Skip to comments.
GOP targets Tancredo
Newsmax.com ^
| 11-19-02
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 11/20/2002 7:21:40 AM PST by nonliberal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator
To: Lion's Cub
Is anyone surpised by this? I'm not. They were willing to lose California rather than see Simon win. He was doing OK as far as I know until Bush sent his people went out there to split the party.Exactly...and all the FR sheeple that think that our president is a conservatrive need to take another look.
Like his dad he is a moderate with some conservative leanings..but he is not a conservative
He like his dad want the New World order..
22
posted on
11/20/2002 8:33:32 AM PST
by
RnMomof7
To: taxed2death; madfly
Meanwhile, back in the real world, homeland insecurity has been passed and we still have 4000-6000 illegal trespassers crossing our borders every 24 hours.......1 out of 5 being OTM's (other than Mexicans).And here is the JOKE played on all of US
We get our shoes checked at the airport..our nail clippers taken and old ladies have to get stripped searched to PROVE that beep is a hip pin..and meanwhile the government policy is to allow every one over the southern border that wants to come..Do they think the Muslims are dumb?
The whole "Homeland Security" program is a "joke" on all of us"
We have less freedom and the terriorests can just walk in..
23
posted on
11/20/2002 8:39:24 AM PST
by
RnMomof7
To: madfly
(Re #11) ROTFL!!!
24
posted on
11/20/2002 9:03:09 AM PST
by
grania
To: nonliberal
I'm curious as to what Rove could possibly say in the President's and his defense? Whether they say it out loud or not, it's obvious that they are sensitive with minority/Latino votes and aren't exactly acting on the right thing to do. It's expected of Demonrats, but the President isn't truthful on this and is more concerned with pandering for votes and he just doesn't like being called on it by a member of his own party that can't stand to see this country invaded and excused for it.
To: nonliberal
I'm curious as to what Rove could possibly say in the President's and his defense? Whether they say it out loud or not, it's obvious that they are sensitive with minority/Latino votes and aren't exactly acting on the right thing to do. It's expected of Demonrats, but the President isn't truthful on this and is more concerned with pandering for votes and he just doesn't like being called on it by a member of his own party that can't stand to see this country invaded and excused for it.
To: nonliberal
I'm curious as to what Rove could possibly say in the President's and his defense? Whether they say it out loud or not, it's obvious that they are sensitive with minority/Latino votes and aren't exactly acting on the right thing to do. It's expected of Demonrats, but the President isn't truthful on this and is more concerned with pandering for votes and he just doesn't like being called on it by a member of his own party that can't stand to see this country invaded and excused for it.
To: nonliberal
How dare a member of Congress suggest that we have the right and duty to defend our borders!
28
posted on
11/20/2002 9:31:49 AM PST
by
per loin
To: MileHi
Tancredo was my congressman as well--hopefully it will be Beauprez really soon. I'm disappointed if this story is true. Why would President Bush try to oust Tancredo, a fellow Republican who happens to have a disagreement, but then gives rides on Air Force 1 to Hitlery and has Fat Teddy over for a movie and dinner. I'm proud of Tancredo and I hope he keeps harping about illegals (even though I know it's probably useless considering he is a lone voice) because it's the right thing to do. I voted for Owens too, but he is another big panderer to the illegals.
To: RnMomof7
I couldn't have said it any better myself!
The Homeland Insecurity Act is just a B.S. P.R. stunt, and the next step the government is taking to chip away at law-abiding citizens' rights and privacy, helping to solidify the police state that is to come. Meanwhile, illegals get a total free pass, and even have the red carpet rolled out for them by Bush, courtesy of all the freebies they get once they cross the border, and all the crimes they commit that are ignored. Outrageous.
To: taxed2death
bttt
To: RnMomof7
As long as the government continues to leave the doors and windows to our house wide open, there will be no Home Land Security
To: Joe Hadenuf
Amen...but then there is the politics of closing that door...so we are left to live with the draft ....Politics trump security ...they have the SS guarding them ..the rest of us are on our own
33
posted on
11/20/2002 10:47:03 AM PST
by
RnMomof7
To: hot august night
The Homeland Insecurity Act is just a B.S. P.R. stunt, and the next step the government is taking to chip away at law-abiding citizens' rights and privacy, helping to solidify the police state that is to come.That is my fear...protect America from the likes of US .
34
posted on
11/20/2002 10:56:19 AM PST
by
RnMomof7
To: Dave S
Me no pero, gringo!
To: nonliberal
Does this guy ever do his own reporting? Does he ever make a single phone call or do any research on what he writes?
Again Carl Limbacher recycles someone else's article and pretends its news. This Tancredo weeper is from another story and doesn't have a word that can be backed up.
It's always amazing to me how Carl can watch a talk show or read someone else's column, write a couple of hundred words and throw it up on Newsmax. I hope they don't pay him.
36
posted on
11/20/2002 11:08:44 AM PST
by
Deb
To: RicocheT
If Tancredo really wanted to do something about illegals, why doesn't he come up with a bill and get McCain to sponsor it in the Senate. If McCain refuses, Tancredo should go public.
Directing his little self-serving propaganda machine against Karl Rove and (indirectly) Bush, he breaks Reagan's 11th Commandment and does no good for his pet issue...oh, yeah it gets him contributions and re-election. If he makes a big enough fuss maybe no one will notice he broke his pledge.
37
posted on
11/20/2002 11:17:27 AM PST
by
Deb
To: beaversmom
Why would President Bush try to oust Tancredo, a fellow Republican who happens to have a disagreement, but then gives rides on Air Force 1 to Hitlery and has Fat Teddy over for a movie and dinner Probably because Bush can work with Hitlery and Kennedy but Tancredo is a loose cannon who is a McCarthy or Huey Long waiting to happen.
38
posted on
11/20/2002 12:31:06 PM PST
by
Dave S
To: Dave S
Because he brings up issues you would rather ignore?
Tancredo is no drunk populist. He adresses the issues rationally against name callers like you.
39
posted on
11/20/2002 3:06:16 PM PST
by
rmlew
To: Brandon
More pandering from Newsmax. Notice that their only sources that suggest there will be a GOP challenge are outsiders. They have no source inside the administration. TARGET: Tom Tancredo (Warned "never to darken the door of the White House again.")
Roll Call ^ | November 18, 2002 | Josh Kurtz
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/791503/posts
40
posted on
11/20/2002 3:08:54 PM PST
by
rmlew
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson