Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The pregnant pause here is me imagining oldster moms
The Virginian-Pilot ^ | 11.14.02 | Kerry Dougherty

Posted on 11/22/2002 6:29:50 PM PST by victim soul

The pregnant pause here is me imagining oldster moms

he Virginian-Pilot © November 14, 2002

http://www.pilotonline.com/opinion/op1114dou.html

Excuse me. Please. I'm trembling so violently I can barely type. I'm also hyperventilating, perspiring and on the verge of what feels like a bad case of the vapors.

Blame it on the news. Once again, The Pilot's front page has scared the bejabbers out of me. And a lot of other women.

No, I'm not referring to Wednesday's headline that raised the specter of Osama bin Laden still menacing America. Most of us already knew that.

I'm talking about that happy little story nestled down there on the bottom of the page. In the right-hand corner.

``Women In 50s Can Safely Have Babies,'' it crowed. Oh joy.

So it's official. Women today really can have it all. Hot flashes and morning sickness. Wrinkles and stretch marks. Visits to the gerontologist and the obstetrician. It's a mad scientist's dream come true: Women can be matronly and maternal all at once!

It's long been known that Mother Nature ``discriminates'' against women. They can't get pregnant after menopause.

``No fair,'' cried some doctors on the West Coast (where else?). The next thing you know, they fixed something that didn't need fixing.

Now, through the miracle of donor eggs, doctors have proven that it is possible for women well past nature's child-bearing years to bear children.

In a discussion of this fabulous breakthrough on National Public Radio on Tuesday, one delirious doctor declared that there was almost no upper age limit for pregnancy. Although I nearly drove my car into an embankment at the news, I think he said at least one woman has already given birth well into her 60s.

Am I the only one who finds this kind of freakishness an affront to nature? This insane quest for the fountain of youth has gone too far. It's time to start acting our age.

What's next, nursing homes with nurseries?

Mothers stooped by osteoporosis toddling their toddlers to preschool?

Gray-haired moms guzzling Geritol on the soccer sidelines?

Apparently it's not enough that women today juggle families, larger-than-ever houses and careers.

Now, thanks to ``advances'' in science, we'll be pressured to get pregnant, change diapers and wake up for midnight feedings until we draw our first Social Security check. Or our last breath.

Maybe I'm just being grumpy. Of course, that's endemic to women of a ``certain age.'' We're moody. Not as gay and carefree as we were during our salad days. Frankly, we're tired.

All the more reason for aging women not to go to extraordinary scientific lengths to give birth to babies. Women who wake up in their second half-century with an irresistible urge for a child might satisfy that desire -- unselfishly -- by adopting an older kid.

Sure, some will point out that men have always been able to be doting fathers well into their dotage. Of course they couldn't do it without the, er, assistance of younger women. Much younger. Women who will likely live long enough to guide their offspring safely through childhood even if the geezers who fathered them have gone on to greener pastures.

This latest hot flash/news flash caused one bioethicist to say something that eerily echoed my late mother's homespun wisdom: ``Simply because we find we can and want to do something doesn't mean we ought to do it,'' she said.

She's right.

I can take my next paycheck and put it all on a pony at Pimlico. It would be fun. It would be exciting.

But it wouldn't be right.

Still, it's a better bet than becoming pregnant at about the same time I become a pensioner.

Reach Kerry at 446-2306 or at kerry.dougherty@att.net


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: mothernature; olderwomen; pregnancy; realitycheck

1 posted on 11/22/2002 6:29:51 PM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: victim soul
Yes, and shame geriatric gentlemen can't procreate, either, isn't it?
2 posted on 11/22/2002 6:34:57 PM PST by frodolives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: victim soul
I've always thought that God's reward for having been a Mom and suffering through all those years of "playing bring me take me", homework, which you have already done once when you were a student, teenage malcontents and disruptors, two million meals to which the cry goes up "What is this? Do I have to eat it?" is that after the approximate age of 50 you no longer have the "curse", you can enjoy sex without being paranoid that you may become pregnant. The kids are pretty much grown and should be gone and now is your time to do whatever it is you wanted all those years to do for you.

I agree with the author of the piece. It is a goulish stupid idea thought up by a male liberal doctor who thinks the only reason women are ever happy is having and careing for their children. While it may have been fun in your 20's and 30's at 55 is positively frightening. Please, once is enough!
3 posted on 11/23/2002 5:23:29 AM PST by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frodolives
Yes, and shame geriatric gentlemen can't procreate, either, isn't it?

I'm a 40-year-old male and I put a stop to that a few years ago (vasectomy). My kids are now becoming teenagers and they will be grown up and out of the house while I am still in my 40s. It's been a joy having them but I'll be damned if I start all over again at age 50. My wife and I are looking very much forward to a long and happy life together with the kids grown. We'll get to travel again and go out to eat wherever we want and fix up our home the way we want it. Who knows, we might even move out into the country where we don't have to worry about how the school systems are or whether there are kids in the neighborhood (for our kids to play with).

It horrifies me to think of having kids to raise when I am in my 50s. To each their own, I guess. But God bless them, they're going to need it.

4 posted on 11/23/2002 5:31:44 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: victim soul
So far it's still a matter of choice........and none of anyone's business either.
5 posted on 11/23/2002 10:53:20 AM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Yes, so far it is about "Choice"

I can kill my kids in my 20's and 30's and do my own thing, be artifically inseminated in my 50's with strangers' donated eggs and sperm -- parts of somebody's else's child and grandchild and heritage.

MAYBE if I work out and get a live-in nanny, I might be able to live to see my kids graduate from college because It is MY CHOICE!!

To hell with MY kids who might even mourn me if they didn't realize beforehand that they were only MY later in life fully deserved trophy/"CHOICE."

6 posted on 11/23/2002 1:16:33 PM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: victim soul
Are you usually this angry? Have you sought help? Do you usually pass judgment on other folks choice about having children?
7 posted on 11/23/2002 5:27:09 PM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson