Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Was Al Gore's Role? (after missile threat to airlines)
NewsMax ^ | Sept. 24, 2001 | Neal Boortz

Posted on 11/29/2002 7:49:29 AM PST by spycatcher

With Al Gore sticking his head back up in the political arena, and the recent missile fired at an Israeli passenger jet I'm reposting this from last year on our "would be President:"

What Was Al Gore's Role?

Neal Boortz
Monday, Sept. 24, 2001

Did Al Gore let the airlines off the hook so he and Bill Clinton could have a little more campaign cash?

Here's the story, according to NewsMax.com and the Boston Globe.

After TWA Flight 800 crashed in 1996, Al Gore was named chairman of the White House Commission on Aviation Safety. It came to be known as the "Gore commission."

So, on Sept. 9 of that year, the Gore commission produced a preliminary report – one that proposed several measures to improve security at airports. The proposals included matching every piece of baggage to a passenger and better training for airport screeners.

But the airlines complained. They said the new procedures would cost too much money. They said that more rigorous screening and baggage matching would take too much time, causing more delays and missed connections.

Ten days after the preliminary report came out, Gore sent a letter to Carol Hallett, an airline lobbyist. He promised her that the commission's findings would not result in any loss of revenue.

Within the next two weeks, the Democratic National Committee received a series of contributions from the following airlines:

TWA: $40,000 American: $265,000 Delta: $120,000 United: $115,000 Northwest: $87,000

That's a total of $627,000 for the 1996 Clinton-Gore presidential campaign. The Boston Globe notes that "over the preceding 10-week period, the airlines gave the Democrats less than half that sum."

Then, after the election, Gore issued a draft of his final report. All of the security measures from the preliminary report were gone, according to one insider. Two members of the Gore commission balked. So did CIA Director John Deutch. Gore pulled the draft final report.

The final report came out a month later. It included the tough security requirements of the preliminary report – but gave no deadline for meeting them. Basically, without a timetable, the report wasn't worth the paper it was printed on.

It doesn't end there. Gore capped his commission's report with a lie. In a meeting with other commission members in 1997, Gore said he would allow room for dissent by those who disagreed with the report. But, minutes later, he announced to Bill Clinton and the public that the report was the work of a unanimous commission!

The true Clinton-Gore legacy is starting to emerge, my friends, and it ain't pretty. It's a legacy that includes gutting intelligence budgets and letting the airlines off the hook in exchange for political contributions. Would 6,700 people be alive today if the CIA had the necessary resources and the airlines weren't so damned lax on security? We'll never know.


(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: airlines; algore; missile; terroristthreat
THE TIMES OF LONDON

June 18, 1997

Gore Sued in Row Over Report on TWA Crash

FROM TOM RHODES IN WASHINGTON

A WOMAN who lost her husband in the Lockerbie disaster and was appointed to a White House airline safety commission is suing Al Gore, the United States Vice-President, over the report into last year's TWA Flight 800 crash.

Victoria Cummock has filed a suit in federal court against Mr Gore and the Department of Transportation, alleging that the Vice-President forced her to abandon a call for specific counter-terrorism measures and demands for their implementation. A magazine report claimed yesterday that Mr Gore's decision may have been influenced by large-scale campaign contributions from the airlines.

Mrs Cummock has not endorsed the accepted theory that the Boeing 747 was brought down by mechanical failure and believes a terrorist bomb could have been the cause of the disaster.

She claims that Mr Gore, as chairman of the commission, refused to publish her detailed dissent as part of the group's official recommendations after last July's TWA crash off Long Island in which all 230 passengers and crew were killed.

The report, when presented to President Clinton in February, was said to have the unanimous support of all 21 members of the White House Commission on Aviation Safety and Security. It recommended that special bomb detectors should be installed at only 54 of America's 450 airports and, even then, only bags deemed suspicious would be checked.

Mrs Cummock refused to sign the report and, according to The American Spectator, she then received a fax from Gerry Kavauer, the commission's executive director, promising her dissent would be published if she relented. She was later told Mr Gore would not agree to include her comments. The magazine alleges that Mr Gore's initial enthusiasm for anti-terrorist measures, which could have cost airlines up to $1 billion (about £600 million), was curbed by large donations to the Clinton-Gore re-election campaign by many airlines, including TWA.

Federal Election Commission documents show that airlines gave nearly $500,000 in soft money to the Democratic Party after Mr Clinton appointed the commission.

In September last year on the day that Mr Gore promised the airline lobby there would be no expensive new counter-terrorism measures, the Democratic National Committee received a $40,000 contribution from TWA headquarters.

In her suit, Mrs Cummock claims that the commission and the Department of Transportation intended to file the final report without her complete dissent. She says the body violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act which requires committees to publish full minority dissents.

1 posted on 11/29/2002 7:49:29 AM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
Gore would be better off going back to seclusion, I would say. The light's beginning to shine on him.
2 posted on 11/29/2002 8:07:48 AM PST by shiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
Truly a stunning display of duplicity: Threaten the airlines with very expensive measures long enough to extort campaign cash from them, and then subvert the investigation and make any hints of terrorism blow away. Remember, the official story of TWA 800 was a spontaneous center wing tank explosion, never mind more than 100 people, including active military soldiers, who saw streaks of light ascend through the sky prior to the massive fireball explosion.
3 posted on 11/29/2002 8:08:54 AM PST by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud
ping
4 posted on 11/29/2002 8:11:29 AM PST by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
"Remember, the official story of TWA 800 was a spontaneous center wing tank explosion..."

And never mind that TW 800 spawned the White House Commission on Aviation Safety...or the "Gore commission." The very existence of this commission was predicated on the assumption that TW 800 was destroyed by faulty security -- i.e., a bomb.

I've always found this dichotomy curious...

5 posted on 11/29/2002 8:22:24 AM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
And at the time the Gore Commission was formed, the working assumption for the charter was that it was a terrorist act -- since even if it wasn't this time, it could have been and may be in the future, as it was on Sept 11th.

This is Al Gore's Vice Presidential legacy

6 posted on 11/29/2002 8:24:16 AM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shiva
Did Mrs. Cummock's lawsuit ever get to court?
7 posted on 11/29/2002 8:28:21 AM PST by Cate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
Does this suprice anybody.
8 posted on 11/29/2002 8:30:36 AM PST by Kev-Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: okie01
It's especially curious that they apparently avoided the missile possibility here even, especially since they were just making "worst-case assumptions" for future safety and didn't know what happened to TWA800. Why would they go out of their way to ignore the missile threat with all the eyewitness reports, unless they were trying to completely bury the idea?

Meanwhile from today: El Al using anti-missile systems on aircraft (other airlines say it's just too darn expensive)

9 posted on 11/29/2002 8:32:00 AM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
Of course, the real mission of the commission from the very outset may well have been to exploit the opportunity for extortion.

With the Clinton administration, I wouldn't discount this possibility...

10 posted on 11/29/2002 8:42:37 AM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cate
From this article on "Why airline security failed:"

"The classified reports used by the White House Commission on Aviation Safety, chaired by Vice President Al Gore and appointed by President Clinton in the wake of the TWA Flight 800 disaster, are still being withheld from a dissenting member of the panel despite a lawsuit to obtain copies, WorldNetDaily has learned...Cummock filed suit to gain access to files she and the public were denied. She won the case, but the material still has not been made available to her."

11 posted on 11/29/2002 8:43:33 AM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: okie01
You're absolutely right when you look at the pattern they had of targeting various groups for campaign cash. Extortion may have been the primary goal, and in the end it appears that's the only thing that happened.
12 posted on 11/29/2002 8:45:39 AM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: shiva
Gore would be better off going back to seclusion, I would say. The light's beginning to shine on him. 2 posted on 11/29/2002 8:07 AM PST by shiva [

DITTO !!!!!

13 posted on 11/29/2002 9:59:24 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking
check this one out
14 posted on 11/29/2002 12:16:37 PM PST by isasis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isasis
bump
15 posted on 12/07/2002 5:15:14 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: okie01
bump
16 posted on 12/07/2002 5:19:10 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: shiva
The light's beginning to shine on him.

And Freepers have MORE bookmarked article we can forward to the press. :-)

17 posted on 12/07/2002 5:21:34 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
This just gets put on the list which contains the sinkEmperor-Loral-Chi-com sales of our national secrets. At this juncture, only a major catastrophe would cause the spineless pubbies to expose all that is known of clinton and goreghoul and democrat perfidy. sadly, the political parties hold ammunition to destroy each other and use it only in the most dire circumstance. Ask yourself, 'Why is Trent Lott still even in the Senate, much less the new majority leader when he sold out the entire legitimacy of the impeachment of the deviant x42?' He is a well threatened pawn to both parites.
18 posted on 12/07/2002 5:25:07 PM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
The Cost of Life (Clinton/Gore Sellout of Security for Campaign Contributions)
19 posted on 12/07/2002 5:50:01 PM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
THE O'REILLY FACTOR: Did Al Gore Increase or Jeopardize Airline Security?
20 posted on 12/07/2002 5:52:34 PM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
bttt
21 posted on 12/08/2002 9:28:12 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson