 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Protect Our Borders !!

Death To all Muslim Extremist's !!

Snuff Saddam, NOW !!

Freedom Is Worth Fighting For !!

Let's Roll !!

Molon Labe !!
37 posted on 11/19/2002 12:15:03 PM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: madfly
The worst part of all this is that Hatch is a total squish on immigration, and he is taking over as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee in January, the committee which has jurisdiction over the Immigration and Naturalization Service. The Immigration Subcommittee Chairman will be the pro-illegal immigrant, pro-amnesty, anti-enforcement of immigration laws Sam Brownback of Kansas. This does not bode well for our country.
38 posted on 11/19/2002 12:15:23 PM PST by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
The Immigration Subcommittee Chairman will be the pro-illegal immigrant, pro-amnesty, anti-enforcement of immigration laws Sam Brownback of Kansas.

Nice choice ain't it, either Brownback or Kennedy.

When will Washington ever get it?

39 posted on 11/19/2002 12:20:06 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Are either of these two up for re-election in 2004?
40 posted on 11/19/2002 12:25:17 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: georgiabelle
You can then file for an extension, then pay as you please....yes you'll get whacked a bit for intrest & penalty, but the intrest you'll earn will offset it.
41 posted on 11/19/2002 12:28:36 PM PST by taxed2death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
Someone from Kansas said on another thread that Brownback has become a joke in that state. Maybe when he's up for re-election his anti-American, pro Mecha, pro La Raza agenda will be brought out.
42 posted on 11/19/2002 12:29:58 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: grania
All of the talk folk are beginning to sound like anti-illegal, secure border freepers.

There's been a distinct increase in the talk-traffic about this issue within the last month. The transition was almost overnight. Like you said, someone got a serious eyeful of a ratings winner.

43 posted on 11/19/2002 12:30:37 PM PST by Semaphore Heathcliffe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: buffyt; madfly
Maybe we should give up our citizenship and come back to US illegally so we can get a break on tuition. SHEESH!

I have always said that in my next lifetime I am coming back as an illegal alien so I can break laws and get all the freebies while dumb Americans pay for it.

We need a strong President that will enforce our existing laws and quotas instead of Bush.

There I go dreaming again!!

44 posted on 11/19/2002 12:32:12 PM PST by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Hatch likes to position himself as the God-fearing Mormon who brags about writing Gospel music and following God's edicts...and then the hypocrite turns out to be an ORIGINATOR of legislation like this that is thoroughly unjust, corrupt and evil...legislation that harms, penalizes and undermines law-abiding, hard-working American citizens and rewards criminals and law-breakers. This aspect of him disgusts me just as much as Bush's claim that he reads the Bible every night and Jesus Christ is his hero -- and then turns a blind eye as the country he has sworn to defend is being destroyed, Border Patrol guards are being violently murdered, and innocent Americans are being preyed upon by gouging taxes to pay for freeloading illegals, forced to see their qualities of life falling apart, and in growing instances, becoming victims of violent crimes like home invasion, robbery, rape and murder from these interlopers.

Since Hatch is a Mormon and follows the Church's instructions to store a year's worth of food (to cope with the famines that the Church prophesizes are heading for this country) -- I hope he is happy when those awful days come to pass and his children and grandchildren are forced to stand in long lines and compete with all these illegals for for their daily ration of bread and water. He can take comfort in that he had a hand in their suffering.

"God-fearing" politicians like Bush and Hatch are going to have to answer for their deeds on Judgment Day...sadly, all of us have to live in the here and now with the consequences of their corrupt actions.

45 posted on 11/19/2002 12:41:11 PM PST by hot august night
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: georgiabelle; All
Someone just pinged me to this thread. It's very timely and might answer our questions, here. It's written very methodically and easy to understand. Give it a look.

(No Answers, No Taxes) by Robert L. Schulz, Chairman, We The People Congress

Presented at Freedom Drive 2002, The National Mall, Washington DC November 14, 2002

Acknowledgement: Bob Schulz wishes to acknowledge and thank Anthony Hargis for his fine research paper, "The Lost Right, Redress of Grievances." (undated). Bob's speech draws heavily on that research and the underlying documents.

The founding fathers, in an act of the Continental Congress in 1774, said, "If money is wanted by Rulers who have in any manner oppressed the People, [the People] may retain [their money] until their grievances are redressed, and thus peaceably procure relief, without trusting to despised petitions or disturbing the public tranquility."

This very American Right of Redress of Grievances Before Taxes is deeply embedded in our law.

The founding fathers could hardly have used words more clear when they declared, "the people . . . may retain [their money] until their grievances are [remedied]."

By these words, the founding fathers fully recognized and clearly stated: that the Right of Redress of Grievances includes the right of Redress Before payment of Taxes, that this Right of Redress Before Taxes lies in the hands of the People, that this Right is the People's non-violent, peaceful means to procuring a remedy to their grievances without having depend on -- or place their trust in -- the government's willingness to respond to the People's petitions and without having to resort to violence.

Before going further, I'd like to clarify two points: first, the question we are dealing with here is not whether the government has the power to tax, but whether the government is abusing its constitutionally limited power to tax; and second, there is the question of whether the government is using the tax revenue to effect other abuses of its authority.

The founding fathers were well acquainted with the fact that government is the enemy of Freedom, that those wielding governmental power despise petitions from the People; the representatives of the People, in a popular assembly, seem sometimes to fancy that they are the People themselves and exhibit strong symptoms of impatience and disgust at the least sign of opposition from any quarter.

The founding fathers knew that it was possible for the institutions of the Congress, the Executive and the Courts to someday begin to fail in their duty to protect the people from tyranny. They knew that unless the People had the right to withhold their money from the government their grievances might fall on deaf ears and Liberty would give way to tyranny, despotism and involuntary servitude.

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution states clearly and unambiguously, "Congress shall make NO law . . . abridging . . . the right of the people . . . to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

While some Rights are reserved with qualifications . . . (continued)

This is a real eye opener!

46 posted on 11/19/2002 12:41:45 PM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hot august night
Excellent post.

As long as the govenment continues to keep the doors and windows wide open to our house, there will be no Home Land Security....

47 posted on 11/19/2002 12:43:42 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
If you have time, check out some Latino news Headlines from various dates

http://www.radiobilingue.org/noticierotoday-prevjune2001.htm

http://www.radiobilingue.org/noticierotoday.htm

http://www.radiobilingue.org/noticierotoday-prevoct2002.htm

http://www.radiobilingue.org/noticierotoday-prevnov2002.htm

48 posted on 11/19/2002 12:46:36 PM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
Yea, but I still say we have to hold that COMPLETE SELLOUT GWB's ass to the fire.

There's no amout of head-bobbing, smirks and butchering of the English language he can come out with to cover up the fact that he's completely turning a blind eye to this problem.

He's the big guy.

He's the Mayor MCcheese.

He's walking point.

He's obviously more concerned about the hispanic vote, rather than what's good in the long run, for our country.

I can't figure out a better way to run this country into the ground and turn a democratic republic into a third world swill-hole socialists dream, than to continue on down this path.

GWB is a "globalist" in the worst sense of the word, through and through.

I did vote for this guy, but never again. His inaction on this matter is simply unacceptable, un-patriotic, and un-American.

It pisses me off to no end how he sucks up to that socialist despot Vincente Fox.

It's just not right to roll out the red carpet to illegals and continually slap LEGAL Americans citizens in the face.

What sense does it make to SINK the one lifeboat this world has.

Am I against immigration? Hell no.

Legal immigrants have made this nation what it is. But this wholesale avoidance of a problem so severe as this begs some consideration.

If Bush passes Amnesty, he should be booted out of office for dereliction of duty. He's dangerously close to becoming a UN lackey regarding this invasion.....er...immigration policy.
49 posted on 11/19/2002 12:49:52 PM PST by taxed2death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: madfly
by some estimates as many 600,000 in our high schools-

I doubt if many of these students are alone here in the US. They probably live with at least 1 illegal parent. Maybe there are are 2 illegal parents, maybe 1 or more illegal siblings and maybe illegal relatives. What does Hatch propose to do about them?

If the student gets in-statue tuition breaks and lawful residency upon graduation, what happens to these relatives? I doubt if Hatch is for deporting them, even though they probably are illegal and are not the ones graduating from high school. In effect this will be an amnesty for anyone who has a kid in school, because of course, "you cannot split up the family".

50 posted on 11/19/2002 12:54:36 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson